PainPhase 2NCT01399567
Nursing Home Pain Management Algorithm Clinical Trial
A Phase 2 study testing Algorithm in people with Pain, run by Swedish Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Pain assessment and management deficiencies in nursing homes (NHs) are well documented. Unrelieved pain in this setting results in poorer resident outcomes, including depression, decreased mobility, sleep disturbance, and impaired physical and social functioning. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 65 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain
- What is being tested?
- Algorithm
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 396 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Sep 2006to Jan 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 65 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Older adult
Who may be able to join
- long-term nursing home residents,
- 65 years and older,
- with moderate or greater pain in the week prior to screening,
- residing in a participating facility,
- who consent to participate (or whose surrogate decisionmaker consents to participation)
Who cannot join
- short-term stay patients,
- persons less than 65 years,
- residents on hospice
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Pain assessment and management deficiencies in nursing homes (NHs) are well documented. Unrelieved pain in this setting results in poorer resident outcomes, including depression, decreased mobility, sleep disturbance, and impaired physical and social functioning. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of a pain management algorithm coupled with intense diffusion strategies in improving pain, physical function and depression among NH residents. Specific aims of the study are to: 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of a pain management algorithm (ALG) coupled with intense diffusion strategies, as compared with pain education (EDU) and weak diffusion strategies, in improving pain, mobility, and depression among NH residents; 2) Determine the extent to which adherence to the ALG and organizational factors are associated with changes in resident outcomes and the extent to which changes in these variables are associated with changes in outcomes; 3) Evaluate the persistence of changes in process and outcome variables at long-term follow-up and 4) Evaluate the relationships among behavioral problems and pain in severely cognitively impaired residents who are unable to provide self-report.
Read the detailed description
Inadequate pain management in nursing homes (NHs) is well documented. Unrelieved pain in this setting results in depression, decreased mobility, sleep disturbance, and impaired physical and social functioning. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of a pain management algorithm delivered using intense diffusion strategies. Outcomes are facility pain practices and residents' pain, physical function and depression. Specific aims of the study are to: 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of a pain management algorithm (ALG) coupled with intense diffusion strategies, as compared with pain education (EDU) and weak diffusion strategies, in improving pain, mobility, and depression among NH residents; 2) Determine the extent to which adherence to the ALG and organizational factors are associated with changes in resident outcomes and the extent to which changes in these variables are associated with changes in outcomes; 3) Evaluate the persistence of changes in process and outcome variables at long-term follow-up and 4) Evaluate the relationships among behavioral problems and pain in severely cognitively impaired residents who are unable to provide self-report.
- Conditions
- Pain
- Being tested
- Algorithm
- Keywords
- pain, depression, nursing homes, diffusion of innovations, clinical trial
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Depression
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AlgorithmBehavioural
The NH pain management algorithm is a series of decision-making tools that begin with regular, comprehensive pain assessment matched to residents' cognitive status and proceed through analgesic therapy appropriate to the character, severity, and pattern of pain.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Algorithm | Experimental | The NH pain management algorithm is a series of decision-making tools that begins with regular, comprehensive pain assessment matched to residents' cognitive status and proceed through analgesic therapy appropriate to the character, severity, and pattern of pain. The algorithm is coupled with intense diffusion strategies (e.g., education, consultation, boosters) to increase adoption of these evidence-based practices Receives: Behavioral: Algorithm |
| Control | Active comparator | Control sites received staff education for pain assessment and management comprised of four one-hour classes Receives: Behavioral: Algorithm |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in Pain at 3 months
Brief Pain Inventory (self-reporting participants) Nursing Assistant Surrogate Report
Measured: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Pain at 6 months
Brief Pain Inventory (self-reporting participants) Nursing Assistant Surrogate Report
Measured: 6 months post intervention
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change from Baseline in Mobility at 3 months
Functional independence measure - locomotion
Measured: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Agitation at 6 months
Pittsburgh Agitation Scale
Measured: 6 months
Change from Baseline Adherence to Best Practices at 3 months
Pain Management Chart audit Tool; 17 item tool evalauting staff adherence to recommended pain assessment and management practices
Measured: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Depression at 3 months
Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia
Measured: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Depression at 6 months
Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia
Measured: 6 months post intervention
Change from Baseline in Mobility at 6 months
Functional independence measure - locomotion
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Change from Baseline in Adherence to Best Practices at 6 months
Pain Management Chart audit Tool; 17 item tool evalauting staff adherence to recommended pain assessment and management practices
Measured: 6 months post-intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2006
- Primary completionNov 2009
- Study completionJan 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 396 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Swedish Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Mary Ersek, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Pennsylvania
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01399567
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5R01NR009100
- Status last verified
- Jul 2011
- First submitted
- 23 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Jablonski AM, DuPen AR, Ersek M. The use of algorithms in assessing and managing persistent pain in older adults. Am J Nurs. 2011 Mar;111(3):34-43; quiz 44-5. doi: 10.1097/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000395239.60981.2f.
PubMed 21346465Ersek M, Polissar N, Neradilek MB. Development of a composite pain measure for persons with advanced dementia: exploratory analyses in self-reporting nursing home residents. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Mar;41(3):566-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
PubMed 21094018Ersek M, Herr K, Neradilek MB, Buck HG, Black B. Comparing the psychometric properties of the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Behaviors (CNPI) and the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAIN-AD) instruments. Pain Med. 2010 Mar;11(3):395-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00787.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
PubMed 20088854Jablonski A, Ersek M. Nursing home staff adherence to evidence-based pain management practices. J Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jul;35(7):28-34; quiz 36-7. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20090428-03.
PubMed 19650621Ersek M, Neradilek MB, Herr K, Jablonski A, Polissar N, Du Pen A. Pain Management Algorithms for Implementing Best Practices in Nursing Homes: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):348-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
PubMed 26897592Ersek M, Polissar N, Pen AD, Jablonski A, Herr K, Neradilek MB. Addressing methodological challenges in implementing the nursing home pain management algorithm randomized controlled trial. Clin Trials. 2012 Oct;9(5):634-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774512454243. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
PubMed 22879574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Nursing Home Pain Management Algorithm Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01399567
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5R01NR009100
- Conditions
- Pain
- Keywords
- pain, depression, nursing homes, diffusion of innovations, clinical trial
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 396 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Swedish Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2006
- Primary completion
- Nov 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain assessment and management deficiencies in nursing homes (NHs) are well documented. Unrelieved pain in this setting results in poorer resident outcomes, including depression, decreased mobility, sleep disturbance, and impaired physical and social functioning. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of a pain management algorithm coupled with intense diffusion strategies in improving pain, physical function and depression among NH residents. Specific aims of the study are to: 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of a pain management algorithm (ALG) coupled with intense diffusion strategies, as compared with pain education (EDU) and weak diffusion strategies, in improving pain, mobility, and depression among NH residents; 2) Determine the extent to which adherence to the ALG and organizational factors are associated with changes in resident outcomes and the extent to which changes in these variables are associated with changes in outcomes; 3) Evaluate the persistence of changes in process and outcome variables at long-term follow-up and 4) Evaluate the relationships among behavioral problems and pain in severely cognitively impaired residents who are unable to provide self-report.
Detailed description
Inadequate pain management in nursing homes (NHs) is well documented. Unrelieved pain in this setting results in depression, decreased mobility, sleep disturbance, and impaired physical and social functioning. This randomized controlled trial will evaluate the efficacy of a pain management algorithm delivered using intense diffusion strategies. Outcomes are facility pain practices and residents' pain, physical function and depression. Specific aims of the study are to: 1) Evaluate the effectiveness of a pain management algorithm (ALG) coupled with intense diffusion strategies, as compared with pain education (EDU) and weak diffusion strategies, in improving pain, mobility, and depression among NH residents; 2) Determine the extent to which adherence to the ALG and organizational factors are associated with changes in resident outcomes and the extent to which changes in these variables are associated with changes in outcomes; 3) Evaluate the persistence of changes in process and outcome variables at long-term follow-up and 4) Evaluate the relationships among behavioral problems and pain in severely cognitively impaired residents who are unable to provide self-report.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Algorithm | Experimental | Behavioral: AlgorithmThe NH pain management algorithm is a series of decision-making tools that begins with regular, comprehensive pain assessment matched to residents' cognitive status and proceed through analgesic therapy appropriate to the character, severity, and pattern of pain. The algorithm is coupled with intense diffusion strategies (e.g., education, consultation, boosters) to increase adoption of these evidence-based practices |
| Control | Active comparator | Behavioral: AlgorithmControl sites received staff education for pain assessment and management comprised of four one-hour classes |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 65 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- long-term nursing home residents,
- 65 years and older,
- with moderate or greater pain in the week prior to screening,
- residing in a participating facility,
- who consent to participate (or whose surrogate decisionmaker consents to participation)
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- short-term stay patients,
- persons less than 65 years,
- residents on hospice
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AlgorithmThe NH pain management algorithm is a series of decision-making tools that begin with regular, comprehensive pain assessment matched to residents' cognitive status and proceed through analgesic therapy appropriate to the character, severity, and pattern of pain. | Behavioural | Algorithm, Control |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in Pain at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Brief Pain Inventory (self-reporting participants) Nursing Assistant Surrogate Report
Change from Baseline in Pain at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months post intervention
Brief Pain Inventory (self-reporting participants) Nursing Assistant Surrogate Report
7 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in Mobility at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Agitation at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months
Change from Baseline Adherence to Best Practices at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Depression at 3 months
Time frame: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Depression at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months post intervention
Change from Baseline in Mobility at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Change from Baseline in Adherence to Best Practices at 6 months
Time frame: 6 months post-intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2011.
- Background: PubMed 21346465Jablonski AM, DuPen AR, Ersek M. The use of algorithms in assessing and managing persistent pain in older adults. Am J Nurs. 2011 Mar;111(3):34-43; quiz 44-5. doi: 10.1097/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000395239.60981.2f.
- Background: PubMed 21094018Ersek M, Polissar N, Neradilek MB. Development of a composite pain measure for persons with advanced dementia: exploratory analyses in self-reporting nursing home residents. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Mar;41(3):566-79. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 20088854Ersek M, Herr K, Neradilek MB, Buck HG, Black B. Comparing the psychometric properties of the Checklist of Nonverbal Pain Behaviors (CNPI) and the Pain Assessment in Advanced Dementia (PAIN-AD) instruments. Pain Med. 2010 Mar;11(3):395-404. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2009.00787.x. Epub 2010 Jan 15.
- Results publication: PubMed 19650621Jablonski A, Ersek M. Nursing home staff adherence to evidence-based pain management practices. J Gerontol Nurs. 2009 Jul;35(7):28-34; quiz 36-7. doi: 10.3928/00989134-20090428-03.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26897592Ersek M, Neradilek MB, Herr K, Jablonski A, Polissar N, Du Pen A. Pain Management Algorithms for Implementing Best Practices in Nursing Homes: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Apr 1;17(4):348-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22879574Ersek M, Polissar N, Pen AD, Jablonski A, Herr K, Neradilek MB. Addressing methodological challenges in implementing the nursing home pain management algorithm randomized controlled trial. Clin Trials. 2012 Oct;9(5):634-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774512454243. Epub 2012 Aug 9.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Investigating the Analgesic Potential of (2R,6R)-HNK in Acute Pain in Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Volunteers
Recruiting
US Guided EOI Block Versus ESPB for Postoperative Analgesia in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Intraligamentary vs Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Pulpitis: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP), Dental Pain
Active, not recruitingObservational study
The Effect of Single Lung Ventilation Duration and Intraoperative Brain Oxygenation on Cognitive Function and Postoperative Pain in Geriatric Patients
Thoracic Anesthesia, Geriatric Anesthesia
Recruiting
Tramadol Versus Morphine for Postoperative Pain Relief Following Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery
Multimodal Analgesia, Tramadol
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mary Ersek, PhD principal investigator
University of Pennsylvania
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Algorithm in people with Pain, run by Swedish Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in Pain at 3 months (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01399567, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2011.