Preterm BirthNCT01436786
Effectiveness of Guided Imagery Intervention on Factors Associated With Maternal Stress and Preterm Birth
A study testing Guided Imagery in people with Preterm Birth and Maternal Stress, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Demonstrating the effectiveness of an economical and feasible intervention such as guided imagery on factors associated with preterm birth, along with better understanding of pathways leading to adverse birth outcomes has tremendous health, social, and financial benefits. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 50 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Preterm Birth, Maternal Stress
- What is being tested?
- Guided Imagery
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 73 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2010to Aug 2012
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 50 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Being pregnant between 14-17 weeks gestation
- Being African American
- 18 years of age or older
- able to read, write and understand English
- verbalize a source of social support
- self-report of no change in level of stress management strategies used within the last month.
Who cannot join
- carrying multiples
- have had cervical cerclage
- currently use oral corticosteroids
- have uterine or cervical abnormality
- have dissociative disorders, borderline personalities or psychotic pathology
- have medical and/or pregnancy complications known to impact cytokine levels (e.g., gestational diabetes)
- currently use GI techniques.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298
About this study
Official title: Guided Imagery Effects on Pregnancy Symptoms and Outcomes
Demonstrating the effectiveness of an economical and feasible intervention such as guided imagery on factors associated with preterm birth, along with better understanding of pathways leading to adverse birth outcomes has tremendous health, social, and financial benefits. This project has the potential to significantly advance the field of nursing and knowledge development in the areas of maternal stress reduction in African American women and to provide scientific evidence of the effectiveness of guided imagery.
Read the detailed description
Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality and has tremendous health and economic costs for the infant, family, and society. There has been little success in reducing PTB; rates are at an all time high. Of particular concern is the major racial disparity in PTB rates; African American women have the highest proportion of PTB compared to women of other races or ethnicities. There is growing evidence suggesting that PTB may be the end point of sub-acute or chronic pathophysiological changes that occur before clinical symptoms of preterm labor are present. There is also evidence to suggest that psychosocial factors such as maternal stress and the related symptoms of fatigue, anxiety, depression, as well as unhappiness about the pregnancy are associated with negative birth outcomes. It is proposed that these behavioral factors could influence birth outcomes through two possible pathways: (1) a neuroendocrine pathway in which maternal stress may lead to early and/or greater activation of the maternal-placental-fetal endocrine systems, with CRH playing a key role, thereby promoting labor; and/or (2) immunologic or inflammatory pathways which may promote labor through pro-inflammatory mechanisms. Experts agree primary prevention interventions are needed to address the issue of PTB. Guided imagery (GI) has been effective in decreasing self-reported measures of stress, depression, and fatigue as well as influencing neuroendocrine and immune measures in the general population. However, there are only limited studies examining the effects of GI on maternal stress, neuroendocrine measures, and/or birth outcomes, and there are no published studies examining the effect of GI as a primary prevention intervention to improve birth outcomes by reducing stress and related symptoms and influencing the proposed immunologic pathway to PTB. The specific aims of this randomized clinical trial are (1) to test the effects of a GI intervention on maternal stress (perceived stress), related symptoms (fatigue, anxiety, depression, and unhappiness), neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF), and birth outcomes (gestational age and neonatal birthweight) in African American women; and (2) to test the proposed theoretical model by examining predicted relationships among stress, fatigue, anxiety, depression, unhappiness, patterns of neuroendocrine and immunologic factors, and birth outcomes. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model will be used to test for group differences between the GI and control groups. To test the proposed theoretical model descriptive statistics, graphical methods and pairwise correlations will be calculated for all baseline data and canonical correlation analysis will be used to look for relationship among groups of the baseline variables. Demonstrating the effectiveness of an economical, easy to distribute and use, intervention on the psychosocial factors associated with PTB and the proposed pathways leading to adverse birth outcomes has tremendous health, social and financial benefits. This project will provide baseline data for further research to test the biobehavioral efficacy of this intervention in larger samples with multiple races/ethnicities as well as test the model during the postpartum period for maternal well-being and infant development.
- Conditions
- Preterm Birth, Maternal Stress
- Being tested
- Guided Imagery
- Keywords
- cytokines, Guided imagery
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Guided ImageryOther
The 12 week intervention consists of a set of 4 GI compact discs (CDs), each 20 minutes in length. Participants will be instructed to listen to the CD once a day in a recommended order for weeks 1-4 and used in any order for weeks 5-12.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Guided Imagery Intervention | Experimental | The 12 week intervention consists of a set of 4 GI compact discs (CDs), each 20 minutes in length. Participants will be instructed to listen to the CD once a day in a recommended order for weeks 1-4 and used in any order for weeks 5-12. Receives: Other: Guided Imagery |
| Control group | No intervention | continues usual plan of care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
maternal stress (perceived stress)
Measured: baseline
maternal stress (perceived stress)
Measured: 8th Week
maternal stress (perceived stress)
Measured: 12th Week
Secondary outcomes (3)
neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF)
Measured: baseline
neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF)
Measured: 8th Week
neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF)
Measured: 12th Week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2010
- Primary completionAug 2012
- Study completionAug 2012
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Preterm BirthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Virginia Commonwealth UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Nancy Jallo, PhD, Principal investigator, VCU
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01436786
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 12900
- Other IDs
- 5P30NR011403
- Status last verified
- May 2014
- First submitted
- 6 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 16 May 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 May 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Guided Imagery Effects on Pregnancy Symptoms and Outcomes
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01436786
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 12900
- Conditions
- Preterm Birth, Maternal Stress
- Keywords
- cytokines, Guided imagery
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 73 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR)
- Study start
- Jun 2010
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2012 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Demonstrating the effectiveness of an economical and feasible intervention such as guided imagery on factors associated with preterm birth, along with better understanding of pathways leading to adverse birth outcomes has tremendous health, social, and financial benefits. This project has the potential to significantly advance the field of nursing and knowledge development in the areas of maternal stress reduction in African American women and to provide scientific evidence of the effectiveness of guided imagery.
Detailed description
Preterm birth (PTB) is the leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality and has tremendous health and economic costs for the infant, family, and society. There has been little success in reducing PTB; rates are at an all time high. Of particular concern is the major racial disparity in PTB rates; African American women have the highest proportion of PTB compared to women of other races or ethnicities. There is growing evidence suggesting that PTB may be the end point of sub-acute or chronic pathophysiological changes that occur before clinical symptoms of preterm labor are present. There is also evidence to suggest that psychosocial factors such as maternal stress and the related symptoms of fatigue, anxiety, depression, as well as unhappiness about the pregnancy are associated with negative birth outcomes. It is proposed that these behavioral factors could influence birth outcomes through two possible pathways: (1) a neuroendocrine pathway in which maternal stress may lead to early and/or greater activation of the maternal-placental-fetal endocrine systems, with CRH playing a key role, thereby promoting labor; and/or (2) immunologic or inflammatory pathways which may promote labor through pro-inflammatory mechanisms. Experts agree primary prevention interventions are needed to address the issue of PTB. Guided imagery (GI) has been effective in decreasing self-reported measures of stress, depression, and fatigue as well as influencing neuroendocrine and immune measures in the general population. However, there are only limited studies examining the effects of GI on maternal stress, neuroendocrine measures, and/or birth outcomes, and there are no published studies examining the effect of GI as a primary prevention intervention to improve birth outcomes by reducing stress and related symptoms and influencing the proposed immunologic pathway to PTB. The specific aims of this randomized clinical trial are (1) to test the effects of a GI intervention on maternal stress (perceived stress), related symptoms (fatigue, anxiety, depression, and unhappiness), neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF), and birth outcomes (gestational age and neonatal birthweight) in African American women; and (2) to test the proposed theoretical model by examining predicted relationships among stress, fatigue, anxiety, depression, unhappiness, patterns of neuroendocrine and immunologic factors, and birth outcomes. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model will be used to test for group differences between the GI and control groups. To test the proposed theoretical model descriptive statistics, graphical methods and pairwise correlations will be calculated for all baseline data and canonical correlation analysis will be used to look for relationship among groups of the baseline variables. Demonstrating the effectiveness of an economical, easy to distribute and use, intervention on the psychosocial factors associated with PTB and the proposed pathways leading to adverse birth outcomes has tremendous health, social and financial benefits. This project will provide baseline data for further research to test the biobehavioral efficacy of this intervention in larger samples with multiple races/ethnicities as well as test the model during the postpartum period for maternal well-being and infant development.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Guided Imagery Intervention | Experimental | Other: Guided ImageryThe 12 week intervention consists of a set of 4 GI compact discs (CDs), each 20 minutes in length. Participants will be instructed to listen to the CD once a day in a recommended order for weeks 1-4 and used in any order for weeks 5-12. |
| Control group | No intervention | –continues usual plan of care |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 50 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Being pregnant between 14-17 weeks gestation
- Being African American
- 18 years of age or older
- able to read, write and understand English
- verbalize a source of social support
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- carrying multiples
- have had cervical cerclage
- currently use oral corticosteroids
- have uterine or cervical abnormality
- have dissociative disorders, borderline personalities or psychotic pathology
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Guided ImageryThe 12 week intervention consists of a set of 4 GI compact discs (CDs), each 20 minutes in length. Participants will be instructed to listen to the CD once a day in a recommended order for weeks 1-4 and used in any order for weeks 5-12. | Other | Guided Imagery Intervention |
Primary outcome
maternal stress (perceived stress)
Time frame: baseline
maternal stress (perceived stress)
Time frame: 8th Week
maternal stress (perceived stress)
Time frame: 12th Week
3 secondary outcomes
neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF)
Time frame: baseline
neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF)
Time frame: 8th Week
neuroendocrine (CRH) and immunological mediators (IL-1β, IL-6, Il-8, IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α, IFN-γ, G-CSF, GM-CSF)
Time frame: 12th Week
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 May 2014.
Related trials for Preterm Birth
Not yet recruiting
nCPAP-NAVA-Backup Versus Standard nCPAP for Severe Apnea in Preterm Infants ≤28 Weeks
Apnea of Prematurity
Recruiting
Study of the Influence of Intraperitoneal Insufflation of CO2 by Laparoscopy on the Short-term Evolution of Premature Infants With Ulcerative Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Preterm Birth, Enterocolitis, Necrotizing
Recruiting
Comparing Surfactant Administration Through Supraglottic Airway and Thin Catheter for Preterm Infants
Surfactant, Respiratory Distress Syndrome (Neonatal)
RecruitingObservational study
Multidimensional Dynamic Early Warning System for Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis: A Multicenter Clinical Study
NEC - Necrotizing Enterocolitis
Recruiting
Optimization of Saturation Targets And Resuscitation Trial (OptiSTART)
Premature Infants, Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Nancy Jallo, PhD principal investigator
VCU
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Guided Imagery in people with Preterm Birth and Maternal Stress, run by Virginia Commonwealth University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
maternal stress (perceived stress) (time frame: baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 May 2014.