AzTrials
AzTrials

Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT01424683

Development of a Method for Converting Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores for Pain and Mobility to EQ-5D Answers

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Lars Oddershede at 1 site in Denmark.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The objective of this study is to investigate how mobility and pain scores, measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), correspond to patients' EuroQol-5Dimensions-3Levels (EQ-5D-3L) answers on pain and mobility. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Cardiovascular Diseases
How many people
217 participants
Where
1 siteDenmark
Study dates
Aug 2011to May 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients undergoing CABG

Who may be able to join

  • Elective CABG patients
  • Use of a vein segment for conduit during CABG

Who cannot join

None listed.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Denmark1 site
  • Aalborg Hospital

    Aalborg, Region Nord, 9100

Other trials in Denmark

About this study

Official title: Development of a Method for Converting VAS Scores for Pain and Mobility to EQ-5D Answers

The objective of this study is to investigate how mobility and pain scores, measured on a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), correspond to patients' EuroQol-5Dimensions-3Levels (EQ-5D-3L) answers on pain and mobility. In addition, the investigators want to evaluate patients' undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) quality of life postoperatively, depending on the vein harvesting method used.

Read the detailed description

Many health economic researchers prefer that a treatments effect is measured in the quantity and quality of life (Qol) the treatment provides. This enables them to calculate effect in the generic Quality Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs). Patients' Qol can be estimates by having patients' answer the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire. However, when performing a post hoc health economic evaluation, data is often incomplete. Often there is no information available regarding the patients' Qol and some health economic researchers therefore resort to various conversions of other measurements of effect to Qol. Such conversions thereby enable them to calculate effect in QALYs even though they had incomplete information. However, no method has been developed for converting eg. VAS pain scores to Qol and the methods currently used are arbitrary. With this study the investigators wish to develop such a method and in the process evaluate our own arbitrary Qol conversion from a prior study by asking the same type of patients. The study is an observational study with no intervention.

Keywords
Qol, Quality of life, VAS, Visual Analogue Scale, CABG, Coronary Artery Bypass Graft, Qol conversion, post hoc HTA
Medical subject headings
Cardiovascular Diseases

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01424683
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Endoscopic Vein Harvest (EVH)A short saphenous vein segment is commonly used as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and clinicians must decide whether to obtain it by performing a traditional open vein harvest (OVH) or by performing an endoscopic vein harvest (EVH).
Open Vein Harvest (OVH)A short saphenous vein segment is commonly used as a conduit for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), and clinicians must decide whether to obtain it by performing a traditional open vein harvest (OVH) or by performing an endoscopic vein harvest (EVH).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The distribution of answers to EQ-5D-3L sub-questions on a 100mm VAS for each sub-question.

    The investigators wish to investigate how patients scoring "no pain or discomfort", "moderate pain or discomfort" and "extreme pain or discomfort" on the EQ-5D questionnaire score their pain on a 100mm VAS of pain. The same is done for the four other sub-questions in the EQ-5D, eg. how do patients score their mobility on a 100mm VAS of mobility if they score "no problems in walking about", "some problems in walking about" or "confined to bed" on the EQ-5D. (see citations for similar study setups)

    Measured: Approximately five days postoperatively

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Quality of life (Qol)

    The investigators will obtain 3 measurements from each patient and are therefore able to evaluate the change in Qol from baseline to approximately 30 days postoperatively in a group of elective bypass patients. Investigators hereby aim to find the incremental Qol. The patient group will be segmented on whether they underwent endoscopic or open vein harvest during their surgery.

    Measured: approximately 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Aug 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
217 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01424683
Sponsor's protocol ID
Oddershede-1
Status last verified
Jun 2013
First submitted
25 Aug 2011
Last updated
5 Jun 2013
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Jensen MP, Chen C, Brugger AM. Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain. J Pain. 2003 Sep;4(7):407-14. doi: 10.1016/s1526-5900(03)00716-8.

    PubMed 14622683
  • Collins SL, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? Pain. 1997 Aug;72(1-2):95-7. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(97)00005-5.

    PubMed 9272792

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cardiovascular Diseases, run by Lars Oddershede at 1 site in Denmark.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Denmark. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The distribution of answers to EQ-5D-3L sub-questions on a 100mm VAS for each sub-question. (time frame: Approximately five days postoperatively). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01424683, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2013.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in