AzTrials
AzTrials

Colonic AdenomasNCT01422577

Diagnosis of Colonic Adenomas by Bright Narrow Band Imaging (B-NBI)

A study testing Bright Narrow Band Imaging and White light Endoscopy in people with Colonic Adenomas, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Early detection of colo-rectal adenoma using colonoscopy can prevent occurrence of colon cancers. While colonoscopy is a standard technique, it can miss early cancers. To improve the detection rate, Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) was introduced in 2006. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Colonic Adenomas
What is being tested?
Bright Narrow Band Imaging and White light Endoscopy
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,006 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Oct 2010to Mar 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Asymptomatic subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy
  • age > 40
  • average risk subjects defined as those without a personal history of inflammatory bowel disease, colon adenoma or cancer or family history of Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) or Familial non-polyposis syndrome or first degree relatives having diagnosed to have colo-rectal carcinoma
  • no colonoscopy in past 5 years
  • ability to provide a written consent to trial participation

Who cannot join

  • Patient age < 50
  • Patients with prior colorectal surgery
  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Colonoscopy done within the past 5 years
  • Lack of consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Comparison Between White Light Endoscopy (WLE) and Bright Narrow Band Imaging (B-NBI) in the Diagnosis of Colonic Adenomas in Asymptomatic Subjects Undergoing Screening Colonoscopy

Early detection of colo-rectal adenoma using colonoscopy can prevent occurrence of colon cancers. While colonoscopy is a standard technique, it can miss early cancers. To improve the detection rate, Narrow Band Imaging (NBI) was introduced in 2006. It has been shown to compare favorably with chromo-endoscopy in the sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignant colo-rectal neoplasms. The major drawback of NBI is that images become dark in the presence of blood and fecal matters. The bright-NBI is a prototype imaging technology that enables endoscopists to obtain better images in suboptimal conditions. The study proposes to compare the performance of colonoscopy using either white light or bright NBI in subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy in search for colon adenomas.

Purpose

To determine that bright -NBI is superior to WLE in detecting colorectal adenomas in average risk subjects undergoing screening colonoscopy.

Read the detailed description

Removal of colorectal adenomas prevents occurrence of cancers [1]. It is recognized that colonoscopy can miss colorectal adenomas and early cancers [2]. There is a need to further improve performance of colonoscopy. The use of chromo-endoscopy has been shown to improve detection of flat adenomas [3]. Narrow band imaging was introduced in year 2006. It is similar to chromo-endoscopy in that it provides more mucosal details. This enables endoscopists to accurately describe the pit pattern of adenomas. NBI has been used as a substitute to chromo-endoscopy. In pooled analysis, NBI is comparable to chromo-endoscopy in their sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of malignant colorectal adenomas [4]. Unfortunately, the use of NBI has not been shown to conclusively improve rate of colorectal adenoma detection. Two of 3 randomized trials that compared WLE to NBI showed a higher adenoma detection rate with the use of NBI [5, 6]. In a study by Rex et al., the rate was however similar with either modality. In a pooled analysis, NBI was only marginally better than WLE [4].

The effective use of NBI depends on the quality of bowel preparation and the experience of endoscopist. In the presence of fecal matters, NBI tends to be dark and detection of small adenomas becomes difficult. The prototype bright NBI coupled with high definition resolution is likely to overcome this drawback of original NBI.

Being tested
Bright Narrow Band Imaging, White light Endoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Bright Narrow Band ImagingDevice

    It is a High Definition system with narrow band imaging option in th endoscope.

  • White light EndoscopyDevice

    White light Endoscopy

Study groups in NCT01422577
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bright Narrow Band ImagingActive comparatorBright Narrow Band Imaging
Receives: Device: Bright Narrow Band Imaging
White Light EndoscopyActive comparatorWhite Light Endoscopy
Receives: Device: White light Endoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Colorectal adenoma detection rate

    compare the rate in colorectal adenoma detection between B-NBI and conventional colonoscopy

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. 1. Rate in the detection of advanced neoplasms (defined by adenomas >10 mm in size, with high grade dysplasia or with >25% villous features).

    compare the advanced neoplasm detection rate

    Measured: 2 years

  2. 2. Sensitivity and specificity of either image modality in the diagnosis of malignant adenomas using pathology

    compare the sensitivity and specificity between B-NBI and conventional colonoscopy

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionMar 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,006 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01422577
Sponsor's protocol ID
B-NBI
Status last verified
Aug 2015
First submitted
2 Aug 2011
Last updated
11 Aug 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Bright Narrow Band Imaging and White light Endoscopy in people with Colonic Adenomas, run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Colorectal adenoma detection rate (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Aug 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in