Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)DotArvNCT01433601
Antiretroviral Treatment Strategies in Relation to Adherence, Resistance and Virological Treatment Failure
A study testing Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS) in people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Vietnam.
Trial summary
This project aims to assess different antiretroviral treatment strategies, optimally controlled and conventional, in relation to drug resistance and virological treatment failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
- What is being tested?
- Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS)
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 640 participants
- Where
- 1 siteVietnam
- Study dates
- Aug 2007to Nov 2011
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 59 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- WHO stage IV of HIV disease, regardless of the CD4 count
- WHO stage III of HIV disease with a CD4 count < 350/mm3
- WHO stages I or II with a CD4 count < 200/mm3
Who cannot join
- Pregnancy
- Ongoing severe opportunistic infections
- Institutionalized patients.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess Antiretroviral Treatment Strategies in Relation to Adherence, Resistance and Virological Treatment Failure
This project aims to assess different antiretroviral treatment strategies, optimally controlled and conventional, in relation to drug resistance and virological treatment failure. A Randomised Controlled trial (RCT) where Vietnamese HIV+ patients with CD4+ T-cells <200/ul are randomized into either enhanced treatment support (ETS) through peer supporters or The National AIDS Control Program recommended self supervised treatment (SST). The treatment strategies will be assessed and compared in relation to treatment adherence and drug resistance development with virological treatment failure as primary endpoint. The results from this project will lead to an increased knowledge in relation the impact of treatment support on adherence, virological suppression and resistance development and have an impact on HIV treatment policies in low income settings globally.
Read the detailed description
Aim To study the impact of patient support on selective drug pressure, defined by semi-quantitative assessments of adherence, on the viral suppression and resistance development through a randomised controlled trial of HIV positive patients randomised in enhanced treatment support (ETS) and self supervised treatment (SST).
Specific Objectives
- To create a study population 600 HIV+ patients with CD4+ T-cell count of <200/ul and randomize in two different treatment cohorts, enhanced treatment support (ETS) and conventional self-supervised treatment (SST).
- To monitor the patients using semi-quantitative assessments of adherence, clinical status including clinical examinations (every 3 months), viral load and CD4+ T-cell count (every 6 months) during 24 months with virological treatment failure as primary endpoint.
- To compare the ETS and SST cohorts with respect to the primary endpoint, virological treatment failure, in relation to the semi-quantitative assessments of adherence and to analyse the mechanism of selective drug pressure for the development of resistance including resistance in minor viral subpopulations.
- To conduct a cost effectiveness assessment comparing ETS and SST with respect to the labour and infrastructural cost, virological treatment failure and change to second line therapy.
The study is conducted in Quang Ninh Province, the area hardest hit by the HIV epidemic in Vietnam with a known HIV+ prevalence above 1%. A study population of 600 HIV+ patients with CD4+ T-cell count of <200 are being be recruited in four districts, Ha Long, Uong Bi, Yen Huong and Dong Trieu. Each HIV+ person is examined according to WHO guidelines. HIV+ persons receive a complete physical examination, clinical staging of HIV infection, opportunistic infections including HBV, HCV and tuberculosis. Laboratory testing will include Full blood count, CD4+ T-cell count, viral load using the affordable and simple ELISA based ExaVirR viral load test (http://www.cavidi.se), liver enzymes, PAP smear and pregnancy test for women. If indicated (e.g. prolonged cough) chest X-ray, sputum microscopy for AFB are done.
Opportunistic infections in HIV+ patients are treated according to national guidelines. HIV+ persons receive counselling including information about the disease and the plan for care and treatment, follow-up visits, nutrition and living, prevention of HIV transmission including safe sex, harm reduction measures, the use of birth control methods and prevention of mother to child HIV transmission.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria's are described below. The patients will be randomised into two equally large cohorts, receiving either of two different treatment strategies a) enhanced treatment support (ETS) (described below) and Self-supervised treatment (SST). Co-infections are assessed, diagnosed and the treatment adjusted according to the national guidelines for such situations. The patients are studied with respect to: (i) virological treatment failure, (ii) adverse effects. (iii) patient's adherence to treatment strategy. First drug regimen for all patients including stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine or efavirenz dosages, follow up for adverse effects and regimen alteration are done according to national guidelines. The health care workers are trained in regular monitoring of patients and implementation of optimal treatment strategy. All procedures and treatment will follow the national guidelines. Follow up consultations including physical examinations and tests are done every 3 month.
The tests will include full blood count, CRP, electrolytes, liver enzymes as well as other indicated. Viral load are monitored every 6 month and CD4+ T-cell count every 12 month.
The number of patients needed for each arm of the experiment was estimated assuming a difference between arms of 15 percent units for treatment failure and corresponding baseline percentage of 20%. Requiring a power of 80% and a significance level of 5% the necessary number is about 300 per arm. Inflating the size by 30% to compensate for expected loss to follow up the investigators get just under 300 patients per arm. The assumptions about differences are based on the following: a) Differences larger than 10% units in virological treatment failure are indications for review and modification of treatment strategies; b) group differences in virological treatment failure less the 20% are unlikely to lead to policy changes in Vietnam. The discussion above uses a binary variable like failure/no failure. Performing analysis on quantitative variables like CD4 T-cell readings, which are more informative, will in some cases have considerably higher power than the corresponding binary.
In the ETS strategy an "internal supporter", family member or other person trusted by the patient, is trained to fill in a checklist whether the drugs has been taken and if this was observed. An"external supporter" - a peer selected PLWHA visit the patient twice weekly the first two months. The external supporter follows a checklist and ask about general well being, psychological problems or adverse drugs reactions as well as go through the adherence since last visit, using the internal supporter checklist. If the adherence is good, the number of visits are decreased to once weekly after two months, if not, the number of visits are intensified. If there are any symptoms of opportunistic infections, immunological reconstruction syndrome or adverse drug reactions the patient are refered for medical checkup.. In SST the patient will self be responsible to take the drugs. At initiation treatment counseling are provided. In both groups the drugs are provided in a pre-packed dosage form for easy remembering and counting of the pills.
The patients are followed for 24 months and monitored through clinical examination (each 3 months), viral load in plasma (each six months), CD4- T-cell counts (each 6 months) and assessment of well-being (every 3 months). Adherence among patients are assessed using Contextualised Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG) Adherence Instruments (Chesney et al, 2000). AACTG Adherence Instruments consists of two questionnaires and the first questionnaire is specifically developed to be used for baseline assessment of adherence. The second questionnaire version is developed for assessment of adherence during follow-up visits. Adherence are assessed using the AACTG Adherence Instruments every third month in both the ETS and SST groups. One person is present at the clinic to answer questions regarding the questionnaire and provide help if necessary. Adherence is also measured by pill count conducted by the External supporters, enabling calculation of the proportion of drugs remaining out of the total amount of prescribed drugs. Assessment of side effects according to WHO suggested monitoring and management of ARV drugs are done together with the clinical examination each three months.
The primary endpoint is virological treatment failure defined as a viral load of 1 fg reverse transcriptase activity/ml, corresponding to 200 copies/ml, at 1 year and 2 years after starting treatment. Drug Resistance is determined using a selective real-time PCR for the detection of the critical mutations in the RT-gene, as a marker for whether virological treatment failure that occurs with wild-type virus or resistant virus. The secondary endpoints immunological treatment failure (no rise in CD4+ T-cell count at 1 year) and clinical treatment failure as defined by a new AIDS defining illness or death due to HIV/AIDS (including TB and opportunistic infection) after starting treatment.
Costing of the two different strategies will be carried out by collecting monetary data of expenses of drugs, test, allowance and other expenses from perspective of the HIV/AIDS treatment provider during ART. The investigators follow the basic principles of activity-based costing by identifying all activities necessary to provide the EST and SST and then calculate the costs of carrying out each activity. Costs for each activity comprise recurrent and capital costs, direct and indirect costs. Recurrent costs are the routine costs of resources that are consumed within a year, i.e., non-capital items such as labor and medical supplies. Capital costs represent the annual portion of the cost of durable HIV Sida DOTARV assets. Effectiveness will be measured by percentages of patients with virological treatment failure defined as Viral Load>400 copies/ml.
The statistical analysis mainly consists in the comparison between the two groups with respect to the defined primary endpoint, virological treatment failure, and possibly the secondary endpoints immunological treatment failure and clinical treatment failure, in relation to the semi-quantitative assessments of adherence. Basically standard statistical methods will be used. Regression models with outcome as the dependent variable and a group indicator together with person characteristics as independent variables will be the main approach. For binary outcomes, logistic regression will be used. Attention has to be paid to the particular, often skewed, distributions of variables like CD4+ T-cell counts and viral load. Transformations or the use of non-parametric approaches are likely to be necessary if such measures are not dichotomised and used in linear regression. The correlation between drug resistance to the used drugs (stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine) and adherence will be statistically analysed in order to study whether the basic mechanisms of selective drug pressure result in a concave or bell-shaped resistance - adherence relationship, for these drugs during ETS or SST in a low-income setting.
The investigators will strictly comply with widely recognized international texts and codes of practice including the Helsinki agreement. In this project one patient cohort will receive ETS and the other SST. Both the OTC and SST cohorts will be encouraged to proceed regularly with their drug treatment and to present difficulties that they may encounter in doing so. For the project period, the project will meet the costs of ARV for the cohorts. Patients' biological samples are collected and used only after written consent. All specimens are coded to protect the identity of patients and to ensure confidentiality. Patients are recruited in a consecutive manner without regard to race or other exclusion considerations. Confidentiality is assured by using codes for patient identification, and confidentially laws will be strictly observed when processing human clinical information. No patient identifying information will be published or available after the requisite clinical data have been collected, and consent will be obtained for the use of all data and tissues. Data is accessible only to members and coordinators of the tissue procurement facility and research team, under approved guidelines.
- Conditions
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
- Being tested
- Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS)
- Keywords
- Adherence, Peer support, Treatment failure
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS)Behavioural
Also called Peer support, Directly Observed Treatment (DOT), Adherence support, Adherence counselling
An "internal supporter" - family member or other person trusted by the patient is trained to fill in a checklist whether the drugs has been taken and if this was observed. An"external supporter" - a peer selected PLWHA visit the patient twice weekly the first two months. The external supporter follows a checklist and ask about general well being, psychological problems or adverse drugs reactions as well as go through the adherence since last visit, using the internal supporter checklist. If the adherence is good, the number of visits are decreased to once weekly after two months, if not, the number of visits are intensified. If there are any symptoms of opportunistic infections, immunological reconstruction syndrome or adverse drug reactions the patient are refered for medical checkup.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Self Supervised Treatment (SST) | No intervention | Treatment according to the National Treatment Guidelines in Vietnam including treatment counseling before initiation of ART and clinical follow up every 3 months. The patient is self responsible to take the drugs and no additional adherence support is provided. |
| Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS) | Experimental | Treatment according to the National Treatment Guidelines in Vietnam including treatment counseling before initiation of ART and clinical follow up every 3 months. In addition adherence support is provided according to the description under intervention. Receives: Behavioral: Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Virological treatment failure
HIV viral load of 1 fg reverse transcriptase activity/ml, corresponding to 200 copies/ml, at 1 year and 2 years after starting treatment.
Measured: 24 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Immunological treatment failure
Immunological treatment failure
- CD4 count returns to or falls below pre-therapy baseline level or
- 50% decline from the on-treatment peak value since the initiation of ART (if known); or
- CD4 count < 100 cells/mm3 after a year without any increase.
Measured: 24 months
Clinical treatment failure
Occurrence or recurrence of stage 4 diseases or conditions after at least 6 months of therapy
Measured: 24 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2007
- Primary completionNov 2011 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2011 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Karolinska InstitutetThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 640 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska Institutet
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hanoi Medical University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mattias Larsson, Karolinska Institutet
- Investigators
- Mattias Larssson, Md PhD, Principal investigator, Karolinska Institutet
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01433601
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DotArv_Vietnam
- Acronym
- DotArv
- Status last verified
- Sep 2011
- First submitted
- 9 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 14 Sep 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Cuong DD, Sonnerborg A, Van Tam V, El-Khatib Z, Santacatterina M, Marrone G, Chuc NT, Diwan V, Thorson A, Le NK, An PN, Larsson M. Impact of peer support on virologic failure in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy - a cluster randomized controlled trial in Vietnam. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2017-x.
PubMed 27986077Van Tam V, Cuong DD, Alfven T, Phuc HD, Chuc NT, Hoa NP, Diwan V, Larsson M. HIV sero-discordance among married HIV patients initiating anti-retroviral therapy in northern Vietnam. AIDS Res Ther. 2016 Nov 15;13:39. doi: 10.1186/s12981-016-0124-9. eCollection 2016.
PubMed 27891160Cuong do D, Thorson A, Sonnerborg A, Hoa NP, Chuc NT, Phuc HD, Larsson M. Survival and causes of death among HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy in north-eastern Vietnam. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;44(3):201-8. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.631937. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
PubMed 22122590
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Sep 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised Controlled Trial to Assess Antiretroviral Treatment Strategies in Relation to Adherence, Resistance and Virological Treatment Failure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01433601
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DotArv / DotArv_Vietnam
- Conditions
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
- Keywords
- Adherence, Peer support, Treatment failure
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 640 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Karolinska InstitutetUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Hanoi Medical University
- Study start
- Aug 2007
- Primary completion
- Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2011 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This project aims to assess different antiretroviral treatment strategies, optimally controlled and conventional, in relation to drug resistance and virological treatment failure. A Randomised Controlled trial (RCT) where Vietnamese HIV+ patients with CD4+ T-cells <200/ul are randomized into either enhanced treatment support (ETS) through peer supporters or The National AIDS Control Program recommended self supervised treatment (SST). The treatment strategies will be assessed and compared in relation to treatment adherence and drug resistance development with virological treatment failure as primary endpoint. The results from this project will lead to an increased knowledge in relation the impact of treatment support on adherence, virological suppression and resistance development and have an impact on HIV treatment policies in low income settings globally.
Detailed description
Aim To study the impact of patient support on selective drug pressure, defined by semi-quantitative assessments of adherence, on the viral suppression and resistance development through a randomised controlled trial of HIV positive patients randomised in enhanced treatment support (ETS) and self supervised treatment (SST).
Specific Objectives
- To create a study population 600 HIV+ patients with CD4+ T-cell count of <200/ul and randomize in two different treatment cohorts, enhanced treatment support (ETS) and conventional self-supervised treatment (SST).
- To monitor the patients using semi-quantitative assessments of adherence, clinical status including clinical examinations (every 3 months), viral load and CD4+ T-cell count (every 6 months) during 24 months with virological treatment failure as primary endpoint.
- To compare the ETS and SST cohorts with respect to the primary endpoint, virological treatment failure, in relation to the semi-quantitative assessments of adherence and to analyse the mechanism of selective drug pressure for the development of resistance including resistance in minor viral subpopulations.
- To conduct a cost effectiveness assessment comparing ETS and SST with respect to the labour and infrastructural cost, virological treatment failure and change to second line therapy.
The study is conducted in Quang Ninh Province, the area hardest hit by the HIV epidemic in Vietnam with a known HIV+ prevalence above 1%. A study population of 600 HIV+ patients with CD4+ T-cell count of <200 are being be recruited in four districts, Ha Long, Uong Bi, Yen Huong and Dong Trieu. Each HIV+ person is examined according to WHO guidelines. HIV+ persons receive a complete physical examination, clinical staging of HIV infection, opportunistic infections including HBV, HCV and tuberculosis. Laboratory testing will include Full blood count, CD4+ T-cell count, viral load using the affordable and simple ELISA based ExaVirR viral load test (http://www.cavidi.se), liver enzymes, PAP smear and pregnancy test for women. If indicated (e.g. prolonged cough) chest X-ray, sputum microscopy for AFB are done.
Opportunistic infections in HIV+ patients are treated according to national guidelines. HIV+ persons receive counselling including information about the disease and the plan for care and treatment, follow-up visits, nutrition and living, prevention of HIV transmission including safe sex, harm reduction measures, the use of birth control methods and prevention of mother to child HIV transmission.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria's are described below. The patients will be randomised into two equally large cohorts, receiving either of two different treatment strategies a) enhanced treatment support (ETS) (described below) and Self-supervised treatment (SST). Co-infections are assessed, diagnosed and the treatment adjusted according to the national guidelines for such situations. The patients are studied with respect to: (i) virological treatment failure, (ii) adverse effects. (iii) patient's adherence to treatment strategy. First drug regimen for all patients including stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine or efavirenz dosages, follow up for adverse effects and regimen alteration are done according to national guidelines. The health care workers are trained in regular monitoring of patients and implementation of optimal treatment strategy. All procedures and treatment will follow the national guidelines. Follow up consultations including physical examinations and tests are done every 3 month.
The tests will include full blood count, CRP, electrolytes, liver enzymes as well as other indicated. Viral load are monitored every 6 month and CD4+ T-cell count every 12 month.
The number of patients needed for each arm of the experiment was estimated assuming a difference between arms of 15 percent units for treatment failure and corresponding baseline percentage of 20%. Requiring a power of 80% and a significance level of 5% the necessary number is about 300 per arm. Inflating the size by 30% to compensate for expected loss to follow up the investigators get just under 300 patients per arm. The assumptions about differences are based on the following: a) Differences larger than 10% units in virological treatment failure are indications for review and modification of treatment strategies; b) group differences in virological treatment failure less the 20% are unlikely to lead to policy changes in Vietnam. The discussion above uses a binary variable like failure/no failure. Performing analysis on quantitative variables like CD4 T-cell readings, which are more informative, will in some cases have considerably higher power than the corresponding binary.
In the ETS strategy an "internal supporter", family member or other person trusted by the patient, is trained to fill in a checklist whether the drugs has been taken and if this was observed. An"external supporter" - a peer selected PLWHA visit the patient twice weekly the first two months. The external supporter follows a checklist and ask about general well being, psychological problems or adverse drugs reactions as well as go through the adherence since last visit, using the internal supporter checklist. If the adherence is good, the number of visits are decreased to once weekly after two months, if not, the number of visits are intensified. If there are any symptoms of opportunistic infections, immunological reconstruction syndrome or adverse drug reactions the patient are refered for medical checkup.. In SST the patient will self be responsible to take the drugs. At initiation treatment counseling are provided. In both groups the drugs are provided in a pre-packed dosage form for easy remembering and counting of the pills.
The patients are followed for 24 months and monitored through clinical examination (each 3 months), viral load in plasma (each six months), CD4- T-cell counts (each 6 months) and assessment of well-being (every 3 months). Adherence among patients are assessed using Contextualised Adult AIDS Clinical Trials Group (AACTG) Adherence Instruments (Chesney et al, 2000). AACTG Adherence Instruments consists of two questionnaires and the first questionnaire is specifically developed to be used for baseline assessment of adherence. The second questionnaire version is developed for assessment of adherence during follow-up visits. Adherence are assessed using the AACTG Adherence Instruments every third month in both the ETS and SST groups. One person is present at the clinic to answer questions regarding the questionnaire and provide help if necessary. Adherence is also measured by pill count conducted by the External supporters, enabling calculation of the proportion of drugs remaining out of the total amount of prescribed drugs. Assessment of side effects according to WHO suggested monitoring and management of ARV drugs are done together with the clinical examination each three months.
The primary endpoint is virological treatment failure defined as a viral load of 1 fg reverse transcriptase activity/ml, corresponding to 200 copies/ml, at 1 year and 2 years after starting treatment. Drug Resistance is determined using a selective real-time PCR for the detection of the critical mutations in the RT-gene, as a marker for whether virological treatment failure that occurs with wild-type virus or resistant virus. The secondary endpoints immunological treatment failure (no rise in CD4+ T-cell count at 1 year) and clinical treatment failure as defined by a new AIDS defining illness or death due to HIV/AIDS (including TB and opportunistic infection) after starting treatment.
Costing of the two different strategies will be carried out by collecting monetary data of expenses of drugs, test, allowance and other expenses from perspective of the HIV/AIDS treatment provider during ART. The investigators follow the basic principles of activity-based costing by identifying all activities necessary to provide the EST and SST and then calculate the costs of carrying out each activity. Costs for each activity comprise recurrent and capital costs, direct and indirect costs. Recurrent costs are the routine costs of resources that are consumed within a year, i.e., non-capital items such as labor and medical supplies. Capital costs represent the annual portion of the cost of durable HIV Sida DOTARV assets. Effectiveness will be measured by percentages of patients with virological treatment failure defined as Viral Load>400 copies/ml.
The statistical analysis mainly consists in the comparison between the two groups with respect to the defined primary endpoint, virological treatment failure, and possibly the secondary endpoints immunological treatment failure and clinical treatment failure, in relation to the semi-quantitative assessments of adherence. Basically standard statistical methods will be used. Regression models with outcome as the dependent variable and a group indicator together with person characteristics as independent variables will be the main approach. For binary outcomes, logistic regression will be used. Attention has to be paid to the particular, often skewed, distributions of variables like CD4+ T-cell counts and viral load. Transformations or the use of non-parametric approaches are likely to be necessary if such measures are not dichotomised and used in linear regression. The correlation between drug resistance to the used drugs (stavudine, lamivudine, nevirapine) and adherence will be statistically analysed in order to study whether the basic mechanisms of selective drug pressure result in a concave or bell-shaped resistance - adherence relationship, for these drugs during ETS or SST in a low-income setting.
The investigators will strictly comply with widely recognized international texts and codes of practice including the Helsinki agreement. In this project one patient cohort will receive ETS and the other SST. Both the OTC and SST cohorts will be encouraged to proceed regularly with their drug treatment and to present difficulties that they may encounter in doing so. For the project period, the project will meet the costs of ARV for the cohorts. Patients' biological samples are collected and used only after written consent. All specimens are coded to protect the identity of patients and to ensure confidentiality. Patients are recruited in a consecutive manner without regard to race or other exclusion considerations. Confidentiality is assured by using codes for patient identification, and confidentially laws will be strictly observed when processing human clinical information. No patient identifying information will be published or available after the requisite clinical data have been collected, and consent will be obtained for the use of all data and tissues. Data is accessible only to members and coordinators of the tissue procurement facility and research team, under approved guidelines.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Self Supervised Treatment (SST) | No intervention | –Treatment according to the National Treatment Guidelines in Vietnam including treatment counseling before initiation of ART and clinical follow up every 3 months. The patient is self responsible to take the drugs and no additional adherence support is provided. |
| Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS) | Experimental | Behavioral: Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS)Treatment according to the National Treatment Guidelines in Vietnam including treatment counseling before initiation of ART and clinical follow up every 3 months. In addition adherence support is provided according to the description under intervention. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 59 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- WHO stage IV of HIV disease, regardless of the CD4 count
- WHO stage III of HIV disease with a CD4 count < 350/mm3
- WHO stages I or II with a CD4 count < 200/mm3
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pregnancy
- Ongoing severe opportunistic infections
- Institutionalized patients.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS)Also: Peer support, Directly Observed Treatment (DOT), Adherence support, Adherence counsellingAn "internal supporter" - family member or other person trusted by the patient is trained to fill in a checklist whether the drugs has been taken and if this was observed. An"external supporter" - a peer selected PLWHA visit the patient twice weekly the first two months. The external supporter follows a checklist and ask about general well being, psychological problems or adverse drugs reactions as well as go through the adherence since last visit, using the internal supporter checklist. If the adherence is good, the number of visits are decreased to once weekly after two months, if not, the number of visits are intensified. If there are any symptoms of opportunistic infections, immunological reconstruction syndrome or adverse drug reactions the patient are refered for medical checkup. | Behavioural | Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS) |
Primary outcome
Virological treatment failure
Time frame: 24 months
HIV viral load of 1 fg reverse transcriptase activity/ml, corresponding to 200 copies/ml, at 1 year and 2 years after starting treatment.
2 secondary outcomes
Immunological treatment failure
Time frame: 24 months
Clinical treatment failure
Time frame: 24 months
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Sep 2011.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27986077Cuong DD, Sonnerborg A, Van Tam V, El-Khatib Z, Santacatterina M, Marrone G, Chuc NT, Diwan V, Thorson A, Le NK, An PN, Larsson M. Impact of peer support on virologic failure in HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy - a cluster randomized controlled trial in Vietnam. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Dec 16;16(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-2017-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27891160Van Tam V, Cuong DD, Alfven T, Phuc HD, Chuc NT, Hoa NP, Diwan V, Larsson M. HIV sero-discordance among married HIV patients initiating anti-retroviral therapy in northern Vietnam. AIDS Res Ther. 2016 Nov 15;13:39. doi: 10.1186/s12981-016-0124-9. eCollection 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 22122590Cuong do D, Thorson A, Sonnerborg A, Hoa NP, Chuc NT, Phuc HD, Larsson M. Survival and causes of death among HIV-infected patients starting antiretroviral therapy in north-eastern Vietnam. Scand J Infect Dis. 2012 Mar;44(3):201-8. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2011.631937. Epub 2011 Nov 28.
Related trials for Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mattias Larssson, Md PhD principal investigator
Karolinska Institutet
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Enhanced Treatment Support (ETS) in people with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), run by Karolinska Institutet at 1 site in Vietnam.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Sep 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Vietnam. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Virological treatment failure (time frame: 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01433601, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Sep 2011.