Allergic RhinitisPhase 4NCT01388595
Fluticasone and Salmeterol in Allergic Rhinitis
A Phase 4 study testing FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATE and Salmeterol in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by University of Dundee at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Allergic rhinitis is an under diagnosed global health problem which affects up to 25% of the population worldwide. It has been reported as being one of the 10 most common causes for attendance to primary care clinics. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Allergic Rhinitis
- What is being tested?
- FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATE and Salmeterol
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 23 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Nov 2006to Oct 2010
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Persistent allergic rhinitis without asthma.
- Atopy to at least 1 allergen on SPT.
- ≥ 20% drop in PNIF following nasal AMP challenge
- Male to female aged 18-65
- Informed Consent
- Ability to comply with the protocol
Who cannot join
- Severe allergic rhinitis as defined by those in whom there are symptoms which significantly impair day to day activities on QOL questionnaire.
- Nasal Polyposis grade 2/3, deviated nasal septum ≥ 50%
- PNIF < 60 litres/min
- The use of oral corticosteroids within the last 3 months.
- Recent respiratory tract / sinus infection (2 months).
- Significant concomitant respiratory disease such as COPD, CF, ABPA, bronchiectasis and active pulmonary tuberculosis.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Any other clinically significant medical condition such as unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction in the preceding 3 months, recent TIA/ CVA,that may endanger the health or safety of the participant, or jeopardise the protocol.
- Any significant abnormal laboratory result as deemed by the investigators
- Pregnancy, planned pregnancy or lactation
- Known or suspected contra-indication to any of the IMP's
- Concomitant use of medicines (prescribed, over the counter or herbal) that may interfere with the trial.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
Asthma and Allergy Research Group, University of Dundee
Dundee, DD1 3AU
About this study
Official title: A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Effects of Intranasal Salmeterol and Fluticasone Given Alone and in Combination in Allergic Rhinitis
Allergic rhinitis is an under diagnosed global health problem which affects up to 25% of the population worldwide. It has been reported as being one of the 10 most common causes for attendance to primary care clinics. It is clinically defined as a symptomatic disorder of the nose induced by an IgE mediated inflammation following allergen exposure of the membranes lining the nose and is characterized by varying combinations of nasal symptoms including sneezing, nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea and itching. Intra nasal corticosteroids form the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy in allergic rhinitis and there is increasing interest in the role of intranasal beta 2 agonists in the management of allergic rhinitis. The question therefore arises as to whether salmeterol exhibits such synergistic activity in the nose in terms of potentiating the steroid response of fluticasone.
Read the detailed description
In vitro and ex vitro data have suggested that salmeterol may exhibit ligand independent activation of glucocorticoid receptors, which might result in potentiation of fluticasone by salmeterol when given in combination.
Although no such evidence of synergy was reported with fluticasone salmeterol combination in the nose with allergen challenge, no data are available on nasal AMP challenge in the nose.
This study compares the single and long term dosing effects of intranasal fluticasone alone, salmeterol alone and fluticasone salmeterol combination on nasal AMP challenge in persistent allergic rhinitis sufferers.
Nasal corticosteroid,leukotriene receptor antagonist and anti histamine stopped for one week before the start of randomized treatment during the run in phase and wash out periods. Intransal sodium cromoglycate spray provided for rescue use throughout the study but witheld for at least twenty four hours before challenge.
Nasal AMP challenges performed at baseline, after run-in and each washout, and 12 hours after the first and last evening dose of the study medication. A Zerostat Antistatic spacer (Cipla, Mumbai, India) used to administer the randomized treatments, adapted with a nasal olive for intranasal use instead of the conventional mouthpiece.
The randomized treatments given once daily at night time as follows: placebo hydrofluoroalkane, 2 puffs (Cipla, Mumbai,India) salmeterol-hydrofluoroalkane, 2 puffs of 25 g (Serevent Evohaler Allen and Hanburys, Middlesex, United Kingdom) fluticasone- salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane, 2 puffs of 250/25 g (Seretide Evohaler, Allen and Hanburys) and fluticasone-hydrofluoroalkane,2 puffs of 250 g (Flixotide Evohaler, Allen and Hanburys).
The double-blind randomization process computer generated from www.randomization.com. Trial drug randomization performed under the direct supervision of the clinical trial pharmacist at Ninewells University Hospital.
Active fluticasone,salmeterol, and fluticasone-salmeterol combination procured from GlaxoSmithKline (Allen and Hanburys) by the clinical trial pharmacy and matched placebo provided by Cipla.
Following Informed Consent and screening visit, participants provided with randomized, labeled treatment packs with a single inhaler, either active or placebo at each study treatment visit.
Blinding of patients and investigators ensured by using identical colored actuators for each treatment and labeling of active or placebo canisters with trial-specific labels.
Measurements made at 12 hours after the first and last dose of each randomized treatment.
At initial screening, nasal endoscopy performed to exclude significant nasal polyp disease (greater than grade 1), concha bullosa, and septal deviation.
A Niox Flex nitric oxide analyzer (Aerocrine AB, Solna, Sweden) used to measure nasal nitric oxide. The standard aspiration technique recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines used with a unilateral,nasal olive, breath-holding, and velum closure.
For nasal AMP challenge, PNIF measured before and every 5 minutes for 60 minutes after 4 squirts of 0.1 mL per actuation in each nostril of 400 mg/mL of AMP (ie, 320-mg total dose) delivered to the nose. The maximum decrease in PNIF measured using an In-check Nasal Inspiratory Flow Meter (Clement Clarke International Ltd, Harlow, United Kingdom).
It has been shown that measuring PNIF (PEAK NASAL INSPIRATORY FLOW) response is more sensitive than measuring nasal airway resistance and is also more reproducible.PNIF correlates well vs symptoms in response to treatment in allergic rhinitis patients and has been shown to have a minimal clinically important difference of 5 L/min.
At screening, patients instructed in the correct technique with particular attention to horizontal positioning of the meter, a closed mouth with maximal peak nasal inspiratory effort, and an adequate mask seal around the mouth and nose.
Nasal impulse oscillometry measurements for nasal airway resistance at 5 Hz performed using a Jaeger MasterScreen impulse oscillometry system (Erich Jaeger, Hoechberg, Germany).
The total nasal symptom 4 (TNS4) scores recorded at all visits, with a total score of 12 for the sum of the 4 separate domains for nasal blockage, run, itch, and sneeze, each rated from 0 to 3.
The Juniper Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-RQLQ) completed by the participant immediately before and a week after each randomized treatment. The global RQLQ is the mean of the 5 individual domains, with individual domains scored from 0 to 6.
Serum eosinophilic cationic protein measured using an enzyme-linked immunoassay technique (UniCAP; Sweden Diagnostics UK Ltd, Milton Keyes, United Kingdom).
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis
- Being tested
- FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATE, Salmeterol, PLACEBO
- Medical subject headings
- Rhinitis, Allergic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATEDrug
Also called Treatment
- Fluticasone Propionate (FP) Product name: Flixotide Evohaler® Manufacturer: Allan and Hanbury's Active ingredients: Fluticasone Propionate Propellant: HFA 134a Dose: 250μg per actuation giving a total dose of 500µg per day through the spacer device with the customised nasal adaptor.
SalmeterolDrug
Also called Treatment
Salmeterol Product Name: Serevent® Manufacturer: Allan and Hanbury's Active ingredients: Salmetrol Xinafoate Propellant: HFA 134a Dose: 25μg per actuation giving a total dose of 50µg per day through the spacer device with the customised nasal adaptor
PLACEBODrug
Also called Treatment
- Placebo inhaler to SM, FP, SM+FP Manufacturer: Cipla Ltd Active ingredients: None Propellants: HFA 134a Imported \& QP release tested in UK : DHP Clinical supplies, Powys, UK
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fluticasone Proprionate | Active comparator | The participants will be randomised and at each study visit, will receive a single inhaler which can either be active or placebo. Receives: Drug: FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATE |
| Salmeterol | Active comparator | The participants will be randomised and at each study visit, will receive a single inhaler which can either be active or placebo. Receives: Drug: Salmeterol |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | The participants will be randomised and at each study visit, will receive a single inhaler which can either be active or placebo. Receives: Drug: PLACEBO |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF).
Maximum change in PNIF following nasal adenosine monophoshate (AMP) challenge testing for active groups versus placebo.. Data will be presented as % change between groups.
Measured: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Nasal symptom scores.
Nasal Quality of Life Scoring.
Measured: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Nasal nitric oxide.
Measured: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Nasal impulse oscillometry.
Assessment of airway resistance.
Measured: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP)
Serum blood test
Measured: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine.
Measured: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2006
- Primary completionOct 2010
- Study completionOct 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Allergic RhinitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Dundee
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Brian J Lipworth, MD, Principal investigator, University of Dundee
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01388595
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NAI002
- Status last verified
- Oct 2019
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 16 Oct 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Lipworth BJ, Short P, Burns P, Nair A. Effects of intranasal salmeterol and fluticasone given alone and in combination in persistent allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Jan;108(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
PubMed 22192967
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Oct 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Proof of Concept Study to Evaluate Effects of Intranasal Salmeterol and Fluticasone Given Alone and in Combination in Allergic Rhinitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01388595
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NAI002
- Conditions
- Allergic Rhinitis
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 23 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of DundeeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2006
- Primary completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Allergic rhinitis is an under diagnosed global health problem which affects up to 25% of the population worldwide. It has been reported as being one of the 10 most common causes for attendance to primary care clinics. It is clinically defined as a symptomatic disorder of the nose induced by an IgE mediated inflammation following allergen exposure of the membranes lining the nose and is characterized by varying combinations of nasal symptoms including sneezing, nasal blockage, rhinorrhoea and itching. Intra nasal corticosteroids form the cornerstone of anti-inflammatory therapy in allergic rhinitis and there is increasing interest in the role of intranasal beta 2 agonists in the management of allergic rhinitis. The question therefore arises as to whether salmeterol exhibits such synergistic activity in the nose in terms of potentiating the steroid response of fluticasone.
Detailed description
In vitro and ex vitro data have suggested that salmeterol may exhibit ligand independent activation of glucocorticoid receptors, which might result in potentiation of fluticasone by salmeterol when given in combination.
Although no such evidence of synergy was reported with fluticasone salmeterol combination in the nose with allergen challenge, no data are available on nasal AMP challenge in the nose.
This study compares the single and long term dosing effects of intranasal fluticasone alone, salmeterol alone and fluticasone salmeterol combination on nasal AMP challenge in persistent allergic rhinitis sufferers.
Nasal corticosteroid,leukotriene receptor antagonist and anti histamine stopped for one week before the start of randomized treatment during the run in phase and wash out periods. Intransal sodium cromoglycate spray provided for rescue use throughout the study but witheld for at least twenty four hours before challenge.
Nasal AMP challenges performed at baseline, after run-in and each washout, and 12 hours after the first and last evening dose of the study medication. A Zerostat Antistatic spacer (Cipla, Mumbai, India) used to administer the randomized treatments, adapted with a nasal olive for intranasal use instead of the conventional mouthpiece.
The randomized treatments given once daily at night time as follows: placebo hydrofluoroalkane, 2 puffs (Cipla, Mumbai,India) salmeterol-hydrofluoroalkane, 2 puffs of 25 g (Serevent Evohaler Allen and Hanburys, Middlesex, United Kingdom) fluticasone- salmeterol hydrofluoroalkane, 2 puffs of 250/25 g (Seretide Evohaler, Allen and Hanburys) and fluticasone-hydrofluoroalkane,2 puffs of 250 g (Flixotide Evohaler, Allen and Hanburys).
The double-blind randomization process computer generated from www.randomization.com. Trial drug randomization performed under the direct supervision of the clinical trial pharmacist at Ninewells University Hospital.
Active fluticasone,salmeterol, and fluticasone-salmeterol combination procured from GlaxoSmithKline (Allen and Hanburys) by the clinical trial pharmacy and matched placebo provided by Cipla.
Following Informed Consent and screening visit, participants provided with randomized, labeled treatment packs with a single inhaler, either active or placebo at each study treatment visit.
Blinding of patients and investigators ensured by using identical colored actuators for each treatment and labeling of active or placebo canisters with trial-specific labels.
Measurements made at 12 hours after the first and last dose of each randomized treatment.
At initial screening, nasal endoscopy performed to exclude significant nasal polyp disease (greater than grade 1), concha bullosa, and septal deviation.
A Niox Flex nitric oxide analyzer (Aerocrine AB, Solna, Sweden) used to measure nasal nitric oxide. The standard aspiration technique recommended by the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society guidelines used with a unilateral,nasal olive, breath-holding, and velum closure.
For nasal AMP challenge, PNIF measured before and every 5 minutes for 60 minutes after 4 squirts of 0.1 mL per actuation in each nostril of 400 mg/mL of AMP (ie, 320-mg total dose) delivered to the nose. The maximum decrease in PNIF measured using an In-check Nasal Inspiratory Flow Meter (Clement Clarke International Ltd, Harlow, United Kingdom).
It has been shown that measuring PNIF (PEAK NASAL INSPIRATORY FLOW) response is more sensitive than measuring nasal airway resistance and is also more reproducible.PNIF correlates well vs symptoms in response to treatment in allergic rhinitis patients and has been shown to have a minimal clinically important difference of 5 L/min.
At screening, patients instructed in the correct technique with particular attention to horizontal positioning of the meter, a closed mouth with maximal peak nasal inspiratory effort, and an adequate mask seal around the mouth and nose.
Nasal impulse oscillometry measurements for nasal airway resistance at 5 Hz performed using a Jaeger MasterScreen impulse oscillometry system (Erich Jaeger, Hoechberg, Germany).
The total nasal symptom 4 (TNS4) scores recorded at all visits, with a total score of 12 for the sum of the 4 separate domains for nasal blockage, run, itch, and sneeze, each rated from 0 to 3.
The Juniper Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (Mini-RQLQ) completed by the participant immediately before and a week after each randomized treatment. The global RQLQ is the mean of the 5 individual domains, with individual domains scored from 0 to 6.
Serum eosinophilic cationic protein measured using an enzyme-linked immunoassay technique (UniCAP; Sweden Diagnostics UK Ltd, Milton Keyes, United Kingdom).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fluticasone Proprionate | Active comparator | Drug: FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATEThe participants will be randomised and at each study visit, will receive a single inhaler which can either be active or placebo. |
| Salmeterol | Active comparator | Drug: SalmeterolThe participants will be randomised and at each study visit, will receive a single inhaler which can either be active or placebo. |
| placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PLACEBOThe participants will be randomised and at each study visit, will receive a single inhaler which can either be active or placebo. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Persistent allergic rhinitis without asthma.
- Atopy to at least 1 allergen on SPT.
- ≥ 20% drop in PNIF following nasal AMP challenge
- Male to female aged 18-65
- Informed Consent
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Severe allergic rhinitis as defined by those in whom there are symptoms which significantly impair day to day activities on QOL questionnaire.
- Nasal Polyposis grade 2/3, deviated nasal septum ≥ 50%
- PNIF < 60 litres/min
- The use of oral corticosteroids within the last 3 months.
- Recent respiratory tract / sinus infection (2 months).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATEAlso: Treatment1. Fluticasone Propionate (FP) Product name: Flixotide Evohaler® Manufacturer: Allan and Hanbury's Active ingredients: Fluticasone Propionate Propellant: HFA 134a Dose: 250μg per actuation giving a total dose of 500µg per day through the spacer device with the customised nasal adaptor. | Drug | Fluticasone Proprionate |
| SalmeterolAlso: TreatmentSalmeterol Product Name: Serevent® Manufacturer: Allan and Hanbury's Active ingredients: Salmetrol Xinafoate Propellant: HFA 134a Dose: 25μg per actuation giving a total dose of 50µg per day through the spacer device with the customised nasal adaptor | Drug | Salmeterol |
| PLACEBOAlso: Treatment4. Placebo inhaler to SM, FP, SM+FP Manufacturer: Cipla Ltd Active ingredients: None Propellants: HFA 134a Imported \& QP release tested in UK : DHP Clinical supplies, Powys, UK | Drug | placebo |
Primary outcome
Change in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF).
Time frame: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Maximum change in PNIF following nasal adenosine monophoshate (AMP) challenge testing for active groups versus placebo.. Data will be presented as % change between groups.
5 secondary outcomes
Nasal symptom scores.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Nasal nitric oxide.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Nasal impulse oscillometry.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Eosinophil cationic protein (ECP)
Time frame: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Overnight urinary cortisol/creatinine.
Time frame: Change from baseline at 1 week.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Oct 2019.
- Results publication: PubMed 22192967Lipworth BJ, Short P, Burns P, Nair A. Effects of intranasal salmeterol and fluticasone given alone and in combination in persistent allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012 Jan;108(1):54-59. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Allergic Rhinitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Tolerability of Fluticasone Propionate 10% Nasal Insert in Participants With Chronic Allergic Rhinitis
Chronic Allergic Rhinitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis_MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
RecruitingPhase 3
Specific Immunotherapy With Mannan-Conjugated Allergoids for HDM-Allergic Rhinitis/Rhinoconjunctivitis. MM09-SIT-063.
Allergic Rhinitis, Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study of Lebrikizumab in Adult Participants With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PREPARED-1)
Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR)
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Allergy, Asthma, and Atopic Eczema in Finland
Asthma, Asthma in Children
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Brian J Lipworth, MD principal investigator
University of Dundee
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing FLUTICASONE PROPRIONATE and Salmeterol in people with Allergic Rhinitis, run by University of Dundee at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Peak Nasal Inspiratory Flow (PNIF). (time frame: Change from baseline at 1 week.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01388595, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2019.