Coronary Artery DiseasePhase 1NANOM PCINCT01436123
Plasmonic Photothermal and Stem Cell Therapy of Atherosclerosis Versus Stenting
A Phase 1 study testing Stenting and micro-infusion of NP and Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerosis, run by Ural State Medical University at 3 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
Intensive therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg and ApoA-I Milano reduces the total atheroma volume (TAV) up to 6.38 or 14.1 mm3 respectively. Our previous bench studies PLASMONICS and NANOM First-in-Man trial documented TAV reduction up to unprecedented 79.4 and 60.3 mm3 respectively with high level of safety and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis
- What is being tested?
- Stenting and micro-infusion of NP and Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 62 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to Oct 2012
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Multivessel coronary artery disease without indications for CABG
- Stable angina with indications for preventive PCI
- NSTEMI (primary PCI and late comers) <=> 12 hr
- STEMI with kept EF>50% (all comers)
- Rescue PCI
- Vessel size between 2.3-4.0 mm
Show all 11Show fewer
- NYHA II-III functional class of HF
- De novo treatment = no history of PCI or CABG
- Atherosclerosis of proximal left anterior descending artery <50% stenosis
- Treated hypertension
- Signed written informed consent
Who cannot join
- History of MI
- History of CABG or PCI
- Indications for CABG
- Contraindications for CABG, PCI
- History of unstable angina, coronary artery syndrome
- History of arrhythmias
Show all 16Show fewer
- History of stroke
- NYHA I, IV functional class of HF
- Diabetes (fasting glucose > 7.0 mM/L)
- Untreated hypertension
- Asthma
- Participation to any drug-investigations during previous 60 days
- Pregnancy
- Intolerance to any limus drugs, aspirin, clopidogrel, aspirin, metals and polymers of stent and nanoparticles
- Need for chronic treatment with anti-vitamin K drugs
- Impossibility of clinical follow-up
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 2 countries.
3 sites in 2 countries
Russia2 sites
Ural Center of Modern Nanotechnologies, Institute of Natural Sciences, Ural Federal University
Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620000
Ural Institute of Cardiology
Yekaterinburg, Sverdlovsk Oblast, 620144
Netherlands1 site
De Haar Research Foundation
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3071PR
About this study
Official title: Plasmonic Photothermal and Stem Cell Therapy of Atherosclerosis With The Use of Gold Nanoparticles With Iron Oxide-Silica Shells Versus Stenting
Intensive therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg and ApoA-I Milano reduces the total atheroma volume (TAV) up to 6.38 or 14.1 mm3 respectively. Our previous bench studies PLASMONICS and NANOM First-in-Man trial documented TAV reduction up to unprecedented 79.4 and 60.3 mm3 respectively with high level of safety and feasibility.
The completed randomized two arm (1:1) study (NANOM-PCI) with parallel assignment (n=62) assessed (NCT01436123) the safety and feasibility of the delivery technique for nanoparticles (NP) using micro-injection catheter (with intravascular intramural injection of allogeneous stem cells carrying NP after MSCT-, IVUS- and OCT-guided mapping of the vessel), and plasmonic photothermal therapy of atherosclerosis combined with stenting (Nano group, n=32) versus stenting with Xience V cage (Stenting group, n=30). The primary outcome was TAV at 12 months.
Read more
The mean reduction of TAV at 12 months in Nano group was -84.1 mm3 (95% CI: SD 28.3; min -52.4 mm3, max -99.1 mm3; p<0.05) versus +12.4 mm3 in case of stenting (p<0.05 between groups). 42/62 patients (68%) in Nano group passed the Glagov threshold of a 40% plaque burden with mean plaque burden (PB) 36.2% (95% CI: SD 9.3%, min 30.9%, max 44.5%). The increase of the minimal lumen diameter was 61.2 and 63.3% at 12 month follow up in groups respectively. The serial assessment of VH-IVUS showed a significant decrease at 12 months in the dense calcium area, fibrous and fibro-fatty tissue with fulminant necrosis due to thermolysis in Nano-group, whereas an increase of fibrous and fibro-fatty components in stenting arm. We have documented 2 vs 3 cases of the definite thrombosis and 3 vs 5 cases of target lesion revascularization in groups respectively. The analysis of the event-free survival of the ongoing clinical follow-up shows the significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death in Nano group if compare with conventional stenting (93.4% vs 86.7%; p<0.05).
Plasmonic resonance-mediated therapy using noble-metal NP associated with significant regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Tested delivery approach has acceptable safety and efficacy for atheroregression below a 40% PB.
The investigators hypothesize that multistep approach with the use of stent in acute care unit, and then subsequent transcatheter micro-injection with nanoparticles can resolve atherosclerosis, stop and regress atherogenesis, remodulate or even rejuvenate arteries. Stem cells in patch can be good carriers for nanoparticles as well as high-effective metabolic vectors (paracrine-like regulation of alive cells and via bioactive products of cell lysis after detonation of nanoparticles) for the treatment of plaque on site. Gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells promise high-energy plasmonic photothermic burning or melting effect under the near-infrared laser irradiation onto the lesion. Thus the investigators expect complex two-side effect on the plaque with protected lumen and adventitia.
Novel discoveries in atherogenesis, and development of nanobiotechnologies with potentials for the management of atherosclerosis leads us to the quest of new approaches. The investigators still cannot really effectively treat atherosclerosis.
The investigators management is more symptomatic, and lipid-pool or inflammation-oriented! The investigators cannot manage non-organic part (mineral deposits, calcified necrotic core, partially collagen and fibrotic tissue) and total plaque volume Surgery and invasive procedures is just focused on blood flow restoration (just manipulate the form of plaque) + concerns of clinical and technical restrictions (incl. alien body - stent) + risk of restenosis or subacute 'fatal' in-stent atherothrombosis + graft survival/ occlusion + surgery-related complications High rate of short- and long-term complications and readmissions. Regression of atherosclerosis in fact is still a dream. The investigators offer an alternative to stenting and may be cardiac artery bypass surgery (CABG). Our approach can really allow to rejuvenate arteries, Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) can burn plaque, but stem cells and bioengineered structures promise restoration of the vessel wall.
Our personal previous data showed that PPTT can 1.6-fold reduce a volume of plaque with most optimal long-term result in subsets with the use of SPCs as a delivery approach. The most optimal delivery systems of NPs into the plaque are the on-artery bioengineered patch and ferro-magnetic approach.
Read the detailed description
Nanoparticles (NPs) are quite safe for an organism but entire kinetics is mostly unknown. The most dangerous approach with lowest level of efficacy and safety is a delivery of NPs with microbubbles. SP+ and mesenchymal SPCs have the similar efficacy as a local delivery system with a lot of beneficial properties such as anti-inflammative, anti-apoptotic, and multi-metabolic effects leading to the plaque degradation and artery rejuvenation. Thus, nanoburning is very challenging technique to demolish and reverse the plaque especially in combination with stem cell technologies promising functional restoration of the vessel wall and can be an alternative to stenting.
Altering general strategy the investigators generally offer:
- The investigators don't need a therapy only with harvested stem cells (not so effective, but more provocative); the investigators have to manage host resident stem cells on site [local in-artery infusion] with growth factors, cytokines [or systemic potentiation, but risk of side effects and adverse events is high].
- Regular intravenous systemic therapy with modified BM (bone marrow), circulating progenitor, and iPS (induced pluripotent) stem cells might be beneficial for prevention of diseases, and rejuvenation of tissues and organs - but the system as whole will be compromised [the investigators can store stem cells of each individual to use for cell therapy or bioengineering].
- The best way - development of bioengineered constructions through life to transplant a bioartificial organ on request.
- Multi-step invasive treatment of atherosclerosis - (1) biodegradable stenting in ACU (acute care unit), or preventively, with no restenosis and no acute atherothrombosis risk profile, (2) regular systemic or local stem cell therapy, or with cytokines, (3) on-artery MSCs (mesenchymal stem cells)-related bioengineered patch with silica-gold iron-bearing NPs [SCs (stem cells) as carriers for NPs with transduction in hands of magnetic fields for local elimination of plaque, and subsequent rejuvenation of artery wall.
Our new approach, challenging modern therapy of atherosclerosis include:
- BIODEGRADABLE STENTS - for 6-24 months period under the soft short-term antithrombotic therapy (resolving concerns with stenosis/ lumen + steered remodeling); no hemorrhages, no alien metal body, no concerns with further CABG, minimal inflammation
- INTRAVENOUS NON-SPECIFIC SYSTEMIC STEM CELL THERAPY - before and after stenting - launch repair effects in vessel + beneficial effects for ischemic or injured tissues
- ON-ARTERY BIOENGINEERED PATCH transplantation with NPs or MICRO-INFUSION of stem cells bearing NP - grown with MSCs and NPs (bovine pericardium scaffold); 3-6 weeks to grow a thin structure (recover cells before or during stenting), multi-effects due to migration of SCs + bioactive products of lysis
- PLASMONIC PHOTOTHERMAL THERAPY - 'melting' and 'burning' effects - direct degradation + bioactive products of stem cells' lysis + further migration of SCs from patch
Potential expected disadvantages of our approach: Necessity of the special precise delivery technique. Lost function of artery - irreparable pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammative damage - necessity of another clinical approach for restoration of tissue (may be with stem cells). Threat of acute fatal atherothrombosis due to rupture of (vulnerable) plaque - verification of the optimal antithrombotic therapy. Cannot treat non-organic part of plaque - necessity of the special therapy for mineral deposits, calcified necrotic core, fibrotic sites - solution using stem cells. Harm of potent detrimental adverse effects - vapor bubbling (boiling of cytoplasm and ECM with subsequent lysis of cells, and provocation of pro-apoptotic cascades), acoustic and shock waves due to plasma-generated laser-related detonation of nanoshells in tissue - need regenerative therapy (type of SCs, conditions and way of transplantation; Culturing? Sorting?). Erratic (unsteered) heating - surrounding tissue of the site of interest can achieve a temperature until 38-39°. But at the site of burning final temperature can be at about 50-180 C (cauterization/ searing/ melting effect) with consequent pro-fibrotic effect - need regenerative therapy and clarification of energy options.
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis
- Being tested
- Stenting and micro-infusion of NP, Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent
- Keywords
- Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy, Nanoparticles, Stem cells, Atherosclerosis, Bioengineering, Biodegradable stenting, Repair disease
- Medical subject headings
- Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Stenting and micro-infusion of NPOther
Also called Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy (PPTT), Stem cell therapy, Bioengineering, Stenting
Step 1 - IVUS, OCT-guided put in everolimus-eluting (drug-eluting-DES) stent + intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) mapping + harvesting stem cells with mesenchymal phenotype; Step 2 - culturing of stem cells in medium by gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells; Step 3 - micro-infusion of stem cells bearing NP into the lesion; Step 4 - detonation of nanoshells after migration of stem cells with NPs inside (until 7-10 days after transplantation). We expect 'melting' and 'burning' effects of PPTT, beneficial effects of bioactive products of stem cells lysis + benefits from further migration of stem cells from patch into the plaque
Implantation of everolimus-eluting stentDevice
Also called Stenting, Xience V stent
Put stent in ischemia-related coronary artery by indications for PCI
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Stenting + Micro-infusion | Experimental | Step 1 - implantation of everolimus-eluting stent with imaging by MSCT, IVUS and OCT; Step 2 - injection of stem cells containing gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells. Receives: Other: Stenting and micro-infusion of NP |
| Stenting | Active comparator | Put in everolimus-eluting stent Receives: Device: Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Total atheroma volume
Total plaque volume measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), cubic mm.
Measured: at month 12
Secondary outcomes (9)
Composite end-point of any MACE (major acute cardiovascular events), all-cause death, any revascularization
Composite end-point of all-cause death, all MACE - major cardiovascular events, any revascularization
Measured: at month 12
Composition of plaque
Analysis of IVUS(intravascular ultrasound)-related composition of plaque (calcified deposits, necrotic calcified core), fibro-lipid core and etc.
Measured: at month 12
Major and minor bleeding
Clinical examination of major and minor bleeding under the antithrombotic therapy
Measured: at month 12
Restenosis rate
Restenosis rate verified clinically + IVUS
Measured: at month 12
Stent thrombosis rate
Stent thrombosis rate verified clinically, angiography, IVUS
Measured: at month 12
Coronary flow-mediated vasodilatation
Ultrasound-related examination of coronary flow-mediated vasodilatation
Measured: at month 12
Coronary intima-media thickness
Ultrasound-IVUS-related examination of coronary intima-media thickness
Measured: at month 12
Minimum diameter stenosis
IVUS-related assessment of minimum diameter stenosis
Measured: at month 12
Minimum lumen diameter
IVUS-related assessment of minimum lumen diameter
Measured: at month 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
- Primary completionJul 2012
- Study completionOct 2012
Why it stopped: The study was terminated under the political pressure of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) and the Russian Society of Cardiology
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Coronary Artery DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ural State Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ural Institute of Cardiology, De Haar Research Foundation, Ural Federal University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Alexander Kharlamov, Ural State Medical University
- Investigators
- Alexander Kharlamov, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, Ural Institute of CardiologyJan Gabinsky, M.D., Ph.D., Study chair, Ural Institute of CardiologyOlga Kovtun, M.D., Ph.D., Study director, Ural State Medical University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01436123
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NANOM PCI
- Acronym
- NANOM PCI
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 14 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 19 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kharlamov AN. Plasmonic photothermal therapy for atheroregression below Glagov threshold. Future Cardiol. 2013 May;9(3):405-25. doi: 10.2217/fca.13.16.
PubMed 23668744
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Plasmonic Photothermal and Stem Cell Therapy of Atherosclerosis With The Use of Gold Nanoparticles With Iron Oxide-Silica Shells Versus Stenting
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01436123
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NANOM PCI / NANOM PCI
- Conditions
- Coronary Artery Disease, Atherosclerosis
- Keywords
- Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy, Nanoparticles, Stem cells, Atherosclerosis, Bioengineering, Biodegradable stenting, Repair disease
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The study was terminated under the political pressure of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) and the Russian Society of Cardiology
- Enrolment
- 62 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ural State Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ural Institute of Cardiology, De Haar Research Foundation, Ural Federal University
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- Primary completion
- Jul 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intensive therapy with rosuvastatin 40 mg and ApoA-I Milano reduces the total atheroma volume (TAV) up to 6.38 or 14.1 mm3 respectively. Our previous bench studies PLASMONICS and NANOM First-in-Man trial documented TAV reduction up to unprecedented 79.4 and 60.3 mm3 respectively with high level of safety and feasibility.
The completed randomized two arm (1:1) study (NANOM-PCI) with parallel assignment (n=62) assessed (NCT01436123) the safety and feasibility of the delivery technique for nanoparticles (NP) using micro-injection catheter (with intravascular intramural injection of allogeneous stem cells carrying NP after MSCT-, IVUS- and OCT-guided mapping of the vessel), and plasmonic photothermal therapy of atherosclerosis combined with stenting (Nano group, n=32) versus stenting with Xience V cage (Stenting group, n=30). The primary outcome was TAV at 12 months.
The mean reduction of TAV at 12 months in Nano group was -84.1 mm3 (95% CI: SD 28.3; min -52.4 mm3, max -99.1 mm3; p<0.05) versus +12.4 mm3 in case of stenting (p<0.05 between groups). 42/62 patients (68%) in Nano group passed the Glagov threshold of a 40% plaque burden with mean plaque burden (PB) 36.2% (95% CI: SD 9.3%, min 30.9%, max 44.5%). The increase of the minimal lumen diameter was 61.2 and 63.3% at 12 month follow up in groups respectively. The serial assessment of VH-IVUS showed a significant decrease at 12 months in the dense calcium area, fibrous and fibro-fatty tissue with fulminant necrosis due to thermolysis in Nano-group, whereas an increase of fibrous and fibro-fatty components in stenting arm. We have documented 2 vs 3 cases of the definite thrombosis and 3 vs 5 cases of target lesion revascularization in groups respectively. The analysis of the event-free survival of the ongoing clinical follow-up shows the significantly lower risk of cardiovascular death in Nano group if compare with conventional stenting (93.4% vs 86.7%; p<0.05).
Plasmonic resonance-mediated therapy using noble-metal NP associated with significant regression of coronary atherosclerosis. Tested delivery approach has acceptable safety and efficacy for atheroregression below a 40% PB.
The investigators hypothesize that multistep approach with the use of stent in acute care unit, and then subsequent transcatheter micro-injection with nanoparticles can resolve atherosclerosis, stop and regress atherogenesis, remodulate or even rejuvenate arteries. Stem cells in patch can be good carriers for nanoparticles as well as high-effective metabolic vectors (paracrine-like regulation of alive cells and via bioactive products of cell lysis after detonation of nanoparticles) for the treatment of plaque on site. Gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells promise high-energy plasmonic photothermic burning or melting effect under the near-infrared laser irradiation onto the lesion. Thus the investigators expect complex two-side effect on the plaque with protected lumen and adventitia.
Novel discoveries in atherogenesis, and development of nanobiotechnologies with potentials for the management of atherosclerosis leads us to the quest of new approaches. The investigators still cannot really effectively treat atherosclerosis.
The investigators management is more symptomatic, and lipid-pool or inflammation-oriented! The investigators cannot manage non-organic part (mineral deposits, calcified necrotic core, partially collagen and fibrotic tissue) and total plaque volume Surgery and invasive procedures is just focused on blood flow restoration (just manipulate the form of plaque) + concerns of clinical and technical restrictions (incl. alien body - stent) + risk of restenosis or subacute 'fatal' in-stent atherothrombosis + graft survival/ occlusion + surgery-related complications High rate of short- and long-term complications and readmissions. Regression of atherosclerosis in fact is still a dream. The investigators offer an alternative to stenting and may be cardiac artery bypass surgery (CABG). Our approach can really allow to rejuvenate arteries, Plasmonic photothermal therapy (PPTT) can burn plaque, but stem cells and bioengineered structures promise restoration of the vessel wall.
Our personal previous data showed that PPTT can 1.6-fold reduce a volume of plaque with most optimal long-term result in subsets with the use of SPCs as a delivery approach. The most optimal delivery systems of NPs into the plaque are the on-artery bioengineered patch and ferro-magnetic approach.
Detailed description
Nanoparticles (NPs) are quite safe for an organism but entire kinetics is mostly unknown. The most dangerous approach with lowest level of efficacy and safety is a delivery of NPs with microbubbles. SP+ and mesenchymal SPCs have the similar efficacy as a local delivery system with a lot of beneficial properties such as anti-inflammative, anti-apoptotic, and multi-metabolic effects leading to the plaque degradation and artery rejuvenation. Thus, nanoburning is very challenging technique to demolish and reverse the plaque especially in combination with stem cell technologies promising functional restoration of the vessel wall and can be an alternative to stenting.
Altering general strategy the investigators generally offer:
- The investigators don't need a therapy only with harvested stem cells (not so effective, but more provocative); the investigators have to manage host resident stem cells on site [local in-artery infusion] with growth factors, cytokines [or systemic potentiation, but risk of side effects and adverse events is high].
- Regular intravenous systemic therapy with modified BM (bone marrow), circulating progenitor, and iPS (induced pluripotent) stem cells might be beneficial for prevention of diseases, and rejuvenation of tissues and organs - but the system as whole will be compromised [the investigators can store stem cells of each individual to use for cell therapy or bioengineering].
- The best way - development of bioengineered constructions through life to transplant a bioartificial organ on request.
- Multi-step invasive treatment of atherosclerosis - (1) biodegradable stenting in ACU (acute care unit), or preventively, with no restenosis and no acute atherothrombosis risk profile, (2) regular systemic or local stem cell therapy, or with cytokines, (3) on-artery MSCs (mesenchymal stem cells)-related bioengineered patch with silica-gold iron-bearing NPs [SCs (stem cells) as carriers for NPs with transduction in hands of magnetic fields for local elimination of plaque, and subsequent rejuvenation of artery wall.
Our new approach, challenging modern therapy of atherosclerosis include:
- BIODEGRADABLE STENTS - for 6-24 months period under the soft short-term antithrombotic therapy (resolving concerns with stenosis/ lumen + steered remodeling); no hemorrhages, no alien metal body, no concerns with further CABG, minimal inflammation
- INTRAVENOUS NON-SPECIFIC SYSTEMIC STEM CELL THERAPY - before and after stenting - launch repair effects in vessel + beneficial effects for ischemic or injured tissues
- ON-ARTERY BIOENGINEERED PATCH transplantation with NPs or MICRO-INFUSION of stem cells bearing NP - grown with MSCs and NPs (bovine pericardium scaffold); 3-6 weeks to grow a thin structure (recover cells before or during stenting), multi-effects due to migration of SCs + bioactive products of lysis
- PLASMONIC PHOTOTHERMAL THERAPY - 'melting' and 'burning' effects - direct degradation + bioactive products of stem cells' lysis + further migration of SCs from patch
Potential expected disadvantages of our approach: Necessity of the special precise delivery technique. Lost function of artery - irreparable pro-fibrotic and pro-inflammative damage - necessity of another clinical approach for restoration of tissue (may be with stem cells). Threat of acute fatal atherothrombosis due to rupture of (vulnerable) plaque - verification of the optimal antithrombotic therapy. Cannot treat non-organic part of plaque - necessity of the special therapy for mineral deposits, calcified necrotic core, fibrotic sites - solution using stem cells. Harm of potent detrimental adverse effects - vapor bubbling (boiling of cytoplasm and ECM with subsequent lysis of cells, and provocation of pro-apoptotic cascades), acoustic and shock waves due to plasma-generated laser-related detonation of nanoshells in tissue - need regenerative therapy (type of SCs, conditions and way of transplantation; Culturing? Sorting?). Erratic (unsteered) heating - surrounding tissue of the site of interest can achieve a temperature until 38-39°. But at the site of burning final temperature can be at about 50-180 C (cauterization/ searing/ melting effect) with consequent pro-fibrotic effect - need regenerative therapy and clarification of energy options.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Stenting + Micro-infusion | Experimental | Other: Stenting and micro-infusion of NPStep 1 - implantation of everolimus-eluting stent with imaging by MSCT, IVUS and OCT; Step 2 - injection of stem cells containing gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells. |
| Stenting | Active comparator | Device: Implantation of everolimus-eluting stentPut in everolimus-eluting stent |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Multivessel coronary artery disease without indications for CABG
- Stable angina with indications for preventive PCI
- NSTEMI (primary PCI and late comers) <=> 12 hr
- STEMI with kept EF>50% (all comers)
- Rescue PCI
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- History of MI
- History of CABG or PCI
- Indications for CABG
- Contraindications for CABG, PCI
- History of unstable angina, coronary artery syndrome
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Stenting and micro-infusion of NPAlso: Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy (PPTT), Stem cell therapy, Bioengineering, StentingStep 1 - IVUS, OCT-guided put in everolimus-eluting (drug-eluting-DES) stent + intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) mapping + harvesting stem cells with mesenchymal phenotype; Step 2 - culturing of stem cells in medium by gold nanoparticles with silica-iron oxide shells; Step 3 - micro-infusion of stem cells bearing NP into the lesion; Step 4 - detonation of nanoshells after migration of stem cells with NPs inside (until 7-10 days after transplantation). We expect 'melting' and 'burning' effects of PPTT, beneficial effects of bioactive products of stem cells lysis + benefits from further migration of stem cells from patch into the plaque | Other | Stenting + Micro-infusion |
| Implantation of everolimus-eluting stentAlso: Stenting, Xience V stentPut stent in ischemia-related coronary artery by indications for PCI | Device | Stenting |
Primary outcome
Total atheroma volume
Time frame: at month 12
Total plaque volume measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), cubic mm.
9 secondary outcomes
Composite end-point of any MACE (major acute cardiovascular events), all-cause death, any revascularization
Time frame: at month 12
Composition of plaque
Time frame: at month 12
Major and minor bleeding
Time frame: at month 12
Restenosis rate
Time frame: at month 12
Stent thrombosis rate
Time frame: at month 12
Coronary flow-mediated vasodilatation
Time frame: at month 12
Coronary intima-media thickness
Time frame: at month 12
Minimum diameter stenosis
Time frame: at month 12
Minimum lumen diameter
Time frame: at month 12
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was terminated under the political pressure of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) and the Russian Society of Cardiology). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 23668744Kharlamov AN. Plasmonic photothermal therapy for atheroregression below Glagov threshold. Future Cardiol. 2013 May;9(3):405-25. doi: 10.2217/fca.13.16.
- Ural Institute of CardiologyLink provided by the sponsor.
- Nanocenter of the Ural Federal UniversityLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Coronary Artery Disease
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Active, not recruiting
Shockwave™ vs Surgical Endarterectomy for Calcified Severe Common Femoral Artery Stenosis: Comparison of Efficacy, Safety and Long-Term Outcomes
Common Femoral Artery Stenosis, Calcification; Heart
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Roxadustat and Myocardial Injury After Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
RecruitingObservational study
Preoperative Gastric Ultrasound and Left Ventricular Function in Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
Coronary Artery Disease, Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction
Active, not recruiting
The OCTOBER Trial - European Trial on Optical Coherence Tomography Optimized Bifurcation Event Reduction (OCTOBER)
Ischaemic Heart Disease, Ischemic Heart Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexander Kharlamov, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
Ural Institute of Cardiology
Jan Gabinsky, M.D., Ph.D. study chair
Ural Institute of Cardiology
Olga Kovtun, M.D., Ph.D. study director
Ural State Medical University
3 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Stenting and micro-infusion of NP and Implantation of everolimus-eluting stent in people with Coronary Artery Disease and Atherosclerosis, run by Ural State Medical University at 3 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in Russia, Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The study was terminated under the political pressure of the Federal Security Service of the Russian Federation (FSB) and the Russian Society of Cardiology). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Total atheroma volume (time frame: at month 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01436123, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2015.