Acute Myeloid LeukaemiaPhase 3OSHO#061NCT01414231
Comparison of the OSHO Protocol to a Standard Arm Protocol of the German AML Intergroup in Patients With AML<60a
A Phase 3 study testing Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, run by University of Leipzig at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
This protocol is part of the German AML Intergroup Trial, where the OSHO study arm is compared to the common German standard arm after randomization in a 9:1 ratio. The hypothesis involves primarily dosing and application of AraC for induction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
- What is being tested?
- Cytarabine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 850 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Apr 2002to Jul 2014
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients < or = 60 years acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) AML t(8;21)(q22;q22), AML1 (CBFa)/ETO, AML(inv(16)(p13q22)) und variants (CBFb/MYH11), AML 11q23, MLL-anomalies, AML with normal karyotyp myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)RAEBT with 20-30% blasts.
- de novo AML secundary AML after MDS secundary AML after chemotherapy with alkylantien sekundäre AML after chemotherapy with Epipodophyllotoxin informed consent
Who cannot join
- AML M3 patients included in another clinical trial contraindications for high dose cytotoxic therapy such as renal insufficiency liver insufficiency cardiac insufficiency NYHA III + IV, acute myocardial infarction uncontroled infection like pneumonia with hypoxemia or septic schock pregnancy Karnofski-Index of 10 and less second maligancy severe, decompensated metabolism disorders
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
University of Leipzig, Hematology
Leipzig, 04103
Dietger Niederwieser, +4934197 ext. 13050, dietger@medizin.uni-leipzig.de
About this study
Official title: Randomised Comparison of OSHO Induction vs. the German AML Intergroup Standard, Randomised Comparison of AraC/Mtx vs. Flu/AraC/Mtx in Pts Without CR After One Induction Cycle and Randomized Comparison of One vs. Two Consolidation Therapies.
This protocol is part of the German AML Intergroup Trial, where the OSHO study arm is compared to the common German standard arm after randomization in a 9:1 ratio. The hypothesis involves primarily dosing and application of AraC for induction. It is expected that CR rates and as a consequence also LFS are higher in protocols using higher AraC compared to lower doses and that LFS might be superior in the study specific arm compared to the golden standard published several years ago. In the standard arm, AraC 100mg/m2/day is given as continuous infusion over 7 days. Daunorubicin is given as 60 mg/m2/day over a two hours infusion on days 3, 4 und 5. On day 22 a second induction course is applied. After reaching CR, three cycles of AraC 3 g/m2 over three hours bid are infused on day 1, 3 und 5. In contrast the OSHO arm consists of induction therapy with IDA 12 mg/m*2 over 20-30-min-iv on day 1 - 3 and AraC 2 x 1 g/m*2 bid over 3-h-iv on days 1+3+5+7.
A previous phase II study of the OSHO has shown high CR in patients with relapsed AML using MitoFlag. In this study we asked the question if MitoFlag is superior to IdaAraC in newly diagnosed AML patients without CR after the first induction chemotherapy. Therefore patients are randomized to receive either MitoFlag or IdaAraC and the difference in CR rates evaluated.
Read more
It is still unclear if two consolidation therapies are needed before allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation. This question is being addressed in the second part of the OSHO study, where patients are randomized to receive either one or two consolidation therapies.
In this study all patients with AML and an age of 18-60 years except M3 are entered
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
- Being tested
- Cytarabine
- Keywords
- AML, acute myeloid leukaemia, low vs intermediate dose AraC, CR rate, patients <60 years
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CytarabineDrug
Intermediate dose against low dose; IDA 12 mg/m2 iv days 1 - 3 and AraC 2 x 1 g/m2 bid on days 1+3+5+7 vs. AraC 100 mg/m2/day i.v.-for 7 days and Daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/Tag on days 3, 4 und 5.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cytarabine low dose | Active comparator | This is the golden standard of AML treatment Receives: Drug: Cytarabine |
| Cytarabine intermediate dose | Active comparator | This is the OSHO internal arm Receives: Drug: Cytarabine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Event free survival
Measured: after 5 years
Secondary outcomes (3)
Complete remission
Measured: average of 6 weeks
Overall survival
Measured: at 5 years average
Relapse free survival
Measured: at 5 years average
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2002
- Primary completionDec 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionJul 2014 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukaemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Leipzig
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Dietger Niederwieser, MD, Principal investigator, University of Leipzig
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01414231
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AML 2002 #061
- Acronym
- OSHO#061
- Status last verified
- Apr 2008
- First submitted
- 5 Aug 2011
- Last updated
- 11 Aug 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Buchner T, Schlenk RF, Schaich M, Dohner K, Krahl R, Krauter J, Heil G, Krug U, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Spath D, Kramer M, Scholl S, Berdel WE, Hiddemann W, Hoelzer D, Hehlmann R, Hasford J, Hoffmann VS, Dohner H, Ehninger G, Ganser A, Niederwieser DW, Pfirrmann M. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): different treatment strategies versus a common standard arm--combined prospective analysis by the German AML Intergroup. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3604-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.2907. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
PubMed 22965967
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Aug 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomised Comparison of OSHO Induction vs. the German AML Intergroup Standard, Randomised Comparison of AraC/Mtx vs. Flu/AraC/Mtx in Pts Without CR After One Induction Cycle and Randomized Comparison of One vs. Two Consolidation Therapies.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01414231
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OSHO#061 / AML 2002 #061
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
- Keywords
- AML, acute myeloid leukaemia, low vs intermediate dose AraC, CR rate, patients <60 years
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 850 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of LeipzigUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2002
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jul 2014 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This protocol is part of the German AML Intergroup Trial, where the OSHO study arm is compared to the common German standard arm after randomization in a 9:1 ratio. The hypothesis involves primarily dosing and application of AraC for induction. It is expected that CR rates and as a consequence also LFS are higher in protocols using higher AraC compared to lower doses and that LFS might be superior in the study specific arm compared to the golden standard published several years ago. In the standard arm, AraC 100mg/m2/day is given as continuous infusion over 7 days. Daunorubicin is given as 60 mg/m2/day over a two hours infusion on days 3, 4 und 5. On day 22 a second induction course is applied. After reaching CR, three cycles of AraC 3 g/m2 over three hours bid are infused on day 1, 3 und 5. In contrast the OSHO arm consists of induction therapy with IDA 12 mg/m*2 over 20-30-min-iv on day 1 - 3 and AraC 2 x 1 g/m*2 bid over 3-h-iv on days 1+3+5+7.
A previous phase II study of the OSHO has shown high CR in patients with relapsed AML using MitoFlag. In this study we asked the question if MitoFlag is superior to IdaAraC in newly diagnosed AML patients without CR after the first induction chemotherapy. Therefore patients are randomized to receive either MitoFlag or IdaAraC and the difference in CR rates evaluated.
It is still unclear if two consolidation therapies are needed before allogeneic or autologous stem cell transplantation. This question is being addressed in the second part of the OSHO study, where patients are randomized to receive either one or two consolidation therapies.
In this study all patients with AML and an age of 18-60 years except M3 are entered
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cytarabine low dose | Active comparator | Drug: CytarabineThis is the golden standard of AML treatment |
| Cytarabine intermediate dose | Active comparator | Drug: CytarabineThis is the OSHO internal arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Adult patients < or = 60 years acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) AML t(8;21)(q22;q22), AML1 (CBFa)/ETO, AML(inv(16)(p13q22)) und variants (CBFb/MYH11), AML 11q23, MLL-anomalies, AML with normal karyotyp myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)RAEBT with 20-30% blasts.
- de novo AML secundary AML after MDS secundary AML after chemotherapy with alkylantien sekundäre AML after chemotherapy with Epipodophyllotoxin informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- AML M3 patients included in another clinical trial contraindications for high dose cytotoxic therapy such as renal insufficiency liver insufficiency cardiac insufficiency NYHA III + IV, acute myocardial infarction uncontroled infection like pneumonia with hypoxemia or septic schock pregnancy Karnofski-Index of 10 and less second maligancy severe, decompensated metabolism disorders
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CytarabineIntermediate dose against low dose; IDA 12 mg/m2 iv days 1 - 3 and AraC 2 x 1 g/m2 bid on days 1+3+5+7 vs. AraC 100 mg/m2/day i.v.-for 7 days and Daunorubicin 60 mg/m2/Tag on days 3, 4 und 5. | Drug | Cytarabine intermediate dose, Cytarabine low dose |
Primary outcome
Event free survival
Time frame: after 5 years
3 secondary outcomes
Complete remission
Time frame: average of 6 weeks
Overall survival
Time frame: at 5 years average
Relapse free survival
Time frame: at 5 years average
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Aug 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22965967Buchner T, Schlenk RF, Schaich M, Dohner K, Krahl R, Krauter J, Heil G, Krug U, Sauerland MC, Heinecke A, Spath D, Kramer M, Scholl S, Berdel WE, Hiddemann W, Hoelzer D, Hehlmann R, Hasford J, Hoffmann VS, Dohner H, Ehninger G, Ganser A, Niederwieser DW, Pfirrmann M. Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): different treatment strategies versus a common standard arm--combined prospective analysis by the German AML Intergroup. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Oct 10;30(29):3604-10. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.2907. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukaemia
RecruitingObservational study
A Long-term Follow-up Study of Patients With ARD103 CAR-T Cell Therapies
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapse, Acute Myeloid Leukemia, in Relapsed or Refractory
RecruitingPhase 2
MYELOMATCH: A Screening Study to Assign People With Myeloid Cancer to a Treatment Study or Standard of Care Treatment Within myeloMATCH (MyeloMATCH Screening Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
RecruitingPhase 1
225Ac-DOTA-Anti-CD38 Daratumumab Monoclonal Antibody With Fludarabine, Melphalan and Total Marrow and Lymphoid Irradiation as Conditioning Treatment for Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With High-Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Addition of Venetoclax or Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) to Usual Treatment Regimen (Cytarabine and Daunorubicin, "7+3") for Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia (CBF-AML) to Improve Response (A MYELOMATCH Treatment Trial)
Core Binding Factor Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Phase I/II Trial: Engineered Donor Graft (Orca Q) for Pediatric Hematopoietic Cell Transplant (HCT)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Lymphoid Leukemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dietger Niederwieser, MD principal investigator
University of Leipzig
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Cytarabine in people with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia, run by University of Leipzig at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Dietger Niederwieser, Prof. (+49 172 3436202, dietger@medizin.uni-leipzig.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Event free survival (time frame: after 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01414231, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2011.