AgingPhase 1/2NCT01384591
Pilot Study of Losartan and N-acetylcysteine as Inhibitors of Muscle Oxidative Stress in Elderly
A Phase 1/2 study testing N-acetylcysteine and Losartan in people with Aging, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The general hypothesis is that elderly have diminished nutritive flow to skeletal muscle and impaired capacity for building muscle. In aging populations, this decreased ability to build muscle may represent a tipping point in the progression towards chronic physical frailty and disability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Aging
- What is being tested?
- N-acetylcysteine and Losartan
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 6 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to May 2015
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age between 60-85 years.
- Ability to sign informed consent.
- Ability to sign consent form.
- Ability to pass a mini-mental status exam (score >23 on the 30-item Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE).
- Free-living, prior to admission.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with cardiac abnormalities considered exclusionary by the study physicians (e.g., unstable angina or a cardiology-confirmed ECG that demonstrates cardiac abnormalities such as > 0.2 mV horizontal or downsloping ST segment depression, frequent arrhythmia's (> 10 PVC/min), or valvular disease).
- Subjects with uncontrolled metabolic disease, including liver or renal disease.
- Subjects with vascular disease characterized by a combination of risk factors of peripheral atherosclerosis. (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, obesity, uncontrolled diabetes, hypercholesterolemia > 250 mg/dl, claudication or evidence of venous or arterial insufficiency upon palpitation of femoral, popliteal, and pedal arteries.
- Any history of hypo- or hyper-coagulation disorders. (e.g., Coumadin use or history of DVT or PE).
- Subjects with chronically elevated systolic pressure >170 or a diastolic blood pressure > 100. Subjects may be included if they are taking medication and have a blood pressure below these criteria.
- Subjects with cancer or recently (6 months) treated cancer other than basal cell carcinoma.
Show all 35Show fewer
- Any subject currently on a weight-loss diet or a body mass index > 33 kg/m2.
- Inability to abstain from smoking for duration of study.
- A history of > 20 pack per year smoking.
- Subjects with atrial fibrillation, history of syncope, angina, or congestive heart failure.
- Any subject that is HIV-seropositive or has active hepatitis.
- Recent anabolic or corticosteroids use (within 3 months).
- Subjects with low hemoglobin or hematocrit (i.e., lower than accepted lab values).
- Agitation/aggression disorder.
- Dementia.
- History of stroke with motor disability.
- A recent history (<12 months) of GI bleed.
- Alcohol (more than 3 drinks per day) or drug abuse.
- Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and/or hyperthecosis.
- Non-classical adrenal hyperplasia.
- Cushing's syndrome.
- Pregnancy.
- Hyperprolactinoma, hypothyroidism.
- Lactose intolerance.
- Subjects with coronary heart or mitral valvular rheumatic heart disease.
- Subjects with impaired renal function and/or renal artery stenosis.
- Subjects with pulmonary hypertension.
- Subjects on any medications known to vasodilate the peripheral arteries.
- Subjects taking NSAIDs
- Physical dependence or frailty (impairment of activities of daily living, ADLs).
- History of falls (>2/year).
- Depression (>5 of the 15 items on the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS).
- Subjects suffering malnutrition or with a BMI < 20 kg/m2 with low albumin or transferrin.
- Asthma
- Any other condition or event considered exclusionary by the PI and covering faculty physician.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
University of Texas Medical Branch
Galveston, Texas, 77555
About this study
The general hypothesis is that elderly have diminished nutritive flow to skeletal muscle and impaired capacity for building muscle. In aging populations, this decreased ability to build muscle may represent a tipping point in the progression towards chronic physical frailty and disability. The goal is to examine whether novel pharmacologic therapies can improve nutritive blood flow to the muscles and muscle building in the elderly.
The purpose of this study is 1) to determine if losartan administration will enhance blood flow and 2) to determine if N-acetylcysteine (NAC) will enhance blood flow.
Read more
The investigators will study community dwelling, healthy older men and women (60-85 years). Subjects will be randomized to one of three groups:
Experimental Group 1: Placebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Experimental Group 2: losartan (25mg/dose) and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Experimental Group 3: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (50 mg/kg/dose) and placebo
Subjects will admit to the clinic on day 1 of the study. Baseline testing consisting of leg blood flow (LBF), contrast enhanced ultrasound, handgrip testing and fatigue questionnaires. After testing is completed the subjects will recieve their first dose of NAC/ losartan/ placebo with dinner. Subjects will be fasted after 10 pm. On day 2, leg blood flow (LBF) will be measured approximately 12 hours post dose 1. Subjects will receive their second dose of NAC/ losartan/ placebo. Leg blood flow will be measured 1 hour and 2 hours post dose 2 of study interventions. The subjects will eat a meal and receive their third dose of the study intervention. Leg blood flow will be repeated at 1 hour and 2 hours post dose 3. Appoximately 30 minutes after dose 3 of the study intervention, handgrip testing will be performed and fatigue questionnaires completed.
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
N-acetylcysteineDrug
Also called NAC
50 mg/kg/dose. 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2.
LosartanDrug
Also called Cozaar
25mg/dose. 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2.
Placebo losartanDrug
Also called Placebo
Placebo losartan 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2.
Placebo N-acetylcysteineDrug
Also called Placebo
Placebo N-acetylcysteine 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine | Experimental | losartan (25mg/dose) and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. Receives: Drug: Losartan; Drug: Placebo N-acetylcysteine |
| Placebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine | Placebo comparator | Placebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. Receives: Drug: Placebo losartan; Drug: Placebo N-acetylcysteine |
| N-acetylcysteine and placebo losartan | Experimental | N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (50 mg/kg/dose) and placebo losartan 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. Receives: Drug: N-acetylcysteine; Drug: Placebo losartan |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Measured: Baseline
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Measured: 12 hours post dose one of the intervention
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Measured: 1 hour post dose two of the intervention, average of 13 hours post dose 1 of the intervention
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Measured: 2 hours post dose two of the intervention, average of 14 hours post dose one of the intervention
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention and a meal, average of 17 hours post dose one of the intervention
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Measured: 1 hour post dose three of the intervention and a meal, average of 18 hours post dose one of the intervention
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Measured: 2 hours post dose three of the intervention and a meal, average of 19 hours post dose one of the intervention
Secondary outcomes (34)
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort at Baseline
Handgrip Strength of dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 50% perceived effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort at Baseline
Handgrip Strength of non-dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 50% perceived effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Effort at Baseline
Handgrip Strength of dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 100% effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Effort at Baseline
Handgrip Strength of non-dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 100% effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: baseline
Handgrip Fatigue of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at Baseline
Handgrip fatigue of dominant hand as measured by handgrip dynamometry fatigue test. The non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes. Data is reported as % of Maximal Voluntary Contraction after fatigue test.
Measured: baseline
Handgrip Fatigue of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at Baseline
Handgrip fatigue of non-dominant hand as measured by handgrip dynamometry fatigue test. The non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes. Data is reported as % of Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC) after fatigue test.
Measured: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Handgrip Strength of dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 50% perceived effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Handgrip Strength of non-dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 50% perceived effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Handgrip Strength of dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 100% perceived effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Handgrip Strength of non-dominant hand is measured by handgrip dynamometry at 100% perceived effort with subjects performing one set of three contractions.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Fatigue of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry After All Doses of Study Intervention
Handgrip fatigue of dominant hand as measured by handgrip dynamometry fatigue test. The non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes. Data reported as % of Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC) after fatigue test.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Fatigue of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry After All Doses of Study Intervention
Handgrip fatigue of non-dominant hand as measured by handgrip dynamometry fatigue test. The non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes. Data reported as % of Maximal Voluntary Contraction (MVC) after fatigue test.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale General Fatigue at Baseline
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the general fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale General Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the general fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Physical Fatigue at Baseline
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the physical fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Physical Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the physical fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Emotional Fatigue at Baseline
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the emotional fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Emotional Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the emotional fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Mental Fatigue at Baseline
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the mental fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Mental Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the mental fatigue scale is 24 to 0, with the higher number meaning more fatigue
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Vigor Fatigue at Baseline
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the vigor scale is 0 to 24, with the higher number meaning more vigor.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Vigor Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the vigor scale is 0 to 24, with the higher number meaning more vigor.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Total Score at Baseline
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Total Score After All Doses of Study Intervention
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory Short Form (MFSI-SF) from the Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida The MFSI-SF is a 30 question assessment designed to assess the principal manifestations of fatigue.
There 5 subscales used to calculate a total score. The subscales are: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Emotional Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, and Vigor (an estimate of the patient's energy level). The total score is calculated with the equation: (general + physical + emotional + mental) - vigor = total score.
The range of the total score is -24 to 96, with the higher the number meaning more fatigue.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory at Baseline
The Brief Fatigue Inventory is a 9 item questionnaire that assesses perceptual fatigue as well as fatigue interferences (e.g. interference with enjoyment of life), with "0" being no fatigue and "10" being as bad as you can imagine. The Global Fatigue score is calculated by averaging the answers of all the questions. Score ranges (0 to 10) with higher score indicating a worse outcome.
Measured: Baseline
Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory After Study Invention
The Brief Fatigue Inventory is a 9 item questionnaire that assesses perceptual fatigue as well as fatigue interferences (e.g. interference with enjoyment of life), with "0" being no fatigue and "10" being as bad as you can imagine. The Global Fatigue score is calculated by averaging the answers of all the questions. Score range 0 to 10, with a higher score indicating a worse outcome.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: baseline - before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: baseline - directly after handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Directly after handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: baseline - before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: baseline - directly after handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
The Visual Analog Scale for Fatigue is an 11cm long line. The subject is asked to mark their level of fatigue (0cm being no fatigue and 11cm being extreme fatigue). This test was performed before and after the handgrip fatigue test, where the non-dominant hand hold a continuous contraction at 20% of the subjects maximal voluntary contraction for 5 minutes.
Handgrip testing was performed at baseline (before any intervention) and post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention.
Measured: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Directly after handgrip fatigue test
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for AgingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lantheus Medical Imaging
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Melinda Sheffield-Moore, PhD, Principal investigator, UTMBAstrid M Horstman, PhD, Study director, UTMB
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01384591
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11-091
- Status last verified
- Apr 2018
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 8 May 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pilot Study of Losartan and N-acetylcysteine as Inhibitors of Muscle Oxidative Stress in Elderly
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01384591
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11-091
- Conditions
- Aging
- Keywords
- oxidative stress, blood flow, antioxidant, muscle, elderly
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 6 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Medical Branch, GalvestonUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lantheus Medical Imaging
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 29 Jun 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 May 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The general hypothesis is that elderly have diminished nutritive flow to skeletal muscle and impaired capacity for building muscle. In aging populations, this decreased ability to build muscle may represent a tipping point in the progression towards chronic physical frailty and disability. The goal is to examine whether novel pharmacologic therapies can improve nutritive blood flow to the muscles and muscle building in the elderly.
The purpose of this study is 1) to determine if losartan administration will enhance blood flow and 2) to determine if N-acetylcysteine (NAC) will enhance blood flow.
The investigators will study community dwelling, healthy older men and women (60-85 years). Subjects will be randomized to one of three groups:
Experimental Group 1: Placebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Experimental Group 2: losartan (25mg/dose) and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Experimental Group 3: N-acetylcysteine (NAC) (50 mg/kg/dose) and placebo
Subjects will admit to the clinic on day 1 of the study. Baseline testing consisting of leg blood flow (LBF), contrast enhanced ultrasound, handgrip testing and fatigue questionnaires. After testing is completed the subjects will recieve their first dose of NAC/ losartan/ placebo with dinner. Subjects will be fasted after 10 pm. On day 2, leg blood flow (LBF) will be measured approximately 12 hours post dose 1. Subjects will receive their second dose of NAC/ losartan/ placebo. Leg blood flow will be measured 1 hour and 2 hours post dose 2 of study interventions. The subjects will eat a meal and receive their third dose of the study intervention. Leg blood flow will be repeated at 1 hour and 2 hours post dose 3. Appoximately 30 minutes after dose 3 of the study intervention, handgrip testing will be performed and fatigue questionnaires completed.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine | Experimental | Drug: Losartan, Drug: Placebo N-acetylcysteinelosartan (25mg/dose) and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. |
| Placebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo losartan, Drug: Placebo N-acetylcysteinePlacebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine (NAC) 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. |
| N-acetylcysteine and placebo losartan | Experimental | Drug: N-acetylcysteine, Drug: Placebo losartanN-acetylcysteine (NAC) (50 mg/kg/dose) and placebo losartan 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Age between 60-85 years.
- Ability to sign informed consent.
- Ability to sign consent form.
- Ability to pass a mini-mental status exam (score >23 on the 30-item Mini Mental State Examination, MMSE).
- Free-living, prior to admission.
Key exclusion criteria (35 listed)
- Subjects with cardiac abnormalities considered exclusionary by the study physicians (e.g., unstable angina or a cardiology-confirmed ECG that demonstrates cardiac abnormalities such as > 0.2 mV horizontal or downsloping ST segment depression, frequent arrhythmia's (> 10 PVC/min), or valvular disease).
- Subjects with uncontrolled metabolic disease, including liver or renal disease.
- Subjects with vascular disease characterized by a combination of risk factors of peripheral atherosclerosis. (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, obesity, uncontrolled diabetes, hypercholesterolemia > 250 mg/dl, claudication or evidence of venous or arterial insufficiency upon palpitation of femoral, popliteal, and pedal arteries.
- Any history of hypo- or hyper-coagulation disorders. (e.g., Coumadin use or history of DVT or PE).
- Subjects with chronically elevated systolic pressure >170 or a diastolic blood pressure > 100. Subjects may be included if they are taking medication and have a blood pressure below these criteria.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| N-acetylcysteineAlso: NAC50 mg/kg/dose. 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. | Drug | N-acetylcysteine and placebo losartan |
| LosartanAlso: Cozaar25mg/dose. 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. | Drug | Losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine |
| Placebo losartanAlso: PlaceboPlacebo losartan 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. | Drug | N-acetylcysteine and placebo losartan, Placebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine |
| Placebo N-acetylcysteineAlso: PlaceboPlacebo N-acetylcysteine 3 total doses: 1 dose on day 1, 2 doses on day 2. | Drug | Losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine, Placebo losartan and placebo N-acetylcysteine |
Primary outcome
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: Baseline
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: 12 hours post dose one of the intervention
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: 1 hour post dose two of the intervention, average of 13 hours post dose 1 of the intervention
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: 2 hours post dose two of the intervention, average of 14 hours post dose one of the intervention
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention and a meal, average of 17 hours post dose one of the intervention
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: 1 hour post dose three of the intervention and a meal, average of 18 hours post dose one of the intervention
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound
Time frame: 2 hours post dose three of the intervention and a meal, average of 19 hours post dose one of the intervention
Femoral Doppler Blood Flow was evaluated via Doppler ultrasound. For the two-dimensional (2-D) and Doppler ultrasound measurements, an ultrasound system (HDI-5000; Philips Medical Systems, Bothell, WA) with a linear array transducer (L7-4) was used with a transmit frequency of 12MHz. 2-D imaging of the common femoral artery will be performed in the long axis. Images will be triggered to the R wave of the cardiac cycle, and the femoral artery diameter will be measured using online video calipers. A pulsed-wave Doppler sample blood volume will be placed at the same location in the center of the artery, and the mean blood velocity will be measured using online angle correction and analysis software. Femoral artery mean blood flow will be calculated from 2-D and Doppler ultrasound data using the equation: Q = vπ ∙ (d/2)2, where Q is femoral blood flow, v is mean femoral artery blood flow velocity, and d is femoral artery diameter.
34 secondary outcomes
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort at Baseline
Time frame: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort at Baseline
Time frame: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Effort at Baseline
Time frame: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Effort at Baseline
Time frame: baseline
Handgrip Fatigue of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at Baseline
Time frame: baseline
Handgrip Fatigue of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at Baseline
Time frame: baseline
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 50% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Strength of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Strength of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry at 100% Perceived Effort After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Fatigue of Dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Handgrip Fatigue of Non-dominant Hand as Measured by Handgrip Dynamometry After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale General Fatigue at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale General Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Physical Fatigue at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Physical Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Emotional Fatigue at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Emotional Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Mental Fatigue at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Mental Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Vigor Fatigue at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Subscale Vigor Fatigue After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Total Score at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Personal Perceptual Fatigue Measured by Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory - Total Score After All Doses of Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Global Fatigue Score as Measured by Brief Fatigue Inventory After Study Invention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
Time frame: baseline - before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
Time frame: baseline - directly after handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Non-dominant Arm as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Directly after handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
Time frame: baseline - before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test at Baseline.
Time frame: baseline - directly after handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale Before Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Before handgrip fatigue test
Perceptual Fatigue of Whole Body as Measured by Visual Analog Scale After Handgrip Fatigue Test After Study Intervention
Time frame: Post dose three of the intervention, average of 17 hours post dose one intervention - Directly after handgrip fatigue test
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 May 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Aging
RecruitingPhase 2
Neuroplasticity Enhancement From Cognitive Training Reinforced by Psilocybin
Alzheimer's Disease
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
RecruitingPhase 2
Metformin as an add-on or Monotherapy in Treatment of Aging People With Multiple Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple Sclerosis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Validation & Intervention Testing for Aging, Longevity and Healthspan
Aging, Functional Decline
RecruitingObservational study
Effects of Obesity on Physical Abilities and Daily Living Activities in Elderly Adults
Obesity, Sarcopenic Obesity
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Melinda Sheffield-Moore, PhD principal investigator
UTMB
Astrid M Horstman, PhD study director
UTMB
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing N-acetylcysteine and Losartan in people with Aging, run by The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 35 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 May 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Leg Blood Flow as Measured by Doppler Ultrasound (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 7 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 May 2018.