HIV-InfectionPhase 4IDEALNCT01417949
Immediate Versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-infected Patients Presenting With Acute AIDS-defining Events
A Phase 4 study testing Time of starting antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV-Infection, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 17 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV-Infection
- What is being tested?
- Time of starting antiretroviral therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 61 participants
- Where
- 17 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- Aug 2011to May 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult (at least 18 years) HIV-1 infected subjects
- Antiretroviral naïve HIV-1-infected patients who have developed an acute AIDS defining event, namely PCP or Toxoplasmosis (women receiving prior MTCT prophylaxis may be enrolled)
- Patients who are able to take or to receive antiretroviral treatment and who are able to give written consent
Who cannot join
- Renal failure or CrCl < 60 mL/min
- Patients who are not able to initiate ART or with current contraindications against atazanavir/ritonavir
- Other AIDS-defining events than PCP or TE (exceptions see below)
- Pregnancy/Women of childbearing potential who want to become pregnant
Trial locations and contacts
17 sites in 1 country.
17 sites in 1 country
Germany17 sites
Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum
Berlin, State of Berlin, 12157
Charitè Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum
Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353
Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Innere Medizin I, Immunologische Ambulanz/Studienzentrale
Bonn, 53127
Universitätsklinik Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin
Cologne, 50937
Medizinische Klinik Nord
Dortmund, 44137
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie
Düsseldorf, 40225
Universitätshauptklinik Essen
Essen, 45122
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik II / Infektiologie
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Centrum Chronische Immundefizienz (CCI)
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
ICH Study Center GmbH & CO. KG
Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20146
ifi Hamburg an der Asklepios Klinik St. Georg
Hamburg, 20099
University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Infectious Diseases Unit,
Hamburg, 20249
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Immunologie und Rheumatologie
Hanover, 30625
Universitätsklinikum Kiel, II. Medizinisch Klinik, UKSH, Campus Kiel
Kiel, 24116
Universitätsklinikum München, Infektionsabteilung, Med. Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Innenstadt
München, 80336
Universitätsklinkum Ulm, Comprehensive Infectious Diseases Center (CIDC) Ulm, Sektion Infektiologie und Klinische Immunologie, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Innere Medizin III
Ulm, 89081
Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
Würzburg, 97080
About this study
Official title: Immediate Versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-infected Patients Presenting With Acute AIDS-defining Events (IDEAL-Study)
The purpose of this study is to compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii encephalitis (TE).
Read the detailed description
Objectives:
To compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii encephalitis (TE).
The primary objective of this study is as follows:
To compare the rates of clinical progression between both groups. Progression is defined as death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections (OI), and other grade 4 clinical endpoints (evaluated by standardized toxicity tables) within 24 weeks after randomization.
The secondary objectives of this study are:
- to evaluate and to compare hospitalization days after completion of initial OI treatment between both groups.
- to evaluate the incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS, definition see Objectives) in both groups during the first 24 weeks.
- to evaluate and to compare the virological outcome proportion in both groups. Virological outcome is assessed by HIV-1 plasma viral load at Week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL). For definition of virological failure, see below.
- to evaluate and to compare the frequency changes in ART regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity in both groups.
- to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) and the adherence to the ARV regimen in subjects starting tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir at late stages of HIV-1-infection.
Study Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study
Number of Subjects to be Randomized:
105 patients per arm (total of 210 patients planned).
Target Population:
ART naïve HIV-1 infected adults, who have developed an acute AIDS defining opportunistic infection, namely PCP or TE.
Duration of Treatment:
24 weeks
Diagnosis and Main Eligibility Criteria:
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (at least 18 years) HIV-1 infected subjects
- Antiretroviral naïve HIV-1-infected patients who have developed an acute AIDS defining event, namely PCP or TE (women receiving prior MTCT prophylaxis may be enrolled)
- Patients who are able to take or to receive antiretroviral treatment and who are able to give written consent Key exclusion criteria
- Renal failure or CrCl below 60 mL/min
- Patients who are not able to initiate ART or with current contraindications against atazanavir/ritonavir
- Other AIDS-defining events than PCP or TE (exceptions see below)
- Pregnancy/Women of childbearing potential who want to become pregnant
Study Procedures/ Frequency:
OI Diagnosis, Screening, Randomization
- Patients should be screened immediately after diagnosis and decision for OI treatment have been made, providing the patient's personal doctor considers ART to be possible and the patient agrees to be included in the study (written consent).
- Diagnosis of both PCP and TE will be established according to standard of care by the treating physician. A definitive diagnosis (histologically proven) is not required for study entry. The decision for specific treatment of OI is also made by the treating physician according to appropriate guidelines.
- Screening assessments include medical history, social background, physical examination, height, weight, vital signs, and concomitant medications.
- Blood parameters should be assessed by the local lab and should contain CBC (complete blood count) with differential and platelet count, Bilirubine, ALT, AST, LDH, yGT, serum creatinine, electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride), calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), urinalysis, and serum pregnancy test (females of childbearing potential only). These results must be available before sending the evaluation form.
- Further screening assessments include HIV-1 RNA, genotype HIV resistance test, CD4/CD8 T-cell count, serology for hepatitis C antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), cryptococcus antigen, CRP and a T Cell Interferon-Gamma Release Assay (TIGRA). Of note, there is no need to wait for the results of these further screening parameters.
- A questionnaire that will describe social and educational status and reasons for presenting late during HIV-infection will be performed at screening or entry. A QoL questionnaire (SF 36) is also required at screening or entry.
Randomization, Baseline Prior to first randomization, every participating center will receive study drugs for the treatment of three patients for one month. Within 24 hours after sending the screening form, the site investigator will receive a randomization sheet with the decision when to start ART ("immediate" or "deferred"). The day of receiving the randomization sheet will be defined as baseline visit. Immediate arm: ART should be initiated as soon as possible but no later than 3 days after initiation of OI treatment. Deferred arm: ART should be initiated after the completion of OI treatment which is achieved at the earliest at day 21 for PCP and at day 28 for TE. ART should be initiated no later than 6 weeks after initiation of OI treatment.
Follow up Procedures
- Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 or Early Study Drug Discontinuation Visit assessments include a symptom-directed physical examination, weight, vital signs, concomitant medications, adverse events, HIV-1 RNA, CD4 count, CBC with differential and platelet count, ALT, AST, LDH, Bilirubine, gGT, serum creatinine, electrolytes, calculated CrCl.
- Additional Week 12, 24, or Early Study Drug Discontinuation Visit assessments include the preservation of a plasma sample for HIV genotype/phenotype analysis in selected centers. Subjects who were HBsAg positive at screening will have HBV DNA and HBV serology measured at these visits.
- If the subject discontinues study drug prior to Week 24, the subject will be asked to return to the clinic within 72 hours of stopping study drug for an Early Study Drug Discontinuation visit. All of the Week 24 assessments will be performed at this visit.
- HIV resistance assessments will be performed in patients who do not achieve plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of < 400 copies/mL at Week 24, who achieve plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of < 400 copies/mL on at least one occasion, and later have at least two consecutive plasma HIV 1 RNA levels > 400 copies/mL, or for subjects who discontinue study drugs prior to Week 24 and have > 400 copies/mL of HIV 1 RNA on their last study visit prior to discontinuing study drugs.
- Additional Week 12, 24 assessments include a patient adherence questionnaire and a QoL Questionnaire (SF 36).
Test Product, Dose, and Mode of Administration:
Atazanavir capsules with 300 mg and ritonavir tablets with 100 mg, each to be taken QD with a meal. The NRTI backbone chosen by the treating physician is preferably the combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir DF tablets.
Criteria for Evaluation: Primary Endpoint:
Clinical Progression (death, all new or relapsing OI, other Grade 4 clinical endpoint) within 24 weeks. For G4 events standardized toxicity grading tables will be used. For abnormalities not found in the Toxicity Tables, a Grade 4 event will be defined as potentially life-threatening (extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable). Patients who drop out of study observation before end of week 12 are counted as clinical progression.
Secondary Endpoints
- Hospitalization days after completion of OI treatment
- Incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) as judged by the site investigator (for definitions see below) compared in the two groups during the first 24 weeks.
- Virological outcome at week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA < 400 (<50 copies/mL).
- Proportion of patients with changes in ARV regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity
- to evaluate and to compare the immunological outcome proportion in both groups.
- Quality of life (QOL), including overall self-reported QOL at Week 24
Statistical Methods:
Tabular and/or graphical descriptive methods will be used to summarize and explore the results. Continuous variables will be summarized by mean, standard deviation, minimum, 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles and maximum. Count and percent of subjects will summarize categorical variables. Appropriate transformations will be applied (e.g., log10 for HIV-1 RNA). Appropriate confidence intervals (two-sided; 95%) will be calculated for changes in major endpoints. Appropriate tests of significance may also be performed.
This study will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs) including archiving of essential documents.
- Conditions
- HIV-Infection
- Being tested
- Time of starting antiretroviral therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Time of starting antiretroviral therapyOther
Within 24 hours after sending the screening form, the site investigator will receive a randomization sheet with the decision when to start ART ("immediate" or "deferred"). The day of receiving the randomization sheet will be defined as baseline visit.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate arm | Active comparator | Immediate arm: ART should be initiated as soon as possible but no later than 3 days after initiation of OI treatment. Receives: Other: Time of starting antiretroviral therapy |
| Deferred arm | Active comparator | Deferred arm: ART should be initiated after the completion of OI treatment which is achieved at the earliest at day 21 for PCP and at day 28 for TE. ART should be initiated no later than 6 weeks after initiation of OI treatment. Receives: Other: Time of starting antiretroviral therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections and other grade 4 clinical endpoints within 24 weeks after randomization
Clinical Progression (death, all new or relapsing OI, other Grade 4 clinical endpoint) within 24 weeks. For abnormalities not found in the Toxicity Tables, a Grade 4 event will be defined as potentially life-threatening (extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable). Patients who drop out of study observation before end of week 12 are counted as clinical progression.
Measured: 24 weeks
Secondary outcomes (6)
Hospitalization days after completion of initial OI treatment between both groups
Hospitalization days after completion of OI treatment
Measured: 24 weeks
incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
Incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) as judged by the site investigator (for definitions see below) compared in the two groups during the first 24 weeks.
Measured: 24 weeks
virological outcome
Virological outcome at week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA < 400 (<50 copies/mL).
Measured: 24 weeks
efficacy and toxicity of the antiretroviral therapy
Proportion of patients with changes in ARV regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity
Measured: 24 weeks
quality of life
Quality of life (QOL), including overall self-reported QOL at Week 24
Measured: 24 weeks
immunological outcome
For evaluation of immunological outcome, CD4 T-cell counts at week 24 (absolute, relative, CD4/CD8 ratio) and the change in CD4 T-cell counts from baseline will be assessed.
Measured: 24 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2011
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionMay 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HIV-InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Stefan Schmiedel, MD, Principal investigator, Infectious Diseases Unit, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01417949
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EudraCT Nr. 2010-022413-26
- Acronym
- IDEAL
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 10 Aug 2011
- Last updated
- 28 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immediate Versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-infected Patients Presenting With Acute AIDS-defining Events (IDEAL-Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01417949
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IDEAL / EudraCT Nr. 2010-022413-26
- Conditions
- HIV-Infection
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 61 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-EppendorfUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii encephalitis (TE).
Detailed description
Objectives:
To compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii encephalitis (TE).
The primary objective of this study is as follows:
To compare the rates of clinical progression between both groups. Progression is defined as death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections (OI), and other grade 4 clinical endpoints (evaluated by standardized toxicity tables) within 24 weeks after randomization.
The secondary objectives of this study are:
- to evaluate and to compare hospitalization days after completion of initial OI treatment between both groups.
- to evaluate the incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS, definition see Objectives) in both groups during the first 24 weeks.
- to evaluate and to compare the virological outcome proportion in both groups. Virological outcome is assessed by HIV-1 plasma viral load at Week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL). For definition of virological failure, see below.
- to evaluate and to compare the frequency changes in ART regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity in both groups.
- to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) and the adherence to the ARV regimen in subjects starting tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir at late stages of HIV-1-infection.
Study Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study
Number of Subjects to be Randomized:
105 patients per arm (total of 210 patients planned).
Target Population:
ART naïve HIV-1 infected adults, who have developed an acute AIDS defining opportunistic infection, namely PCP or TE.
Duration of Treatment:
24 weeks
Diagnosis and Main Eligibility Criteria:
Key Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (at least 18 years) HIV-1 infected subjects
- Antiretroviral naïve HIV-1-infected patients who have developed an acute AIDS defining event, namely PCP or TE (women receiving prior MTCT prophylaxis may be enrolled)
- Patients who are able to take or to receive antiretroviral treatment and who are able to give written consent Key exclusion criteria
- Renal failure or CrCl below 60 mL/min
- Patients who are not able to initiate ART or with current contraindications against atazanavir/ritonavir
- Other AIDS-defining events than PCP or TE (exceptions see below)
- Pregnancy/Women of childbearing potential who want to become pregnant
Study Procedures/ Frequency:
OI Diagnosis, Screening, Randomization
- Patients should be screened immediately after diagnosis and decision for OI treatment have been made, providing the patient's personal doctor considers ART to be possible and the patient agrees to be included in the study (written consent).
- Diagnosis of both PCP and TE will be established according to standard of care by the treating physician. A definitive diagnosis (histologically proven) is not required for study entry. The decision for specific treatment of OI is also made by the treating physician according to appropriate guidelines.
- Screening assessments include medical history, social background, physical examination, height, weight, vital signs, and concomitant medications.
- Blood parameters should be assessed by the local lab and should contain CBC (complete blood count) with differential and platelet count, Bilirubine, ALT, AST, LDH, yGT, serum creatinine, electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride), calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), urinalysis, and serum pregnancy test (females of childbearing potential only). These results must be available before sending the evaluation form.
- Further screening assessments include HIV-1 RNA, genotype HIV resistance test, CD4/CD8 T-cell count, serology for hepatitis C antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), cryptococcus antigen, CRP and a T Cell Interferon-Gamma Release Assay (TIGRA). Of note, there is no need to wait for the results of these further screening parameters.
- A questionnaire that will describe social and educational status and reasons for presenting late during HIV-infection will be performed at screening or entry. A QoL questionnaire (SF 36) is also required at screening or entry.
Randomization, Baseline Prior to first randomization, every participating center will receive study drugs for the treatment of three patients for one month. Within 24 hours after sending the screening form, the site investigator will receive a randomization sheet with the decision when to start ART ("immediate" or "deferred"). The day of receiving the randomization sheet will be defined as baseline visit. Immediate arm: ART should be initiated as soon as possible but no later than 3 days after initiation of OI treatment. Deferred arm: ART should be initiated after the completion of OI treatment which is achieved at the earliest at day 21 for PCP and at day 28 for TE. ART should be initiated no later than 6 weeks after initiation of OI treatment.
Follow up Procedures
- Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 or Early Study Drug Discontinuation Visit assessments include a symptom-directed physical examination, weight, vital signs, concomitant medications, adverse events, HIV-1 RNA, CD4 count, CBC with differential and platelet count, ALT, AST, LDH, Bilirubine, gGT, serum creatinine, electrolytes, calculated CrCl.
- Additional Week 12, 24, or Early Study Drug Discontinuation Visit assessments include the preservation of a plasma sample for HIV genotype/phenotype analysis in selected centers. Subjects who were HBsAg positive at screening will have HBV DNA and HBV serology measured at these visits.
- If the subject discontinues study drug prior to Week 24, the subject will be asked to return to the clinic within 72 hours of stopping study drug for an Early Study Drug Discontinuation visit. All of the Week 24 assessments will be performed at this visit.
- HIV resistance assessments will be performed in patients who do not achieve plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of < 400 copies/mL at Week 24, who achieve plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of < 400 copies/mL on at least one occasion, and later have at least two consecutive plasma HIV 1 RNA levels > 400 copies/mL, or for subjects who discontinue study drugs prior to Week 24 and have > 400 copies/mL of HIV 1 RNA on their last study visit prior to discontinuing study drugs.
- Additional Week 12, 24 assessments include a patient adherence questionnaire and a QoL Questionnaire (SF 36).
Test Product, Dose, and Mode of Administration:
Atazanavir capsules with 300 mg and ritonavir tablets with 100 mg, each to be taken QD with a meal. The NRTI backbone chosen by the treating physician is preferably the combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir DF tablets.
Criteria for Evaluation: Primary Endpoint:
Clinical Progression (death, all new or relapsing OI, other Grade 4 clinical endpoint) within 24 weeks. For G4 events standardized toxicity grading tables will be used. For abnormalities not found in the Toxicity Tables, a Grade 4 event will be defined as potentially life-threatening (extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable). Patients who drop out of study observation before end of week 12 are counted as clinical progression.
Secondary Endpoints
- Hospitalization days after completion of OI treatment
- Incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) as judged by the site investigator (for definitions see below) compared in the two groups during the first 24 weeks.
- Virological outcome at week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA < 400 (<50 copies/mL).
- Proportion of patients with changes in ARV regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity
- to evaluate and to compare the immunological outcome proportion in both groups.
- Quality of life (QOL), including overall self-reported QOL at Week 24
Statistical Methods:
Tabular and/or graphical descriptive methods will be used to summarize and explore the results. Continuous variables will be summarized by mean, standard deviation, minimum, 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles and maximum. Count and percent of subjects will summarize categorical variables. Appropriate transformations will be applied (e.g., log10 for HIV-1 RNA). Appropriate confidence intervals (two-sided; 95%) will be calculated for changes in major endpoints. Appropriate tests of significance may also be performed.
This study will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs) including archiving of essential documents.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Immediate arm | Active comparator | Other: Time of starting antiretroviral therapyImmediate arm: ART should be initiated as soon as possible but no later than 3 days after initiation of OI treatment. |
| Deferred arm | Active comparator | Other: Time of starting antiretroviral therapyDeferred arm: ART should be initiated after the completion of OI treatment which is achieved at the earliest at day 21 for PCP and at day 28 for TE. ART should be initiated no later than 6 weeks after initiation of OI treatment. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult (at least 18 years) HIV-1 infected subjects
- Antiretroviral naïve HIV-1-infected patients who have developed an acute AIDS defining event, namely PCP or Toxoplasmosis (women receiving prior MTCT prophylaxis may be enrolled)
- Patients who are able to take or to receive antiretroviral treatment and who are able to give written consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Renal failure or CrCl < 60 mL/min
- Patients who are not able to initiate ART or with current contraindications against atazanavir/ritonavir
- Other AIDS-defining events than PCP or TE (exceptions see below)
- Pregnancy/Women of childbearing potential who want to become pregnant
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Time of starting antiretroviral therapyWithin 24 hours after sending the screening form, the site investigator will receive a randomization sheet with the decision when to start ART ("immediate" or "deferred"). The day of receiving the randomization sheet will be defined as baseline visit. | Other | Deferred arm, Immediate arm |
Primary outcome
Death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections and other grade 4 clinical endpoints within 24 weeks after randomization
Time frame: 24 weeks
Clinical Progression (death, all new or relapsing OI, other Grade 4 clinical endpoint) within 24 weeks. For abnormalities not found in the Toxicity Tables, a Grade 4 event will be defined as potentially life-threatening (extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable). Patients who drop out of study observation before end of week 12 are counted as clinical progression.
6 secondary outcomes
Hospitalization days after completion of initial OI treatment between both groups
Time frame: 24 weeks
incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome
Time frame: 24 weeks
virological outcome
Time frame: 24 weeks
efficacy and toxicity of the antiretroviral therapy
Time frame: 24 weeks
quality of life
Time frame: 24 weeks
immunological outcome
Time frame: 24 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Nov 2016.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for HIV-Infection
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Stefan Schmiedel, MD principal investigator
Infectious Diseases Unit, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
17 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Time of starting antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV-Infection, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 17 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 17 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections and other grade 4 clinical endpoints within 24 weeks after randomization (time frame: 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2016.