AzTrials
AzTrials

Posterior Fossa HemorrhageMBIRNCT01431378

Pilot Study of Model Based Iterative Reconstruction Using 64-Slice

An observational study of Posterior Fossa Hemorrhage and Lung Cancer, run by GE Healthcare at 3 sites in United States.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is being performed to confirm that the new technique, Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) with reduced radiation dose can deliver equivalent image quality for CT scans compared to current techniques (Filtered Back Projection with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (FBP with ASiR) and also… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
How many people
92 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2011to Aug 2015
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Population to include women or men 30 years of age or older referred for a CT scan

Who may be able to join

  • Men or Women 30 years of age or older voluntarily willing to sign an informed consent.
  • Patients indicated for one of the following:
  • CNS: Known or suspected pathology in the posterior fossa Thorax: Patients referred for staging of a known or suspected lung cancer Abdomen: Patients with acute flank pain and suspected urolithiasis or Abdomen: Patients with a known or suspected focal liver lesion

Who cannot join

  • Subjects less than 30 years of age
  • Pregnant women as confirmed by urine test or current accepted institution standard
  • If IV contrast is required:
  • Severe or uncontrolled allergy to iodinated contrast media
  • Serum creatinine > 1.7 mg/dl or estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] of <60 mg/min as recorded in medical file or by current accepted institution standard
  • Unable or unwilling to provide written informed consent by self or legal guardian at the time of study enrollment
  • Unstable physical condition as identified by physician

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • Massachusetts General Hospital

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02114-2696

  • Duke University Medical Center

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • Froedtert Memorial Lutheran Hospital

    Miwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226-3596

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Pilot Study of Model Based Iterative Reconstruction Using 64-Slice Multidetector-Row CT Datasets Obtained From the Central Nervous System, Thorax, and Abdomen

This study is being performed to confirm that the new technique, Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR) with reduced radiation dose can deliver equivalent image quality for CT scans compared to current techniques (Filtered Back Projection with Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction (FBP with ASiR) and also to demonstrate that MBIR can improve general image quality characteristics at equivalent radiation dose levels.

Read the detailed description

See brief summary

Keywords
CT scan, CNS, Thorax, Abdomen, staging of a known or suspected lung cancer, suspected urolithiasis, known or suspected focal liver lesion
Medical subject headings
Intracranial Hemorrhages, Lung Neoplasms, Flank Pain, Urolithiasis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT01431378
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CNSCNS: Known or suspected pathology in the posterior fossa
ThoraxThorax: Patients referred for staging of a known or suspected lung cancer
Abdomen 1Abdomen: Patients with acute flank pain and suspected urolithiasis
Abdomen 2Abdomen: Patients with a known or suspected focal liver lesion

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evidence for reduced x-ray radiation exposure for applicable patient indications

    Ultra-low radiation dose images reconstructed with MBIR yield similar anatomic and pathologic information compared to routine radiation dose images reconstructed with Filtered Back Projection (FBP) in the central nervous system (CNS), thorax, and abdomen.

    Measured: Side by side comparison once both scans have been performed

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted9 Sep 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2015

Why it stopped: Feasibility study, sufficient amount of data collected.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case crossover
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
92 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01431378
Sponsor's protocol ID
106-2010-GES-0010
Acronym
MBIR
Status last verified
Dec 2015
First submitted
7 Sep 2011
Last updated
11 Dec 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Posterior Fossa Hemorrhage and Lung Cancer, run by GE Healthcare at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: Feasibility study, sufficient amount of data collected.). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evidence for reduced x-ray radiation exposure for applicable patient indications (time frame: Side by side comparison once both scans have been performed). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Dec 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in