AzTrials
AzTrials

Kidney TumorsNCT01401777

Electromagnetic Tracking of Devices During Interventional Procedures - A Cryoablation Study

An observational study of Kidney Tumors, run by Philips Healthcare at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to assess and quantify any differences between assisted (using real-time visualization of tracked cryo-probes) and unassisted cryoablation procedures using pre-procedure CT scans or CT fluoroscopy with respect to: Primary Endpoint: "TRE" Target Registration Error (distance between… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Kidney Tumors
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2014to Dec 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Promary Care Clinic

Who may be able to join

  • Has had a pre-operative CT/MRI scan performed and will be undergoing an ablation procedure of the kidney;
  • Is over the age of 18;
  • Has the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent form, and complies with the protocol;
  • Has the ability to follow procedural instructions, including, but not limited to, holding their breath and remaining reasonably motionless during the procedure.

Who cannot join

  • 1. Was precluded from an ablation procedure based on standard ablation exclusions; 2. Has an adhesive allergy (due to the application of active fiducials with adhesive backing); 3. Has a pacemaker or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator; 4. Has a gross body weight above the procedural table limit (typically > 170 kg); 5. Is pregnant
  • -

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

Other trials in United States

About this study

The objective of this study is to assess and quantify any differences between assisted (using real-time visualization of tracked cryo-probes) and unassisted cryoablation procedures using pre-procedure CT scans or CT fluoroscopy with respect to:

Primary Endpoint:

Read more
  • "TRE" Target Registration Error (distance between "virtual" needle position (tracking data) and the actual needle position (CT confirmation scan))

Secondary Endpoints

  • Accuracy of needle targeting - The vector of each needle insertion (The initial vector allows us to project the path to the pre-defined target. If the initial entry point is not ideal, the path to the target will need adjustment) Based on a two-sample t-test (significance level of 0.05, two-tailed), the study has 89% power to detect a difference of 2mm in accuracy between the two treatment groups (assuming a standard deviation of 1.9mm).
  • Measure time difference between assisted and unassisted procedure
Read the detailed description

The objective of this study is to assess and quantify any differences between assisted (using real-time visualization of tracked cryo-probes) and unassisted cryoablation procedures using pre-procedure CT scans or CT fluoroscopy. To assess this, physicians will perform ablation procedures with and without the Percu Nav device. Data will be collected on the angle of needle entry unassisted and then assisted by PercuNAv to determine if the added imaging information modifies the physician's needle approach.

Each patient will have a pre-procedure CT image set of the area of interest acquired. The patient will be scanned in the same position that the ablation will be performed in, although not requisite. Sterile registration patches will be applied to the patient's skin around the area of interest prior to the scan, ensuring that suitable windows are left available for needle entry. The patient will undergo these pre-procedural scans as part of the usual clinical evaluation of the lesion to undergo ablation. The scans may be acquired with or without contrast, at the discretion of the physician.

Control group: The physician will perform the procedure using the standard of care method (CT only), without the additional information being recorded by the PercuNav device. The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded by pushing the start button again. At the end of the procedure a verification CT scan will be taken with the needle in place and sent to the PercuNav.

Percu Nav group: The physician will perform the procedure using the standard of care procedure with the additional information displayed and recorded by the PercuNav device (CT and PercuNav). The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. The physician will be shown the PercuNav screen and will correct the desired approach path and another screen capture will be taken. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded. At the end of the procedure a verification CT scan will be taken (as is part of the regular standard of care procedure) with the needle in place and sent to the PercuNav.

The outcome measures that will be evaluated in the groups include:

  1. Accuracy - The distance between the "virtual" needle position (tracking data) and the actual needle position (CT confirmation scan)), where applicable (TRE)
  2. Time to reach a clinically acceptable target in the tumor
  3. The total procedure time
  4. Accuracy of needle targeting - The vector of each needle insertion (The initial vector allows us to project the path to the pre-defined target. If the initial entry point is not ideal, the path to the target will need adjustment)
Conditions
Kidney Tumors
Keywords
Kidney Tumors, Cryoablation, Biopsy
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Renal Cell

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01401777
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control, No PercuNavPatient having procedure without PercuNav Guidance information
PercuNav aided procedureBiopsy procedure aided with use of PercuNav

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Target Registration Error

    "TRE" Target Registration Error (distance between "virtual" needle position (tracking data) and the actual needle position (CT confirmation scan))

    Measured: 24 hrs

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Accuracy of needle targeting

    The vector of each needle insertion (The initial vector allows us to project the path to the pre-defined target. If the initial entry point is not ideal, the path to the target will need adjustment)

    Measured: 24 hrs

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted25 Jul 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2014
  3. Primary completionMay 2015 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2015 (estimated)

Why it stopped: On hold pending product development

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01401777
Sponsor's protocol ID
2010_CRYO_V7
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
21 Jul 2011
Last updated
27 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Kidney Tumors, run by Philips Healthcare at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Target Registration Error (time frame: 24 hrs). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Apr 2021.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in