Postoperative Nausea and VomitingPDNVFNCT01393288
Developing Individualized Strategies to Prevent Nausea and Vomiting
A study testing Ondansetron, Lorazepam and Aprepitant in people with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Genetic Polymorphisms, run by University of California, San Francisco at 6 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Every year, more than 5 million patients in the US experience postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) and in the ambulatory setting post-discharge nausea and/or vomiting (PDNV) is the most common cause for unanticipated hospital re-admissions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, Genetic Polymorphisms
- What is being tested?
- Ondansetron, Lorazepam and Aprepitant
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Nov 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adult (i.e. at least 21 years of age) ambulatory surgery patients, with a duration of 1-4 hours
- able to understand, read, and write in English, are ASA physical status 1-3, and are high risk PDNV patients (with 3 or more of the following risk factors:
- female gender
- age < 50
- history of PONV and/or currently prone to motion sickness, and expectation of post-op opioid use).
Who cannot join
- patients not at high risk for PDNV (as described above)
- patients <21 years of age
- planned inpatient surgical patients
- planned total intravenous anesthesia, sedation, or regional technique without inhaled anesthetic
- inability to provide informed consent in English
- pregnant or breastfeeding
- persistent and/or current nausea/vomiting.
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 1 country.
6 sites in 1 country
United States6 sites
Brigham & Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
University of Kansas Medical Center
Kansas City, Kansas, 66160
University of Kentucky Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40506
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94115
About this study
Every year, more than 5 million patients in the US experience postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) and in the ambulatory setting post-discharge nausea and/or vomiting (PDNV) is the most common cause for unanticipated hospital re-admissions. Similarly, millions of patients suffer from chemotherapy induced nausea and/or vomiting (CINV), and one out of five patients discontinues chemotherapy for this reason. Thus, the control of nausea and vomiting remains a major health concern for the investigators society. The investigatorsoverall goal is to further the understanding of nausea and vomiting and optimize antiemetic selection in order to facilitate individualized patient care.
Unfortunately, current antiemetics reduce the incidence of nausea by only about one third. As a result, antiemetics are often combined, exposing patients to adverse events and drug interactions without evidence for the most effective combination. Moreover, it remains unclear why such a large amount of inter-individual variability exists in antiemetic responsiveness. 5HT3, NK1, and GABA receptors are targets for some of the most commonly prescribed anti-emetics. Furthermore, these receptors have many known genetic polymorphisms, including several linked to incidence of nausea and vomiting. Thus pharmacogenomic variation may in part explain interindividual differences in treatment responses and will be tested in this proposal.
Read more
Leveraging the established infrastructure of the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute, and the support of 6 patient recruitment sites, the investigators will enroll 1280 high risk patients to three oral interventions with distinct mechanisms of action for nausea and vomiting. Investigating nausea and vomiting in ambulatory surgical patients is an excellent model for this trial owing to a high incidence, short observational period, and the ability to standardize and control potentially confounding variables. In this proposal, 100% of patients will receive a single intraoperative dose of 4 mg ondansetron, which is similar to the 80% of patients who receive prophylaxis in common practice. Using a factorial design, these patients will be randomized to receive one out of eight possible combinations of the three interventions (ondansetron, aprepitant, lorazepam) versus placebo (ond+aprep+lora, ond+aprep, ond+lora, aprep+lora, ond, aprep, lora, or placebo). Thus, in this proposal 87.5% (7 out of 8 patients) will have antiemetic coverage for the postdischarge period, which is considerably higher than in common practice, where only 4% of patients have antiemetic coverage after discharge. The primary endpoint will be the prevention of nausea and vomiting within 48 hours after ambulatory surgery. The advantage of the factorial trial design is its high efficiency to systematically investigate multiple interventions while allowing us to test for potential interactions. It is also an ideal format for the simultaneous assessment of pharmacogenomic interactions of antiemetics in this proposal.
To this end, the investigators will collect DNA samples and take advantage of the unique opportunity to investigate the effects of variation in candidate receptor genes in the context of the three treatment interventions for PDNV. This approach may in part explain inter-individual differences in drug efficacy and allow for future screening of at-risk patients. Specifically, the investigators will be assessing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variants (CNVs) of targeted receptors for the antiemetics tested.
Aim 1: To determine efficacy of three interventions for the prevention of PDNV.
Hypothesis 1.1: Each intervention reduces the incidence of PDNV.
Hypothesis 1.2: Efficacy of all interventions is independent so that efficacy of a combination can be derived from the efficacy of the individual interventions.
Aim 2: To determine if drug response for anti-emetics is dependent upon genetic variance.
Hypothesis 2: Efficacy of ondansetron, aprepitant and lorazepam to reduce PDNV differs with 5HT3, NK1, and GABA receptor gene variation, respectively.
- Being tested
- Ondansetron, Lorazepam, Aprepitant
- Medical subject headings
- Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OndansetronDrug
8 mg ondansetron ODT or placebo, 1 hour pre-operatively, before discharge, evening of day of surgery, morning of postoperative day (POD) 1, lunch POD 1, evening POD 1, and morning of POD 2
LorazepamDrug
1 mg Lorazepam or placebo 1 hour preoperatively, before discharge, evening of day of surgery, morning of postoperative day (POD) 1, lunch of POD 1, evening of POD 1, and morning of POD 2.
AprepitantDrug
40 mg Aprepitant or placebo 1 hour preoperatively and before discharge (placebo for postoperative days 1-2)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ondansetron | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Ondansetron |
| Lorazepam | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Lorazepam |
| Aprepitant | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Aprepitant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV)
Measured: 48 hours post-discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionNov 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Postoperative Nausea and VomitingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of California, San FranciscoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San Francisco
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01393288
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1R01CA163074-01A1
- Other IDs
- 10831533
- Acronym
- PDNVF
- Status last verified
- Nov 2013
- First submitted
- 11 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Developing Individualized Strategies to Prevent Nausea and Vomiting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01393288
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PDNVF / 1R01CA163074-01A1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Withdrawn
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of California, San FranciscoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Cancer Institute (NCI)
- Study start
- Nov 2013
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014
- Study completion
- Nov 2015
- First posted
- 13 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Every year, more than 5 million patients in the US experience postoperative nausea and/or vomiting (PONV) and in the ambulatory setting post-discharge nausea and/or vomiting (PDNV) is the most common cause for unanticipated hospital re-admissions. Similarly, millions of patients suffer from chemotherapy induced nausea and/or vomiting (CINV), and one out of five patients discontinues chemotherapy for this reason. Thus, the control of nausea and vomiting remains a major health concern for the investigators society. The investigatorsoverall goal is to further the understanding of nausea and vomiting and optimize antiemetic selection in order to facilitate individualized patient care.
Unfortunately, current antiemetics reduce the incidence of nausea by only about one third. As a result, antiemetics are often combined, exposing patients to adverse events and drug interactions without evidence for the most effective combination. Moreover, it remains unclear why such a large amount of inter-individual variability exists in antiemetic responsiveness. 5HT3, NK1, and GABA receptors are targets for some of the most commonly prescribed anti-emetics. Furthermore, these receptors have many known genetic polymorphisms, including several linked to incidence of nausea and vomiting. Thus pharmacogenomic variation may in part explain interindividual differences in treatment responses and will be tested in this proposal.
Leveraging the established infrastructure of the UCSF Clinical and Translational Science Institute, and the support of 6 patient recruitment sites, the investigators will enroll 1280 high risk patients to three oral interventions with distinct mechanisms of action for nausea and vomiting. Investigating nausea and vomiting in ambulatory surgical patients is an excellent model for this trial owing to a high incidence, short observational period, and the ability to standardize and control potentially confounding variables. In this proposal, 100% of patients will receive a single intraoperative dose of 4 mg ondansetron, which is similar to the 80% of patients who receive prophylaxis in common practice. Using a factorial design, these patients will be randomized to receive one out of eight possible combinations of the three interventions (ondansetron, aprepitant, lorazepam) versus placebo (ond+aprep+lora, ond+aprep, ond+lora, aprep+lora, ond, aprep, lora, or placebo). Thus, in this proposal 87.5% (7 out of 8 patients) will have antiemetic coverage for the postdischarge period, which is considerably higher than in common practice, where only 4% of patients have antiemetic coverage after discharge. The primary endpoint will be the prevention of nausea and vomiting within 48 hours after ambulatory surgery. The advantage of the factorial trial design is its high efficiency to systematically investigate multiple interventions while allowing us to test for potential interactions. It is also an ideal format for the simultaneous assessment of pharmacogenomic interactions of antiemetics in this proposal.
To this end, the investigators will collect DNA samples and take advantage of the unique opportunity to investigate the effects of variation in candidate receptor genes in the context of the three treatment interventions for PDNV. This approach may in part explain inter-individual differences in drug efficacy and allow for future screening of at-risk patients. Specifically, the investigators will be assessing single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and copy number variants (CNVs) of targeted receptors for the antiemetics tested.
Aim 1: To determine efficacy of three interventions for the prevention of PDNV.
Hypothesis 1.1: Each intervention reduces the incidence of PDNV.
Hypothesis 1.2: Efficacy of all interventions is independent so that efficacy of a combination can be derived from the efficacy of the individual interventions.
Aim 2: To determine if drug response for anti-emetics is dependent upon genetic variance.
Hypothesis 2: Efficacy of ondansetron, aprepitant and lorazepam to reduce PDNV differs with 5HT3, NK1, and GABA receptor gene variation, respectively.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ondansetron | Placebo comparator | Drug: Ondansetron |
| Lorazepam | Placebo comparator | Drug: Lorazepam |
| Aprepitant | Placebo comparator | Drug: Aprepitant |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- adult (i.e. at least 21 years of age) ambulatory surgery patients, with a duration of 1-4 hours
- able to understand, read, and write in English, are ASA physical status 1-3, and are high risk PDNV patients (with 3 or more of the following risk factors:
- female gender
- age < 50
- history of PONV and/or currently prone to motion sickness, and expectation of post-op opioid use).
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- patients not at high risk for PDNV (as described above)
- patients <21 years of age
- planned inpatient surgical patients
- planned total intravenous anesthesia, sedation, or regional technique without inhaled anesthetic
- inability to provide informed consent in English
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ondansetron8 mg ondansetron ODT or placebo, 1 hour pre-operatively, before discharge, evening of day of surgery, morning of postoperative day (POD) 1, lunch POD 1, evening POD 1, and morning of POD 2 | Drug | Ondansetron |
| Lorazepam1 mg Lorazepam or placebo 1 hour preoperatively, before discharge, evening of day of surgery, morning of postoperative day (POD) 1, lunch of POD 1, evening of POD 1, and morning of POD 2. | Drug | Lorazepam |
| Aprepitant40 mg Aprepitant or placebo 1 hour preoperatively and before discharge (placebo for postoperative days 1-2) | Drug | Aprepitant |
Primary outcome
Incidence of post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV)
Time frame: 48 hours post-discharge
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2013.
Related trials for Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Not yet recruiting
Amisulpride Injection for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery
PONV
Not yet recruiting
Binaural Beats and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Active, not recruiting
Advancing Strategies to Optimize the PerIopeRativE Management of PostOperative Nausea and Vomiting (ASPIRE-PONV) Trial
Postoperative Nausea, Postoperative Vomiting
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effects of Different Anesthetic Sedatives on PONV in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Cholelithiasis, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Effect of Ketamine-Propofol Total Intravenous Anesthesia Versus Sevoflurane-Based Anesthesia on Postoperative Vomiting in Children Undergoing Strabismus Surgery
Postoperative Vomiting, Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
6 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Ondansetron, Lorazepam and Aprepitant in people with Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting and Genetic Polymorphisms, run by University of California, San Francisco at 6 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of post-discharge nausea and vomiting (PDNV) (time frame: 48 hours post-discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2013.