Liver TumorsNCT01403727
Electromagnetic Tracking of Devices During Biopsy Procedures
An observational study of Liver Tumors, run by Philips Healthcare at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the differences between PercuNav assisted and unassisted biopsy in the areas of CT radiation dose, procedure time and biopsy accuracy. This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will compare the use of electromagnetic tracking and image guidance (CT) during biopsy procedures… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Liver Tumors
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to May 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients undergoing a liver biopsy procedure
Who may be able to join
- Has had a pre-operative CT scan performed and will be undergoing a biopsy procedure of the liver;
- Is over the age of 18;
- Has the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent form, and complies with the protocol;
- Has the ability to follow procedural instructions, including, but not limited to, holding their breath and remaining reasonably motionless during the procedure.
Who cannot join
- Was precluded from a biopsy procedure based on standard exclusions;
- Has an adhesive allergy (due to the application of active fiducials with adhesive backing);
- Has a pacemaker or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator;
- Has a gross body weight above 180lbs for women and 260lbs for men;
- Is pregnant
- A patient may be excluded after enrollment if any of the following criteria are met:
- 1. The patient's health and/or safety become jeopardized for any reason making it unsafe to continue; 2. Technical errors and/or difficulties; 3. Any reasonable rationale put forth by the physician or investigator 4. Lost to follow up - In-evaluable data
- -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
About this study
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the differences between PercuNav assisted and unassisted biopsy in the areas of CT radiation dose, procedure time and biopsy accuracy.
This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will compare the use of electromagnetic tracking and image guidance (CT) during biopsy procedures verses the typical CT image guided procedure alone.
Read the detailed description
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the differences between PercuNav assisted and unassisted biopsy. The primary objective of this study is to assess and quantify any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided biopsy procedures of the liver with respect to radiation dose.
The secondary objectives of this study are to assess and quantify any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided biopsy procedures with respect to:
- Total procedure time
- Accuracy of needle targeting (distance from defined target on PercuNav and angle of entry)
- Number of needle passes
- Target registration error (TRE- distance between "virtual" needle position (tracking data) and the actual needle position (CT confirmation scan))
The study will consist of 50 patients from 1 site. The expected completion time for enrollment is 3 months, but will depend on the ability of the clinic to enroll patients. There are two arms in the study. An Unassisted Biopsy Control arm (physician and patient blinded to needle positioning using PercuNav system) and Assisted Biopsy (Physician not blinded to needle positioning using PercuNav). Patients will be randomized to each arm.
The PercuNav provides real-time, three-dimensional visualization and navigation tools for all stages of diagnosis and surgery including pre-procedure planning and intra-procedure navigation. PercuNav transforms two-dimensional patient images (scan sets), derived from CT, PET/CT and MRI into dynamic representations on which a tool can be navigated and fused with ultrasound. The system performs spatial mapping from one image space to another image space or from image space to physical space (registration) allowing the physician to correlate scan sets with each other and to the patient.
For this trial, each patient will have a pre-procedure CT image set of the area of interest. The image set should display the patient in the same position that the biopsy will be performed in, although not requisite.
Unassisted Biopsy - CONTROL GROUP (Physician blinded to PercuNav system):
The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded by pushing the start button again.
The final dose of radiation displayed by the CT scanner will be recorded on the Case Report Form.
Assisted Biopsy - STUDY GROUP:
The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. The physician will be shown the PercuNav screen and will correct the desired approach path and another screen capture will be taken. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded.
The final dose of radiation displayed by the CT scanner will be recorded on the Case Report Form.
The primary study objective is to quantify, in terms of a point estimate and confidence interval, the treatment effect which characterizes the mean difference in number of CT scans between the "unassisted" CT and "assisted" CT groups during guided liver biopsy procedures. More specifically, the goal will be to show with 95% Confidence that the "assisted" CT procedure leads to 3 fewer scans, on average, than the "unassisted" CT group during guided liver biopsies.
H0: uT - aT < 3 scans HA: uT - aT >= 3 scans uT = mean number of scans during "unassisted" CT procedure aT = mean number of scans during "assisted" CT procedure Equivalently, the desired superiority will have been demonstrated whenever the lower 95% confidence limit on the difference, "unassisted" CT minus "assisted" CT, exceeds 3 scans.
Primary Endpoint and Objective:
The primary endpoint for this study is the number of CT radiation exposure scans received during the course of a CT guided liver biopsy procedure. The primary study objective is to characterize the difference in the number of scans received between the "assisted" and the "unassisted" CT groups during guided liver biopsy procedures.
The primary measure that will be assessed and quantified is any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided liver biopsies with respect to radiation dose.
The secondary measures that will be assessed and quantified are any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided procedures with respect to:
- Total procedure time
- Accuracy of needle targeting (distance from defined target on PercuNav and angle of entry)
- Conditions
- Liver Tumors
- Keywords
- Biopsy of liver tumors
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Unassisted Biopsy - CONTROL GROUP | Routine biopsy needle placement and Physician blinded to needle location | |
| Assisted Biopsy - STUDY GROUP | The physician will be shown the PercuNav screen and will correct the desired approach path. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Radiation Dose
The primary objective of this study is to assess and quantify any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided biopsy procedures of the liver with respect to radiation dose.
Measured: 24 hrs
Secondary outcomes (2)
Total procedure time
Total procedure time is determined by the timespan of the moment the patient is accepted into the room (start) and the time when the procedure is complete (finish - when physician exits room).
Measured: 24 hrs
Accuracy of needle targeting
Distance from defined target on PercuNav and angle of entry
Measured: 24 hrs
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionApr 2013
- Study completionMay 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Liver TumorsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Philips Healthcare
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Edward Kim, MD, Principal investigator, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01403727
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2010_MtSinai_BiopTrial_V2
- Status last verified
- May 2013
- First submitted
- 22 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 29 May 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 May 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electromagnetic Tracking of Devices During Biopsy Procedures
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01403727
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2010_MtSinai_BiopTrial_V2
- Conditions
- Liver Tumors
- Keywords
- Biopsy of liver tumors
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Philips HealthcareIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Apr 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 27 Jul 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the differences between PercuNav assisted and unassisted biopsy in the areas of CT radiation dose, procedure time and biopsy accuracy.
This prospective, randomized, controlled trial will compare the use of electromagnetic tracking and image guidance (CT) during biopsy procedures verses the typical CT image guided procedure alone.
Detailed description
The purpose of the trial is to evaluate the differences between PercuNav assisted and unassisted biopsy. The primary objective of this study is to assess and quantify any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided biopsy procedures of the liver with respect to radiation dose.
The secondary objectives of this study are to assess and quantify any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided biopsy procedures with respect to:
- Total procedure time
- Accuracy of needle targeting (distance from defined target on PercuNav and angle of entry)
- Number of needle passes
- Target registration error (TRE- distance between "virtual" needle position (tracking data) and the actual needle position (CT confirmation scan))
The study will consist of 50 patients from 1 site. The expected completion time for enrollment is 3 months, but will depend on the ability of the clinic to enroll patients. There are two arms in the study. An Unassisted Biopsy Control arm (physician and patient blinded to needle positioning using PercuNav system) and Assisted Biopsy (Physician not blinded to needle positioning using PercuNav). Patients will be randomized to each arm.
The PercuNav provides real-time, three-dimensional visualization and navigation tools for all stages of diagnosis and surgery including pre-procedure planning and intra-procedure navigation. PercuNav transforms two-dimensional patient images (scan sets), derived from CT, PET/CT and MRI into dynamic representations on which a tool can be navigated and fused with ultrasound. The system performs spatial mapping from one image space to another image space or from image space to physical space (registration) allowing the physician to correlate scan sets with each other and to the patient.
For this trial, each patient will have a pre-procedure CT image set of the area of interest. The image set should display the patient in the same position that the biopsy will be performed in, although not requisite.
Unassisted Biopsy - CONTROL GROUP (Physician blinded to PercuNav system):
The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded by pushing the start button again.
The final dose of radiation displayed by the CT scanner will be recorded on the Case Report Form.
Assisted Biopsy - STUDY GROUP:
The tracking device will be placed on the patient's skin at the desired point of entry. Without displaying the PercuNav screen to the physician, a screen capture will be taken to record the approach path. The physician will be shown the PercuNav screen and will correct the desired approach path and another screen capture will be taken. At the point of insertion, the time stamp will be recorded and the start button will be pressed. Once the physician states they are at the defined target a screen capture will be taken on the PercuNav and the distance to target and time stamp will be recorded.
The final dose of radiation displayed by the CT scanner will be recorded on the Case Report Form.
The primary study objective is to quantify, in terms of a point estimate and confidence interval, the treatment effect which characterizes the mean difference in number of CT scans between the "unassisted" CT and "assisted" CT groups during guided liver biopsy procedures. More specifically, the goal will be to show with 95% Confidence that the "assisted" CT procedure leads to 3 fewer scans, on average, than the "unassisted" CT group during guided liver biopsies.
H0: uT - aT < 3 scans HA: uT - aT >= 3 scans uT = mean number of scans during "unassisted" CT procedure aT = mean number of scans during "assisted" CT procedure Equivalently, the desired superiority will have been demonstrated whenever the lower 95% confidence limit on the difference, "unassisted" CT minus "assisted" CT, exceeds 3 scans.
Primary Endpoint and Objective:
The primary endpoint for this study is the number of CT radiation exposure scans received during the course of a CT guided liver biopsy procedure. The primary study objective is to characterize the difference in the number of scans received between the "assisted" and the "unassisted" CT groups during guided liver biopsy procedures.
The primary measure that will be assessed and quantified is any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided liver biopsies with respect to radiation dose.
The secondary measures that will be assessed and quantified are any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided procedures with respect to:
- Total procedure time
- Accuracy of needle targeting (distance from defined target on PercuNav and angle of entry)
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Unassisted Biopsy - CONTROL GROUP | – | –Routine biopsy needle placement and Physician blinded to needle location |
| Assisted Biopsy - STUDY GROUP | – | –The physician will be shown the PercuNav screen and will correct the desired approach path. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients undergoing a liver biopsy procedure
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Has had a pre-operative CT scan performed and will be undergoing a biopsy procedure of the liver;
- Is over the age of 18;
- Has the ability to understand and the willingness to sign a written informed consent form, and complies with the protocol;
- Has the ability to follow procedural instructions, including, but not limited to, holding their breath and remaining reasonably motionless during the procedure.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Was precluded from a biopsy procedure based on standard exclusions;
- Has an adhesive allergy (due to the application of active fiducials with adhesive backing);
- Has a pacemaker or automatic implantable cardiac defibrillator;
- Has a gross body weight above 180lbs for women and 260lbs for men;
- Is pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Radiation Dose
Time frame: 24 hrs
The primary objective of this study is to assess and quantify any differences between assisted and unassisted CT guided biopsy procedures of the liver with respect to radiation dose.
2 secondary outcomes
Total procedure time
Time frame: 24 hrs
Accuracy of needle targeting
Time frame: 24 hrs
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 May 2013.
Related trials for Liver Tumors
Recruiting
Distance-Based Exercise to Preserve Function and Prevent Disability
Localized Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Anal Cancer
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Detect and Expunge Concealed Tumors of the Liver
Liver Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Circulating Tumor DNA Methylation-Guided Adjuvant Therapy Decision-Making in Patients With Resectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases After Resection
Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases (CRLM), ctDNA
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Durvalumab and Tremelimumab in Combination With Propranolol and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Advanced Hepatopancreabiliary Tumors (BLOCKED)
Pancreatic Cancer, Hepatocellular Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Edward Kim, MD principal investigator
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Liver Tumors, run by Philips Healthcare at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Radiation Dose (time frame: 24 hrs). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2013.