TachycardiaISIS-ICDNCT01410552
Inappropriate Shock Reduction wIth PARAD+ Rhythm DiScrimination
A study testing PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770 in people with Tachycardia, run by MicroPort CRM at 80 sites in 7 countries.
Trial summary
ISIS- ICD study has been designed to evaluate the impact of PARAD+ algorithm on inappropriate shocks, in a general population implanted for primary or secondary prevention with a dual or tri chamber device at one year follow-up Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Tachycardia
- What is being tested?
- PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,013 participants
- Where
- 80 sitesin 7 countries
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to Feb 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient eligible for implantation (according to current accepted guidelines, or scheduled for implant (primo-implant, replacement, upgrade) with a Paradym/Paradym RF (CRT-D or DR-ICD) within the next 30 days, or has already been implanted within the last 30 days
- Patient in sinus rhythm, or patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia or patients with persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia in whom a cardioversion is planned within three months
Who cannot join
- Any contraindication for ICD therapy
- Atrial lead not implanted
- Patient with permanent atrial tachyarrhythmia
- Patients implanted with a ventricular assist device (VAD)
Trial locations and contacts
80 sites in 7 countries.
80 sites in 7 countries
United States27 sites
Southern California Electrophysiology Associates
Anaheim, California, 92801
MGH
Boston, Massachusetts
Raymond H. M. Schaerf MD, Inc.
Burbank, California, 91505
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29403
University of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois
Fairview Hospital
Cleveland, Ohio, 44111
Providence Hospital
Columbia, South Carolina, 29204
St. Tammany Hospital
Covington, Louisiana, 70433
Easton Hospital
Easton, Pennsylvania, 18042
Broward General Medical Center
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316
St. Rose Hospital
Fremont, California, 94538
Pitt Memeorial Hospital Heart Rhythm Associates
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Gulfport Memorial Hospital
Gulfport, Mississippi, 39501
H. Raj Reddy Md, Inc.
Hanford, California, 93230
Medical Center of Central Georgia
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Southwest Cardiovascular Associates
Mesa, Arizona, 85205
Pacific Arrhythmia Services
Mesa, Arizona, 91942
Carolina Arrhythmia Consultants
Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, 29464
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70121
Harlem Cardiology
New York, New York, 10035
Memorial West Hospital
Pembroke Pines, Florida, 33024
Banner Arizona Medical Clinic
Peoria, Arizona, 85381
Drexel University College of Medicine
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85006
Rex Heart and Vascular Specialists
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607
Louisiana Heart Center
Slidell, Louisiana, 70458
The Toledo Hospital
Toledo, Ohio, 43615
France22 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire D'Amiens
Amiens, 80090
Clinique Saint Joseph
Angers
Chu Annecy
Annecy, 74011
CH Henri Duffaut - Avignon
Avignon, 84902
Hôpital Privé de Bois Bernad
Bois-Bernard, 62320
CHRU du Morvan Hôpital la Cavale Blanche
Brest, 29069
Hôpital Instruction des Armées
Clamart, 92141
CH La Rochelle - hôpital St Louis
La Rochelle, 17019
CH LENS
Lens, 62307
Hopital Saint Joseph et saint Luc
Lyon
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de La Timone
Marseille, 13000
Hopital Nord
Marseille
CH Montpellier
Montpellier
CH Emile Muller
Mulhouse
CHU Groupe Hospitalo-universitaire Caremeau
Nîmes, 30029
Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, 75013
Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris
Centre Hospitalier
Pau, 64000
CH Périgueux
Périgueux, 24019
CH Yves le Foll
Saint-Brieuc
Centre Hospitalier de Valence
Valence, 26953
CHU Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, 54500
Japan13 sites
Chiba University Hospital
Chiba
Ichinomiya Nishi Hospital
Ichinomiya, 494-0001
Iizuka Hospital
Iizuka, 820-8505
Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital
Kofu, 400-8506
Kokura Memorial Hospital
Kokura
Ohtanishinouchi Hospital
Kōriyama, 963-8558
Tokai University School of Medicine
Tōkai
Shin-Tokyo Hospital
Tokyo
Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital
Tokyo
Tokyo Metropolitan Hiroo Hospital
Tokyo
Yamaguchi University Hospital
Ube, 755-8505
Yokohama City University Hospital
Yokohama
Yokohama Rosai general Hospital
Yokosuka, 238-8558
Germany6 sites
Klinikum Bogenhausen
Bogenhausen
Universitatsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck
Lübeck, 23501
UKSH Campus Luebeck
Lübeck, 23562
Klinik für Kardiologie Städtisches Klinikum Lüneburg gGmbH
Lüneburg, 21339
Kardiologische Praxis Dr. med Taggeselle
Markkleeberg
DRK Krankenhaus Ratzeburg
Ratzeburg
United Kingdom5 sites
Basildon University Hospital
Basildon, England, SS16
Blackpool Victoria Hospital
Blackpool, FY3 8NR
Papworth Everard
Cambridge, CB23 3RE
Dorset County Hospital
Dorchester, DT1 2JY
Kettering Hospital
Kettering
Spain4 sites
Hospital Universitario de la Ribera
Alzira, 46023
Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol
Badalona, 08916
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
CHU VIGO
Vigo, 3204
Italy3 sites
Policlinico Consorziale di Bari U.O Cardiologia Universitaria
Bari, 70124
Po Melorio
Santa Maria Capua Vetere, 81055
Ospedale S.Andrea
Vercelli, 13100
About this study
ISIS- ICD study has been designed to evaluate the impact of PARAD+ algorithm on inappropriate shocks, in a general population implanted for primary or secondary prevention with a dual or tri chamber device at one year follow-up
Read the detailed description
The primary endpoint is to demonstrate that 95% of patients implanted with PARAD+ algorithm are free from inapproporiate shock compared to 92.5% in general ICD population.
- Conditions
- Tachycardia
- Being tested
- PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770
- Keywords
- Primary prevention, Secondary prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Tachycardia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770Device
PARADYM ICD and CRT-d with PARAD+ algorithm available
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ICD or CRT-D with PARAD+ | Other | only 1 arm is the study: all patients implanted with ICD or CRT-D with PARAD+ enabled, no comparator Receives: Device: PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Patients With Inappropriate Shock(s)
Percentage of patients presenting with inappropriate shock(s)
Measured: 552 days
Secondary outcomes (1)
Shock(s) Appropriately Delivered
Percentage of shocks appropriately delivered
Measured: 552 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionAug 2015
- Study completionFeb 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TachycardiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- ICD device
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 1,013 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- MicroPort CRM
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Ricardo RUIZ GRANELL, Dr, Principal investigator, Cardiology Department Arrhythmia Unit Hospital Clinico Universitario Valencia SPAINMark RICHARDS, Dr., Principal investigator, Toledo Hospital, 4614 Brookside Dr. Toledo (OH)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01410552
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ISIS ICD - ITSY09
- Acronym
- ISIS-ICD
- Status last verified
- Mar 2019
- First submitted
- 3 Aug 2011
- Last updated
- 22 Mar 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Publications
Ruiz-Granell R, Dovellini EV, Dompnier A, Khalighi K, Garcia-Campo E, Olivier A, Barcelo A, Ritter P. Algorithm-based reduction of inappropriate defibrillator shock: Results of the Inappropriate Shock Reduction wIth PARAD+ Rhythm DiScrimination-Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Study. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Sep;16(9):1429-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
PubMed 30910709
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Mar 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Inappropriate Shock Reduction wIth PARAD+ Rhythm DiScrimination
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01410552
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ISIS-ICD / ISIS ICD - ITSY09
- Conditions
- Tachycardia
- Keywords
- Primary prevention, Secondary prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,013 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- MicroPort CRMIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 12 Feb 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
ISIS- ICD study has been designed to evaluate the impact of PARAD+ algorithm on inappropriate shocks, in a general population implanted for primary or secondary prevention with a dual or tri chamber device at one year follow-up
Detailed description
The primary endpoint is to demonstrate that 95% of patients implanted with PARAD+ algorithm are free from inapproporiate shock compared to 92.5% in general ICD population.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- ICD device
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ICD or CRT-D with PARAD+ | Other | Device: PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770only 1 arm is the study: all patients implanted with ICD or CRT-D with PARAD+ enabled, no comparator |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient eligible for implantation (according to current accepted guidelines, or scheduled for implant (primo-implant, replacement, upgrade) with a Paradym/Paradym RF (CRT-D or DR-ICD) within the next 30 days, or has already been implanted within the last 30 days
- Patient in sinus rhythm, or patients with paroxysmal atrial tachyarrhythmia or patients with persistent atrial tachyarrhythmia in whom a cardioversion is planned within three months
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Any contraindication for ICD therapy
- Atrial lead not implanted
- Patient with permanent atrial tachyarrhythmia
- Patients implanted with a ventricular assist device (VAD)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770PARADYM ICD and CRT-d with PARAD+ algorithm available | Device | ICD or CRT-D with PARAD+ |
Primary outcome
Patients With Inappropriate Shock(s)
Time frame: 552 days
Percentage of patients presenting with inappropriate shock(s)
1 secondary outcome
Shock(s) Appropriately Delivered
Time frame: 552 days
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Mar 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30910709Ruiz-Granell R, Dovellini EV, Dompnier A, Khalighi K, Garcia-Campo E, Olivier A, Barcelo A, Ritter P. Algorithm-based reduction of inappropriate defibrillator shock: Results of the Inappropriate Shock Reduction wIth PARAD+ Rhythm DiScrimination-Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Study. Heart Rhythm. 2019 Sep;16(9):1429-1435. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.016. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
Related trials for Tachycardia
Not yet recruiting
MRI-guided Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Structural Heart Disease
Ventricular Tachycardia (VT), Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Enrolling by invitation
VINTAGE (Ventricular Intramyocardial Navigation for Tachycardia Ablation Guided by Electrograms) Using Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) Catheters
Ventricular Arrhythmia
Recruiting
Safety and Effectiveness of the Sphere-9™ Catheter and Affera™ Ablation System for the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia (Sphere VT)
Ventricular Tachycardia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of SGT-501 Gene Therapy in Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia (CPVT)
Catecholaminergic Polymorphic Ventricular Tachycardia
Active, not recruiting
Repeat Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Including Mitral Isthmus Catheter Ablation, With the FARAPULSE Pulsed Field Ablation System
Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ricardo RUIZ GRANELL, Dr principal investigator
Cardiology Department Arrhythmia Unit Hospital Clinico Universitario Valencia SPAIN
Mark RICHARDS, Dr. principal investigator
Toledo Hospital, 4614 Brookside Dr. Toledo (OH)
80 sites in 7 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PARADYM DR model 8550; PARADYM CRT model 8750; PARADYM RF DR model 9550; PARADYM RF CRT model 9750; PARADYM RF CRT SonR model 9770 in people with Tachycardia, run by MicroPort CRM at 80 sites in 7 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Mar 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 80 sites in United States, France, Japan, Germany, United Kingdom and 2 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 Feb 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Patients With Inappropriate Shock(s) (time frame: 552 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01410552, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Mar 2019.