Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)Phase 3NCT01395524
A 12-week Extension of the Phase III Study (D3820C00004) to Assess the Effect and Safety of NKTR-118 in Patients With Non-cancer-related Pain and Opioid-induced Constipation
A Phase 3 study testing NKTR-118 in people with Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC), run by AstraZeneca at 116 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of NKTR-118 treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer-related pain over a 6-month period. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 84 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- What is being tested?
- NKTR-118
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 302 participants
- Where
- 116 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to Sep 2012
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 84 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Must have completed the 12-week study D3820C00004 through Visit 8.
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
- Men and women who were between the ages of >18 and <85 years at the time of the screening visit for study D3820C00004.
- Continuing to receive a stable maintenance opioid regimen consisting of a total daily dose of 30 mg to 1000 mg of oral morphine, or equianalgesic amount(s) of 1 or more other opioid therapies.
- Willingness to continue abstinence from all laxatives and other bowel regimens including prune juice and herbal products throughout this additional 12-week treatment period, and to use only bisacodyl as rescue medication if a bowel movement (BM) has not occurred within at least 72 hours of the last recorded BM.
Who cannot join
- Patients receiving opioid regimen for treatment of pain related to cancer.
- History of cancer within 5 years from the screening visit of study D3820C00004 with the exception of basal cell cancer and squamous cell skin cancer.
- Medical conditions and treatments associated with diarrhea, intermittent loose stools, or constipation.
- Other issues related to the gastrointestinal tract that could impose risk to the patient.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Trial locations and contacts
116 sites in 4 countries.
116 sites in 4 countries
United States90 sites
Research Site
Albuquerque, New Mexico
Research Site
Anaheim, California
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia
Research Site
Austin, Texas
Research Site
Avon, Indiana
Research Site
Beavercreek, Ohio
Research Site
Beverly Hills, California
Research Site
Biloxi, Mississippi
Research Site
Birmingham, Alabama
Research Site
Bloomington, Illinois
Research Site
Boise, Idaho
Research Site
Boynton Beach, Florida
Research Site
Brockton, Massachusetts
Research Site
Brooksville, Florida
Research Site
Burbank, California
Research Site
Calera, Alabama
Research Site
Charleston, South Carolina
Research Site
Charlotte, North Carolina
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio
Research Site
Clarksville, Tennessee
Research Site
Crystal River, Florida
Research Site
Cumberland, Rhode Island
Research Site
Dallas, Texas
Research Site
Decatur, Georgia
Research Site
DeLand, Florida
Research Site
Denver, Colorado
Research Site
Doral, Texas
Research Site
Evansville, Indiana
Research Site
Feasterville, Pennsylvania
Research Site
Fort Myers, Florida
Research Site
Garden Grove, California
Research Site
Glendale, Arizona
Research Site
Greensboro, North Carolina
Research Site
Greer, South Carolina
Research Site
Hialeah, Florida
Research Site
Hickory, North Carolina
Research Site
High Point, North Carolina
Research Site
Hot Springs, Arkansas
Research Site
Houston, Texas
Research Site
Huntingdon Valley, Pennsylvania
Reserach Site
Indianapolis, Indiana
Research Site
Jacksonville, Florida
Research Site
Jupiter, Florida
Research Site
Kalamazoo, Michigan
Research Site
Laguana Hills, California
Research Site
Laguna Hills, California
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada
Research Site
Levittown, Pennsylvania
Research Site
Long Beach, California
Research Site
Los Gatos, California
Research Site
Maitland, Florida
Research Site
Malvern, Arkansas
Research Site
Medord, Oregon
Research Site
Mesa, Arizona
Research Site
Miami, Florida
Research Site
Missoula, Montana
Research Site
Montebello, California
Research Site
Morrisville, North Carolina
Research Site
Naples, Florida
Research Site
National City, California
Research Site
New York, New York
Research Site
North Richland Hills, Texas
Research Site
Norwalk, California
Research Site
Omaha, Nebraska
Research Site
Orangeburg, South Carolina
Research Site
Orlando, Florida
Research Site
Ormond Beach, Florida
Research Site
Paramount, California
Research Site
Pembroke Pines, Florida
Research Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Research Site
Phoenix, Arizona
Research Site
Pikesville, Maryland
Research Site
Plantation, Florida
Research Site
Rockford, Illinois
Research Site
Sacramento, California
Research Site
Saint Joseph, Missouri
Research Site
Salt Lake City, Utah
Research Site
San Diego, California
Research Site
Santa Ana, California
Research Site
Spokane, Washington
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri
Research Site
Tamarac, Florida
Research Site
Tampa, Florida
Research Site
Trenton, New Jersey
Research Site
Tucson, Arizona
Research Site
Venice, Florida
Research Site
West Des Moines, Iowa
Research Site
West Palm Beach, Florida
Research Site
Winter Park, Florida
Research Site
Yardley, Pennsylvania
Germany14 sites
Research Site
Berlin
Research Site
Celle, Lower Saxony
Research Site
Dietzenbach, Hesse
Research Site
Dresden
Research Site
Essen, North Rhine-Westphalia
Research Site
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg
Research Site
Hanover, Lower Saxony
Research Site
Hüttenberg, Hesse
Research Site
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein
Research Site
Leipzig, Saxony
Research Site
Mainz, Rhineland-Palatinate
Research Site
Potsdam, BR
Research Site
Schwerin, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Research Site
Wetzlar, Hesse
Australia8 sites
Research Site
Adelaide, South Australia
Research Site
Broadmeadow, New South Wales
Research Site
Darlinghurst, New South Wales
Research Site
Fremantle, Western Australia
Research Site
Greenslopes, Queensland
Research Site
Nedlands, Western Australia
Research Site
Port Kembla, New South Wales
Research Site
Westmead, New South Wales
Slovakia4 sites
Research Site
Banská Bystrica
Research Site
Bratislava
Research Site
Košice
Research Site
Prešov
About this study
Official title: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 12-Week Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of NKTR-118 in Patients With Non-Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of NKTR-118 treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer-related pain over a 6-month period.
- Conditions
- Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- Being tested
- NKTR-118, Placebo
- Keywords
- Non-Cancer-Related Pain, Opioid-Induced Constipation.
- Medical subject headings
- Opioid-Induced Constipation
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NKTR-118Drug
12.5 mg oral tablet once daily
NKTR-118Drug
25 mg oral tablet once daily
PlaceboDrug
Oral tablet intake once daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NKTR-118 12.5mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: NKTR-118 |
| NKTR-118 25mg | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: NKTR-118 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Incidence of Patients Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
The incidence of patients experiencing at least one AE during the randomized treatment and follow-up periods was calculated.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 14)
Incidence of Patients Experiencing AEs That Resulted in Discontinuation of Investigational Product (IP)
The incidence of patients experiencing AEs that resulted in discontinuation of IP during the randomized treatment or follow-up periods was calculated.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 14)
Incidence of Patients Experiencing Severe Adverse Events (SAEs)
The incidence of patients experiencing SAEs during the randomized treatment and follow-up periods was calculated.
Measured: Baseline (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 14)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)
The PAC-SYM questionnaire is a 12-item questionnaire that evaluates the severity of symptoms of constipation in 3 domains (stool, rectal, and abdominal symptoms) on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absent) to 4 (very severe) in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items (ie, symptoms). The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'absent' for each item) to 4 (response is 'very severe' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (prior to treatment) to last on-treatment assessment (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL)
The PAC-QOL scale is a 28-item self-report instrument designed to evaluate the burden of constipation on patients' everyday functioning and well-being in the 2 weeks (14 days) prior to assessment. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). The instrument can be used to generate an overall score, but is also reported to assess 4 specific constipation-related domains including: 1) Worries and concerns (11 items), 2) Physical discomfort (4 items), 3) Psychosocial discomfort (8 items), and 4) Satisfaction (5 items). Each domain score is the mean of the non-missing items for that domain. The total score is the mean of all non-missing items. The range of the domain or total score is 0 (response is 'not at all' for each item) to 4 (response is 'extremely' for each item). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Measured: Baseline (prior to treatment) to last on-treatment assessment (up to Week 12)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionSep 2012
- Study completionSep 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AstraZenecaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZeneca
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mark Sostek, Study director, AstraZeneca
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01395524
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D3820C00007
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 28 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Webster L, Tummala R, Diva U, Lappalainen J. A 12-week extension study to assess the safety and tolerability of naloxegol in patients with noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation. J Opioid Manag. 2016 Nov/Dec;12(6):405-419. doi: 10.5055/jom.2016.0360.
PubMed 28059433Lawson R, King F, Marsh K, Altincatal A, Cimen A. Impact of Treatment with Naloxegol for Opioid-Induced Constipation on Patients' Health State Utility. Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1331-46. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0365-y. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
PubMed 27342744
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 12-Week Extension Study to Assess the Safety and Tolerability of NKTR-118 in Patients With Non-Cancer-Related Pain and Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01395524
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- D3820C00007
- Conditions
- Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
- Keywords
- Non-Cancer-Related Pain, Opioid-Induced Constipation.
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 302 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AstraZenecaIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect and safety of NKTR-118 treatment of opioid-induced constipation in patients with non-cancer-related pain over a 6-month period.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NKTR-118 12.5mg | Experimental | Drug: NKTR-118 |
| NKTR-118 25mg | Experimental | Drug: NKTR-118 |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 84 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Must have completed the 12-week study D3820C00004 through Visit 8.
- Provision of written informed consent prior to any study-specific procedures.
- Men and women who were between the ages of >18 and <85 years at the time of the screening visit for study D3820C00004.
- Continuing to receive a stable maintenance opioid regimen consisting of a total daily dose of 30 mg to 1000 mg of oral morphine, or equianalgesic amount(s) of 1 or more other opioid therapies.
- Willingness to continue abstinence from all laxatives and other bowel regimens including prune juice and herbal products throughout this additional 12-week treatment period, and to use only bisacodyl as rescue medication if a bowel movement (BM) has not occurred within at least 72 hours of the last recorded BM.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients receiving opioid regimen for treatment of pain related to cancer.
- History of cancer within 5 years from the screening visit of study D3820C00004 with the exception of basal cell cancer and squamous cell skin cancer.
- Medical conditions and treatments associated with diarrhea, intermittent loose stools, or constipation.
- Other issues related to the gastrointestinal tract that could impose risk to the patient.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NKTR-11812.5 mg oral tablet once daily | Drug | NKTR-118 12.5mg |
| NKTR-11825 mg oral tablet once daily | Drug | NKTR-118 25mg |
| PlaceboOral tablet intake once daily | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Incidence of Patients Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 14)
The incidence of patients experiencing at least one AE during the randomized treatment and follow-up periods was calculated.
Incidence of Patients Experiencing AEs That Resulted in Discontinuation of Investigational Product (IP)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 14)
The incidence of patients experiencing AEs that resulted in discontinuation of IP during the randomized treatment or follow-up periods was calculated.
Incidence of Patients Experiencing Severe Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 14)
The incidence of patients experiencing SAEs during the randomized treatment and follow-up periods was calculated.
2 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms Questionnaire (PAC-SYM)
Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment) to last on-treatment assessment (up to Week 12)
Change From Baseline in Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL)
Time frame: Baseline (prior to treatment) to last on-treatment assessment (up to Week 12)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 28059433Webster L, Tummala R, Diva U, Lappalainen J. A 12-week extension study to assess the safety and tolerability of naloxegol in patients with noncancer pain and opioid-induced constipation. J Opioid Manag. 2016 Nov/Dec;12(6):405-419. doi: 10.5055/jom.2016.0360.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27342744Lawson R, King F, Marsh K, Altincatal A, Cimen A. Impact of Treatment with Naloxegol for Opioid-Induced Constipation on Patients' Health State Utility. Adv Ther. 2016 Aug;33(8):1331-46. doi: 10.1007/s12325-016-0365-y. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
- Clinical\_Study\_Report\_Synopsis\_D3820C00007Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
RecruitingPhase 4
Prevention of Opioid-induced Constipation in Patients With Advanced Cancer
Constipation, Opioid-Induced
RecruitingObservational study
Risk of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events for Naldemedine & Other Medications for Opioid Induced Constipation
Opioid-induced Constipation
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Naldemedine in Paediatric Participants Receiving Opioids
Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel-controlled, Superiority Trial
OIC
RecruitingObservational study
Naldemedine in Clinical Practice in Cancer Patients With Opioid Induced CONstipation: Clinical Outcomes and Patient Experience
Cancer, Opioid Induced Constipation (OIC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mark Sostek study director
AstraZeneca
116 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing NKTR-118 in people with Opioid-Induced Constipation (OIC), run by AstraZeneca at 116 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 116 sites in United States, Germany, Australia, Slovakia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Incidence of Patients Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event (AE) (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) to end of the follow-up period (Week 14)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01395524, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.