Multiple MyelomaPhase 1/2NCT01383928
Study of Oral IXAZOMIB in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Participants With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma
A Phase 1/2 study testing Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 20 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in phase 1 and to determine the combined response rate of clinical response CR and very good partial response (VGPR) in phase 2 of oral (PO) ixazomib administered twice-weekly in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma
- What is being tested?
- Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- 31 Oct 2011to 27 Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Male or female patients 18 years or older
- Symptomatic multiple myeloma or asymptomatic myeloma with myeloma-related organ damage diagnosed according to standard criteria
- Measurable disease as specified in study protocol
- Hematologic, liver, and renal function as specified in the study protocol.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
- Female patients who are post menopausal, surgically sterile, or agree to practice 2 effective methods of contraception or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse; must also adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program
Show all 9Show fewer
- Male patients who agree to practice effective barrier contraception or agree to abstain from heterosexual intercourse AND must adhere to the guidelines of the lenalidomide pregnancy prevention program
- Must be able to take concurrent aspirin 325 mg daily
- Voluntary written consent
Who cannot join
- Peripheral neuropathy that is greater or equal to Grade 2
- Female patients who are lactating or pregnant
- Major surgery or radiotherapy within 14 days before the first dose of study drug
- Uncontrolled infection requiring systematic antibiotics within 14 days before the first dose of study drug
- Diarrhea (> Grade 1)
- Prior systemic therapy for multiple myeloma, including investigational drugs (prior treatment with corticosteroids or localized radiation therapy dose not disqualify the patient)
Show all 16Show fewer
- Systemic treatment with strong inhibitors of CYP1A2, strong inhibitors of CYP3A, or strong CYP3A inducers, or use of Ginkgo biloba or St. John's wort within 14 days before the first dose of study treatment
- Central nervous system involvement
- Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia, POEMS syndrome, plasma cell leukemia, primary amyloidosis, myelodysplastic syndrome, or myeloproliferative syndrome
- Evidence of current uncontrolled cardiovascular conditions
- Prior or concurrent deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positive, hepatitis B surface antigen-positive status, or known or suspected active hepatitis C infection
- Serious medical or psychiatric illness that could, in the investigator's opinion, potentially interfere with the completion of treatment according to the protocol
- Known allergy to any of the study medications
- Known gastrointestinal condition or procedure that could interfere with swallowing or the oral absorption, or tolerance of IXAZOMIB
- Diagnosed or treated for another malignancy within 2 years before the first dose or previously diagnosed with another malignancy and have any evidence of residual disease with the exception of nonmelanoma skin cancer or any completely resected carcinoma in situ
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 1 country.
20 sites in 1 country
United States20 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
UCSF Medical Center
Berkeley, California, 94704
Dana Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Baylor Sammons Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75246
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27705
Virginia Cancer Care Specialist
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Virginia Cancer Specialists PC
Fairfax, Virginia, 22031
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Michigan State University
Lansing, Michigan, 48910
SCRI Tennessee Oncology Nashville
Nashville, Tennessee, 37203
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10021
Mount Sinai Hospital
New York, New York, 31406
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Associates of Oncology/Hematology PC
Rockville, Maryland, 20850
Stanford University
Stanford, California, 94305
H Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Mercy St Anne Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43623
About this study
Official title: An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Formulation of IXAZOMIB (MLN9708), Administered Twice-weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in phase 1 and to determine the combined response rate of clinical response CR and very good partial response (VGPR) in phase 2 of oral (PO) ixazomib administered twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in a 21-day cycle in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDDM).
Read the detailed description
The drug being tested in this study is called ixazomib. Ixazomib was tested to slow disease progression and improve overall survival in participants who have newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study looked at the safety, tolerability and response in participants when administered in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone.
The study enrolled 64 patients. Participants were assigned to one of the 3 treatment groups:
- Phase 1 Ixazomib 3 mg
- Phase 1 Ixazomib 3.7 mg
- Phase 2 Ixazomib 3 mg
All participants were administered with Ixazomib capsules, orally, twice-weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 along with lenalidomide capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1-14 and dexamethasone, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib capsules, orally, twice weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
This multi-center trial conducted in the United States. The overall time to participate in this study was 2037 days. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic, and a final visit after 30 days after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Being tested
- Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, Dexamethasone
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
IxazomibDrug
Ixazomib capsules
LenalidomideDrug
Lenalidomide capsules
DexamethasoneDrug
Dexamethasone Tablets
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg or 3.7 mg | Experimental | Ixazomib (MLN9708), orally, twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide orally and dexamethasone orally as prescribed, in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Ixazomib; Drug: Lenalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone |
| Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg | Experimental | Ixazomib (MLN9708), orally, twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide orally and dexamethasone orally as prescribed, in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 2. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. Receives: Drug: Ixazomib; Drug: Lenalidomide; Drug: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
MTD was highest dose of ixazomib given with combination drugs, at which <=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500 cell per cubic millimeter [cells/mm^3]) for >7 days; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for >7 days; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count <10,000/mm^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or >=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >14 days; <=80% lenalidomide doses administered due to other >=Grade 2 combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation.
Measured: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
The RP2D of ixazomib was determined after the evaluation of the available data from the phase 1 portion of the trial which included, but was not limited to analyses of efficacy results, toxicity characterization, all grades peripheral neuropathy, and treatment discontinuation. The maximum number of cycles received was 83 cycles (approximately up to 2037 days).
Measured: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Abnormal laboratory value was assessed as an AE if the value lead to discontinuation or delay in treatment, dose modification, therapeutic intervention, or was considered by the investigator to be a clinically significant change from baseline. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to Neurotoxicity
TEAE related to neurotoxicity grading based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTACE) version 4.03 are reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Only TEAEs related to neurotoxicity with values are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Vital signs included body temperature, blood pressure and heart rate.
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein >=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level >=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE), Grade 3 = AE with severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = AE with life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated and Grade 5 = Death related to AE.
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events
A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Measured: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
Secondary outcomes (19)
Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.
Measured: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
AUC(0-72) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration time-curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib.
Measured: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
Tmax: Time to reach the first maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax of ixazomib after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve.
Measured: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib
The accumulation ratio (Rac) was estimated as the ratio of AUC (0-72) on Day 11 to the AUC (0-72) on Day 1. AUC (0-72) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to 72 hours post-dose for ixazomib.
Measured: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response
CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. Partial response(PR):>=50% reduction of serum M-protein,urinary M-protein by >=90%/to <200 mg/24 hr reduction.Near CR(nCR):positive immunofixation of serum/urine;soft tissue plasmacytomas disappearance;<=5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein >=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level >=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.
Measured: Baseline until end of study treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 83 - approximately 2037 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (CR+VGPR+PR)
Overall response is defined as CR, VGPR or PR based on IMWG Response Criteria for malignant lymphoma. CR: disappearance of all detectable clinical evidence of disease and disease-related symptoms if present before therapy. VGPR: serum, urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein+urine M-protein level <100 mg/24h. Partial response (PR) is a minimum of 50% decrease in sum of the product of the diameters of up to 6 of the largest dominant nodes or nodal masses and no increase in the size of other nodes.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16
CR as per IMWG criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR were applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein; Urine M-protein; Serum FLC assay.
Measured: Cycles 4, 8, and 16
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
CR as per IMWG criteria is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
sCR as per IMWG criteria is CR plus normal FLC ratio and absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. CR is negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
VGPR as per IMWG criteria is serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)
nCR as per IMWG criteria is positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease; appearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <=5% plasma cells in bone marrow.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR)
PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hr urinary M-protein by 90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Response (MR)
MR as per IMWG criteria is 25%-49% reduction in serum paraprotein and 50%-89% reduction in urine light chain excretion for 6 weeks.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Time to Response
Time to first response is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documentation of a confirmed response (PR or better) in a participant who responded + 1 day. PR as per IMWG criteria is 50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by 90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)
DOR was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response to the date of first documented PD. PD is defined as >=25% increase from lowest value in: serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas development or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcaemia development.
Measured: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
Time to progression was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of PD + 1 day. Participants that did not experience PD will be censored at the last response assessment that is SD or better. PD: >=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved, uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants that received Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) or an alternate cancer therapy were also be censored at the last response assessment that is, SD or better prior to initiation of therapy. Participants without response assessment will be censored at the date of first dose. TTP was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Measured: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of progressive disease or to death due to any cause, whichever occurred first plus 1. PD: >=25% increase from lowest value in:serum/urine M-component; difference between involved,uninvolved FLC levels; bone marrow plasma cell percent; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size rise; hypercalcaemia development. SD: not meeting criteria for CR, VGPR, PR, or PD. Participants who received ASCT or an alternate anticancer therapy were censored at the last response assessment that was SD or better before initiation of therapy. Participants without a response assessment were censored at the date of first dose. PFS was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Measured: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Achieving Survival at Year 1
The Kaplan-Meier estimate reports the percentage of participants surviving at Year 1.
Measured: 1 year after the first dose of study treatment
Overall Survival
Overall survival was measured as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the time of death plus 1 day. For participants who did not die, survival was censored at the date of last contact. Overall Survival was analyzed using standard survival analysis techniques based on Kaplan-Meier estimates.
Measured: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study start31 Oct 2011
- Primary completion13 Oct 2014
- Study completion27 Nov 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Monitor, Study director, Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01383928
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- C16008
- Other IDs
- U1111-1168-1172
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 27 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 21 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received, an opportunity for the primary publication of the research has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com/Approach for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Formulation of IXAZOMIB (MLN9708), Administered Twice-weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01383928
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- C16008
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 31 Oct 2011 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Oct 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 27 Nov 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 18 Dec 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety, tolerability, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) in phase 1 and to determine the combined response rate of clinical response CR and very good partial response (VGPR) in phase 2 of oral (PO) ixazomib administered twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone in a 21-day cycle in participants with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDDM).
Detailed description
The drug being tested in this study is called ixazomib. Ixazomib was tested to slow disease progression and improve overall survival in participants who have newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). This study looked at the safety, tolerability and response in participants when administered in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone.
The study enrolled 64 patients. Participants were assigned to one of the 3 treatment groups:
- Phase 1 Ixazomib 3 mg
- Phase 1 Ixazomib 3.7 mg
- Phase 2 Ixazomib 3 mg
All participants were administered with Ixazomib capsules, orally, twice-weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 along with lenalidomide capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1-14 and dexamethasone, capsules, orally, once daily on Days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib capsules, orally, twice weekly on Days 1, 4, 8, and 11 in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
This multi-center trial conducted in the United States. The overall time to participate in this study was 2037 days. Participants will make multiple visits to the clinic, and a final visit after 30 days after last dose of study drug for a follow-up assessment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg or 3.7 mg | Experimental | Drug: Ixazomib, Drug: Lenalidomide, Drug: DexamethasoneIxazomib (MLN9708), orally, twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide orally and dexamethasone orally as prescribed, in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 1. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. |
| Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg | Experimental | Drug: Ixazomib, Drug: Lenalidomide, Drug: DexamethasoneIxazomib (MLN9708), orally, twice-weekly in combination with lenalidomide orally and dexamethasone orally as prescribed, in 21-day treatment cycles for up to 16 cycles in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity as induction therapy during Phase 2. Participants with stable or responding disease continued receiving ixazomib (MLN9708) orally, twice weekly in 21-day treatment cycles as maintenance therapy until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Male or female patients 18 years or older
- Symptomatic multiple myeloma or asymptomatic myeloma with myeloma-related organ damage diagnosed according to standard criteria
- Measurable disease as specified in study protocol
- Hematologic, liver, and renal function as specified in the study protocol.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- Peripheral neuropathy that is greater or equal to Grade 2
- Female patients who are lactating or pregnant
- Major surgery or radiotherapy within 14 days before the first dose of study drug
- Uncontrolled infection requiring systematic antibiotics within 14 days before the first dose of study drug
- Diarrhea (> Grade 1)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| IxazomibIxazomib capsules | Drug | Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg or 3.7 mg, Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg |
| LenalidomideLenalidomide capsules | Drug | Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg or 3.7 mg, Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg |
| DexamethasoneDexamethasone Tablets | Drug | Phase 1: Ixazomib 3 mg or 3.7 mg, Phase 2: Ixazomib 3 mg |
Primary outcome
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
MTD was highest dose of ixazomib given with combination drugs, at which <=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500 cell per cubic millimeter [cells/mm^3]) for >7 days; Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for >7 days; Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count <10,000/mm^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or >=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >14 days; <=80% lenalidomide doses administered due to other >=Grade 2 combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation.
Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)
The RP2D of ixazomib was determined after the evaluation of the available data from the phase 1 portion of the trial which included, but was not limited to analyses of efficacy results, toxicity characterization, all grades peripheral neuropathy, and treatment discontinuation. The maximum number of cycles received was 83 cycles (approximately up to 2037 days).
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants Experiencing 1 or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Markedly Abnormal Laboratory Values Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Abnormal laboratory value was assessed as an AE if the value lead to discontinuation or delay in treatment, dose modification, therapeutic intervention, or was considered by the investigator to be a clinically significant change from baseline. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE) Related to Neurotoxicity
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
TEAE related to neurotoxicity grading based on common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTACE) version 4.03 are reported. Grade 1= mild; Grade 2= moderate; within normal limits, Grade 3= severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; Grade 4= life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5= death. Only TEAEs related to neurotoxicity with values are reported.
Phase 1: Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Vital Signs
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after last dose of study drug (Up to Cycle 83 - approximately 2067 days)
Vital signs included body temperature, blood pressure and heart rate.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
CR as per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) uniform criteria is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR as per IMWG criteria is defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hours. VGPR was applicable only to participants who had measurable disease defined by at least 1 of the following 3 measurements: Serum M-protein greater than or equal to (>=)1 g/dL; Urine M-protein >=200 mg/24 hours; Serum FLC assay level >=10 mg/dL, provided serum FLC ratio was abnormal.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. As per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 (CTCAE), Grade 3 = AE with severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care activities of daily living. Grade 4 = AE with life-threatening consequences; urgent intervention indicated and Grade 5 = Death related to AE.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Serious Adverse Events
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Resulting in Study Drug Discontinuation
Time frame: Baseline up to 30 days after the last dose of study drug (approximately 1905 days)
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A TEAE is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.
19 secondary outcomes
Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib
Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib
Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib
Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib
Time frame: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11
Phase 1: Percentage of Participants With Best Overall Response
Time frame: Baseline until end of study treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 83 - approximately 2037 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Overall Response (CR+VGPR+PR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) After Cycles 4, 8, and 16
Time frame: Cycles 4, 8, and 16
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Stringent Complete Response (sCR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Near Complete Response (nCR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Partial Response (PR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Minimal Response (MR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Time to Response
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)
Time frame: Baseline until end of treatment (Up to treatment Cycle 74 - approximately 1875 days)
Time to Disease Progression (TTP)
Time frame: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants Achieving Survival at Year 1
Time frame: 1 year after the first dose of study treatment
Overall Survival
Time frame: Baseline up to a follow-up of 62.1 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Mar 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Takeda makes patient-level, de-identified data sets and associated documents available after applicable marketing approvals and commercial availability have been received, an opportunity for the primary publication of the research has been allowed, and other criteria have been met as set forth in Takeda's Data Sharing Policy (see www.TakedaClinicalTrials.com/Approach for details). To obtain access, researchers must submit a legitimate academic research proposal for adjudication by an independent review panel, who will review the scientific merit of the research and the requestor's qualifications and conflict of interest that can result in potential bias. Once approved, qualified researchers who sign a data sharing agreement are provided access to these data in a secure research environment.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Medical Monitor study director
Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
20 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Ixazomib, Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in people with Multiple Myeloma, run by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc. at 20 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) (time frame: Cycle 1 (21 days)). The study lists 10 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Mar 2019.