AzTrials
AzTrials

3 or More Rib FracturesNCT01401712

Optimal Method of Pain Management in Patients With Multiple Rib Fractures

A study testing ON-Q® Pain Relief System and Thoracic epidural catheter in people with 3 or More Rib Fractures, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rib fractures are a common injury of trauma patients and can cause significant pain which, if inadequately treated, can lead to impaired breathing, lung collapse, and respiratory failure. Hence, it is crucial to manage pain associated with rib fractures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
3 or More Rib Fractures
What is being tested?
ON-Q® Pain Relief System and Thoracic epidural catheter
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
96 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2012to Oct 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Three or more rib fractures;
  • Pain
  • Severe pain (i.e. causing deleterious affect on respiratory mechanics, respiratory rate, or oxygen saturations), OR
  • Mild to moderate pain (i.e. minimally affecting respiratory mechanics, respiratory rate, or oxygen saturations) that does not respond to oral or intravenous analgesics within 4 hours;
  • Patient has capacity to provide informed consent, as determined by:
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Clinical assessment by study staff MD who will explain the study to potential subjects and then ask them to summarize the purpose, procedures, risks and alternatives back to the MD;
  • GCS 15;
  • Clinical assessment by independent MD who will explain the study to potential subjects and then ask them to summarize the purpose, procedures, risks and alternatives back to the MD.

Who cannot join

  • Lack capacity to provide informed consent;
  • Intubation at time of enrollment;
  • Contraindications to procedure (e.g. known allergy to local anesthetics).
  • Presence of infection at site of catheter placement;
  • Current use of anticoagulant medication;
  • Known allergy to silver;
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Inability to obtain informed consent;
  • Body weight > 300 lbs;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Significant co-morbid medical illness that might alter the metabolism of the anesthetic agents and result in unexpected toxicity (hepatic, renal or cardiopulmonary disease).
  • All women of child-bearing age will receive a urine pregnancy test prior to the start of the interventional portion of the study. A positive test result excludes the patient from inclusion in the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Katharine M Koury, BA contact

617-643-7095

kkoury@partners.org

Leily Naraghi, MD contact

617-480-1668

lnaraghi@partners.org

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114

    Katharine M Koury, BA, 617-643-7095, kkoury@partners.org

    George C Velmahos, MD, PhD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Compared to Thoracic Paravertebral Pump Infusion for Pain Management in Patients With Three or More Rib Fractures

Rib fractures are a common injury of trauma patients and can cause significant pain which, if inadequately treated, can lead to impaired breathing, lung collapse, and respiratory failure. Hence, it is crucial to manage pain associated with rib fractures. Currently, epidurals are used to treat the pain, but placement can be risky as rib fractures are often associated with other injuries and complications.

An alternative pain management option is the ON-Q® Pain Relief System. It is an FDA-approved device that automatically and continuously delivers medication to the region of the thoracic intercostal nerves. One study by Truitt et al (2010)demonstrated that the ON-Q® system effectively reduced pain and increased lung volumes after one hour, in patients with three or more rib fractures. However, that study sample was small and did not have a comparison group. In this study, we will compare two groups: 1) ON-Q system and 2) epidural analgesia. We hypothesize that trauma patients with three or more rib fractures, who receive pain management through the ON-Q® Pain Relief System achieve discharge criteria earlier and thus have a shorter hospital length of stay (LOS) when compared with epidural analgesia.

Being tested
ON-Q® Pain Relief System, Thoracic epidural catheter
Keywords
ON-Q, epidural, analgesia
Medical subject headings
Agnosia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • ON-Q® Pain Relief SystemProcedure or surgery

    Identify insertion site lateral to paraspinous muscles and posteromedial to the rib fractures. Then, incise skin and soft tissue down to the level of the rib. Advance tunneler perpendicular to chest wall until it contacts the rib, then, advance superiorly at 45° angle in the extrathoracic space. Remove tunneler and advance catheter in space created. Attach catheter to pump filled with 0.2% ropivacaine at infusion rate of 2-12ml/hr.

  • Thoracic epidural catheterProcedure or surgery

    Introduce needle into the interspinous space of the vertebral column and advance into the epidural space. Advance the epidural catheter about 3-5 cm into the epidural space and remove the needle.

Study groups in NCT01401712
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Paravertebral catheter (ON-Q® Pain Relief System)ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Procedure: ON-Q® Pain Relief System
Thoracic epidural catheterActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Procedure: Thoracic epidural catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Hospital length of stay/time to achieve discharge criteria

    The study will compare the time to achieve discharge criteria between the two groups. Readiness for discharge is defined by the following criteria:

    1. Visual Analog Score (VAS) for pain below 4 (of a maximum 10);
    2. Ability to perform incentive spirometry with sustained maximal inspiration for three seconds;
    3. Hemodynamic stability (heart rate <100 beats/min, respiratory rate <20 breaths/min, and systolic blood pressure >90mmHg at 3 consecutive time points that are 10 minutes apart) and oxygen saturation greater than 95% on room air;
    4. Absence of neurological deficits; and
    5. Monitored for at least 1 hour after ON Q® catheter placement to ensure no immediate complications from placement or local anesthestic toxicity.

    Measured: Patient will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, 1 week

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Pain score reduction

    Decrease in pain as measured by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pre-placement and 60 min post-placement of intervention. Pain score will be followed for the duration of the intervention.

    Measured: Patient will be followed for duration of hospital stay and through daily phone calls upon discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2012
  3. Primary completionApr 2014 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2014 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
96 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01401712
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011P001678
Status last verified
Oct 2013
First submitted
21 Jul 2011
Last updated
29 Oct 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Truitt MS, Mooty RC, Amos J, Lorenzo M, Mangram A, Dunn E. Out with the old, in with the new: a novel approach to treating pain associated with rib fractures. World J Surg. 2010 Oct;34(10):2359-62. doi: 10.1007/s00268-010-0651-9.

    PubMed 20567973

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing ON-Q® Pain Relief System and Thoracic epidural catheter in people with 3 or More Rib Fractures, run by Massachusetts General Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Katharine M Koury, BA (617-643-7095, kkoury@partners.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Hospital length of stay/time to achieve discharge criteria (time frame: Patient will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, 1 week). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01401712, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2013.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in