Healthy VolunteersEOS-SPINENCT01406743
Spine Reference Parameters on EOS Imaging
A study testing EOS™ Acquisition in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
The lumbar pain caring consists from a 3D reconstruction of the spine obtained to scan or radiography, determining the lumbar pain cause and gravity, to propose a conservative treatment in first intention or a adapted spine surgery in first or second intention (Fritzell and al ., on 2001). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy Volunteers
- What is being tested?
- EOS™ Acquisition
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 161 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- May 2011to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects of more than 18 years old
- Both genders
- Woman under efficient contraception (if not menopause)
- EVA < 2 for the rachis (lumbar vertebra and radiculaire),
- Score ODI ≤ 20 %
- Given informed consent
- Subject with French health system
Who cannot join
- Pregnant or feeding women
- Subject having a follow-up of the back or a regular back pain,
- Subject presenting lower limbs pathology which can have an echo on the rachis such as a length disparity or a flexum
- Subject with spine and pelvis surgery antecedents.
- Person placed under protection of justice
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: PARAMETRES GLOBAUX DE REFERENCE DU RACHIS CALCULES SUR DES PATIENTS ASYMPTOMATIQUES PAR IMAGERIE EOS™
The lumbar pain caring consists from a 3D reconstruction of the spine obtained to scan or radiography, determining the lumbar pain cause and gravity, to propose a conservative treatment in first intention or a adapted spine surgery in first or second intention (Fritzell and al ., on 2001).
The analysis and the correction of postural disorders pass inevitably by a good knowledge of the not pathological posture. The validation of the acquisition 2D / 3D reconstruction by EOS ™ technology demonstrated its interest for the diagnosis and the lumbar pain caring.
Read more
However, the EOS technology ™ is recent and few data were acquired with this technology for healthy population.
So, this clinical study with EOS ™technology would allow to obtain a precise knowledge of the standing skeleton in position (to an asymptomatic adult population), by displaying the gravity constraints on the joints, and the compensation phenomena in normal situation. This functional information for a given age bracket would allow to propose to the patients with lumbar pain, adapted interventions to the gravity constraints considering the skeleton evolution for age bracket.
Read the detailed description
The main objective of this study is to describe thoraco-lumbar spine characteristics, obtained by EOS ™technology, in a reference population, not presenting spine pathology. It's a monocentric transverse descriptive study. This study allows creating a database of the spine, pelvis and sagittal balance parameters to asymptomatic subjects according to age brackets.
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Being tested
- EOS™ Acquisition
- Keywords
- Spine and pelvis parameters, Sagittal balance, Database
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
EOS™ AcquisitionDevice
Double Incidence Postero Anterior and Lateral full body low-dose X-ray acquisition on EOS™ device following SOP of the service of radiology.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| EOS™ Acquisition | Experimental | Not described Receives: Device: EOS™ Acquisition |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
the profile spine parameters: apex lumbar position
Measured: 1 day
the lordosis lower angle, back type according to the ROUSSOULY
Measured: 1 day
the sagittal balance parameters
Measured: 1 day
the lordosis upper angle, back type according to the ROUSSOULY
Measured: 1 day
the pelvis parameters
Measured: 1 day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Healthy VolunteersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 161 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Bordeaux
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Jean-Charles LE HUEC, PU-PH, Principal investigator, University Hospital, BordeauxAntoine BENARD, MD, Study chair, University Hospital, Bordeaux
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01406743
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CHUBX 2010/26
- Other IDs
- 2010-A01248-31
- Acronym
- EOS-SPINE
- Status last verified
- Jan 2015
- First submitted
- 28 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Borenstein D. Low back pain: epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and therapy. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1991 Apr;3(2):207-17.
PubMed 1829622Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. No abstract available.
PubMed 18046031Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. Identifying patients at risk of becoming disabled because of low-back pain. The Vermont Rehabilitation Engineering Center predictive model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6):605-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00001.
PubMed 1830688Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Deguise J, Kalifa G, Ferey S. [A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2005 Feb;189(2):287-97; discussion 297-300. French.
PubMed 16114859Kalifa G, Charpak Y, Maccia C, Fery-Lemonnier E, Bloch J, Boussard JM, Attal M, Dubousset J, Adamsbaum C. Evaluation of a new low-dose digital x-ray device: first dosimetric and clinical results in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Jul;28(7):557-61. doi: 10.1007/s002470050413.
PubMed 9662585Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 1;26(23):2521-32; discussion 2532-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002.
PubMed 11725230Geijer H, Verdonck B, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization. Eur Radiol. 2003 Mar;13(3):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1476-1. Epub 2002 Jun 14.
PubMed 12594558Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D Jr, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.004.
PubMed 16413443Hansen J, Jurik AG, Fiirgaard B, Egund N. Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2003 Nov;33(11):752-65. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-1015-5. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
PubMed 12961040Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s005860050038.
PubMed 9629932Pellise F, Hernandez A, Vidal X, Minguell J, Martinez C, Villanueva C. Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):574-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256875.17765.e6.
PubMed 17334293Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L. Working disability due to occupational back pain: three-year follow-up of 2,300 compensated workers in Quebec. J Occup Med. 1988 Jun;30(6):502-5.
PubMed 2969044Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J. [Geometrical and mechanical analysis of lumbar lordosis in an asymptomatic population: proposed classification]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2003 Nov;89(7):632-9. French.
PubMed 14699309Spengler DM, Bigos SJ, Martin NA, Zeh J, Fisher L, Nachemson A. Back injuries in industry: a retrospective study. I. Overview and cost analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1986 Apr;11(3):241-5. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198604000-00010.
PubMed 2940707Scientific approach to the assessment and management of activity-related spinal disorders. A monograph for clinicians. Report of the Quebec Task Force on Spinal Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1987 Sep;12(7 Suppl):S1-59. No abstract available.
PubMed 2961086
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- PARAMETRES GLOBAUX DE REFERENCE DU RACHIS CALCULES SUR DES PATIENTS ASYMPTOMATIQUES PAR IMAGERIE EOS™
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01406743
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EOS-SPINE / CHUBX 2010/26
- Conditions
- Healthy Volunteers
- Keywords
- Spine and pelvis parameters, Sagittal balance, Database
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 161 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, BordeauxUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The lumbar pain caring consists from a 3D reconstruction of the spine obtained to scan or radiography, determining the lumbar pain cause and gravity, to propose a conservative treatment in first intention or a adapted spine surgery in first or second intention (Fritzell and al ., on 2001).
The analysis and the correction of postural disorders pass inevitably by a good knowledge of the not pathological posture. The validation of the acquisition 2D / 3D reconstruction by EOS ™ technology demonstrated its interest for the diagnosis and the lumbar pain caring.
However, the EOS technology ™ is recent and few data were acquired with this technology for healthy population.
So, this clinical study with EOS ™technology would allow to obtain a precise knowledge of the standing skeleton in position (to an asymptomatic adult population), by displaying the gravity constraints on the joints, and the compensation phenomena in normal situation. This functional information for a given age bracket would allow to propose to the patients with lumbar pain, adapted interventions to the gravity constraints considering the skeleton evolution for age bracket.
Detailed description
The main objective of this study is to describe thoraco-lumbar spine characteristics, obtained by EOS ™technology, in a reference population, not presenting spine pathology. It's a monocentric transverse descriptive study. This study allows creating a database of the spine, pelvis and sagittal balance parameters to asymptomatic subjects according to age brackets.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| EOS™ Acquisition | Experimental | Device: EOS™ Acquisition |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Subjects of more than 18 years old
- Both genders
- Woman under efficient contraception (if not menopause)
- EVA < 2 for the rachis (lumbar vertebra and radiculaire),
- Score ODI ≤ 20 %
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Pregnant or feeding women
- Subject having a follow-up of the back or a regular back pain,
- Subject presenting lower limbs pathology which can have an echo on the rachis such as a length disparity or a flexum
- Subject with spine and pelvis surgery antecedents.
- Person placed under protection of justice
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| EOS™ AcquisitionDouble Incidence Postero Anterior and Lateral full body low-dose X-ray acquisition on EOS™ device following SOP of the service of radiology. | Device | EOS™ Acquisition |
Primary outcome
the profile spine parameters: apex lumbar position
Time frame: 1 day
the lordosis lower angle, back type according to the ROUSSOULY
Time frame: 1 day
the sagittal balance parameters
Time frame: 1 day
the lordosis upper angle, back type according to the ROUSSOULY
Time frame: 1 day
the pelvis parameters
Time frame: 1 day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2026.
- Background: PubMed 1829622Borenstein D. Low back pain: epidemiology, etiology, diagnostic evaluation, and therapy. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 1991 Apr;3(2):207-17.
- Background: PubMed 18046031Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007 Nov 29;357(22):2277-84. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra072149. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 1830688Cats-Baril WL, Frymoyer JW. Identifying patients at risk of becoming disabled because of low-back pain. The Vermont Rehabilitation Engineering Center predictive model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Jun;16(6):605-7. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199106000-00001.
- Background: PubMed 16114859Dubousset J, Charpak G, Dorion I, Skalli W, Lavaste F, Deguise J, Kalifa G, Ferey S. [A new 2D and 3D imaging approach to musculoskeletal physiology and pathology with low-dose radiation and the standing position: the EOS system]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 2005 Feb;189(2):287-97; discussion 297-300. French.
- Background: PubMed 9662585Kalifa G, Charpak Y, Maccia C, Fery-Lemonnier E, Bloch J, Boussard JM, Attal M, Dubousset J, Adamsbaum C. Evaluation of a new low-dose digital x-ray device: first dosimetric and clinical results in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1998 Jul;28(7):557-61. doi: 10.1007/s002470050413.
- Background: PubMed 11725230Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A; Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. 2001 Volvo Award Winner in Clinical Studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Dec 1;26(23):2521-32; discussion 2532-4. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200112010-00002.
- Background: PubMed 12594558Geijer H, Verdonck B, Beckman KW, Andersson T, Persliden J. Digital radiography of scoliosis with a scanning method: radiation dose optimization. Eur Radiol. 2003 Mar;13(3):543-51. doi: 10.1007/s00330-002-1476-1. Epub 2002 Jun 14.
- Background: PubMed 16413443Glassman S, Gornet MF, Branch C, Polly D Jr, Peloza J, Schwender JD, Carreon L. MOS short form 36 and Oswestry Disability Index outcomes in lumbar fusion: a multicenter experience. Spine J. 2006 Jan-Feb;6(1):21-6. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.09.004.
- Background: PubMed 12961040Hansen J, Jurik AG, Fiirgaard B, Egund N. Optimisation of scoliosis examinations in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2003 Nov;33(11):752-65. doi: 10.1007/s00247-003-1015-5. Epub 2003 Sep 5.
- Background: PubMed 9629932Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s005860050038.
- Background: PubMed 17334293Pellise F, Hernandez A, Vidal X, Minguell J, Martinez C, Villanueva C. Radiologic assessment of all unfused lumbar segments 7.5 years after instrumented posterior spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Mar 1;32(5):574-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000256875.17765.e6.
- Background: PubMed 2969044Rossignol M, Suissa S, Abenhaim L. Working disability due to occupational back pain: three-year follow-up of 2,300 compensated workers in Quebec. J Occup Med. 1988 Jun;30(6):502-5.
Related trials for Healthy Volunteers
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Novel Biomarkers of Non-IgE Immediate Hypersensitivity Drug Reactions
Healthy Volunteer, Hypersensitivity Reactions
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study Evaluating ABCL635 for Vasomotor Symptoms of Menopause
Vasomotor Symptoms Associated With Menopause, Healthy Volunteers
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Establishing Fibroblast-Derived Cell Lines From Skin Biopsies of Patients With Immunodeficiency or Immunodysregulation Disorders
Primary Immunodeficiency, DOCK8
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Enrolling by invitation
Development and Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Acquisition and Analysis Methods
Healthy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jean-Charles LE HUEC, PU-PH principal investigator
University Hospital, Bordeaux
Antoine BENARD, MD study chair
University Hospital, Bordeaux
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing EOS™ Acquisition in people with Healthy Volunteers, run by University Hospital, Bordeaux at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
the profile spine parameters: apex lumbar position (time frame: 1 day). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01406743, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2026.