AzTrials
AzTrials

HIV-InfectionPhase 4IDEALNCT01417949

Immediate Versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-infected Patients Presenting With Acute AIDS-defining Events

A Phase 4 study testing Time of starting antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV-Infection, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 17 sites in Germany.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
HIV-Infection
What is being tested?
Time of starting antiretroviral therapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
61 participants
Where
17 sitesGermany
Study dates
Aug 2011to May 2015
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult (at least 18 years) HIV-1 infected subjects
  • Antiretroviral naïve HIV-1-infected patients who have developed an acute AIDS defining event, namely PCP or Toxoplasmosis (women receiving prior MTCT prophylaxis may be enrolled)
  • Patients who are able to take or to receive antiretroviral treatment and who are able to give written consent

Who cannot join

  • Renal failure or CrCl < 60 mL/min
  • Patients who are not able to initiate ART or with current contraindications against atazanavir/ritonavir
  • Other AIDS-defining events than PCP or TE (exceptions see below)
  • Pregnancy/Women of childbearing potential who want to become pregnant

Trial locations and contacts

17 sites in 1 country.

17 sites in 1 country

Germany17 sites
  • Vivantes Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 12157

  • Charitè Universitätsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 13353

  • Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Innere Medizin I, Immunologische Ambulanz/Studienzentrale

    Bonn, 53127

  • Universitätsklinik Köln, Klinik I für Innere Medizin

    Cologne, 50937

  • Medizinische Klinik Nord

    Dortmund, 44137

  • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • Universitätshauptklinik Essen

    Essen, 45122

  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Medizinische Klinik II / Infektiologie

    Frankfurt am Main, 60590

  • Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Centrum Chronische Immundefizienz (CCI)

    Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106

  • ICH Study Center GmbH & CO. KG

    Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20146

  • ifi Hamburg an der Asklepios Klinik St. Georg

    Hamburg, 20099

  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Infectious Diseases Unit,

    Hamburg, 20249

  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Klinik für Immunologie und Rheumatologie

    Hanover, 30625

  • Universitätsklinikum Kiel, II. Medizinisch Klinik, UKSH, Campus Kiel

    Kiel, 24116

  • Universitätsklinikum München, Infektionsabteilung, Med. Poliklinik, Klinikum der Universität München, Campus Innenstadt

    München, 80336

  • Universitätsklinkum Ulm, Comprehensive Infectious Diseases Center (CIDC) Ulm, Sektion Infektiologie und Klinische Immunologie, Zentrum für Innere Medizin, Innere Medizin III

    Ulm, 89081

  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg

    Würzburg, 97080

Other trials in Germany

About this study

Official title: Immediate Versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy in HIV-infected Patients Presenting With Acute AIDS-defining Events (IDEAL-Study)

The purpose of this study is to compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii encephalitis (TE).

Read the detailed description

Objectives:

To compare the early versus deferred initiation of antiretroviral combination therapy consisting of tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir in treatment naive patients who present with an acute AIDS-defining illness, namely pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) or toxoplasma gondii encephalitis (TE).

The primary objective of this study is as follows:

To compare the rates of clinical progression between both groups. Progression is defined as death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections (OI), and other grade 4 clinical endpoints (evaluated by standardized toxicity tables) within 24 weeks after randomization.

The secondary objectives of this study are:

  • to evaluate and to compare hospitalization days after completion of initial OI treatment between both groups.
  • to evaluate the incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS, definition see Objectives) in both groups during the first 24 weeks.
  • to evaluate and to compare the virological outcome proportion in both groups. Virological outcome is assessed by HIV-1 plasma viral load at Week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL). For definition of virological failure, see below.
  • to evaluate and to compare the frequency changes in ART regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity in both groups.
  • to evaluate the quality of life (QOL) and the adherence to the ARV regimen in subjects starting tenofovir, emtricitabine and atazanavir/ritonavir at late stages of HIV-1-infection.

Study Design: Prospective, randomized, open-label multicenter study

Number of Subjects to be Randomized:

105 patients per arm (total of 210 patients planned).

Target Population:

ART naïve HIV-1 infected adults, who have developed an acute AIDS defining opportunistic infection, namely PCP or TE.

Duration of Treatment:

24 weeks

Diagnosis and Main Eligibility Criteria:

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult (at least 18 years) HIV-1 infected subjects
  • Antiretroviral naïve HIV-1-infected patients who have developed an acute AIDS defining event, namely PCP or TE (women receiving prior MTCT prophylaxis may be enrolled)
  • Patients who are able to take or to receive antiretroviral treatment and who are able to give written consent Key exclusion criteria
  • Renal failure or CrCl below 60 mL/min
  • Patients who are not able to initiate ART or with current contraindications against atazanavir/ritonavir
  • Other AIDS-defining events than PCP or TE (exceptions see below)
  • Pregnancy/Women of childbearing potential who want to become pregnant

Study Procedures/ Frequency:

OI Diagnosis, Screening, Randomization

  • Patients should be screened immediately after diagnosis and decision for OI treatment have been made, providing the patient's personal doctor considers ART to be possible and the patient agrees to be included in the study (written consent).
  • Diagnosis of both PCP and TE will be established according to standard of care by the treating physician. A definitive diagnosis (histologically proven) is not required for study entry. The decision for specific treatment of OI is also made by the treating physician according to appropriate guidelines.
  • Screening assessments include medical history, social background, physical examination, height, weight, vital signs, and concomitant medications.
  • Blood parameters should be assessed by the local lab and should contain CBC (complete blood count) with differential and platelet count, Bilirubine, ALT, AST, LDH, yGT, serum creatinine, electrolytes (sodium, potassium, chloride), calculated creatinine clearance (CrCl), urinalysis, and serum pregnancy test (females of childbearing potential only). These results must be available before sending the evaluation form.
  • Further screening assessments include HIV-1 RNA, genotype HIV resistance test, CD4/CD8 T-cell count, serology for hepatitis C antibody, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), cryptococcus antigen, CRP and a T Cell Interferon-Gamma Release Assay (TIGRA). Of note, there is no need to wait for the results of these further screening parameters.
  • A questionnaire that will describe social and educational status and reasons for presenting late during HIV-infection will be performed at screening or entry. A QoL questionnaire (SF 36) is also required at screening or entry.

Randomization, Baseline Prior to first randomization, every participating center will receive study drugs for the treatment of three patients for one month. Within 24 hours after sending the screening form, the site investigator will receive a randomization sheet with the decision when to start ART ("immediate" or "deferred"). The day of receiving the randomization sheet will be defined as baseline visit. Immediate arm: ART should be initiated as soon as possible but no later than 3 days after initiation of OI treatment. Deferred arm: ART should be initiated after the completion of OI treatment which is achieved at the earliest at day 21 for PCP and at day 28 for TE. ART should be initiated no later than 6 weeks after initiation of OI treatment.

Follow up Procedures

  • Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24 or Early Study Drug Discontinuation Visit assessments include a symptom-directed physical examination, weight, vital signs, concomitant medications, adverse events, HIV-1 RNA, CD4 count, CBC with differential and platelet count, ALT, AST, LDH, Bilirubine, gGT, serum creatinine, electrolytes, calculated CrCl.
  • Additional Week 12, 24, or Early Study Drug Discontinuation Visit assessments include the preservation of a plasma sample for HIV genotype/phenotype analysis in selected centers. Subjects who were HBsAg positive at screening will have HBV DNA and HBV serology measured at these visits.
  • If the subject discontinues study drug prior to Week 24, the subject will be asked to return to the clinic within 72 hours of stopping study drug for an Early Study Drug Discontinuation visit. All of the Week 24 assessments will be performed at this visit.
  • HIV resistance assessments will be performed in patients who do not achieve plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of < 400 copies/mL at Week 24, who achieve plasma HIV 1 RNA levels of < 400 copies/mL on at least one occasion, and later have at least two consecutive plasma HIV 1 RNA levels > 400 copies/mL, or for subjects who discontinue study drugs prior to Week 24 and have > 400 copies/mL of HIV 1 RNA on their last study visit prior to discontinuing study drugs.
  • Additional Week 12, 24 assessments include a patient adherence questionnaire and a QoL Questionnaire (SF 36).

Test Product, Dose, and Mode of Administration:

Atazanavir capsules with 300 mg and ritonavir tablets with 100 mg, each to be taken QD with a meal. The NRTI backbone chosen by the treating physician is preferably the combination of emtricitabine and tenofovir DF tablets.

Criteria for Evaluation: Primary Endpoint:

Clinical Progression (death, all new or relapsing OI, other Grade 4 clinical endpoint) within 24 weeks. For G4 events standardized toxicity grading tables will be used. For abnormalities not found in the Toxicity Tables, a Grade 4 event will be defined as potentially life-threatening (extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable). Patients who drop out of study observation before end of week 12 are counted as clinical progression.

Secondary Endpoints

  • Hospitalization days after completion of OI treatment
  • Incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) as judged by the site investigator (for definitions see below) compared in the two groups during the first 24 weeks.
  • Virological outcome at week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA < 400 (<50 copies/mL).
  • Proportion of patients with changes in ARV regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity
  • to evaluate and to compare the immunological outcome proportion in both groups.
  • Quality of life (QOL), including overall self-reported QOL at Week 24

Statistical Methods:

Tabular and/or graphical descriptive methods will be used to summarize and explore the results. Continuous variables will be summarized by mean, standard deviation, minimum, 25th, 50th (median), and 75th percentiles and maximum. Count and percent of subjects will summarize categorical variables. Appropriate transformations will be applied (e.g., log10 for HIV-1 RNA). Appropriate confidence intervals (two-sided; 95%) will be calculated for changes in major endpoints. Appropriate tests of significance may also be performed.

This study will be conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Good Clinical Practices (GCPs) including archiving of essential documents.

Conditions
HIV-Infection
Being tested
Time of starting antiretroviral therapy
Medical subject headings
Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Time of starting antiretroviral therapyOther

    Within 24 hours after sending the screening form, the site investigator will receive a randomization sheet with the decision when to start ART ("immediate" or "deferred"). The day of receiving the randomization sheet will be defined as baseline visit.

Study groups in NCT01417949
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Immediate armActive comparatorImmediate arm: ART should be initiated as soon as possible but no later than 3 days after initiation of OI treatment.
Receives: Other: Time of starting antiretroviral therapy
Deferred armActive comparatorDeferred arm: ART should be initiated after the completion of OI treatment which is achieved at the earliest at day 21 for PCP and at day 28 for TE. ART should be initiated no later than 6 weeks after initiation of OI treatment.
Receives: Other: Time of starting antiretroviral therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections and other grade 4 clinical endpoints within 24 weeks after randomization

    Clinical Progression (death, all new or relapsing OI, other Grade 4 clinical endpoint) within 24 weeks. For abnormalities not found in the Toxicity Tables, a Grade 4 event will be defined as potentially life-threatening (extreme limitation in activity, significant assistance required; significant medical intervention/therapy required, hospitalization or hospice care probable). Patients who drop out of study observation before end of week 12 are counted as clinical progression.

    Measured: 24 weeks

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Hospitalization days after completion of initial OI treatment between both groups

    Hospitalization days after completion of OI treatment

    Measured: 24 weeks

  2. incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome

    Incidence of immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome (IRIS) as judged by the site investigator (for definitions see below) compared in the two groups during the first 24 weeks.

    Measured: 24 weeks

  3. virological outcome

    Virological outcome at week 24 (proportion of patients achieving HIV RNA < 400 (<50 copies/mL).

    Measured: 24 weeks

  4. efficacy and toxicity of the antiretroviral therapy

    Proportion of patients with changes in ARV regimen for lack of efficacy or of toxicity

    Measured: 24 weeks

  5. quality of life

    Quality of life (QOL), including overall self-reported QOL at Week 24

    Measured: 24 weeks

  6. immunological outcome

    For evaluation of immunological outcome, CD4 T-cell counts at week 24 (absolute, relative, CD4/CD8 ratio) and the change in CD4 T-cell counts from baseline will be assessed.

    Measured: 24 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2015
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
61 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01417949
Sponsor's protocol ID
EudraCT Nr. 2010-022413-26
Acronym
IDEAL
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
10 Aug 2011
Last updated
28 Nov 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Time of starting antiretroviral therapy in people with HIV-Infection, run by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf at 17 sites in Germany.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 17 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Death, all new/relapsing opportunistic infections and other grade 4 clinical endpoints within 24 weeks after randomization (time frame: 24 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in