StrokePhase 1/2NCT01407536
Effect of Thermal Stimulation on Cortical Excitability and Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Patients
A Phase 1/2 study testing Thermal stimulation system in people with Stroke, run by Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
Trial summary
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has confirmed that thermal stimulation (TS) may facilitate cortical excitability in healthy adults. However, it is unknown whether TS can increase cortical excitability in stroke patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- Thermal stimulation system
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTaiwan
- Study dates
- Aug 2009to Sep 2010
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- first-ever stroke survivors with unilateral hemispheric lesions from a ischemic stroke.
- stroke onset more than 3 months
- no severe cognitive impairments and able to follow instructions
- the ability to sit on a chair for more than 30 minutes independently
- no family history of epilepsy
Who cannot join
- musculoskeletal or cardiac disorders that could potentially interfere with experimental tests;
- diabetic history or sensory impairment attributable to peripheral vascular disease or neuropathy;
- speech disorder or global aphasia;
- participating in any experimental rehabilitation or drug studies;
- skin injuries, burns, or fresh scars at the sites of stimulation;
- contraindication of heat or ice application
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Taiwan1 site
Department of Physical Therapy, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
Kaohsiung City
About this study
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has confirmed that thermal stimulation (TS) may facilitate cortical excitability in healthy adults. However, it is unknown whether TS can increase cortical excitability in stroke patients. Compared to the fMRI, the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) possesses more concise conditions in temporal resolution, and it can present the cerebrum activation situation more instantaneously. This study aimed to use TMS examining the effect on corticomotor excitability, reorganization and functional motor recovery after TS on affected upper limbs of chronic stroke patients.
Read the detailed description
The study was an assessor-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. The participants (more than 3 months posts-stroke)were randomly assigned to experiment (EXP) and control (COT) groups. All participants received regular conventional rehabilitation programs. The EXP and COT received additional upper extremity TS protocol for 30 minutes a day for 20 days. The TS temperature of EXP for noxious stimulation was set at 46-47°C for heat and 7-8°C for cold stimulation; the temperature of COT for innoxious stimulation was set at 40°C for warm and 20°C for cold stimulation. The motor and sensory performance were evaluated at baseline and post-20th- TS by Brunnstrom's recovery stage, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Barthel Index (BI), Upper Extremity Subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Function Assessment (UE-FM) and Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing (tQST). At pre-1st-TS, post-1st-TS, post-10th-TS and post-20th-TS, focal TMS was used to obtain measurement of motor threshold (MT), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), size of cortical motor output map and location of the amplitude-weighted centre of gravity of the motor output map (CoG) from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) in bilateral upper extremities.
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- Thermal stimulation system
- Keywords
- Stroke, Thermal Stimulation, Upper Extremity, Motor Recovery, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Thermal stimulation systemDevice
The subjects meeting our criteria will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (EXP) or the control group (COT). The EXP and COT received upper extremity thermal stimulation protocol for 30 minutes a day for 20 days. The TS temperature of EXP for noxious stimulation was set at 46-47°C for heat and 7-8°C for cold stimulation; the temperature of COT for innoxious stimulation was set at 40°C for warm and 20°C for cold stimulation.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Measured: Change from baseline in cortical excitability at post-1st-intervention, post-10th-intervention, post-20th-intervention and 1 month follow-up
Secondary outcomes (4)
Modified Ashworth Scale
Measured: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Barthel Index
Measured: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Upper Extremity Subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Function Assessment
Measured: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing
Measured: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2009
- Primary completionJun 2010
- Study completionSep 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan, Kaohsiung Medical University
- Investigators
- Jau Hong Lin, PhD, Principal investigator, Kaohsiung Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01407536
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NSC-96-2314-B-037-028-MY3
- Status last verified
- Jun 2011
- First submitted
- 26 Jun 2011
- Last updated
- 2 Aug 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Aug 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Thermal Stimulation on Cortical Excitability and Motor Function in Chronic Stroke Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01407536
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NSC-96-2314-B-037-028-MY3
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- Stroke, Thermal Stimulation, Upper Extremity, Motor Recovery, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan, National Health Research Institutes, Taiwan, Kaohsiung Medical University
- Study start
- Aug 2009
- Primary completion
- Jun 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has confirmed that thermal stimulation (TS) may facilitate cortical excitability in healthy adults. However, it is unknown whether TS can increase cortical excitability in stroke patients. Compared to the fMRI, the transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) possesses more concise conditions in temporal resolution, and it can present the cerebrum activation situation more instantaneously. This study aimed to use TMS examining the effect on corticomotor excitability, reorganization and functional motor recovery after TS on affected upper limbs of chronic stroke patients.
Detailed description
The study was an assessor-blinded randomized controlled clinical trial. The participants (more than 3 months posts-stroke)were randomly assigned to experiment (EXP) and control (COT) groups. All participants received regular conventional rehabilitation programs. The EXP and COT received additional upper extremity TS protocol for 30 minutes a day for 20 days. The TS temperature of EXP for noxious stimulation was set at 46-47°C for heat and 7-8°C for cold stimulation; the temperature of COT for innoxious stimulation was set at 40°C for warm and 20°C for cold stimulation. The motor and sensory performance were evaluated at baseline and post-20th- TS by Brunnstrom's recovery stage, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), Barthel Index (BI), Upper Extremity Subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Function Assessment (UE-FM) and Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing (tQST). At pre-1st-TS, post-1st-TS, post-10th-TS and post-20th-TS, focal TMS was used to obtain measurement of motor threshold (MT), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), size of cortical motor output map and location of the amplitude-weighted centre of gravity of the motor output map (CoG) from abductor pollicis brevis (APB) in bilateral upper extremities.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- first-ever stroke survivors with unilateral hemispheric lesions from a ischemic stroke.
- stroke onset more than 3 months
- no severe cognitive impairments and able to follow instructions
- the ability to sit on a chair for more than 30 minutes independently
- no family history of epilepsy
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- musculoskeletal or cardiac disorders that could potentially interfere with experimental tests;
- diabetic history or sensory impairment attributable to peripheral vascular disease or neuropathy;
- speech disorder or global aphasia;
- participating in any experimental rehabilitation or drug studies;
- skin injuries, burns, or fresh scars at the sites of stimulation;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Thermal stimulation systemThe subjects meeting our criteria will be randomly assigned to either the experimental group (EXP) or the control group (COT). The EXP and COT received upper extremity thermal stimulation protocol for 30 minutes a day for 20 days. The TS temperature of EXP for noxious stimulation was set at 46-47°C for heat and 7-8°C for cold stimulation; the temperature of COT for innoxious stimulation was set at 40°C for warm and 20°C for cold stimulation. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Time frame: Change from baseline in cortical excitability at post-1st-intervention, post-10th-intervention, post-20th-intervention and 1 month follow-up
4 secondary outcomes
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time frame: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Barthel Index
Time frame: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Upper Extremity Subscale of the Fugl-Meyer Motor Function Assessment
Time frame: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Thermal Quantitative Sensory Testing
Time frame: baseline, post-20th-intervention, 1 month follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Aug 2011.
Related trials for Stroke
Recruiting
The AHA Oneida Study
Oneida Nation Members
Active, not recruiting
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of the iNstroke 4F Thromboaspiration Catheter in Patients With Acute Ischaemic Stroke Due to Primary Distal Medium Vessel Occlusions (DMVO)
Acute Ischemic Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Left Atrial Appendage Exclusion for Prophylactic Stroke Reduction Trial
Ischemic Stroke, Systemic Embolism
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Orforglipron (LY3502970) on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Adults With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and/or Chronic Kidney Disease (ATTAIN-Outcomes)
Atherosclerosis Cardiovascular Disease, Chronic Kidney Disease
Active, not recruiting
Brain Connectivity Analysis
Neural Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Jau Hong Lin, PhD principal investigator
Kaohsiung Medical University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Thermal stimulation system in people with Stroke, run by Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital at 1 site in Taiwan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Taiwan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (time frame: Change from baseline in cortical excitability at post-1st-intervention, post-10th-intervention, post-20th-intervention and 1 month follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Aug 2011.