AzTrials
AzTrials

Coronary Artery DiseaseRIFLE-STEACSNCT01420614

RadIal Versus Femoral InvEstigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

A study testing Femoral approach and Radial approach in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Policlinico Casilino ASL RMB at 4 sites in Italy.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective, randomized, multi-center trial comparing the safety and efficacy in the prevention of net adverse clinical outcomes (NACE) of transfemoral vs. transradial approach for the treatment of patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) undergoing primary angioplasty Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Femoral approach and Radial approach
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,001 participants
Where
4 sitesItaly
Study dates
Jan 2009to Jul 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subject is >18 years old with recent acute ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) requiring emergent coronary angiography.
  • Patient has no contraindication to percutaneous arterial access by both and transfemoral route.
  • Subject has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board/Ethics Committee of the respective clinical site.
  • Patient and the treating physician agree that the subject will comply with all follow-up evaluations.

Who cannot join

  • Subject's age is <18 years and he has no acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (ST elevation of a least 0.1 mV in ≥2 extremity leads or at least 0.2 mV in ≥2 precordial leads).
  • Subject has had a recent stroke or TIA (<4 weeks), irrespective of age.
  • Patient has an international normalized ratio (INR) > 2.0, or other severe bleeding diathesis
  • The patient is pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Known allergies to: aspirin, clopidogrel and ticlopidine, heparin, IIb/IIIa inhibitors, stainless steel, or contrast agent (which cannot be adequately premedicated).
  • 7.Subject is currently participating in an investigational drug or device study that has not completed the primary endpoint or that clinically interferes with the current study endpoints.
  • 8.Prior participation in this study.

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Italy4 sites
  • Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia

    Modena, Modena, 41124

  • Ospedale Sandro Pertini

    Rome, Rome, 00100

  • Policlinico Casilino

    Rome, Rome, 00100

  • University of Turin, San Giovanni Battista Hospital

    Turin, Turin, 10100

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Official title: RadIal Versus Femoral Randomized InvEstigation in ST Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome

Prospective, randomized, multi-center trial comparing the safety and efficacy in the prevention of net adverse clinical outcomes (NACE) of transfemoral vs. transradial approach for the treatment of patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STEACS) undergoing primary angioplasty

Read the detailed description

Prospective, randomized, double arm study. The study population will include all consecutive patients presenting with a ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome and candidates for primary percutaneous coronary intervention, who agree and provide written informed consent for the study.

Before arterial stick for percutaneous access, patients will be randomized according to sealed numbered envelopes. Subsequently, arterial access will be obtained and the diagnostic/interventional procedure will be performed according to routine clinical practice, leaving ancillary medications, choice of devices and means of hemostasis at the physician's discretion.

In the randomization process all participating centers will be equally stratified to avoid statistical unbalance.

Being tested
Femoral approach, Radial approach
Keywords
radial access, primary angioplasty, trial, randomization, outcome
Medical subject headings
Coronary Artery Disease, Acute Coronary Syndrome

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Femoral approachProcedure or surgery

    Also called transfemoral

    diagnostic and interventional procedures by femoral artery access

  • Radial approachProcedure or surgery

    Also called transradial

    diagnostic and interventional procedures by radial artery access

Study groups in NCT01420614
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RadialExperimentalgroup of patients undergoing primary angioplasty by transradial approach
Receives: Procedure: Radial approach
FemoralActive comparatorgroup of patients undergoing primary angioplasty by transfemoral approach
Receives: Procedure: Femoral approach

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Net Adverse Clinical Event

    Cumulative of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stroke and bleeding

    Measured: 30-day

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Net Adverse Clinical Event

    Cumulative of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, stroke and bleeding

    Measured: 1-year

  2. Individual components of NACE

    Cardiac death, Myocardial infarction, Target Lesion revascularization, Stroke, Major Bleeding

    Measured: 30-day

  3. Individual components of NACE

    Cardiac death, Myocardial infarction, Target Lesion revascularization, Stroke, Major Bleeding

    Measured: 1-year

  4. Total procedural and fluoroscopy times for the index procedure

    Comparison of procedural and fluoroscopy times between the two study groups

    Measured: 1 day

  5. Hospital stay

    Days of hospitalization

    Measured: 30-day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2009
  3. Primary completionJul 2011
  4. Study completionJul 2012 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,001 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01420614
Sponsor's protocol ID
PC-03ER
Acronym
RIFLE-STEACS
Status last verified
Feb 2012
First submitted
15 Aug 2011
Last updated
7 Feb 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Romagnoli E, Biondi-Zoccai G, Sciahbasi A, Politi L, Rigattieri S, Pendenza G, Summaria F, Patrizi R, Borghi A, Di Russo C, Moretti C, Agostoni P, Loschiavo P, Lioy E, Sheiban I, Sangiorgi G. Radial versus femoral randomized investigation in ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome: the RIFLE-STEACS (Radial Versus Femoral Randomized Investigation in ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome) study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2481-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.06.017. Epub 2012 Aug 1.

    PubMed 22858390

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Femoral approach and Radial approach in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Acute Coronary Syndrome, run by Policlinico Casilino ASL RMB at 4 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Feb 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Net Adverse Clinical Event (time frame: 30-day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01420614, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Feb 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in