AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankle SprainNCT01423513

Effects of Ankle Support on Muscle Activation and Function

A study testing Fibular Taping in people with Ankle Sprain, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of ankle taping on improving muscle function and ankle motion in individuals who frequently twist (sprain) their ankle. It is thought that ankle taping may increase muscle function and ankle motion which would benefit individuals who frequently sprain their ankle. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 16 to 45 years
Conditions the study is for
Ankle Sprain
What is being tested?
Fibular Taping
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
26 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2011to Mar 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 16 to 45 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 16-45 years
  • History of one or more ankle sprains
  • Scoring at least an 85% on the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) Sport or at least 3 on the Modified Ankle Instability Instrument (AII).
  • At least 5° ankle dorsiflexion asymmetry compared to the contralateral limb OR ankle dorsiflexion ROM less than 21°

Who cannot join

  • Lower extremity injury or surgery within the past 6 months (including lateral ankle sprain)
  • Diagnosed ankle osteoarthritis
  • History of ankle surgery that involves intra-articular fixation
  • Potential for current pregnancy

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Creighton University

    Omaha, Nebraska, 68178

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of ankle taping on improving muscle function and ankle motion in individuals who frequently twist (sprain) their ankle. It is thought that ankle taping may increase muscle function and ankle motion which would benefit individuals who frequently sprain their ankle.

Read the detailed description

Previous research has demonstrated improved dynamic balance following the application of fibular taping. The effects of fibular taping on ankle dorsiflexion ROM and muscle activation in individuals with CAI are unknown. The purpose of this study is to determine the acute effects of fibular taping on muscle activation of the fibularis longus (peroneus) and soleus muscles, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM) and dynamic balance. The investigators hypothesize that fibular taping will have similar effectiveness as mobilization interventions which have been shown to improve muscle activation, ankle dorsiflexion ROM,and dynamic balance. Outcomes will be measured immediately before and after intervention. A crossover design will be used and participants will complete two visits at least 48 hours apart, but not more than 1 week apart. After participants complete both arms of the study their participation will be complete (average time to completion for each subject is 1 week).

Conditions
Ankle Sprain
Being tested
Fibular Taping, Sham Taping
Keywords
ankle tape, Hoffmann reflex, Balance
Medical subject headings
Ankle Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Fibular TapingOther

    Tape with be applied with tension.

  • Sham TapingOther

    Tape will be applied without tension

Study groups in NCT01423513
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Fibular TapingExperimentalWith the ankle in a neutral position, two strips of nonrigid hypoallergenic tape will be applied beginning at the distal aspect of the fibula, wrapping around the posterior aspect of the leg, and finishing superior and medial to the starting point. Next,a strip of rigid zinc oxide tape will be applied to the distal aspect of the fibula with tension.
Receives: Other: Fibular Taping
Sham TapingSham comparatorSham taping will be applied in the same manner as the fibular taping, but tension will not applied to the zinc oxide tape
Receives: Other: Sham Taping

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Changes in muscle activation

    To determine the changes in muscle activation of the fibularis longus and soleus muscles following a fibular taping or sham taping intervention in individuals with CAI. Changes in muscle activation will be quantified by assessing the H-reflex technique before and after intervention.

    Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the fibular taping intervention will result in a greater activation of the fibularis longus and soleus muscles than a sham taping intervention.

    Measured: All study visits up to day 7

  2. Changes in ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM)

    To determine the changes in ankle dorsiflexion ROM following a fibular taping or sham taping intervention in individuals with CAI. Changes in ankle dorsiflexion ROM will be quantified using a weight bearing lunge.

    Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the fibular taping intervention will result in a greater improvement in ankle dorsiflexion ROM than the sham taping intervention.

    Measured: All study visits up to day 7

  3. Changes in dynamic balance

    To determine the acute changes in balance following a fibular taping or sham taping intervention in individuals with CAI. Changes in balance will be quantified using the the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT).

    Hypothesis: We hypothesize that the fibular taping intervention will result in greater improvements in reach distance in all three SEBT directions compared to the sham taping intervention.

    Measured: All study visits up to day 7

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2011
  3. Primary completionMar 2012
  4. Study completionMar 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
26 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01423513
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-16018
Status last verified
Apr 2012
First submitted
22 Aug 2011
Last updated
4 Mar 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Grindstaff TL, Hanish MJ, Wheeler TJ, Basnett CR, Miriovsky DJ, Danielson EL, Barr JB, Joseph Threlkeld A. Fibular taping does not alter lower extremity spinal reflex excitability in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Apr;25(2):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2015.01.009. Epub 2015 Feb 16.

    PubMed 25727519

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Fibular Taping in people with Ankle Sprain, run by Creighton University at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Changes in muscle activation (time frame: All study visits up to day 7). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01423513, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2016; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 31 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in