AzTrials
AzTrials

StillbirthsMARIASNCT01417962

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study

An observational study of Stillbirths and Sudden Infant Death, run by Thayyil, Sudhin at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this project is to establish whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can provide a minimally invasive approach for post-mortem assessment of the fetus, infant and child, with similar detection rates for anomalies and determination of the cause of death. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages Up to 18 years
Conditions the study is for
Stillbirths, Sudden Infant Death
How many people
400 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited Kingdom
Study dates
Mar 2007to Sep 2011
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Up to 18 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: This study will be performed across two hospital sites: Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children (GOSH) and University College London Hospitals (UCLH). Both of these hospitals are associated with a single academic institution - University College London (UCL). Consecutive fetuses, newborns and children referred for autopsy at these two hospitals will be eligible for recruitment. All recruited cases will have conventional post-mortem MR imaging at 1.5 Tesla and conventional autopsy. CT imaging will be performed in suspected traumatic injuries and skeletal dysplasias.

Who may be able to join

  • Fetuses, newborns and Infants undergoing conventional autopsy

Who cannot join

  • Lack of parental consent

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United Kingdom2 sites
  • Great Ormond Street Hospital

    London

  • University College Hospital

    London

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: Post Mortem Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Fetus, Infant and Child: A Comparative Study With Conventional Autopsy

The aim of this project is to establish whether magnetic resonance (MR) imaging can provide a minimally invasive approach for post-mortem assessment of the fetus, infant and child, with similar detection rates for anomalies and determination of the cause of death.

This will be achieved by acquiring a database of whole-body, post-mortem MR images in approximately 400 fetuses, infants and children, over a 3 years period. Images will be acquired on a dedicated 1.5T research MR scanner. MR images will be reported by an expert group of paediatric radiologists, and compared, in a blinded fashion, with reports from conventional autopsy performed by expert perinatal and paediatric pathologists. Importantly, the post-mortem information will be assessed with reference to the needs of the parents, referring clinicians and HM Coroners. The detection of central nervous system abnormalities will be assessed separately.

Read more

The study will be performed across two sites: A dedicated children's hospital (Great Ormond Street Hospital) and a teaching hospital, with large obstetric, fetal and neonatal departments (University College London Hospital), which are linked academically by University College London.

Co-ordination of the project will be managed by a steering committee, which will ensure accurate collation and comparison of the data.

Keywords
Autopsy, MRI, Stillbirths, Neonatal death, Sudden Infant death
Medical subject headings
Stillbirth, Sudden Infant Death, Perinatal Death

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01417962
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
FetusesStill birth and Termination of pregnancies
ChildrenIncludes Newborns, Infants and Children

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of cases where the cause of death and/or major pathological lesions are detected

    Conventional autopsy will be considered as the gold standard. The number (%) of cases where post-mortem MR imaging identifies the cause of death and/or major pathological lesions when compared with conventional autopsy will be reported

    Measured: 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. MR appearance of death-induced artefacts.

    The common artefacts seen on post-mortem MR imaging will be described

    Measured: 6 weeks

  2. Number of cases where there is a change in ante-mortem diagnosis

    Number of cases where there is a change in ante-mortem diagnosis following post-mortem MR imaging will be reported

    Measured: 6 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2007
  3. Primary completionSep 2011
  4. Study completionSep 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
400 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01417962
Sponsor's protocol ID
MR07
Acronym
MARIAS
Status last verified
Apr 2013
First submitted
13 Aug 2011
Last updated
22 Apr 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Sebire NJ, Weber MA, Thayyil S, Mushtaq I, Taylor A, Chitty LS. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination ("keyhole autopsy"): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012 May;25(5):513-8. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2011.601368. Epub 2011 Aug 10.

    PubMed 21740313
  • Thayyil S, De Vita E, Sebire NJ, Bainbridge A, Thomas D, Gunny R, Chong K, Lythgoe MF, Golay X, Robertson NJ, Cady EB, Taylor AM. Post-mortem cerebral magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 in fetuses, newborns and infants. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Mar;81(3):e232-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.01.105. Epub 2011 Feb 23.

    PubMed 21349673
  • Thayyil S, Chitty LS, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ. Minimally invasive fetal postmortem examination using magnetic resonance imaging and computerised tomography: current evidence and practical issues. Prenat Diagn. 2010 Aug;30(8):713-8. doi: 10.1002/pd.2534.

    PubMed 20661883
  • Thayyil S. Less invasive autopsy: an evidenced based approach. Arch Dis Child. 2011 Jul;96(7):681-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.165704. Epub 2010 Jun 1.

    PubMed 20515965
  • Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Chitty LS, Wade A, Skordis-Worrall J, Bennett-Britton I, Cohen M, Withby E, Sebire NJ, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM. Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2010 Jul;75(1):e142-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.007. Epub 2009 Nov 11.

    PubMed 19910149
  • Thayyil S, Cleary JO, Sebire NJ, Scott RJ, Chong K, Gunny R, Owens CM, Olsen OE, Offiah AC, Parks HG, Chitty LS, Price AN, Yousry TA, Robertson NJ, Lythgoe MF, Taylor AM. Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):467-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60913-2.

    PubMed 19665645
  • Thayyil S, Robertson NJ, Scales A, Weber MA, Jacques TS, Sebire NJ, Taylor AM; MaRIAS (Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) Collaborative Group. Prospective parental consent for autopsy research following sudden unexpected childhood deaths: a successful model. Arch Dis Child. 2009 May;94(5):354-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2008.150904. Epub 2009 Mar 12.

    PubMed 19282335
  • Thayyil S, Schievano S, Robertson NJ, Jones R, Chitty LS, Sebire NJ, Taylor AM; MaRIAS (Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study) Collaborative group. A semi-automated method for non-invasive internal organ weight estimation by post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, newborns and children. Eur J Radiol. 2009 Nov;72(2):321-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.013. Epub 2008 Sep 2.

    PubMed 18768277
  • Thayyil S, Robertson NJ, Scales A, Sebire NJ, Taylor AM. Parental consent for research and sudden infant death. Lancet. 2008 Aug 30;372(9640):715. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61298-2. No abstract available.

    PubMed 18761215
  • Schievano S, Sebire NJ, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM, Thayyil S. Reconstruction of fetal and infant anatomy using rapid prototyping of post-mortem MR images. Insights Imaging. 2010 Sep;1(4):281-286. doi: 10.1007/s13244-010-0028-5. Epub 2010 Jun 19.

    PubMed 22347922
  • Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Pauliah SS, Jacques TS, Chong WK, Gunny R, Saunders D, Addison S, Lally P, Cady E, Jones R, Norman W, Scott R, Robertson NJ, Wade A, Chitty L, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study (MaRIAS) Collaborative Group. Diagnostic accuracy and limitations of post-mortem MRI for neurological abnormalities in fetuses and children. Clin Radiol. 2015 Aug;70(8):872-80. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 Jun 6.

    PubMed 26050535
  • Arthurs OJ, Thayyil S, Addison S, Wade A, Jones R, Norman W, Scott R, Robertson NJ, Chitty LS, Taylor AM, Sebire NJ, Offiah AC; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study (MaRIAS) Collaborative Group. Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem MRI for musculoskeletal abnormalities in fetuses and children. Prenat Diagn. 2014 Dec;34(13):1254-61. doi: 10.1002/pd.4460. Epub 2014 Aug 6.

    PubMed 25043483
  • Taylor AM, Sebire NJ, Ashworth MT, Schievano S, Scott RJ, Wade A, Chitty LS, Robertson N, Thayyil S; Magnetic Resonance Imaging Autopsy Study Collaborative Group. Postmortem cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses and children: a masked comparison study with conventional autopsy. Circulation. 2014 May 13;129(19):1937-44. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005641. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

    PubMed 24647275
  • Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Olsen O, Gunny RS, Offiah A, Saunders DE, Owens CM, Chong WK, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM. Post mortem magnetic resonance imaging in the fetus, infant and child: a comparative study with conventional autopsy (MaRIAS Protocol). BMC Pediatr. 2011 Dec 22;11:120. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-120.

    PubMed 22192497

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Stillbirths and Sudden Infant Death, run by Thayyil, Sudhin at 2 sites in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Apr 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of cases where the cause of death and/or major pathological lesions are detected (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01417962, which also lists 14 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Apr 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in