CrimePhase 1/2IOC-1NCT01380977
Trial of Impact of Crime Group Intervention for Jail Inmates
A Phase 1/2 study testing Impact of Crime group intervention in people with Crime and Substance Abuse, run by George Mason University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This pilot study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Impact of Crime (IOC) group intervention for jail inmates. The hypothesis is that participants in IOC will show decreases in criminogenic thinking, decreases in shame, increases in guilt, and increases in empathy, which in turn will be reflected in reduced… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Crime, Substance Abuse, HIV Risk
- What is being tested?
- Impact of Crime group intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2002to Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must be 18 years or older
- Must be male
- Must be currently incarcerated jail inmate
- Must be sentenced
- Must speak, read, and write in English with sufficient proficiency to use workbook and participate in group sessions
- Must be assigned to the jail's "general population"
Who cannot join
- Actively psychotic
- Assigned "keep separate" from other group members
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Fairfax County Adult Detention Center
Fairfax, Virginia, 22030
About this study
This pilot study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Impact of Crime (IOC) group intervention for jail inmates. The hypothesis is that participants in IOC will show decreases in criminogenic thinking, decreases in shame, increases in guilt, and increases in empathy, which in turn will be reflected in reduced recidivism (official records and self report), relative to those randomly assigned to a treatment as usual group.
- Conditions
- Crime, Substance Abuse, HIV Risk, Criminogenic Thinking, Shame
- Being tested
- Impact of Crime group intervention
- Keywords
- crime, substance abuse, HIV risk, criminogenic thinking, shame, guilt, restorative justice, victim impact group
- Medical subject headings
- Substance-Related Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Impact of Crime group interventionBehavioural
A group intervention for 16 1.5 hr sessions held twice a week
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of Crime group intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Impact of Crime group intervention |
| Treatment as usual | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Impact of Crime group intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Measured: 1 year post-release up to 2 yrs post release
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Measured: 4 years post-release up to 5 yrs post release
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Measured: 7 years post-release up to 8 yrs post-release
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Measured: 10 years post-release up to 11 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Measured: 1 year post-release up to 2 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Measured: 4 years post-release up to 5 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Measured: 7 years post-release up to 8 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Measured: 10 years post-release up to 11 yrs post release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Measured: 1 year post-release - up to 2 yrs post-release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Measured: 4 years post-release up to 5 yrs post-release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Measured: 7 years post-release up to 8 yrs post-release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Measured: 10 years post-release up to 11 yrs post-release
Secondary outcomes (24)
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Measured: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Measured: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Measured: Baseline to 1 yr post-release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Measured: Baseline to 4 yrs post-release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Measured: Baseline to 7 yrs post-release up 9,5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Measured: Baseline to 10 yrs post-release up to 12.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 1 yr post release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 4 yrs post release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 7 yrs post release up to 9.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 10 yrs post release up to 12.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 1 yr post-release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 4 yrs post-release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 7 yrs post-release up to 9.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Measured: Baseline to 10 yrs post-release up to 12.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Measured: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Measured: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Measured: Baseline to 1 year post-release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Measured: Baseline to 4 years post-release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Measured: Baseline to 7 years post-release up to 9.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Measured: Baseline to 10 years post-release up to 12.5 yrs
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2002
- Primary completionAug 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2016 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CrimeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- George Mason University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, June Tangney, George Mason University
- Investigators
- June P Tangney, Ph.D., Principal investigator, George Mason University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01380977
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- R01DA014694-1
- Other IDs
- R01DA014694
- Acronym
- IOC-1
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 21 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 7 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Trial of Impact of Crime Group Intervention for Jail Inmates
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01380977
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IOC-1 / R01DA014694-1
- Conditions
- Crime, Substance Abuse, HIV Risk, Criminogenic Thinking, Shame
- Keywords
- crime, substance abuse, HIV risk, criminogenic thinking, shame, guilt, restorative justice, victim impact group
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- George Mason UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- Aug 2002
- Primary completion
- Aug 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2016 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This pilot study is designed to evaluate the efficacy of the Impact of Crime (IOC) group intervention for jail inmates. The hypothesis is that participants in IOC will show decreases in criminogenic thinking, decreases in shame, increases in guilt, and increases in empathy, which in turn will be reflected in reduced recidivism (official records and self report), relative to those randomly assigned to a treatment as usual group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of Crime group intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: Impact of Crime group intervention |
| Treatment as usual | Active comparator | Behavioral: Impact of Crime group intervention |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Must be 18 years or older
- Must be male
- Must be currently incarcerated jail inmate
- Must be sentenced
- Must speak, read, and write in English with sufficient proficiency to use workbook and participate in group sessions
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Actively psychotic
- Assigned "keep separate" from other group members
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Impact of Crime group interventionA group intervention for 16 1.5 hr sessions held twice a week | Behavioural | Impact of Crime group intervention, Treatment as usual |
Primary outcome
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Time frame: 1 year post-release up to 2 yrs post release
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Time frame: 4 years post-release up to 5 yrs post release
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Time frame: 7 years post-release up to 8 yrs post-release
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses)
Time frame: 10 years post-release up to 11 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Time frame: 1 year post-release up to 2 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Time frame: 4 years post-release up to 5 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Time frame: 7 years post-release up to 8 yrs post-release
Self-reported Substance Use and Dependence - TCU
Time frame: 10 years post-release up to 11 yrs post release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Time frame: 1 year post-release - up to 2 yrs post-release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Time frame: 4 years post-release up to 5 yrs post-release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Time frame: 7 years post-release up to 8 yrs post-release
Self-reported HIV risk behaviors (sex and IDU) - TCU
Time frame: 10 years post-release up to 11 yrs post-release
24 secondary outcomes
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Time frame: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Time frame: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Time frame: Baseline to 1 yr post-release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Time frame: Baseline to 4 yrs post-release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Time frame: Baseline to 7 yrs post-release up 9,5 yrs
Changes from baseline in Self reported criminogenic beliefs - CCS
Time frame: Baseline to 10 yrs post-release up to 12.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 1 yr post release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 4 yrs post release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 7 yrs post release up to 9.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported shame - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 10 yrs post release up to 12.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 1 yr post-release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 4 yrs post-release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 7 yrs post-release up to 9.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Guilt - TOSCA-SD
Time frame: Baseline to 10 yrs post-release up to 12.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Time frame: Baseline to post-treatment up to 9 mos
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Time frame: Baseline to pre-release up to 1.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Time frame: Baseline to 1 year post-release up to 3.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Time frame: Baseline to 4 years post-release up to 6.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Time frame: Baseline to 7 years post-release up to 9.5 yrs
Changes from baseline in self-reported Empathy - IRI
Time frame: Baseline to 10 years post-release up to 12.5 yrs
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 May 2013.
Related trials for Crime
Not yet recruiting
QAIAx - SGI/SI Smart Health Cities: Microcity Enclave Program (Quantum SI/AGI Agency a/k/a AI City Hall Project - UPSTO App Nos. 64/074,526, 64/063,557, 64/105,164, 63/903,181, 63/729,428, 64/125,360; USPTO EO 9424 Assignment ID: 2101042 / ARN: REEL/FRAME: 76481/0026 - OUSD-R&E, Department of War)
Asperger's Disorder, Asperger Disorder
Recruiting
Rigorous Evaluation of the READY to Stand Curriculum to Prevent the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children
Sex Trafficking, Sex Crimes
RecruitingObservational study
The Time Before the Crime - Risk Patterns in Offenders Undergoing a Forensic Psychiatric Evaluation
Crime
Recruiting
Talking for Change: Secondary Prevention of Child Sexual Abuse Perpetration
Pedophilia, Hebephilia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Urban Transformations and Health: the Case of TransMiCable in Bogotá
Quality of Life, Social Capital
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
June P Tangney, Ph.D. principal investigator
George Mason University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Impact of Crime group intervention in people with Crime and Substance Abuse, run by George Mason University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Self reported recidivism (arrests and undetected offenses) (time frame: 1 year post-release up to 2 yrs post release). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 May 2013.