HealthyPhase 1ICPNCT01390467
Cognitive Impact of Paracetamol in Healthy Volunteers
A Phase 1 study testing Cantab® in people with Healthy, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand.
Trial summary
Randomized study, double-blind, crossover, controlled versus placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 25 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- Cantab®
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to Jan 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 25 years
- Men only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- healthy volunteers,
- aged over 18 years and not more than 25 years,
- males,
- free from any treatment in the 7 days preceding inclusion especially no use of analgesics or anti-inflammatories
Who cannot join
- Contraindications to the administration of paracetamol
- medical and/or surgical history judged by the investigator or his representative as being incompatible with the test, especially subjects with neuropathic pain
- evolutionary pathology at review for inclusion
- excessive intake of alcohol, tobacco (more than 10 cigarettes / day), coffee, tea or drinks containing caffeine (equivalent to more than 4 cups per day) or drug
About this study
Randomized study, double-blind, crossover, controlled versus placebo.
Read the detailed description
Paracetamol impact on cognitive processes has been until recently little studied in literature that presents conflicting results. Some authors do not describe any cognitive performance change (Bradley and Nicholson, 1987) but more recent studies (Ishida et al., 2007) report an interesting performance improvement in therapeutic doses of paracetamol.
This improved performance would use the serotonergic pathway that is involved in the analgesic mechanism of paracetamol as the investigators demonstrated in our laboratory on previous work (Pickering et al. 2006, 2008). However, non-therapeutic dose, instead, showed a deterioration of memory processes in animals which may be link to implication of Cyclooxygenases COX-2. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated (Sharifzadeh et al. 2005; Teather et al., 2005) that anti COX-2 (such as Celebrex) cause in animal a deleterious effect on memory, while an anti COX1 and 2 (as indomethacin) or an anti COX1 (as piroxicam) lead to no change. A dose-effect relationship is therefore suggested on animals. Furthermore, a recent study in healthy volunteers showed that paracetamol acts not only on pain but also on pain / stress in society in everyday life (" social pain ") (deWall et al., 2010). By fMRI, these psychologists have shown that the reduction of "social" pain is associated with a decrease in neuronal activity in brain regions that are involved in social processes but also those who are involved in pain processes (anterior cingulate cortex , anterior insula etc..). They also showed that paracetamol known for its painkillers properties may reduce the painful feelings of rejection or shelved in everyday life. The cognitive-emotional impact of paracetamol is even more interesting that the investigators now know that its metabolism could involve cannabinoids receptors, particularly CB1 in hippocampus and association cortex involved themselves in cognitive phenomena.
INSERM U766 team to which the investigators belong has proposed the following sequence from preclinical : 1) metabolism of acetaminophen in analgesic metabolite AM404 via FAAH enzyme, 2) AM404 acts indirectly on CB1 receptors, 3) strengthening of bulbo spinal descending pathways by the endocannabinoid system, 4) involvement of serotonergic receptors pain suppressors.
This protocol follows a pilot that the investigators completed (HOP clinicaltrial.gov NCT01053650, unpublished results yet) where the investigators studied the impact of 2g of paracetamol in healthy volunteers. The investigators showed a memory improvement, but with no placebo group, it has not been possible to conclude a significant impact of oral paracetamol. Thus, this protocol will allow us to better understand if paracetamol can affect some cognitive processes, particularly vigilance, memory and decision making.
In addition, the investigators will build a biological collection to assess the pharmacogenetic profile of subjects and, in a secondary objective, correlate it to cognitive characteristics of subjects.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- Cantab®
- Keywords
- Paracetamol, Cognitive impact
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cantab®Drug
Randomized study, double-blind, crossover, controlled versus placebo.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assess cognitive impact of taking paracetamol within healthy volunteers by comparing the results on cognitive tests Cantab® between two passages, in particular a memory test (SOC)
Measured: after the results on cognitive tests Cantab
Secondary outcomes (1)
Assess cognitive impact of taking paracetamol on other cognitive tests Cantab® (understanding : MOT and DMS, reaction time : RTI, visual memory : PRM, decision making : IST)
Measured: after an other cognitive test Cantab
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionJul 2011
- Study completionJan 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Grünenthal GmbH
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gisèle PICKERING, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01390467
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHU-0095
- Other IDs
- 2011-000662-35
- Acronym
- ICP
- Status last verified
- Jan 2012
- First submitted
- 7 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 30 Jan 2012
- Results posted
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jan 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cognitive Impact of Paracetamol in Healthy Volunteers
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01390467
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ICP / CHU-0095
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- Paracetamol, Cognitive impact
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Clermont-FerrandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Grünenthal GmbH
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Randomized study, double-blind, crossover, controlled versus placebo.
Detailed description
Paracetamol impact on cognitive processes has been until recently little studied in literature that presents conflicting results. Some authors do not describe any cognitive performance change (Bradley and Nicholson, 1987) but more recent studies (Ishida et al., 2007) report an interesting performance improvement in therapeutic doses of paracetamol.
This improved performance would use the serotonergic pathway that is involved in the analgesic mechanism of paracetamol as the investigators demonstrated in our laboratory on previous work (Pickering et al. 2006, 2008). However, non-therapeutic dose, instead, showed a deterioration of memory processes in animals which may be link to implication of Cyclooxygenases COX-2. Indeed, several studies have demonstrated (Sharifzadeh et al. 2005; Teather et al., 2005) that anti COX-2 (such as Celebrex) cause in animal a deleterious effect on memory, while an anti COX1 and 2 (as indomethacin) or an anti COX1 (as piroxicam) lead to no change. A dose-effect relationship is therefore suggested on animals. Furthermore, a recent study in healthy volunteers showed that paracetamol acts not only on pain but also on pain / stress in society in everyday life (" social pain ") (deWall et al., 2010). By fMRI, these psychologists have shown that the reduction of "social" pain is associated with a decrease in neuronal activity in brain regions that are involved in social processes but also those who are involved in pain processes (anterior cingulate cortex , anterior insula etc..). They also showed that paracetamol known for its painkillers properties may reduce the painful feelings of rejection or shelved in everyday life. The cognitive-emotional impact of paracetamol is even more interesting that the investigators now know that its metabolism could involve cannabinoids receptors, particularly CB1 in hippocampus and association cortex involved themselves in cognitive phenomena.
INSERM U766 team to which the investigators belong has proposed the following sequence from preclinical : 1) metabolism of acetaminophen in analgesic metabolite AM404 via FAAH enzyme, 2) AM404 acts indirectly on CB1 receptors, 3) strengthening of bulbo spinal descending pathways by the endocannabinoid system, 4) involvement of serotonergic receptors pain suppressors.
This protocol follows a pilot that the investigators completed (HOP clinicaltrial.gov NCT01053650, unpublished results yet) where the investigators studied the impact of 2g of paracetamol in healthy volunteers. The investigators showed a memory improvement, but with no placebo group, it has not been possible to conclude a significant impact of oral paracetamol. Thus, this protocol will allow us to better understand if paracetamol can affect some cognitive processes, particularly vigilance, memory and decision making.
In addition, the investigators will build a biological collection to assess the pharmacogenetic profile of subjects and, in a secondary objective, correlate it to cognitive characteristics of subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 25 years
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- healthy volunteers,
- aged over 18 years and not more than 25 years,
- males,
- free from any treatment in the 7 days preceding inclusion especially no use of analgesics or anti-inflammatories
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Contraindications to the administration of paracetamol
- medical and/or surgical history judged by the investigator or his representative as being incompatible with the test, especially subjects with neuropathic pain
- evolutionary pathology at review for inclusion
- excessive intake of alcohol, tobacco (more than 10 cigarettes / day), coffee, tea or drinks containing caffeine (equivalent to more than 4 cups per day) or drug
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cantab®Randomized study, double-blind, crossover, controlled versus placebo. | Drug | – |
Primary outcome
Assess cognitive impact of taking paracetamol within healthy volunteers by comparing the results on cognitive tests Cantab® between two passages, in particular a memory test (SOC)
Time frame: after the results on cognitive tests Cantab
1 secondary outcome
Assess cognitive impact of taking paracetamol on other cognitive tests Cantab® (understanding : MOT and DMS, reaction time : RTI, visual memory : PRM, decision making : IST)
Time frame: after an other cognitive test Cantab
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jan 2012.
Related trials for Healthy
Recruiting
THE EFFECTS OF GAME-BASED EXERCISE PROGRAMS
Physical Activity, Body Image
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase I Study of GLR2053 Tablets in Chinese Healthy Adult Participants
Atopic Dermatitis
Recruiting
Colon-delivered Riboflavin and Gut Microbiota Composition
Microbiome Dysbiosis, Gut Health
Not yet recruiting
Neuroergonomic Analysis of a Brain-Computer Interface Device (BCI)
Healthy Volunteers - Male and Female
RecruitingPhase 1
First-in-Human Trial to Assess REGN20423 in Healthy Adult Participants and Adult Participants With Atopic Dermatitis
Healthy Volunteer, Atopic Dermatitis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gisèle PICKERING principal investigator
University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Cantab® in people with Healthy, run by University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assess cognitive impact of taking paracetamol within healthy volunteers by comparing the results on cognitive tests Cantab® between two passages, in particular a memory test (SOC) (time frame: after the results on cognitive tests Cantab). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2012.