Prostate CancerPhase 3NCT01407263
Trial of Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy
A Phase 3 study testing Lymph node template, Transverse versus vertical closure and antibiotic prophylaxis in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 5 sites in United States.
Trial summary
This trial will evaluate whether the following aspect of surgical technique influence outcome: Lymph node dissection. In some patients, scans taken before surgery show that a lymph node has cancer. Surgeons make sure to remove those affect lymph nodes and all other lymph nodes in the area. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older, men only
- Conditions the study is for
- Prostate Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Lymph node template, Transverse versus vertical closure and antibiotic prophylaxis
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 3,204 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2011to Jul 2027
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- Men only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients do not have to be eligible for both modifications to be included in the study.
- Lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy:
- Patients 21 years or older scheduled for radical prostatectomy for treatment of prostate cancer with one of the consenting surgeons at MSKCC
- Hemostatic agent vs. no hemostatic agent
- Patients 21 years or older scheduled for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer with one of the consenting surgeons at MSKC
Who cannot join
- Lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy
- Presence of positive/suspicious pelvic nodes on MRI, CT or PSMA scan (positive/suspicious defined as a pelvic node >15mm in short axis on CT or MRI, a PSMA avid node, or a node with abnormal morphology such as roundness or irregularity or loss of fatty hilum)
- Any prior pelvic radiation therapy used to treat prostate cancer
- Hemostatic agent vs. no hemostatic agent
- No additional exclusion criteria
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 1 country.
5 sites in 1 country
United States5 sites
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at Basking Ridge
Basking Ridge, New Jersey, 07920
Memorial Sloan Kettering Westchester
Harrison, New York, 10604
Memorial Sloan Kettering Bergen (Consent Only)
Montvale, New Jersey, 07645
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
New York, New York, 10065
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center @ Nassau (Consent only)
Uniondale, New York, 11553
About this study
Official title: A Randomized Trial of Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy
This trial will evaluate whether the following aspect of surgical technique influence outcome: Lymph node dissection. In some patients, scans taken before surgery show that a lymph node has cancer. Surgeons make sure to remove those affect lymph nodes and all other lymph nodes in the area. However, it is not known whether removing lymph nodes helps prostate cancer patients whose scans do not show positive nodes. In this study, patients with clear scans will either receive a lymph node dissection or not."
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Being tested
- Lymph node template, Transverse versus vertical closure, antibiotic prophylaxis, Hemostatic Agent
- Keywords
- radical prostatectomy, anastomotic suturing, lymph node dissection, 11-096
- Medical subject headings
- Prostatic Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Lymph node templateProcedure or surgery
Inclusion of the external iliac, hypogastric and obturator fossa nodal groups in the template undergoing a Radical Prostatectomy. Modifying the template for lymph node dissection may lead to removal of additional affected nodes, reducing the chance of recurrence. .No lymph nodes will be removed in patients randomized to the no PLND arm.
Transverse versus vertical closureProcedure or surgery
Transverse versus vertical closure of the port site incision
antibiotic prophylaxisDrug
One vs. three days of antibiotic prophylaxis at catheter removal
Hemostatic AgentDrug
For the patients randomized to routine indwelling HA agent use, the operating surgeon may choose to use either Surgicel™, Surgicel SNoW™, Arista™, FloSeal or surgeon's choice HA directed at the prostatic fossa, ligated dorsal vein complex, or neurovascular bundles. Because there is no standard HA or method of application, the surgeon will apply the HA according to the surgeon's experience and document both the HA used, and the location applied in the operative report. For patients randomized to no routine indwelling HA use, surgeons will only apply a HA if they are unable to achieve hemostasis using traditional means or feel it would be unsafe to complete the operation without using a HA for additional hemostasis. Providers in either arm may use HA as needed provided the intention is not to leave the HA indwelling.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy | Experimental | In patients randomized to standard, only the nodal packet under the external iliac vein and above the obturator nerve will be dissected. For patients randomized to the modified template, the external iliac, hypogastric and obturator fossa nodal groups will be removed.No lymph nodes will be removed in patients randomized to the no PLND arm. Receives: Procedure: Lymph node template |
| Transverse versus vertical closure of the port site incision (Closed as of 9/30/2021) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Procedure: Transverse versus vertical closure |
| One vs. three days of antibiotic prophylaxis (Closed as of 9/30/2021) | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: antibiotic prophylaxis |
| Hemostatic agent vs. no hemostatic agent | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Hemostatic Agent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patient-reported hernia
Patient-reported hernia is a routine assessment on post-operative questionnaires completed by prostate cancer patients at MSKCC. The questionnaire asks about hernia near the surgical scar and if there has been a need for surgical repair of the hernia.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
To evaluate whether a modification to the template for lymph node dissection reduces biochemical recurrence rates
Biochemical recurrence is defined as any postoperative PSA of 0.2 ng / mL or higher, or treatment with hormones, radiotherapy or chemotherapy starting six months or more after radical prostatectomy.
Measured: 2 years
urinary tract infection (UTI)
urinary tract infection (UTI) within 10 days of catheter removal. We will use the CDC's definition of UTI: symptomatic UTI diagnosed in patients with positive urine cultures (≥100,000 microorganisms per cm3) and at least one of the following signs or symptoms with no other recognized cause: fever (>38oC), urgency, frequency, dysuria or suprapubic tenderness.50 UTI is routinely captured by clinical staff as a surgical complication.
Measured: within 10 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2011
- Primary completionJul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Prostate CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 3,204 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Andrew Vickers, PhD, Principal investigator, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01407263
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11-096
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2026
- Results posted
- No
Publications
Touijer KA, Vertosick EA, Sjoberg DD, Liso N, Nalavenkata S, Melao B, Laudone VP, Ehdaie B, Carver B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Vickers AJ. Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Update from a Randomized Clinical Trial of Limited Versus Extended Dissection. Eur Urol. 2025 Feb;87(2):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
PubMed 39472200Gaffney CD, Vertosick EA, Laudone V, Goh AC, Carlsson SV, Pietzak E, Donahue T, Smith R, Touijer K, Vickers AJ, Ehdaie B. Randomized Trial of Transverse vs Vertical Extraction Site Incision After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Sep;212(3):401-408. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004066. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
PubMed 39115122Touijer KA, Sjoberg DD, Benfante N, Laudone VP, Ehdaie B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Vickers A. Limited versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
PubMed 33865797
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomized Trial of Modifications to Radical Prostatectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01407263
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11-096
- Conditions
- Prostate Cancer
- Keywords
- radical prostatectomy, anastomotic suturing, lymph node dissection, 11-096
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 3,204 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jul 2011
- Primary completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This trial will evaluate whether the following aspect of surgical technique influence outcome: Lymph node dissection. In some patients, scans taken before surgery show that a lymph node has cancer. Surgeons make sure to remove those affect lymph nodes and all other lymph nodes in the area. However, it is not known whether removing lymph nodes helps prostate cancer patients whose scans do not show positive nodes. In this study, patients with clear scans will either receive a lymph node dissection or not."
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Factorial
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy | Experimental | Procedure: Lymph node templateIn patients randomized to standard, only the nodal packet under the external iliac vein and above the obturator nerve will be dissected. For patients randomized to the modified template, the external iliac, hypogastric and obturator fossa nodal groups will be removed.No lymph nodes will be removed in patients randomized to the no PLND arm. |
| Transverse versus vertical closure of the port site incision (Closed as of 9/30/2021) | Experimental | Procedure: Transverse versus vertical closure |
| One vs. three days of antibiotic prophylaxis (Closed as of 9/30/2021) | Experimental | Drug: antibiotic prophylaxis |
| Hemostatic agent vs. no hemostatic agent | Experimental | Drug: Hemostatic Agent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- Male only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients do not have to be eligible for both modifications to be included in the study.
- Patients 21 years or older scheduled for radical prostatectomy for treatment of prostate cancer with one of the consenting surgeons at MSKCC
- Hemostatic agent vs. no hemostatic agent
- Patients 21 years or older scheduled for minimally invasive radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer with one of the consenting surgeons at MSKC
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Lymphadenectomy vs no lymphadenectomy
- Presence of positive/suspicious pelvic nodes on MRI, CT or PSMA scan (positive/suspicious defined as a pelvic node >15mm in short axis on CT or MRI, a PSMA avid node, or a node with abnormal morphology such as roundness or irregularity or loss of fatty hilum)
- Any prior pelvic radiation therapy used to treat prostate cancer
- Hemostatic agent vs. no hemostatic agent
- No additional exclusion criteria
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Lymph node templateInclusion of the external iliac, hypogastric and obturator fossa nodal groups in the template undergoing a Radical Prostatectomy. Modifying the template for lymph node dissection may lead to removal of additional affected nodes, reducing the chance of recurrence. .No lymph nodes will be removed in patients randomized to the no PLND arm. | Procedure or surgery | Lymphadenectomy vs. no lymphadenectomy |
| Transverse versus vertical closureTransverse versus vertical closure of the port site incision | Procedure or surgery | Transverse versus vertical closure of the port site incision (Closed as of 9/30/2021) |
| antibiotic prophylaxisOne vs. three days of antibiotic prophylaxis at catheter removal | Drug | One vs. three days of antibiotic prophylaxis (Closed as of 9/30/2021) |
| Hemostatic AgentFor the patients randomized to routine indwelling HA agent use, the operating surgeon may choose to use either Surgicel™, Surgicel SNoW™, Arista™, FloSeal or surgeon's choice HA directed at the prostatic fossa, ligated dorsal vein complex, or neurovascular bundles. Because there is no standard HA or method of application, the surgeon will apply the HA according to the surgeon's experience and document both the HA used, and the location applied in the operative report. For patients randomized to no routine indwelling HA use, surgeons will only apply a HA if they are unable to achieve hemostasis using traditional means or feel it would be unsafe to complete the operation without using a HA for additional hemostasis. Providers in either arm may use HA as needed provided the intention is not to leave the HA indwelling. | Drug | Hemostatic agent vs. no hemostatic agent |
Primary outcome
Patient-reported hernia
Time frame: 1 year
Patient-reported hernia is a routine assessment on post-operative questionnaires completed by prostate cancer patients at MSKCC. The questionnaire asks about hernia near the surgical scar and if there has been a need for surgical repair of the hernia.
2 secondary outcomes
To evaluate whether a modification to the template for lymph node dissection reduces biochemical recurrence rates
Time frame: 2 years
urinary tract infection (UTI)
Time frame: within 10 days
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39472200Touijer KA, Vertosick EA, Sjoberg DD, Liso N, Nalavenkata S, Melao B, Laudone VP, Ehdaie B, Carver B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Vickers AJ. Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer: Update from a Randomized Clinical Trial of Limited Versus Extended Dissection. Eur Urol. 2025 Feb;87(2):253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.10.006. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39115122Gaffney CD, Vertosick EA, Laudone V, Goh AC, Carlsson SV, Pietzak E, Donahue T, Smith R, Touijer K, Vickers AJ, Ehdaie B. Randomized Trial of Transverse vs Vertical Extraction Site Incision After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Sep;212(3):401-408. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004066. Epub 2024 Aug 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33865797Touijer KA, Sjoberg DD, Benfante N, Laudone VP, Ehdaie B, Eastham JA, Scardino PT, Vickers A. Limited versus Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021 Aug;4(4):532-539. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.006. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer CenterLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Prostate Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Veterans Affairs Seamless Phase II/III Randomized Trial of STAndard Systemic theRapy With or Without PET-directed Local Therapy for Oligometastatic pRosTate Cancer
Prostate Cancer, Oligometastasis
Not yet recruiting
Mind-Body Interventions for the Improvement of Quality of Life, Stress, and Sleep Quality Among Survivors of Breast, Prostate, Endometrial, or Colorectal Cancer
Breast Cancer Stage I, Colorectal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Study of Opevesostat (MK-5684) Versus Alternative NHA in mCRPC (MK-5684-003)
Prostate Cancer Metastatic
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Spatial Needle Placement Strategies and Pathological Concordance in Prostate Biopsy: A National Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study
Prostate Cancer, Prostatic Neoplasms
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
177Lu Radiolabeled Monoclonal Antibody HuJ591 (177Lu-J591) and Ketoconazole in Patients With Prostate Cancer
Prostate Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Andrew Vickers, PhD principal investigator
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
5 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Lymph node template, Transverse versus vertical closure and antibiotic prophylaxis in people with Prostate Cancer, run by Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center at 5 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patient-reported hernia (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01407263, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2026.