AzTrials
AzTrials

Pain Relief After Forefoot SurgeryUSGABNCT01386320

Ultrasound Guided Ankle Block Versus Medial Forefoot Block for Forefoot Surgery

A study testing Ultrasound guided ankle block and Medial forefoot block in people with Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery, run by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Forefoot surgery includes bunion surgery and similar reconstructive bone cutting surgery and is very painful. Local anaesthetic nerve blocks have been used for many years to help alleviate pain following this surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 years
Conditions the study is for
Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery
What is being tested?
Ultrasound guided ankle block and Medial forefoot block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Feb 2011to Oct 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Fit adult patients requiring forefoot surgery with bone cutting.

Who cannot join

  • Morbid obesity (BMI >40), known contraindications to regional anaesthesia

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Castle Hill Hospital, Castle Road, Cottingham

    Hull, East Yorkshire, HU16 5JQ

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Randomised, Blinded Comparison of an Ultrasound Guided Ankle Block Compared to a Nerve Stimulator Guided Ankle Block for Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery.

Forefoot surgery includes bunion surgery and similar reconstructive bone cutting surgery and is very painful. Local anaesthetic nerve blocks have been used for many years to help alleviate pain following this surgery. The present study aims to compare a new ultrasound guided nerve block to a well established nerve stimulator guided technique. Comparisons will include time taken to carry out the block, speed of onset of numbness and duration and quality of pain relief after surgery.

Being tested
Ultrasound guided ankle block, Medial forefoot block
Keywords
anaesthetic techniques, regional; surgery orthopaedic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound guided ankle blockProcedure or surgery

    Under ultrasound guidance, block of the tibial nerve, superficial and deep branches of the common peroneal nerve and saphenous nerves will be carried out using 12 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine and 12 mls 0.75% levobupivacaine.

  • Medial forefoot blockProcedure or surgery

    Using peripheral nerve stimulator guidance, the tibial and common peroneal nerves will be blocked ( plus the saphenous nerve ), using a total of 12 mls 0.75% levobupivacaine and 12 mls 0.5% levobupivacaine.

Study groups in NCT01386320
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound guided ankle blockActive comparatorSubjects in this arm will be given an ultrasound guided ankle block prior to foot surgery.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound guided ankle block
Medial forefoot blockActive comparatorSubjects in this arm will be given a nerve-stimulator guided forefoot block prior to anaesthesia and forefoot surgery
Receives: Procedure: Medial forefoot block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Time taken to carry out each local anaesthetic block

    Time taken between opening sterile packs and completion of local anaesthetic block is measured by a blind observer.

    Measured: Over forty five minutes from the start of the study.

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Onset of local anaesthesia

    Following administration of the local block, development of anaesthesia will be measured looking at cold and pin-prick sensation by a blind observer.

    Measured: Over thirty minutes from completion of the local anaesthetic block.

  2. Duration of pain relief following local anaesthetic block.

    Pain relief will be assessed over 24 hours following surgery, to assess its duration and quality, by a blind observer.

    Measured: Over 24 hours following surgery.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2011
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01386320
Sponsor's protocol ID
R0929 10/1304/1
Acronym
USGAB
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
29 Jun 2011
Last updated
15 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound guided ankle block and Medial forefoot block in people with Pain Relief After Forefoot Surgery, run by Hull University Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Time taken to carry out each local anaesthetic block (time frame: Over forty five minutes from the start of the study.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in