ThrombocytopaeniaPhase 2ASPIRENCT01440374
A Three-part Study of Eltrombopag in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia
A Phase 2 study testing eltrombopag in people with Thrombocytopaenia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 120 sites in 22 countries.
Trial summary
This was a worldwide, three-part (Part 1: open-label, Part 2: randomized, double-blind, Part 3: extension), multi-center study to evaluate the effect of eltrombopag in subjects with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow insufficiency from their… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 110 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Thrombocytopaenia
- What is being tested?
- eltrombopag
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 162 participants
- Where
- 120 sitesin 22 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Dec 2015
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 110 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult subjects (18 years of age or older) with MDS or AML (bone marrow blasts ≤50%) with thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow insufficiency from the disease or prior treatment. Subjects with transient thrombocytopenia due to active treatment with disease modifying agents or chemotherapy (except for hydroxyurea) are excluded.
- Subjects must have Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <25 Gi/L) due to bone marrow insufficiency (or Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, but platelet count greater than or equal to 25 Gi/L due to platelet transfusion). In addition, subjects must have had at least one of the following during the 4 week screening period: platelet transfusion, or symptomatic bleeding or platelet count <10 Gi/L. Subjects whose thrombocytopenia below 10 Gi/L is due to causes other than bone marrow insufficiency (e.g., fever, infection, autoimmune disease) are not eligible.
- Subjects must have platelet count, bleeding and platelet transfusion data available over a period of at least 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Prior systemic treatment for malignancy, with the exception of hydroxyurea, must have been discontinued prior to entry into the study: at least 4 weeks before Day 1 for the following: chemotherapy, demethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine), lenalidomide, thalidomide, clofarabine and IL-11(oprelvekin); at least 8 weeks before Day 1 for antithymocyte/antilymphocyte globulin.
- Subjects with a prior stem cell transplant (SCT) must have relapsed after the SCT.
- Subjects must be stable and, in the opinion of the investigator, be expected to complete a 12 week treatment period.
Show all 12Show fewer
- ECOG Status 0-2.
- Subject must be able to understand and comply with protocol requirements and instructions.
- Subject has signed and dated an informed consent form.
- Adequate baseline organ function defined by the criteria below: total bilirubin ≤ 1.5xULN except for Gilbert's syndrome or cases clearly not indicative of inadequate liver function (i.e. elevation of indirect (hemolytic) bilirubin in the absence of ALT abnormality), ALT ≤ 3xULN, creatinine ≤ 2.5xULN
- Women must be either of non-child bearing potential or women with child-bearing potential and men with reproductive potential must be willing to practice acceptable methods of birth control during the study Women of childbearing potential must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test within 7 days prior to the first dose of study treatment.
- In France, a subject eligible for inclusion in this study only if either affiliated to, or a beneficiary of, a social security category.
Who cannot join
- Subjects with MDS and an IPSS of low or intermediate-1 risk at screening.
- Subjects with a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic or megakaryocytic leukemia or AML secondary to a myeloproliferative neoplasm.
- History of treatment with romiplostim or other TPO-R agonists.
- Subjects with a QTc >480 msec (QTc >510 msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block).
- Leukocytosis ≥25,000/uL on Day 1 of treatment with study medication.
- Subjects with known thrombophilic risk factors. Exception: Subjects for whom the potential benefits of participating in the study outweigh the potential risks of thromboembolic events, as determined by the investigator.
Show all 15Show fewer
- Female subjects who are nursing or pregnant (positive serum or urine β-human chorionic gonadotropin [β-hCG] pregnancy test) at screening or pre-dose on Day 1.
- Current alcohol or drug abuse.
- Treatment with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) preceding the first dose of study medication.
- Active and uncontrolled infections (e.g. sepsis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C).
- Subjects infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV).
- Subjects with liver cirrhosis (as determined by the investigator).
- Subjects receiving or planned to receive any prohibited medication.
- Have a known immediate or delayed hypersensitivity reaction or idiosyncrasy to drugs chemically related to eltrombopag or excipient (microcrystalline cellulose, mannitol, polyvinylpyrrolidone, sodium starch glycolate, magnesium stearate, hypromellose, titanium dioxide, polyethylene glycol 400 and polysorbate 80) that contraindicates the subjects' participation.
- In France, subjects who have participated in any study using an investigational drug during the previous 30 days.
Trial locations and contacts
120 sites in 22 countries.
120 sites in 22 countries
United States18 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Augusta, Georgia, 30912
Novartis Investigative Site
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Novartis Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Novartis Investigative Site
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
Novartis Investigative Site
Hot Springs, Arkansas, 71913
Novartis Investigative Site
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
Novartis Investigative Site
Jonesboro, Arkansas, 72401
Novartis Investigative Site
Kansas City, Missouri, 64128
Novartis Investigative Site
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Novartis Investigative Site
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Novartis Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Novartis Investigative Site
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19140
Novartis Investigative Site
Phoenix, Arizona, 85016
Novartis Investigative Site
Seattle, Washington, 98108
Novartis Investigative Site
Stanford, California, 94305
Novartis Investigative Site
The Bronx, New York, 10467
Novartis Investigative Site
Voorhees Township, New Jersey, 08043
Novartis Investigative Site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Brazil10 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400
Novartis Investigative Site
Barretos, São Paulo, 14784-400
Novartis Investigative Site
Curitiba, Paraná, 81520-060
Novartis Investigative Site
Curitiba, Paraná, 81520-060
Novartis Investigative Site
Goiânia - GO, Goiás, 74605-020
Novartis Investigative Site
Goiânia - GO, Goiás, 74605-020
Novartis Investigative Site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
Novartis Investigative Site
Rio de Janeiro, 20211-030
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01236030
Novartis Investigative Site
São Paulo, 01236030
Israel9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Beersheba, 84101
Novartis Investigative Site
Haifa, 31048
Novartis Investigative Site
Haifa, 31096
Novartis Investigative Site
Holon, 58100
Novartis Investigative Site
Jerusalem, 91120
Novartis Investigative Site
Petah Tikva, 49100
Novartis Investigative Site
Ramat Gan, 52621
Novartis Investigative Site
Rehovot, 76100
Novartis Investigative Site
Tel Aviv, 64239
Spain9 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Barcelona, 08036
Novartis Investigative Site
Granada
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
Madrid, 28034
Novartis Investigative Site
Málaga, 29010
Novartis Investigative Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón/Madrid, 28223
Novartis Investigative Site
Pozuelo de Alarcón/Madrid, 28223
Novartis Investigative Site
Salamanca, 37007
Novartis Investigative Site
Santander, 39008
Belgium7 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Antwerp, 2060
Novartis Investigative Site
Brasschaat, 2930
Novartis Investigative Site
Bruges, 8000
Novartis Investigative Site
Brussels, 1000
Novartis Investigative Site
Ghent, 9000
Novartis Investigative Site
Leuven, 3000
Novartis Investigative Site
Yvoir, 5530
Germany6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cologne, North Rhine-Westphalia, 50937
Novartis Investigative Site
Dresden, Saxony, 01307
Novartis Investigative Site
Düsseldorf, North Rhine-Westphalia, 40225
Novartis Investigative Site
Göttingen, Lower Saxony, 37075
Novartis Investigative Site
Mannheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, 68167
Novartis Investigative Site
Stuttgart, Baden-Wurttemberg, 70199
Ireland6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Cork
Novartis Investigative Site
Dublin, 7
Novartis Investigative Site
James Street, 8
Novartis Investigative Site
Limerick
Novartis Investigative Site
Tallaght, Dublin, 24
Novartis Investigative Site
Tullamore
Italy6 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Alessandria, Piedmont, 15100
Novartis Investigative Site
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
Novartis Investigative Site
Brescia, Lombardy, 25123
Novartis Investigative Site
Florence, Tuscany, 50134
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
Novartis Investigative Site
Milan, Lombardy, 20162
Argentina5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Buenos Aires, 1405
Novartis Investigative Site
Buenos Aires, C1025ABH
Novartis Investigative Site
Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, 1405
Novartis Investigative Site
Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, C1431FWO
Novartis Investigative Site
La Plata, Buenos Aires, B1900AXI
Hungary5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Budapest, 1088
Novartis Investigative Site
Debrecen, 4012
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaposvár, 7400
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaposvár, 7400
Novartis Investigative Site
Szeged, 6720
Mexico5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Chihuahua City, 31203
Novartis Investigative Site
Mexico City, CP 14080
Novartis Investigative Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Novartis Investigative Site
Monterrey, Nuevo León, 64460
Novartis Investigative Site
Oaxaca City, 68000
Russia5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Nizhny Novgorod, 603126
Novartis Investigative Site
Petrozavodsk, 185019
Novartis Investigative Site
Saint Petersburg, 197 089
Novartis Investigative Site
St'Petersburg, 191024
Novartis Investigative Site
St'Petersburg, 197341
Thailand5 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10330
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10400
Novartis Investigative Site
Bangkok, 10700
Novartis Investigative Site
Khon Kaen, 40002
Novartis Investigative Site
Songkhla, 90110
Czechia4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Brno, 625 00
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 100 34
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 128 08
Novartis Investigative Site
Prague, 128 20
Greece4 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Athens, 11527
Novartis Investigative Site
Heraklion, Crete, 71201
Novartis Investigative Site
Ioannina, 45 500
Novartis Investigative Site
Thessaloniki, 57010
Canada3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 2Y9
Novartis Investigative Site
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Novartis Investigative Site
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9
Poland3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Chorzów, 41-500
Novartis Investigative Site
Torun, 87-100
Novartis Investigative Site
Warsaw, 02-097
South Korea3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Hwasun, 519-809
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 110-744
Novartis Investigative Site
Seoul, 120-752
Taiwan3 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Kaohsiung City, 83301
Novartis Investigative Site
Tainan County, 736
Novartis Investigative Site
Taoyuan County, 333
Hong Kong2 sites
Novartis Investigative Site
Chai Wan
Novartis Investigative Site
Shatin, New Territories
About this study
Official title: A Three-part Study of Eltrombopag in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Part 1: Open-label, Part 2: Randomized, Double-blind, Part 3: Extension)
This was a worldwide, three-part (Part 1: open-label, Part 2: randomized, double-blind, Part 3: extension), multi-center study to evaluate the effect of eltrombopag in subjects with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow insufficiency from their underlying disease or prior chemotherapy. This objective was assessed by a composite primary endpoint that consists of the following: the proportion of ≥Grade 3 hemorrhagic adverse events, or platelet counts <10 Gi/L, or platelet transfusions. Patients with MDS or AML and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow insufficiency from their underlying disease or prior chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. No low or intermediate-1 risk MDS subjects were enrolled in the study. Subjects must have had at least one of the following during the 4 weeks prior to enrolment: platelet count <10 Gi/L, platelet transfusion, or symptomatic hemorrhagic event. Supportive standard of care (SOC), including hydroxyurea, was allowed as indicated by local practice throughout the study. The study had 3 sequential parts. Subjects who were enrolled in Part 1 (open-label) cannot be enrolled in Part 2 of the study (randomized, double-blind); however, subjects who completed the treatment period for Part 1 or Part 2 (8 and 12 weeks, respectively) continued in Part 3 (extension) if the investigator determined that the subject was receiving clinical benefit on treatment.
- Conditions
- Thrombocytopaenia
- Being tested
- eltrombopag, placebo
- Keywords
- acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute non lymphocytic leukemia (ANLL), myeloproliferative disease (MDS), myelodysplastic syndrome ( secondary acute myeloid leukemia), refractory acute myeloid leukemia
- Medical subject headings
- Thrombocytopenia, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Myeloproliferative Disorders, Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eltrombopagDrug
Also called Promacta
100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage)
placeboDrug
100 mg matching placebo daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg matching placebo (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1, Open Label | Experimental | 100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intrasubject dose escalations to a maximum dose 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) are allowed. Receives: Drug: eltrombopag |
| Part 2, eltrombopag arm | Experimental | 100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) Receives: Drug: eltrombopag |
| Part 2, placebo arm | Experimental | 100 mg matching placebo daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg matching placebo (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) Receives: Drug: placebo |
| part 3 extension | Experimental | 100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) Receives: Drug: eltrombopag |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Platelet Response up to Week 8 During Part 1
A participant was considered as a responder if he/she met the following response criteria: a Baseline platelet count <20 Giga cells per liter (Gi/L) and a post-Baseline increased to >20 Gi/L and at least 2 times the Baseline value; or a Baseline platelet count >=20 Gi/L and a post-Baseline absolute platelet count increased to >=50 Gi/L and at least 2 times the Baseline value. The response criteria was evaluated at each visit. Increase in platelet count observed up to 3 days after a platelet transfusion was not considered as a platelet response. The Part 1 Population was comprised of all participants enrolled into Part 1.
Measured: From Baseline up to Week 8 during Part 1
Clinically Relevant Thrombocytopenic Events (CRTE) From Week 5 up to Week 12 During Part 2
A participant was considered to have a CRTE at a given assessment if he/she had platelet counts <10 Gi/L, or platelet transfusions, or >=Grade 3 hemorrhagic adverse events. CRTEs during Weeks 5 to 12 were compared between treatments using a generalized linear mixed model. Average of weekly proportion of subjects with CRTE during Week 5 to 12 was estimated for each treatment. Intent to Treat (ITT) Population was comprised of all randomized participants during Part 2.
Measured: From Week 5 up to Week 12 during Part 2
Secondary outcomes (13)
Plasma Eltrombopag Pharmacokinetic Concentration-Time Data - by Visit (Part 1 Subjects)
Measured: Day 1 to week 8
Plasma Eltrombopag Pharmacokinetic Concentration-Time Data - by Visit (Part 2 Subjects)
Measured: Day 1 to week 12
Mean Number of Platelet Transfusions
Measured: Weeks 5 to 12
Hematologic Improvement
Definitions of hematologic improvement for platelets, neutrophils, and hemoglobin were based on modified International Working Group (IWG) consensus criteria.
Measured: Weeks 5 to 12
Change in Mean Platelet Count
Measured: Baseline to Week 12
Maximum Duration of Platelet Transfusion Independence
Measured: Weeks 5 to 12
Number of Participants With Maximum Bleeding Grade According to World Health Organization on Bleeding Scale
Occurrence and severity of bleeding, measured using the WHO Bleeding Scale Grade 0=no bleeding; Grade 1=petechiae; Grade 2=mild blood loss; Grade 3=gross blood loss; Grade 4=debilitating blood loss.
Measured: Weeks 5 to 12
Independent Reviewer-Assessed Best Response
Participants were evaluated in accordance with the modified International Working Group (Cheson, 2006). CR: Bone marrow blasts <5%, Hgb ≥11g/dL, Hematologic Improvement - Platelets (Baseline <20Gi/L: >20 Gi/L and 2x baseline; Baseline ≥20 Gi/L: ≥50 Gi/L and 2x baseline), Neutrophils ≥1.0 Gi/L, Peripheral blasts 0%. PR: Bone marrow blasts decreased by ≥50% but >5%, Peripheral blood as in CR. Marrow CR: Bone marrow blasts <5% and decrease by ≥50%, Note any Hematologic Improvements, Stable disease: Failure to achieve PR, but no evidence of progression for >8w, Cytogenetic response: Complete: disappearance of chromosomal abnormality; no new abnormalities Partial: ≥50% reduction of chromosomal abnormality.
Measured: up to week 12
Independent Reviewer Assessed Disease Progression
Measured: Up to week 12
Median Overall Survival
Measured: Up to 13 months
Summary of Health Outcomes
The number of subject with medical resource utilization (MRU) data are reported in this table.
MRU included number of emergency room visits, number of home healthcare visits, number of hospitalization days, number of medication or surgery specialist visits, number of procedures inpatient, number of procedures outpatient, number of non-study radiology visits, number of non-study laboratory visits, number of nurse practitioner/physician assistance/nurse visits, number of primary care physician visits, number of telephone consultations.
Measured: week 12
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)
The FACT-Th-18 is the most widely used and accepted tool evaluating health-related quality-of-life outcomes in cancer patients with chronically low platelets (where Th designates thrombocytopenia). The entire FACT-Th-18 was used in this trial, which includes the 18-item thrombocytopenia subscale used to assess the impact of symptoms, signs, and functional consequences of thrombocytopenia in MDS and AML subjects. The FACT-Th-18 is a validated and reliable instrument with known psychometric properties. FACT-ThS is an 18 item questionnaire specific to assessing the impact of symptoms, signs, and functional consequences of Thrombocytopenia. ThS score ranges from 0 to 72 with higher the score, the better the QoL. FACT G total score moves from 0 to 108 where higher the score, the better the HRQL.
FACT-Th Total Score is calculated by adding the FACT-ThS and FACT-G score. Total score ranges from 0 to 180 and again, higher the score, the better the HRQL.
Measured: Change from baseline, up to week 12
EQ-5D Utility Score Analysis
EuroQoL Five Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) is a standardized generic preference based health related quality of life instrument. It records how one's health is "today" and consists of a descriptive system. The Descriptive system is Comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression. Each dimension on the EQ-5D involves a 3-point response scale which indicates the level of impairment (level 1 = no problem; level 2 = some or moderate problem(s) and level 3 = unable, or extreme problems). Level of problem reported in each EQ-5D dimension determines a unique health state which is converted into a weighted health state index by applying scores from EQ-5D preference weights elicited from general population samples. This generates a unique description of the subjects' health status, which is valued between 0 (representing death) and 1 (representing perfect health). Higher the score, the better the quality of life.
EQ-ED is a score.
Measured: Change from baseline, up to week 12
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionMar 2015
- Study completionDec 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ThrombocytopaeniaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Novartis PharmaceuticalsThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Study director, Novartis Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01440374
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 114968
- Other IDs
- 2011-000114-19
- Acronym
- ASPIRE
- Status last verified
- May 2017
- First submitted
- 15 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 5 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Mittelman M, Platzbecker U, Grosicki S, Lawniczek T, Zhu Z, Selleslag D. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Eltrombopag for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Severe Thrombocytopenia: Results of the ASPIRE Extension Study. Acta Haematol. 2023;146(5):373-378. doi: 10.1159/000531146. Epub 2023 May 19.
PubMed 37231838Mittelman M, Platzbecker U, Afanasyev B, Grosicki S, Wong RSM, Anagnostopoulos A, Brenner B, Denzlinger C, Rossi G, Nagler A, Garcia-Delgado R, Portella MSO, Zhu Z, Selleslag D. Eltrombopag for advanced myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukaemia and severe thrombocytopenia (ASPIRE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Jan;5(1):e34-e43. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30228-4. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
PubMed 29241762
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Three-part Study of Eltrombopag in Thrombocytopenic Subjects With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (Part 1: Open-label, Part 2: Randomized, Double-blind, Part 3: Extension)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01440374
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ASPIRE / 114968
- Conditions
- Thrombocytopaenia
- Keywords
- acute myeloid leukemia (AML), acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), acute non lymphocytic leukemia (ANLL), myeloproliferative disease (MDS), myelodysplastic syndrome ( secondary acute myeloid leukemia), refractory acute myeloid leukemia
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Novartis PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Jun 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This was a worldwide, three-part (Part 1: open-label, Part 2: randomized, double-blind, Part 3: extension), multi-center study to evaluate the effect of eltrombopag in subjects with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who have thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow insufficiency from their underlying disease or prior chemotherapy. This objective was assessed by a composite primary endpoint that consists of the following: the proportion of ≥Grade 3 hemorrhagic adverse events, or platelet counts <10 Gi/L, or platelet transfusions. Patients with MDS or AML and Grade 4 thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow insufficiency from their underlying disease or prior chemotherapy were enrolled in the study. No low or intermediate-1 risk MDS subjects were enrolled in the study. Subjects must have had at least one of the following during the 4 weeks prior to enrolment: platelet count <10 Gi/L, platelet transfusion, or symptomatic hemorrhagic event. Supportive standard of care (SOC), including hydroxyurea, was allowed as indicated by local practice throughout the study. The study had 3 sequential parts. Subjects who were enrolled in Part 1 (open-label) cannot be enrolled in Part 2 of the study (randomized, double-blind); however, subjects who completed the treatment period for Part 1 or Part 2 (8 and 12 weeks, respectively) continued in Part 3 (extension) if the investigator determined that the subject was receiving clinical benefit on treatment.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Part 1, Open Label | Experimental | Drug: eltrombopag100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intrasubject dose escalations to a maximum dose 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) are allowed. |
| Part 2, eltrombopag arm | Experimental | Drug: eltrombopag100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) |
| Part 2, placebo arm | Experimental | Drug: placebo100 mg matching placebo daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg matching placebo (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) |
| part 3 extension | Experimental | Drug: eltrombopag100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 110 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Adult subjects (18 years of age or older) with MDS or AML (bone marrow blasts ≤50%) with thrombocytopenia due to bone marrow insufficiency from the disease or prior treatment. Subjects with transient thrombocytopenia due to active treatment with disease modifying agents or chemotherapy (except for hydroxyurea) are excluded.
- Subjects must have Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelet counts <25 Gi/L) due to bone marrow insufficiency (or Grade 4 thrombocytopenia, but platelet count greater than or equal to 25 Gi/L due to platelet transfusion). In addition, subjects must have had at least one of the following during the 4 week screening period: platelet transfusion, or symptomatic bleeding or platelet count <10 Gi/L. Subjects whose thrombocytopenia below 10 Gi/L is due to causes other than bone marrow insufficiency (e.g., fever, infection, autoimmune disease) are not eligible.
- Subjects must have platelet count, bleeding and platelet transfusion data available over a period of at least 4 weeks prior to randomization.
- Prior systemic treatment for malignancy, with the exception of hydroxyurea, must have been discontinued prior to entry into the study: at least 4 weeks before Day 1 for the following: chemotherapy, demethylating agents (azacitidine or decitabine), lenalidomide, thalidomide, clofarabine and IL-11(oprelvekin); at least 8 weeks before Day 1 for antithymocyte/antilymphocyte globulin.
- Subjects with a prior stem cell transplant (SCT) must have relapsed after the SCT.
Key exclusion criteria (15 listed)
- Subjects with MDS and an IPSS of low or intermediate-1 risk at screening.
- Subjects with a diagnosis of acute promyelocytic or megakaryocytic leukemia or AML secondary to a myeloproliferative neoplasm.
- History of treatment with romiplostim or other TPO-R agonists.
- Subjects with a QTc >480 msec (QTc >510 msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block).
- Leukocytosis ≥25,000/uL on Day 1 of treatment with study medication.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eltrombopagAlso: Promacta100 mg daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) | Drug | Part 1, Open Label, Part 2, eltrombopag arm, part 3 extension |
| placebo100 mg matching placebo daily (50 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage), intra-subject dose escalations to a maximum dose of 300 mg matching placebo (150 mg for subjects of East Asian heritage) | Drug | Part 2, placebo arm |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Platelet Response up to Week 8 During Part 1
Time frame: From Baseline up to Week 8 during Part 1
A participant was considered as a responder if he/she met the following response criteria: a Baseline platelet count <20 Giga cells per liter (Gi/L) and a post-Baseline increased to >20 Gi/L and at least 2 times the Baseline value; or a Baseline platelet count >=20 Gi/L and a post-Baseline absolute platelet count increased to >=50 Gi/L and at least 2 times the Baseline value. The response criteria was evaluated at each visit. Increase in platelet count observed up to 3 days after a platelet transfusion was not considered as a platelet response. The Part 1 Population was comprised of all participants enrolled into Part 1.
Clinically Relevant Thrombocytopenic Events (CRTE) From Week 5 up to Week 12 During Part 2
Time frame: From Week 5 up to Week 12 during Part 2
A participant was considered to have a CRTE at a given assessment if he/she had platelet counts <10 Gi/L, or platelet transfusions, or >=Grade 3 hemorrhagic adverse events. CRTEs during Weeks 5 to 12 were compared between treatments using a generalized linear mixed model. Average of weekly proportion of subjects with CRTE during Week 5 to 12 was estimated for each treatment. Intent to Treat (ITT) Population was comprised of all randomized participants during Part 2.
13 secondary outcomes
Plasma Eltrombopag Pharmacokinetic Concentration-Time Data - by Visit (Part 1 Subjects)
Time frame: Day 1 to week 8
Plasma Eltrombopag Pharmacokinetic Concentration-Time Data - by Visit (Part 2 Subjects)
Time frame: Day 1 to week 12
Mean Number of Platelet Transfusions
Time frame: Weeks 5 to 12
Hematologic Improvement
Time frame: Weeks 5 to 12
Change in Mean Platelet Count
Time frame: Baseline to Week 12
Maximum Duration of Platelet Transfusion Independence
Time frame: Weeks 5 to 12
Number of Participants With Maximum Bleeding Grade According to World Health Organization on Bleeding Scale
Time frame: Weeks 5 to 12
Independent Reviewer-Assessed Best Response
Time frame: up to week 12
Independent Reviewer Assessed Disease Progression
Time frame: Up to week 12
Median Overall Survival
Time frame: Up to 13 months
Summary of Health Outcomes
Time frame: week 12
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)
Time frame: Change from baseline, up to week 12
EQ-5D Utility Score Analysis
Time frame: Change from baseline, up to week 12
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Jun 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37231838Mittelman M, Platzbecker U, Grosicki S, Lawniczek T, Zhu Z, Selleslag D. Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Eltrombopag for Advanced Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Severe Thrombocytopenia: Results of the ASPIRE Extension Study. Acta Haematol. 2023;146(5):373-378. doi: 10.1159/000531146. Epub 2023 May 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29241762Mittelman M, Platzbecker U, Afanasyev B, Grosicki S, Wong RSM, Anagnostopoulos A, Brenner B, Denzlinger C, Rossi G, Nagler A, Garcia-Delgado R, Portella MSO, Zhu Z, Selleslag D. Eltrombopag for advanced myelodysplastic syndromes or acute myeloid leukaemia and severe thrombocytopenia (ASPIRE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Jan;5(1):e34-e43. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30228-4. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
Related trials for Thrombocytopaenia
RecruitingPhase 2
Preoperative Use of Romiplostim in Thrombocytopenic Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.
Chirurgical Intervention, Thrombocytopaenia
RecruitingPhase 4
Sirolimus Monotherapy in the Treatment of Antiphospholipid Antibody Related Thrombocytopenia
Antiphospholipid (aPL)-Positive, Thrombocytopaenia
RecruitingObservational study
Clinical Efficacy of Platelet Transfusion
Thrombocytopaenia, Haematological Malignancies
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Novartis Pharmaceuticals study director
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
120 sites in 22 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing eltrombopag in people with Thrombocytopaenia, run by Novartis Pharmaceuticals at 120 sites in 22 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 120 sites in United States, Brazil, Israel, Spain, Belgium and 17 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Platelet Response up to Week 8 During Part 1 (time frame: From Baseline up to Week 8 during Part 1). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01440374, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Jun 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.