HIV-1 InfectionPhase 2NCT01400412
Bone, Immunologic, and Virologic Effects of a Antiretroviral Regimen
A Phase 2 study testing Darunavir, Ritonavir and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in people with HIV-1 Infection, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 38 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this study was to compare the effects on bones of the following two drug combinations: maraviroc (MVC), emtricitabine (FTC), plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) tenofovir (TDF) plus emtricitabine (FTC) plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) Additional study objectives were the following: To see how the drug… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV-1 Infection
- What is being tested?
- Darunavir, Ritonavir and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 262 participants
- Where
- 38 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- 17 Jan 2012to 30 Jun 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- HIV-1 infection
- No evidence of exclusionary resistance mutations defined as evidence of any major NRTI mutation according to the current IAS list of HIV-1 Resistance Mutations Associated with Drug Resistance, or any DRV RAMs (refer to the A5303 PSWP for a list of these mutations) on any genotype; or evidence of significant NRTI or DRV resistance on any phenotype performed at any time prior to study entry. NNRTI-associated resistance mutations were not exclusionary.
- ARV drug-naïve, defined as </=10 days of ART at any time prior to study entry, except in the instances defined in section 4.1.3 of the protocol.
- R5-only tropism based on Trofile testing performed within 90 days prior to study entry.
- Screening HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/mL obtained within 90 days prior to study entry by any FDA-approved test for quantifying HIV-1 RNA at any laboratory that has a CLIA certification or its equivalent.
- Known hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody status (performed at any laboratory that had a CLIA certification or its equivalent).
Show all 13Show fewer
- Certain laboratory values obtained within 60 days prior to study entry, as defined in section 4.1.7 of the protocol.
- For women of reproductive potential, negative serum or urine pregnancy test with a sensitivity of ≤25 mIU/mL within 72 hours prior to study entry.
- Female subjects of reproductive potential, who were participating in sexual activity that could lead to pregnancy, must agree to use at least one reliable method of contraception (as defined in section 4.1.9.1 of the protocol) while receiving the study drugs and for 6 weeks after stopping the medications.
- Female subjects who were not of reproductive potential or whose male partner(s) had azoospermia were eligible to take study drugs without the use of contraceptives.
- Ability and willingness of subject or legal guardian/representative to give written informed consent.
- Willingness to undergo neuropsychological testing.
- DXA scan performed after confirmation of the subject's eligibility by Trofile testing but no more than 4 weeks prior to randomization.
Who cannot join
- Use of immunomodulators (e.g., interleukins, interferons, cyclosporine), HIV vaccine, systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, or investigational therapy within 30 days prior to study entry.
- New use of hormonal therapies within 6 months prior to study entry. (Stable therapy for ≥6 months was permitted.)
- New use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in the past 3 months. (Stable therapy for ≥3 months was permitted.)
- Any oral, intravenous, or inhaled steroids within 30 days prior to study entry. (Intranasal steroids and topical corticosteroids were allowed.)
- Known allergy/sensitivity to study drugs or their formulations. (A history of sulfa allergy was not an exclusionary condition.)
- Known hypersensitivity to soy lecithin.
Show all 17Show fewer
- Serious illness requiring systemic treatment and/or hospitalization until subject either completes therapy or was clinically stable on therapy, in the opinion of the site investigator, for at least 7 days prior to study entry. (Oral candidiasis, vaginal candidiasis, mucocutaneous herpes simplex, and other minor illnesses (as judged by the site investigator) were not exclusionary conditions.)
- Requirement for any current medications that were prohibited with any study drugs. (Prohibited medications must be discontinued at least 30 days prior to entry. Refer to the A5303 PSWP for a list of prohibited medications.)
- The presence of decompensated cirrhosis.
- A history of or current, active HBV infection defined as positive hepatitis B surface antigen test (or positive HBV DNA in subjects with isolated HBcAb positivity, defined as negative HBsAg, negative HBsAb, and positive HBcAb) at screening.
- Current or prior use of biphosphonates, teriparatide, raloxifene, or denosumab.
- Weight >300 lbs (exceeds weight limit of DXA scanners).
- History after 18 years of age of fracture of the spine, hip, wrist, or other site thought to be related to osteoporosis or bone fragility.
- Currently breastfeeding.
- Any active psychiatric illness including schizophrenia, severe depression, or severe bipolar affective disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, could confound the analysis of the neurological examination or neuropsychological test results.
- Active drug or alcohol abuse that, in the investigator's opinion, could prevent compliance with study procedures or confound the analysis of study endpoints.
- Active brain infection (except for HIV-1), fungal meningitis, toxoplasmosis, central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma, brain neoplasm, or space-occupying brain lesion requiring acute or chronic therapy.
Trial locations and contacts
38 sites in 2 countries.
38 sites in 2 countries
United States37 sites
The Ponce de Leon Center CRS (5802)
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
University of Colorado Hospital CRS (6101)
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
IHV Baltimore Treatment CRS (4651)
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
201 Johns Hopkins University CRS
Baltimore, Maryland, 21205
31788 Alabama CRS
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Massachusetts General Hospital ACTG CRS (101)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Women's Hosp. ACTG CRS (107)
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Cooper Univ. Hosp. CRS (31476)
Camden, New Jersey, 08103
Unc Aids Crs (3201)
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27516
Northwestern University CRS (2701)
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Rush Univ. Med. Ctr. ACTG CRS (2702)
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Univ. of Cincinnati CRS (2401)
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45267
Case CRS (2501)
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106
Metro Health CRS (2503)
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109
The Ohio State Univ. AIDS CRS (2301)
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Peabody Health Center CRS (31443)
Dallas, Texas, 75215
University of Colorado Denver ATN CRS (33022)
Denver, Colorado, 80262
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital CRS (3203)
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
Houston AIDS Research Team CRS (31473)
Houston, Texas, 77030
Texas Childrens Hospital ATN CRS (33018)
Houston, Texas, 77030
University of Southern California (1201)
Los Angeles, California, 90033-1079
UCLA CARE Center CRS (601)
Los Angeles, California, 90095
St. Jude Children's Research Hosp. ATN CRS (33016)
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105
Univ. of Miami AIDS CRS (901)
Miami, Florida, 33136
Vanderbilt Therapeutics CRS (3652)
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232
Columbia Physicians and Surgeons CRS (30329)
New York, New York, 10032
Hops. of Univ. of Pennsylvania CRS (6201)
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
The Miriam Hospital ACTG CRS (2951)
Providence, Rhode Island, 02906
Trillium Health ACTG CRS (1108)
Rochester, New York, 14642
University of Rochester Adult HIV Therapeutic Strategies Network CRS (31787)
Rochester, New York, 14642
Ucsd, Avrc Crs (701)
San Diego, California, 92103
Ucsf Aids Crs (801)
San Francisco, California, 94110
University of Washington AIDS CRS (1401)
Seattle, Washington, 98104
Washington U CRS (2101)
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Univ. of South Florida (USF) College of Medicine ATN CRS (33001)
Tampa, Florida, 33606
Georgetown University CRS (GU CRS) (1008)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Children's National Med. Ctr. ATN CRS (33003)
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010
About this study
Official title: A Phase 2b, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Exploratory Randomized Trial to Determine the Bone, Immunologic, Virologic, and Neurocognitive Effects of a Novel Maraviroc-Containing Antiretroviral Regimen in Treatment-Naïve Patients Infected With R5-Tropic HIV-1
The main purpose of this study was to compare the effects on bones of the following two drug combinations:
- maraviroc (MVC), emtricitabine (FTC), plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)
- tenofovir (TDF) plus emtricitabine (FTC) plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)
Additional study objectives were the following:
- To see how the drug combinations affect the brain and kidneys.
- To see how well the drug combinations lower the HIV viral load.
- To see how safe the drug combinations are, how well people are able to take the study drug combinations, and how well their immune systems respond to the study drugs.
Read the detailed description
There are now several HIV treatment options for a person with HIV infection who has not yet been treated. Most people who receive treatment and take their medications as directed have a good result. This is usually determined by measuring the amount of HIV in the blood (viral load). The best response is when HIV cannot be found (less than 50 copies/mL) in the blood. However, it has recently become clear that some people with HIV who are receiving effective HIV drugs continue to have more health problems than people without HIV infection. Sometimes, there is damage to organs in the body, including bone, kidneys, and the brain.
- Conditions
- HIV-1 Infection
- Being tested
- Darunavir, Ritonavir, Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, Emtricitabine, Placebo for Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DarunavirDrug
Also called Prezista, TMC-114, DRV
Darunavir was administered orally once a day as two 400 mg tablets with food. When the 800 mg formulation tablet became available, it was substituted for the two 400 mg tablet.
RitonavirDrug
Also called Norvir, RTV
Ritonavir was administered orally together with darunavir as one 100 mg tablet once daily with food.
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarateDrug
Also called Viread, TDF
Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was administered orally as one 300 mg tablet once a day.
EmtricitabineDrug
Also called Emtriva, FTC, Coviracil
Emtricitabine was administered orally once a day as one 200 mg capsule.
Placebo for Tenofovir disoproxil fumarateDrug
Placebo for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was administered orally once a day as one tablet.
Placebo for MaravirocDrug
Placebo for maraviroc was administered orally once a day as one tablet.
MaravirocDrug
Also called Celesentri, Selzentry
Maraviroc was administered orally once a day as one 150 mg tablet.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| MVC Arm: DRV/r + MVC + FTC + TDF placebo | Experimental | Darunavir 800 mg PO QD + Ritonavir 100 mg PO QD + Maraviroc 150 mg PO QD + Emtricitabine 200 mg PO QD + Placebo for Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate PO QD Receives: Drug: Darunavir; Drug: Ritonavir; Drug: Emtricitabine; Drug: Placebo for Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; Drug: Maraviroc |
| TDF Arm: DRV/r + TDF + FTC + MVC placebo | Experimental | Darunavir 800 mg PO QD + Ritonavir 100 mg PO QD + Emtricitabine 200 mg PO QD + Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg PO QD + Placebo for Maraviroc PO QD Receives: Drug: Darunavir; Drug: Ritonavir; Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate; Drug: Emtricitabine; Drug: Placebo for Maraviroc |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
The primary endpoint is the percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at total hip (as measured by DXA scan) from baseline (week 0) to week 48.
Measured: Week 0, week 48
Secondary outcomes (19)
Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
The percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at lumbar spine (as measured by DXA scan) from baseline (week 0) to week 48.
Measured: Week 0, week 48
Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 24
Change in CD4 count from baseline (week 0) to week 24
Measured: Week 0, week 24
Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 48
Change in CD4 count from baseline (week 0) to week 48
Measured: Week 0, week 48
CD8+ T-cell Change From Baseline to Week 48
CD8+ T-cell change from baseline to week 48
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Percentage Change in Expression of CD38+/HLA-DR+ on CD4+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
percentage change is define as [ (week 48 - week 0) / week 0 ] * 100%
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Percentage Change in Expression of CD38+/HLA-DR+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
percentage change is defined as [ (week 48 - week 0) / week 0 ] * 100%
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of CD28+/CD57+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
percentage change is define as [ (week 48 - week 0) / week 0 ] * 100%
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of CD57+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
percentage change is define as [ (week 48 - week 0) / week 0 ] * 100%
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of CD28+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
percentage change is define as [ (week 48 - week 0) / week 0 ] * 100%
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of RANKL+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
percentage change is defined as [ (week 48 - week 0) / week 0 ] * 100%
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of IL-6 From Baseline to Week 48
Change in levels of Interleukin 6 (IL-6) from baseline to week 48
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Level of IP-10 From Baseline to Week 48
Change in level of Interferon gamma-induced protein 10 (IP-10) from baseline to week 48
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of sCD163 From Baseline to Week 48
Change in levels of soluble CD163 from baseline to week 48
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of sCD14 From Baseline
Change in levels of soluble CD14 from baseline
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of D-dimer From Baseline
Change in levels of D-dimer from baseline
Measured: At weeks 0 and 48
Cumulative Probability of Virologic Failure by Week 48
Confirmed virologic failure is defined as confirmed plasma HIV-1 RNA levels > 1000 copies/mL at or after week 16 and before week 24, or confirmed HIV-1 RNA levels> 200 copies/mL at or after week 24. Participants who discontinued the study with an unconfirmed virologic failure (HIV-1 RNA > 1000 copies at 16 weeks or HIV-1 RNA level > 200 copies/mL at or after week 24) are considered as virologic failures at the study visit week of the unconfirmed value. Time to virologic failure is defined as the time from study entry to the planned visit week of the initial failure.
Product-limit estimates for the survival function were used to estimate the cumulative probability of virologic failure over time and its corresponding 95% confidence interval for each treatment group.
Measured: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Number of Participants Who Experienced Bone Fractures
Number of participants who experienced bone fractures during the study
Measured: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Number of Participants Who Died During the Study
Number of participants who died during the study
Measured: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Number of Participants Who Developed Grade 3 or 4 Primary Adverse Events
Grade 3 or 4 primary adverse events includes primary signs/symptoms, primary laboratory abnormalities, or primary diagnoses.
See DAIDS AE Grading Table Version 1.0, Dec 2004 (Clarification, Aug 2009)
Measured: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study start17 Jan 2012
- Primary completion30 Jun 2014
- Study completion30 Jun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIV-1 InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 262 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections
- Sponsor type
- Research network
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Babafemi Taiwo, MBBS, MD, Study chair, Northwestern University CRS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01400412
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ACTG A5303
- Other IDs
- 1U01AI068636
- Status last verified
- Oct 2024
- First submitted
- 21 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 15 Oct 2024
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Taiwo BO, Chan ES, Fichtenbaum CJ, Ribaudo H, Tsibris A, Klingman KL, Eron JJ, Berzins B, Robertson K, Landay A, Ofotokun I, Brown T; AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5303 Study Team. Less Bone Loss With Maraviroc- Versus Tenofovir-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5303 Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;61(7):1179-88. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ455. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
PubMed 26060295
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Oct 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 2b, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Exploratory Randomized Trial to Determine the Bone, Immunologic, Virologic, and Neurocognitive Effects of a Novel Maraviroc-Containing Antiretroviral Regimen in Treatment-Naïve Patients Infected With R5-Tropic HIV-1
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01400412
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ACTG A5303
- Conditions
- HIV-1 Infection
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 262 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other InfectionsResearch network
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)
- Study start
- 17 Jan 2012 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 15 Jul 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this study was to compare the effects on bones of the following two drug combinations:
- maraviroc (MVC), emtricitabine (FTC), plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)
- tenofovir (TDF) plus emtricitabine (FTC) plus darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r)
Additional study objectives were the following:
- To see how the drug combinations affect the brain and kidneys.
- To see how well the drug combinations lower the HIV viral load.
- To see how safe the drug combinations are, how well people are able to take the study drug combinations, and how well their immune systems respond to the study drugs.
Detailed description
There are now several HIV treatment options for a person with HIV infection who has not yet been treated. Most people who receive treatment and take their medications as directed have a good result. This is usually determined by measuring the amount of HIV in the blood (viral load). The best response is when HIV cannot be found (less than 50 copies/mL) in the blood. However, it has recently become clear that some people with HIV who are receiving effective HIV drugs continue to have more health problems than people without HIV infection. Sometimes, there is damage to organs in the body, including bone, kidneys, and the brain.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| MVC Arm: DRV/r + MVC + FTC + TDF placebo | Experimental | Drug: Darunavir, Drug: Ritonavir, Drug: Emtricitabine, Drug: Placebo for Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, Drug: MaravirocDarunavir 800 mg PO QD + Ritonavir 100 mg PO QD + Maraviroc 150 mg PO QD + Emtricitabine 200 mg PO QD + Placebo for Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate PO QD |
| TDF Arm: DRV/r + TDF + FTC + MVC placebo | Experimental | Drug: Darunavir, Drug: Ritonavir, Drug: Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, Drug: Emtricitabine, Drug: Placebo for MaravirocDarunavir 800 mg PO QD + Ritonavir 100 mg PO QD + Emtricitabine 200 mg PO QD + Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg PO QD + Placebo for Maraviroc PO QD |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (13 listed)
- HIV-1 infection
- No evidence of exclusionary resistance mutations defined as evidence of any major NRTI mutation according to the current IAS list of HIV-1 Resistance Mutations Associated with Drug Resistance, or any DRV RAMs (refer to the A5303 PSWP for a list of these mutations) on any genotype; or evidence of significant NRTI or DRV resistance on any phenotype performed at any time prior to study entry. NNRTI-associated resistance mutations were not exclusionary.
- ARV drug-naïve, defined as </=10 days of ART at any time prior to study entry, except in the instances defined in section 4.1.3 of the protocol.
- R5-only tropism based on Trofile testing performed within 90 days prior to study entry.
- Screening HIV-1 RNA >1000 copies/mL obtained within 90 days prior to study entry by any FDA-approved test for quantifying HIV-1 RNA at any laboratory that has a CLIA certification or its equivalent.
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Use of immunomodulators (e.g., interleukins, interferons, cyclosporine), HIV vaccine, systemic cytotoxic chemotherapy, or investigational therapy within 30 days prior to study entry.
- New use of hormonal therapies within 6 months prior to study entry. (Stable therapy for ≥6 months was permitted.)
- New use of oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) in the past 3 months. (Stable therapy for ≥3 months was permitted.)
- Any oral, intravenous, or inhaled steroids within 30 days prior to study entry. (Intranasal steroids and topical corticosteroids were allowed.)
- Known allergy/sensitivity to study drugs or their formulations. (A history of sulfa allergy was not an exclusionary condition.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DarunavirAlso: Prezista, TMC-114, DRVDarunavir was administered orally once a day as two 400 mg tablets with food. When the 800 mg formulation tablet became available, it was substituted for the two 400 mg tablet. | Drug | MVC Arm: DRV/r + MVC + FTC + TDF placebo, TDF Arm: DRV/r + TDF + FTC + MVC placebo |
| RitonavirAlso: Norvir, RTVRitonavir was administered orally together with darunavir as one 100 mg tablet once daily with food. | Drug | MVC Arm: DRV/r + MVC + FTC + TDF placebo, TDF Arm: DRV/r + TDF + FTC + MVC placebo |
| Tenofovir disoproxil fumarateAlso: Viread, TDFTenofovir disoproxil fumarate was administered orally as one 300 mg tablet once a day. | Drug | TDF Arm: DRV/r + TDF + FTC + MVC placebo |
| EmtricitabineAlso: Emtriva, FTC, CoviracilEmtricitabine was administered orally once a day as one 200 mg capsule. | Drug | MVC Arm: DRV/r + MVC + FTC + TDF placebo, TDF Arm: DRV/r + TDF + FTC + MVC placebo |
| Placebo for Tenofovir disoproxil fumaratePlacebo for tenofovir disoproxil fumarate was administered orally once a day as one tablet. | Drug | MVC Arm: DRV/r + MVC + FTC + TDF placebo |
| Placebo for MaravirocPlacebo for maraviroc was administered orally once a day as one tablet. | Drug | TDF Arm: DRV/r + TDF + FTC + MVC placebo |
| MaravirocAlso: Celesentri, SelzentryMaraviroc was administered orally once a day as one 150 mg tablet. | Drug | MVC Arm: DRV/r + MVC + FTC + TDF placebo |
Primary outcome
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time frame: Week 0, week 48
The primary endpoint is the percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at total hip (as measured by DXA scan) from baseline (week 0) to week 48.
19 secondary outcomes
Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
Time frame: Week 0, week 48
Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Week 0, week 24
Change in CD4 Count From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: Week 0, week 48
CD8+ T-cell Change From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Percentage Change in Expression of CD38+/HLA-DR+ on CD4+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Percentage Change in Expression of CD38+/HLA-DR+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of CD28+/CD57+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of CD57+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of CD28+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Percent Change in Expression of RANKL+ on CD8+ T Cells From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of IL-6 From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Level of IP-10 From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of sCD163 From Baseline to Week 48
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of sCD14 From Baseline
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Change in Levels of D-dimer From Baseline
Time frame: At weeks 0 and 48
Cumulative Probability of Virologic Failure by Week 48
Time frame: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Number of Participants Who Experienced Bone Fractures
Time frame: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Number of Participants Who Died During the Study
Time frame: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Number of Participants Who Developed Grade 3 or 4 Primary Adverse Events
Time frame: From study treatment initiation to week 48
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Oct 2024.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26060295Taiwo BO, Chan ES, Fichtenbaum CJ, Ribaudo H, Tsibris A, Klingman KL, Eron JJ, Berzins B, Robertson K, Landay A, Ofotokun I, Brown T; AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5303 Study Team. Less Bone Loss With Maraviroc- Versus Tenofovir-Containing Antiretroviral Therapy in the AIDS Clinical Trials Group A5303 Study. Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Oct 1;61(7):1179-88. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ455. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
Related trials for HIV-1 Infection
RecruitingObservational study
Cohort of Women Living With HIV-1 and Receiving Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide
HIV (Human Immunodeficiency Virus), Pregnancy
RecruitingPhase 4
A Study to Provide Continued Access to Study Drug to Children and Adolescents Who Have Completed Clinical Studies Involving Gilead HIV Treatments
HIV-1-infection
RecruitingObservational study
Leukapheresis Procedures to Obtain Plasma and Lymphocytes for Research Studies on Antiretroviral Naive HIV-1 Research Participants
HIV
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
Study to Compare Bictegravir/Lenacapavir Versus Current Therapy in People With HIV-1 Who Are Successfully Treated With Biktarvy
HIV-1-infection
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Study to Compare Bictegravir/Lenacapavir Versus Current Therapy in People With HIV-1 Who Are Successfully Treated With a Complicated Regimen (ARTISTRY-1)
HIV-1-infection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Babafemi Taiwo, MBBS, MD study chair
Northwestern University CRS
38 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Darunavir, Ritonavir and Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in people with HIV-1 Infection, run by Advancing Clinical Therapeutics Globally for HIV/AIDS and Other Infections at 38 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 13 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Oct 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 38 sites in United States, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jul 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) (time frame: Week 0, week 48). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01400412, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Oct 2024.