AzTrials
AzTrials

Metastatic Colorectal CancerPhase 3NCT01412957

Comparison of Survival Benefit of Panitumumab With Supportive Care to Best Supportive Care Alone in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

A Phase 3 study testing Panitumumab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen at 78 sites in 16 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of panitumumab in addition to best supportive care compared to best supportive care alone in patients with chemorefractory wild-type KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) metastatic colorectal cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
What is being tested?
Panitumumab
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
377 participants
Where
78 sitesin 16 countries
Study dates
Nov 2011to Nov 2016
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnosis of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC)
  • Wild-type (without mutation in codons 12 and 13) KRAS gene in tumor tissue confirmed by a central laboratory
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1 or 2
  • At least 1 measurable or non-measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 guidelines.
  • Treatment failure (defined as failure due to either disease progression [clinical or radiological] or toxicity [treatment intolerance]) of a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease. Oxaliplatin and irinotecan may have been administered sequentially or in combination.
  • Disease relapse within 6 months after completing adjuvant chemotherapy (with either an irinotecan or oxaliplatin containing regimen) will also be considered as treatment failure of a prior regimen for metastatic disease
Show all 12Show fewer
  • Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of CRC
  • Man or woman at least 18 years of age
  • Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function
  • Negative pregnancy test within 72 hours before randomization (for women of childbearing potential only)
  • Subject or subject's legally acceptable representative has provided informed consent.
  • Other protocol-specified criteria may apply

Who cannot join

  • Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
  • History of another primary cancer within 5 years of randomization
  • Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFR inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib)
  • Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy) within 21 days before randomization
  • Radiotherapy within 14 days before randomization.
  • Exclusion Criteria for corrected QT (QTc) Evaluation Subpart of the Study: Prolongation of QT/QTc interval > 450 milliseconds at screening
  • Other protocol-specified criteria may apply

Trial locations and contacts

78 sites in 16 countries.

78 sites in 16 countries

China12 sites
  • Research Site

    Beijing, 100032

  • Research Site

    Changchun, Jilin, 130021

  • Research Site

    Chongqing, 400037

  • Research Site

    Chongqing, 400042

  • Research Site

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350001

  • Research Site

    Fuzhou, Fujian, 350025

  • Research Site

    Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029

  • Research Site

    Shanghai, 200233

  • Research Site

    Shenyang, Liaoning, 110001

  • Research Site

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050011

  • Research Site

    Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710032

  • Research Site

    Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061

Other trials in China

Romania11 sites
  • Research Site

    Bucharest, 022328

  • Research Site

    Bucharest, 022338

  • Research Site

    Cluj-Napoca, 400006

  • Research Site

    Cluj-Napoca, 400015

  • Research Site

    Cluj-Napoca, 400058

  • Research Site

    Craiova, 200385

  • Research Site

    Craiova, 200642

  • Research Site

    Lasi, 700106

  • Research Site

    Ploieşti, 100337

  • Research Site

    Suceava, 720237

  • Research Site

    Timișoara, 300167

Other trials in Romania

India9 sites
  • Research Site

    Bangalore, Karnataka, 560 054

  • Research Site

    Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600 018

  • Research Site

    Hyderabad, Andhra Pradesh, 500 024

  • Research Site

    Kochi, Kerala, 682 304

  • Research Site

    Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400 012

  • Research Site

    Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 004

  • Research Site

    Nashik, Maharashtra, 422 005

  • Research Site

    Pune, Maharashtra, 411 001

  • Research Site

    Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 530 002

Other trials in India

Canada6 sites
  • Research Site

    Greenfield Park, Quebec, J4V 2H1

  • Research Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H1T 2M4

  • Research Site

    Montreal, Quebec, H4J 1C5

  • Research Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1R 2J6

  • Research Site

    Québec, Quebec, G1S 4L8

  • Research Site

    Trois-Rivières, Quebec, G8Z 3R9

Other trials in Canada

Croatia5 sites
  • Research Site

    Osijek, 31000

  • Research Site

    Pula, 52100

  • Research Site

    Rijeka, 51000

  • Research Site

    Split, 21000

  • Research Site

    Zagreb, 10000

Other trials in Croatia

Philippines5 sites
  • Research Site

    Cebu City, 6000

  • Research Site

    Davao City, Davao Region, 8000

  • Research Site

    Manila, 1000

  • Research Site

    Manila, 1008

  • Research Site

    Pasay, 1300

Other trials in Philippines

Brazil4 sites
  • Research Site

    Curitiba, Paraná, 80420-090

  • Research Site

    Ijuí, Rio Grande do Sul, 98700-000

  • Research Site

    Natal, Rio Grande do Norte, 59075-740

  • Research Site

    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90610-000

Other trials in Brazil

Malaysia4 sites
  • Research Site

    George Town, Pulau Pinang, 10400

  • Research Site

    Kampung Baharu Nilai, Negeri Sembilan, 71800

  • Research Site

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000

  • Research Site

    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 59100

Other trials in Malaysia

Mexico4 sites
  • Research Site

    Cuernavaca, Morelos, 62290

  • Research Site

    Mexico City, Mexico City, 06760

  • Research Site

    Mexico City, Mexico City, 14080

  • Research Site

    Oaxaca City, Oaxaca, 68000

Other trials in Mexico

South Korea4 sites
  • Research Site

    Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, 410-769

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 120-752

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 135-710

  • Research Site

    Seoul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

Latvia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Daugavpils, 5417

  • Research Site

    Riga, 1002

  • Research Site

    Riga, 1079

Other trials in Latvia

Serbia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Belgrade, 11000

  • Research Site

    Kamenitz, 21204

  • Research Site

    Niš, 18000

Other trials in Serbia

Chile2 sites
  • Research Site

    Temuco, Cautín, 4810469

  • Research Site

    Viña del Mar, Valparaiso, 2520612

Other trials in Chile

Estonia2 sites
  • Research Site

    Tallinn, 13419

  • Research Site

    Tartu, 51014

Other trials in Estonia

Greece2 sites
  • Research Site

    Athens, 11522

  • Research Site

    Chania, 73300

Other trials in Greece

Lithuania2 sites
  • Research Site

    Kaunas, 50009

  • Research Site

    Vilnius, 08660

Other trials in Lithuania

About this study

Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Open-label Trial to Evaluate the Survival Benefit of Panitumumab and Best Supportive Care, Compared to Best Supportive Care Alone, in Subjects With Chemorefractory Wild-type KRAS Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the benefit of panitumumab in addition to best supportive care compared to best supportive care alone in patients with chemorefractory wild-type KRAS (Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) metastatic colorectal cancer.

Being tested
Best Supportive Care (BSC), Panitumumab
Keywords
Best Supportive Care, Panitumumab, Chemorefractory, Wild-type KRAS, Overall Survival, Phase 3
Medical subject headings
Colorectal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Best Supportive Care (BSC)Other

    BSC was defined as the best palliative care available as judged appropriate by the investigator and according to institutional guidelines and could include antibiotics, analgesics, radiation therapy for pain control (limited to bone metastases), corticosteroids, transfusions, psychotherapy, growth factors, palliative surgery, or any other symptomatic therapy as clinically indicated.

  • PanitumumabDrug

    Also called Vectibix

    Administered intravenously

Study groups in NCT01412957
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Panitumumab + BSCExperimentalParticipants received panitumumab administered intravenously 6 mg/kg every 14 days plus BSC until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, death, or intolerance of study drug.
Receives: Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC); Drug: Panitumumab
BSC AloneOtherParticipants received best supportive care until disease progression, withdrawal of consent, or death.
Receives: Other: Best Supportive Care (BSC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date and participants with survival data obtained after the planned analysis data cut-off date had survival censored at the cut-off date.

    Measured: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Progression-free Survival

    Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 or death. Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions compared with the smallest size since treatment started and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, any new lesions or an increase in size of non-target lesions thought be ≥ 20% and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or significant increase in pleural effusions, ascites or other fluid collections with cytologic proof of malignancy. Participants who were alive and did not meet the criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

    Measured: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).

  2. Overall Survival in Participants With Wild-type RAS

    A secondary efficacy endpoint was overall survival in participants with wild-type rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS) (without mutation in exons 2 [codons 12 and 13], 3 [codons 59 and 61], and 4 [codons 117 and 146] of KRAS and neuroblastoma RAS viral oncogene (NRAS)). In participants with wild-type RAS, RAS mutation status was defined by KRAS exon 2 mutation status per clinical trial assay testing and mutation status of KRAS exon 3 and 4 and NRAS exons 2, 3 and 4 per Sanger bi-directional sequencing. Overall survival was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of death. Participants who had not died by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last contact date and participants with survival data obtained after the planned analysis data cut-off date had survival censored at the cut-off date.

    Measured: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).

  3. Progression Free Survival (PFS) in Participants With Wild-type RAS

    PFS was defined as the time from the randomization date to the date of disease progression per RECIST version 1.1 or death.

    Progressive disease (PD): At least a 20% increase in the size of target lesions compared with the smallest size since treatment started and an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, any new lesions, or an increase in size of non-target lesions thought be ≥ 20% with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or significant increase in pleural effusions, ascites or other fluid collections with cytologic proof of malignancy. Participants who were alive and did not meet the criteria for progression by the analysis data cut-off date were censored at their last evaluable disease assessment date.

    Measured: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).

  4. Objective Response Rate

    Objective response rate (ORR) is defined as the percentage of participants with either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments and investigator's assessment of response were performed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until disease progression (radiographic or clinical progression). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.

    Measured: Response was assessed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).

  5. Objective Response Rate in Participants With Wild-type RAS

    Objective response rate is defined as the percentage of participants with either a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST version 1.1. Radiographic tumor assessments and investigator's assessment of response were performed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until disease progression (radiographic or clinical progression). CR: Disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to < 10 mm. PR: At least a 30% decrease in the size of target lesions with no progression of non-target lesions and no new lesions, or, the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more non-target lesions not qualifying for either CR or PD and no new lesions.

    Measured: Response was assessed at Week 4, Week 8, and then every 8 weeks until the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 36.1 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 43.7 weeks; BSC alone: 23.6 weeks).

  6. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

    The severity of each AE was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0 (Grade 1 = Mild; 2 = Moderate (discomfort enough to cause interference with usual activity); 3 = Severe (incapacitating with inability to work or do usual activity); 4 = Life-threatening and 5 = Fatal), with the exception of the skin-or nail-related AEs which were graded using a CTCAE version 3.0 with modifications. A serious AE was defined as an AE that met at least 1 of the following criteria: • fatal, • life-threatening, • required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, • resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, • congenital anomaly/birth defect, and/or • other medically important serious event. Treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) are those the investigator considered there was reasonable possibility that the event might have been caused by study drug.

    Measured: From first dose until 30 days after last dose; median safety reporting periods were 4.2 months and 2.2 months for panitumumab plus BSC arm and BSC alone arm, respectively.

  7. Maximum Post-baseline Change From Baseline in Corrected QT (QTc) Interval

    QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle as measured by electrocardiogram (ECG). QTc is the QT interval corrected for heart rate. To evaluate the effect of panitumumab treatment on the QTc interval length among participants treated with panitumumab, ECGs were collected at the following time points from participants randomized to panitumumab arm at a limited number of sites: Week 1 prior to the first panitumumab infusion (Baseline) and within 30 minutes following the end of the first infusion of panitumumab (Cmax), Week 7 after 3 doses of panitumumab (steady state), and at the safety follow-up visit. The ECGs were submitted for independent central review to calculate the reported QTc interval. QTc was calculated using both the Bazett correction (QTcB) and the Fridericia correction (QTcF).

    Measured: Baseline (pre-dose), Week 1 and Week 7 (post-dose) and 4 weeks after the last dose (Safety Follow-up visit)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2011
  3. Primary completionJun 2014
  4. Study completionNov 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
377 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01412957
Sponsor's protocol ID
20100007
Other IDs
2010-022951-49
Status last verified
Feb 2017
First submitted
31 Mar 2011
Last updated
15 Mar 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kim TW, Elme A, Kusic Z, Park JO, Udrea AA, Kim SY, Ahn JB, Valencia RV, Krishnan S, Bilic A, Manojlovic N, Dong J, Guan X, Lofton-Day C, Jung AS, Vrdoljak E. A phase 3 trial evaluating panitumumab plus best supportive care vs best supportive care in chemorefractory wild-type KRAS or RAS metastatic colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016 Nov 8;115(10):1206-1214. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2016.309. Epub 2016 Oct 13.

    PubMed 27736842

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Panitumumab in people with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer, run by Amgen at 78 sites in 16 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Mar 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 78 sites in China, Romania, India, Canada, Croatia and 11 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Apr 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival (time frame: From randomization to the last on-study or long-term follow-up visit, as of the data cut-off date of 10 June 2014. The median follow-up time was 34.9 weeks (panitumumab plus BSC: 41.0 weeks; BSC alone: 25.5 weeks).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01412957, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Mar 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in