AzTrials
AzTrials

GoutNCT01418781

CLinical Prediction Rule Score in Veterans

An observational study of Gout, run by jasvinder singh at 1 site in United States.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

We will study whether the health care costs and health utilities differ in patients with gout and those without gout and whether they differ between those with more severe versus less severe gout Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 110 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Gout
How many people
0 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2008to Mar 2010
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 110 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with and without gout from the Veterans Upper Midwest SF-36 survey database will be included in the analyses for Study questions 1 and 5. This is approximately 3000 gout patients and 67,000 non-gout patients Patients with SF-36 data from the above cohort will be included in the analyses for Study aims 2-4. This is approximately 1500 gout patients and 38,000 non-gout patients

Who may be able to join

  • participated in the survey
  • Have SF-36 adn utilization data

Who cannot join

  • Absence of utilization and/or cost data

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Minneapolis VA Medical Center

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55123

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Development of CLinical Prediction Rule Score in Veterans: A Study of Impact of Gout on Health Care Utilization and Costs

We will study whether the health care costs and health utilities differ in patients with gout and those without gout and whether they differ between those with more severe versus less severe gout

Read the detailed description

The purpose of this project is to study the out-patient and inpatient utilization and costs associated with tophaceous gout (a classic form of treatment-failure gout), compare these costs to patients with non-tophaceous gout and evaluate health utilities associated with these gout states. The analyses will be conducted in a manner to support a burden of illness type of presentation / manuscript.

Study Questions

  1. What are the VA health care costs (inpatient and outpatient) for patients with gout compared to those without gout?
  2. Does health utility, as calculated by SF-6D, differ in patients with gout compared to patients without gout and between tophaceous and non-tophaceous gout?
  3. What are the relationships between costs and health utility?
  4. How does the burden of illness differ by subgroups of gout patients (costs and utilities)?
  5. What are the VA health care costs for patients with tophaceous gout and are they higher than patients with non-tophaceous gout?

Inclusion criteria Patients with and without gout from the Veterans database described above will be included in the analyses for Study aims 1 and 5. This is approximately 3000 gout patients and 67,000 non-gout patients

Patients with SF-36 data from the above cohort will be included in the analyses for Study aims 2-4. This is approximately 1500 gout patients and 38,000 non-gout patients

Conditions
Gout
Keywords
gout, cost, utilization
Medical subject headings
Gout, Patient Acceptance of Health Care

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01418781
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GoutPatients with ICD-9 for gout
No GoutPatients withOUT ICD-9 for gout
Tophaceous goutPatients with ICD-9 for tophaceous gout
non-tophaceous goutthose with ICD-9 for gout other than the codes specific for tophaceous gout

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Health care costs

    Total of outpatient, inpatient and emergent care costs

    Measured: Up to 5-year post-survey

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Health utility index, SF-6D

    at 18-month post-survey

    Measured: 18-months

  2. Health care utilization

    Health care utilization as sum of outpatient, inpatient and emergent care utilization

    Measured: 1-year post-survey

  3. Activity limitation on Katz 6 ADL

    Katz 6 ADL questions assess difficulty with doing 6 key activities, bathing, eating, toileting, walking, getting up and climbing stairs

    Measured: 18-months

  4. Mortality

    Up to 5-year post-survey

    Measured: 5-years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2008
  3. Primary completionMar 2010
  4. Study completionMar 2010

Why it stopped: Funding withdrawn by the funding agency; study could not be performed.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01418781
Sponsor's protocol ID
MVAMC-3669A
Status last verified
Mar 2024
First submitted
15 Aug 2011
Last updated
13 Mar 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Gout, run by jasvinder singh at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Mar 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Health care costs (time frame: Up to 5-year post-survey). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Mar 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in