AzTrials
AzTrials

AsthmaNCT01400217

Qvar Versus Clenil, a General Practice Research Database Study

An observational study of Asthma, run by Research in Real-Life Ltd at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of asthma management in patients on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance therapy as either extra-fine-particle or larger-particle formulation beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) via metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) using the propellant hydrofluoroalkane… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Asthma
What is being tested?
extra fine particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler and standard particle particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
How many people
56,985 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Jan 1991to Oct 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: All patients are aged between 4-80 years and have evidence of asthma and subsequent therapy.

Who may be able to join

  • Aged: 4-80 years
  • Paediatric cohort (aged 4-11 years), and
  • Adult cohort (aged 12-80 years )
  • Evidence of asthma and current asthma therapy:
  • All cohorts (IPDI, IPDS, IPDA):
  • a diagnostic code for asthma, and / or *≥2 prescriptions for asthma at different points in time during the prior year and/or IPDI only: ≥2 prescriptions for asthma therapies during the outcome year, including ≥1 ICS prescription in addition to that received at IPD
Show all 12Show fewer
  • IPDA and IPDS only:
  • 1 ICS prescription in the baseline year, and
  • 1 other asthma prescription during the baseline year.
  • Evidence of "current therapy":
  • 2 prescription for ICS during the outcome year (i.e. ≥1 prescription in addition to the prescription at index date
  • Have at least one year of up-to-standard (UTS) baseline data (prior to the IPD) and at least one year of UTS outcome data (following the IPD).

Who cannot join

  • Had a COPD read code at any time; and/or
  • Had any chronic respiratory disease, except asthma, at any time; and/or
  • Patients on maintenance oral steroids during baseline year
  • Received a combination inhaler in addition to a separate ICS inhaler in the baseline year; and/or
  • Received ICS therapy during baseline year via DPI (IPDA and IPDS cohorts only).
  • If they received multiple ICS prescriptions on the same day at IPD or immediately before

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Research in Real Life Ltd

    Cawston, Norfolk, NR10 4FE

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: HFA Beclomethasone in Asthma, a General Practice Research Database Study: Real-life Observational Evaluation of Extra-fine With Standard Particle Size Beclometasone Dipropionate Using the Propellant Hydrofluoroalkane 134a for the Management of Asthma in a Representative UK Primary Care Population

This study will compare the absolute and relative effectiveness of asthma management in patients on inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) maintenance therapy as either extra-fine-particle or larger-particle formulation beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) via metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) using the propellant hydrofluoroalkane propellant (HFA-BDP), namely Qvar® MDI compared with Clenil® MDI.

Read the detailed description

Current asthma guidelines in the UK are underpinned by evidence derived from randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Although RCT data are considered the gold standard, patients recruited to asthma RCTs are estimated to represent less than 10% of the UK's asthma population. The poor representation of the asthma population is due to a number of factors, such as tightly-controlled inclusion criteria for RCTs. There is, therefore, a need for more representative RCTs and real-life observational studies to inform existing guidelines and help optimise asthma outcomes.

In response to the Montreal Protocol's ruling to phase out ozone-depleting chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants in asthma inhalers, several hydrofluoroalkane-134a-propellant (HFA-) formulations of BDP have been developed. Two branded generic formulations currently available in the UK are Qvar® (Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd) - an extra-fine-particle (~1.1 microns) HFA-BDP (solution) formulation and Clenil® (Chiesi Limited) - a larger particle (~2.9 microns) HFA-BDP (suspension) formulation.

The extra-fine particle formulation HFA-BDP formulation (Qvar®) has been shown to improve total and small airway deposition relative to CFC-BDP. As a result of the more even distribution through both the large and small airways of the lungs and data from short-term randomised clinical trials (RCTs), Qvar® dosing is recommended at approximately one half the dose of traditional CFC-BDP (average particle size ~3.5 microns). However, the larger-particle Clenil® is recommended for prescribing at the same dose as traditional CFC-BDP.

Further studies are required to understand whether the differences in particle size and airway distribution have an impact on asthma outcomes over the long-term.

This observational study will investigate the real-world effectiveness of extra-fine HFA-BDP (Qvar®) as compared with larger-particle HFA-BDP (Clenil®) in patients with asthma who: were new to ICS therapy; received an increase in their ICS dose, or switched / changed baseline ICS therapy to HFA-BDP with no change in BDP-equivalent ICS dose. We hypothesise that differences in effectiveness might become apparent over the longer term through a retrospective database analysis of one-year outcomes for the diverse patient population seen in primary care.

Conditions
Asthma
Being tested
extra fine particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler, standard particle particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
Keywords
Primary Care, Particle size, beclomethasone dipropionate, Asthma Management, Maintenance Therapy, Metered-Dose Inhaler
Medical subject headings
Asthma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • extra fine particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhalerDrug

    Also called Qvar

    IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug

  • standard particle particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhalerDrug

    Also called Fostair

    IPDI cohort intervention = initiation of intervention drug; IPDS cohort intervention = switching from baseline inhaled corticosteroid therapy to intervention drug without a change in baseline inhaled corticosteroid dose; IPDA cohort intervention = increase in baseline inhaled corticosteroid drug as intervention drug

Study groups in NCT01400217
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IPDI EF HFA-BDPPatients initiating inhaled corticosteroid therapy as extra-fine HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
Receives: Drug: extra fine particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
IPDI SP HFA-BDPPatients initiating inhaled corticosteroid therapy as standard particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
Receives: Drug: standard particle particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
IPDA SP HFA-BDPPatients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as standard particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
Receives: Drug: standard particle particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
IPDA EF HFA-BDPPatients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as extra fine particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
Receives: Drug: extra fine particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
IPDS SP HFA-BDPPatients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as standard particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
Receives: Drug: standard particle particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler
IPDS EF HFA-BDPPatients increased inhaled corticosteroid therapy as extrafine particle HFA-BDP MDI at the index date
Receives: Drug: extra fine particle hydrofluoroalkane beclomethasone dipropionate via metered dose inhaler

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Severe asthma exacerbation (ATS/ERS based defn)

    Exacerbation defined as:

    (i) Respiratory-related:

    1. Hospital attendance / admissions OR
    2. A\&E attendance OR (ii) Use of acute oral steroids**

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Primary composite asthma control

    Where control is defined as absence of:

    (i) Respiratory-related:

    1. Hospital attendance or admission
    2. A\&E attendance, OR
    3. Out of hours attendance, OR
    4. Out-patient department attendance (ii) GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (iii) Prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids

    Measured: 1 year

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Exacerbation definition based on clinical experience

    Defined as:

    (i) Respiratory-related:

    1. Hospital attendance / admissions OR
    2. A\&E attendance OR
    3. Out of hours consultation OR
    4. GP consultation OR (ii) Use of acute oral steroids

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Asthma control + SABA usage

    Where control requires the absence of:

    (i) Respiratory-related:

    1. Hospital attendance or admission
    2. A\&E attendance, OR
    3. Out of hours consultation, OR
    4. Out-patient department attendance (ii) GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (iii) Prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids (iv) Average daily prescribed dose of ≤200mcg salubtamol / ≤500mcg terbutaline

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Treatment success

    (i) Control

    1. No respiratory-related: i. Hospital attendance or admission ii. A\&E attendance, OR iii. Out of hours consultation, OR iv. Out-patient department attendance b. No GP consultations for lower respiratory tract infection (ii) No prescriptions for acute courses of oral steroids (iii) No additional or change in therapy
    2. Increased dose of ICS (≥50% increase), and/or
    3. Change in ICS and/or
    4. Change in delivery device, and/or
    5. Use of additional therapy as defined by: LABA, theophylline, leukotreine receptor antagonists (LTRAs).

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Asthma-related hospitalisations

    Defined as sum of:

    (i) Definite: Hospitalisations coded with an asthma read code (ii) Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of an asthma read code

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Respiratory hospitalisations

    Defined as the sum of:

    (i) Definite: Hospitalisations coded with a lower respiratory code (ii) Definite + Probable: Hospitalisations with an asthma read code + uncoded hospitalisations occurring within a 7-day window (either side of the hospitalisation date) of a lower respiratory read code

    Measured: 1 year

  6. SABA usage

    Average daily dosage during outcome year - outcome SABA usage will be categorised within ranges used to match baseline SABA use to optimise matching of the treatment arms.

    Measured: 1 year

  7. ICS compliance

    Based on prescription refills

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Oral Thrush

    Defined as:

    (i) Topical oral anti-fungal prescriptions, and / or (ii) Coded for oral candidiasis

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jul 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 1991
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
56,985 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01400217
Sponsor's protocol ID
007/11
Status last verified
Oct 2012
First submitted
20 Jul 2011
Last updated
30 Oct 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Herland K, Akselsen JP, Skjonsberg OH, Bjermer L. How representative are clinical study patients with asthma or COPD for a larger "real life" population of patients with obstructive lung disease? Respir Med. 2005 Jan;99(1):11-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.03.026.

    PubMed 15672843
  • Travers J, Marsh S, Caldwell B, Williams M, Aldington S, Weatherall M, Shirtcliffe P, Beasley R. External validity of randomized controlled trials in COPD. Respir Med. 2007 Jun;101(6):1313-20. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2006.10.011. Epub 2006 Nov 17.

    PubMed 17113277
  • Appleton SL, Adams RJ, Wilson DH, Taylor AW, Ruffin RE; North West Adelaide Cohort Health Study Team. Spirometric criteria for asthma: adding further evidence to the debate. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov;116(5):976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.034.

    PubMed 16275363
  • Vanden Burgt JA, Busse WW, Martin RJ, Szefler SJ, Donnell D. Efficacy and safety overview of a new inhaled corticosteroid, QVAR (hydrofluoroalkane-beclomethasone extrafine inhalation aerosol), in asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2000 Dec;106(6):1209-26. doi: 10.1067/mai.2000.111582.

    PubMed 11112914
  • Leach CL, Davidson PJ, Hasselquist BE, Boudreau RJ. Influence of particle size and patient dosing technique on lung deposition of HFA-beclomethasone from a metered dose inhaler. J Aerosol Med. 2005 Winter;18(4):379-85. doi: 10.1089/jam.2005.18.379.

    PubMed 16379614
  • Leach CL, Davidson PJ, Boudreau RJ. Improved airway targeting with the CFC-free HFA-beclomethasone metered-dose inhaler compared with CFC-beclomethasone. Eur Respir J. 1998 Dec;12(6):1346-53. doi: 10.1183/09031936.98.12061346.

    PubMed 9877489
  • Busse WW, Brazinsky S, Jacobson K, Stricker W, Schmitt K, Vanden Burgt J, Donnell D, Hannon S, Colice GL. Efficacy response of inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate in asthma is proportional to dose and is improved by formulation with a new propellant. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1999 Dec;104(6):1215-22. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(99)70016-3.

    PubMed 10589004
  • Davies RJ, Stampone P, O'Connor BJ. Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate extrafine aerosol provides equivalent asthma control to chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate at approximately half the total daily dose. Respir Med. 1998 Jun;92 Suppl A:23-31. doi: 10.1016/s0954-6111(98)90214-1.

    PubMed 9850360
  • Gross G, Thompson PJ, Chervinsky P, Vanden Burgt J. Hydrofluoroalkane-134a beclomethasone dipropionate, 400 microg, is as effective as chlorofluorocarbon beclomethasone dipropionate, 800 microg, for the treatment of moderate asthma. Chest. 1999 Feb;115(2):343-51. doi: 10.1378/chest.115.2.343.

    PubMed 10027430
  • IBM SPSS Statistics. 2010. Statistics family. Available online at: www.spss.com/uk/software/statistics/

  • AS Institute Inc. 2010. Statistical Analysis with SAS/STAT Software. Available online at: www.SAS.com/offices/europe/uk/technologies/analytics/statistics/stat/ondex.html

  • Price D, Thomas M, Haughney J, Lewis RA, Burden A, von Ziegenweidt J, Chisholm A, Hillyer EV, Corrigan CJ. Real-life comparison of beclometasone dipropionate as an extrafine- or larger-particle formulation for asthma. Respir Med. 2013 Jul;107(7):987-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 May 3.

    PubMed 23643486

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Asthma, run by Research in Real-Life Ltd at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Severe asthma exacerbation (ATS/ERS based defn) (time frame: 1 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01400217, which also lists 12 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Oct 2012; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in