Cultural CompetenceNCT01421745
Construct Validity, Responsiveness, and Demographic Predictors of the IAPCC-SV
A study testing Cultural Competence Education module in people with Cultural Competence, run by Texas Woman's University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
There are three purposes for this study: I. to establish the construct validity (via factor analysis) of the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV) II. to determine the responsiveness of the IAPCC-SV III. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any age
- Conditions the study is for
- Cultural Competence
- What is being tested?
- Cultural Competence Education module
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- May 2011to May 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- First semester PT students at Texas State will be eligible to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Students previously enrolled in a PT education program will be excluded from this study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Texas State University-San Marcos
San Marcos, Texas, 78666
About this study
Official title: Construct Validity, Responsiveness, and Demographic Predictors of the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV)
There are three purposes for this study:
- to establish the construct validity (via factor analysis) of the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV) II. to determine the responsiveness of the IAPCC-SV III. to investigate demographic predictor variables of the IAPCC-SV
Read more
It is hypothesized that:
- the variables will load on only one component, with each component being represented by a number of strongly loaded variables II. the IAPCC-SV will demonstrate responsiveness, evidenced by significantly higher post-module IAPCC-SV scores of the experimental group when compared to the control group III. the cultural composite score and race will be significant predictors of IAPCC-SV score
- Conditions
- Cultural Competence
- Being tested
- Cultural Competence Education module
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cultural Competence Education moduleOther
A four hour cultural competence education module including lecture, case studies, and discussion of cultural competence.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural Competence Module | Experimental | The module will include lecture, case studies, and discussion of cultural competence. Receives: Other: Cultural Competence Education module |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV) Score
Measured: pre and post module
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2011
- Primary completionMay 2012
- Study completionMay 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cultural CompetenceStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Woman's University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas Physical Therapy Association
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Suzanna Dougherty Okere, Texas Woman's University
- Investigators
- Suzanna D Okere, MPT, Principal investigator, Texas Woman's University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01421745
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16206
- Status last verified
- May 2012
- First submitted
- 19 Aug 2011
- Last updated
- 16 May 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Construct Validity, Responsiveness, and Demographic Predictors of the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01421745
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16206
- Conditions
- Cultural Competence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Texas Woman's UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas Physical Therapy Association
- Study start
- May 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Aug 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are three purposes for this study:
- to establish the construct validity (via factor analysis) of the Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV) II. to determine the responsiveness of the IAPCC-SV III. to investigate demographic predictor variables of the IAPCC-SV
It is hypothesized that:
- the variables will load on only one component, with each component being represented by a number of strongly loaded variables II. the IAPCC-SV will demonstrate responsiveness, evidenced by significantly higher post-module IAPCC-SV scores of the experimental group when compared to the control group III. the cultural composite score and race will be significant predictors of IAPCC-SV score
Study design
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural Competence Module | Experimental | Other: Cultural Competence Education moduleThe module will include lecture, case studies, and discussion of cultural competence. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- First semester PT students at Texas State will be eligible to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Students previously enrolled in a PT education program will be excluded from this study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cultural Competence Education moduleA four hour cultural competence education module including lecture, case studies, and discussion of cultural competence. | Other | Cultural Competence Module |
Primary outcome
Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV) Score
Time frame: pre and post module
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2012.
Related trials for Cultural Competence
Not yet recruiting
Culturally-Tailored AI Chatbot Simulation for Therapeutic Communication and Empathy in Psychiatric Nursing Students
Therapeutic Communication
RecruitingObservational study
OHANA: Optimizing Cross-Cultural Care
Cultural Competence
Recruiting
An mHealth Intervention to Improve Outcomes for Women With HIV/AIDS
HIV/AIDS
Not yet recruiting
Evaluating in Person Curriculum for Educating Obstetrical Residents on Better Caring for 2 Spirit Metis Patients Using and AI Assisted OSCE.
Cultural Safety, Medical Education
Not yet recruiting
Storytelling for Provider Empathy & Patient Trust in Obstetric Care
Pregnancy, Labor Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Suzanna D Okere, MPT principal investigator
Texas Woman's University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cultural Competence Education module in people with Cultural Competence, run by Texas Woman's University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Inventory for Assessing the Process of Cultural Competence Among Healthcare Professionals - Student Version (IAPCC-SV) Score (time frame: pre and post module). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2012.