AzTrials
AzTrials

Systemic Lupus ErythematosusPhase 2NCT01438489

A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

A Phase 2 study testing Anifrolumab 300 mg and Anifrolumab 1000 mg in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by MedImmune LLC at 79 sites in 14 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MEDI-546 compared to placebo in subjects with chronic, moderately-to-severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with an inadequate response to standard of care treatment for SLE. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
What is being tested?
Anifrolumab 300 mg and Anifrolumab 1000 mg
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
626 participants
Where
79 sitesin 14 countries
Study dates
Jan 2012to Apr 2015
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Fulfills at least 4 of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) including a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) greater than or equal to 1:80 or elevated anti-double-stranded DNA or anti-Smith antibody at screening
  • Pediatric or adult SLE with chronic disease activity for greater than or equal to 24 weeks
  • Weight greater than or equal to 40 kg
  • Currently receiving stable dose of oral prednisone (or equivalent) less than or equal to 40 mg/day and/or antimalarials/immunosuppressives
  • Active moderate to severe SLE disease based on SLE disease activity score (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (BILAG) and Physicians Global Assessment
  • No evidence of cervical malignancy on Pap smear within 2 years of randomization
  • Female participants must be willing to avoid pregnancy
  • Negative tuberculosis (TB) test or newly positive TB test due to latent TB for which treatment must be initiated at or before randomization.

Who cannot join

  • Active severe SLE-driven renal disease or unstable renal disease prior to screening
  • Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE
  • Clinically significant active infection including ongoing and chronic infections
  • History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
  • Confirmed Positive tests for hepatitis B or positive test for hepatitis C
  • History of severe herpes infection such as herpes encephalitis, ophthalmic herpes, disseminated herpes
  • Live or attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to screening
  • Participants with significant hematologic abnormalities.

Trial locations and contacts

79 sites in 14 countries.

79 sites in 14 countries

United States30 sites
  • Research Site

    Atlanta, Georgia

  • Research Site

    Birmingham, Alabama

  • Research Site

    Charlotte, North Carolina

  • Research Site

    Chicago, Illinois

  • Research Site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Research Site

    Decatur, Georgia

  • Research Site

    Edmond, Oklahoma

  • Research Site

    Houston, Texas

  • Research Site

    Idaho Falls, Idaho

  • Research Site

    Indianapolis, Indiana

  • Research Site

    La Jolla, California

  • Research Site

    La Palma, California

  • Research Site

    Las Cruces, New Mexico

  • Research Site

    Long Beach, California

  • Research Site

    Los Angeles, California

  • Research Site

    Memphis, Tennessee

  • Research Site

    Miami, Florida

  • Research Site

    New York, New York

  • Research Site

    Ocala, Florida

  • Research Site

    Orlando, Florida

  • Research Site

    Palm Desert, California

  • Research Site

    Palm Harbor, Florida

  • Research Site

    Raleigh, North Carolina

  • Research Site

    San Leandro, California

  • Research Site

    Seattle, Washington

  • Research Site

    Spokane, Washington

  • Research Site

    Stockbridge, Georgia

  • Research Site

    Tampa, Florida

  • Research Site

    Tulsa, Oklahoma

  • Research Site

    Upland, California

Other trials in United States

Ukraine7 sites
  • Research Site

    Donetsk

  • Research Site

    Kyiv

  • Research Site

    Luhansk

  • Research Site

    Lviv

  • Research Site

    Ternopil

  • Research Site

    Vinnitsya

  • Research Site

    Vinnytsia

Other trials in Ukraine

India6 sites
  • Research Site

    Dantoli-Nagpur

  • Research Site

    Hyderabad

  • Research Site

    Mumbai

  • Research Site

    New Delhi

  • Research Site

    Pune

  • Research Site

    Secunderabad

Other trials in India

Colombia5 sites
  • Research Site

    Barranquilla

  • Research Site

    Bogotá

  • Research Site

    Bucaramanga

  • Research Site

    Chía

  • Research Site

    Medellín

Other trials in Colombia

Poland5 sites
  • Research Site

    Bialystok

  • Research Site

    Bydgoszcz

  • Research Site

    Krakow

  • Research Site

    Nadarzyn

  • Research Site

    Poznan

Other trials in Poland

Mexico4 sites
  • Research Site

    Guadalajara

  • Research Site

    León

  • Research Site

    México

  • Research Site

    Toluca

Other trials in Mexico

South Korea4 sites
  • Research Site

    Gwangjin-gu

  • Research Site

    Gwangju

  • Research Site

    Seodaemun-gu

  • Research Site

    Suwon

Other trials in South Korea

Taiwan4 sites
  • Research Site

    Chiayi City

  • Research Site

    Kaohsiung City

  • Research Site

    Taichung

  • Research Site

    Taipei

Other trials in Taiwan

Czechia3 sites
  • Research Site

    Brno

  • Research Site

    Prague

  • Research Site

    Uherské Hradiště

Other trials in Czechia

Romania3 sites
  • Research Site

    Brasov

  • Research Site

    Iași

  • Research Site

    Târgu Mureş

Other trials in Romania

Brazil2 sites
  • Research Site

    Rio de Janeiro

  • Research Site

    São Paulo

Other trials in Brazil

Bulgaria2 sites
  • Research Site

    Plovdiv

  • Research Site

    Sofia

Other trials in Bulgaria

Hungary2 sites
  • Research Site

    Budapest

  • Research Site

    Debrecen

Other trials in Hungary

Peru2 sites
  • Research Site

    Arequipa

  • Research Site

    Lima

Other trials in Peru

About this study

Official title: A Phase 2, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MEDI-546 compared to placebo in subjects with chronic, moderately-to-severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with an inadequate response to standard of care treatment for SLE.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 intravenous (IV) treatment regimens in adult participants with chronic, moderately-to-severely active SLE with an inadequate response to SOC SLE. The investigational product (anifrolumab or placebo) will be administered as a fixed dose every 4 weeks (28 days) for a total of 13 doses.

Being tested
Anifrolumab 300 mg, Anifrolumab 1000 mg, Placebo
Keywords
MEDI-546, Anifrolumab, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Medical subject headings
Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Anifrolumab 300 mgBiological

    Also called MEDI-546

    Participants will receive 300 milligram (mg) anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.

  • Anifrolumab 1000 mgBiological

    Also called MEDI-546

    Participants will receive 1000 mg anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.

  • PlaceboOther

    Participants will receive placebo matched to anifrolumab intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.

Study groups in NCT01438489
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Anifrolumab (MEDI-546) 300 mgExperimentalParticipants will receive 300 milligram (mg) anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Receives: Biological: Anifrolumab 300 mg
Anifrolumab (MEDI-546) 1000 mgExperimentalParticipants will receive 1000 mg anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Receives: Biological: Anifrolumab 1000 mg
Matching PlaceboPlacebo comparatorParticipants will receive placebo matched to anifrolumab intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Receives: Other: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index [SRI (4)] Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 169

    An SRI (4) responder defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of greater than or equal to (>=) 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index 'A' organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index 'B' organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 milligram per day (mg/day) and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.

    Measured: Day 169

  2. Percentage of Type I Interferon (IFN) Test High Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) (4) Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 169

    Type I IFN signature in whole blood assessed by using a 4-gene diagnostic test. The blood samples collected were to be used to prospectively identify participants as IFN test-high or test-low. The results of this test were used to stratify participants. An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.

    Measured: Day 169

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Percentage of Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index [SRI (4)] Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 365

    An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the MDGA (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 281 through Day 365 (less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1). SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.

    Measured: Day 365

  2. Percentage of Participants on Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) >=10 mg/Day of Prednisone or Equivalent at Baseline Who Were Able to Taper to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/Day at Day 365

    Participants on OCS >=10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent at baseline who were able to taper to <= 7.5 mg/day at Day 365 were evaluated.

    Measured: Day 365

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)

    An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly (in offspring of participant). AEs may be treatment emergent (TE) [that is, occurring after initial receipt of investigational product] or non-TE. An AESI is one of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by investigator to sponsor.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)

  4. Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Investigations Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events

    Any medically significant change in laboratory evaluations were recorded as Treatment emergent adverse events.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)

  5. Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Vital sign parameters are temperature, blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate and weight. Vital signs abnormalities were reported as TEAEs.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)

  6. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

    Any medically significant changes from the screening ECG was recorded as TEAEs. An abnormal ECG findings such as QT prolonged were reported as treatment emergent adverse events.

    Measured: Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)

  7. Percentage of SLE Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)

    Anti-drug antibody responses to anifrolumab in serum were evaluated.

    Measured: Days 1, 85, 141, 169, 253, 337 (Treatment Phase), 365, 396, and 422 (Follow-up Period)

  8. Neutralization Ratio of 21-Gene Type I Interferon (IFN) Signature for Participants With Positive Baseline Pharmacodynamic (PD) Gene Signature

    The PD positive and negative gene signature was determined by comparing the expression of type I IFN-inducible genes in a 21-gene panel in study participants relative to pooled normal blood collected from healthy participants.

    Measured: Days 29, 85, 141, 169, 253, 337 (treatment phase), on Days 365, 396, and 422 (follow up period)

  9. Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Anifrolumab at Day 1, 169 and 337

    Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was defined as the peak plasma level of anifrolumab, derived from plasma concentration -time data.

    Measured: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 1, 169 and 337

  10. Accumulation Ratio of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax,AR) of Anifrolumab

    Accumulation ratio for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 337 was calculated.

    Measured: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 169 and 337

  11. Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Anifrolumab at Day 29, 169 and 365

    Trough concentration (Ctrough) of anifrolumab at Day 29, 169 and 365 were calculated.

    Measured: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 29, 169 and 365

  12. Accumulation Ratio of Trough Concentration (Ctrough,AR) of Anifrolumab at Day 169 and 365

    Accumulation ratio for trough concentration (Ctrough,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 365 was calculated.

    Measured: Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 169 and 365

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Sep 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2012
  3. Primary completionApr 2015
  4. Study completionApr 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
626 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01438489
Sponsor's protocol ID
CD-IA-MEDI-546-1013
Status last verified
Aug 2016
First submitted
9 Sep 2011
Last updated
7 Oct 2016
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.

    PubMed 33687069
  • Casey KA, Smith MA, Sinibaldi D, Seto NL, Playford MP, Wang X, Carlucci PM, Wang L, Illei G, Yu B, Wang S, Remaley AT, Mehta NN, Kaplan MJ, White WI. Modulation of Cardiometabolic Disease Markers by Type I Interferon Inhibition in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;73(3):459-471. doi: 10.1002/art.41518. Epub 2021 Feb 15.

    PubMed 32909675
  • Brohawn PZ, Streicher K, Higgs BW, Morehouse C, Liu H, Illei G, Ranade K. Type I interferon gene signature test-low and -high patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have distinct gene expression signatures. Lupus. 2019 Nov;28(13):1524-1533. doi: 10.1177/0961203319885447. Epub 2019 Oct 29.

    PubMed 31660791
  • Casey KA, Guo X, Smith MA, Wang S, Sinibaldi D, Sanjuan MA, Wang L, Illei GG, White WI. Type I interferon receptor blockade with anifrolumab corrects innate and adaptive immune perturbations of SLE. Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Nov 22;5(1):e000286. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000286. eCollection 2018.

    PubMed 30538817
  • Morand EF, Trasieva T, Berglind A, Illei GG, Tummala R. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) attainment discriminates responders in a systemic lupus erythematosus trial: post-hoc analysis of the Phase IIb MUSE trial of anifrolumab. Ann Rheum Dis. 2018 May;77(5):706-713. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2017-212504. Epub 2018 Feb 2.

    PubMed 29420200
  • Furie R, Khamashta M, Merrill JT, Werth VP, Kalunian K, Brohawn P, Illei GG, Drappa J, Wang L, Yoo S; CD1013 Study Investigators. Anifrolumab, an Anti-Interferon-alpha Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;69(2):376-386. doi: 10.1002/art.39962.

    PubMed 28130918

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Anifrolumab 300 mg and Anifrolumab 1000 mg in people with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, run by MedImmune LLC at 79 sites in 14 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 79 sites in United States, Ukraine, India, Colombia, Poland and 9 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Aug 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index [SRI (4)] Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 169 (time frame: Day 169). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01438489, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in