Bladder CancerPhase 3BCG/EMDA-MMCNCT01442519
Sequential Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) and Electromotive Mitomycin-C Versus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) Alone for High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer
A Phase 3 study testing bacillus Calmette-Guerin and electromotive mitomycin in people with Bladder Cancer, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Intravesical treatment for superficial bladder cancer has been used for the past 4-5 decades. Intravesical chemotherapy is beneficial in terms of recurrence and time to recurrence in grade 1-2 stage Ta tumours, usually non-invasive. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer
- What is being tested?
- bacillus Calmette-Guerin and electromotive mitomycin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 212 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- Jan 1994to Jun 2002
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 90 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- adequate bone-marrow reserve (ie, white-blood-cell count ≥4000 x106 cells/L and platelet count ≥120 x 109/L)
- normal renal function (ie, serum creatinine ≤123•76 μmol/L)
- normal liver function (ie, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase ≤42 U/L, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase ≤48 U/L, and total bilirubin ≤22•23 μmol/L)
- Karnofsky performance status between 50 and 100.
Who cannot join
- previous treatment with BCG or electromotive mitomycin
- treatment with any other intravesical cytostatic agent within the past 6 months
- concomitant urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract;
- previous muscle-invasive (ie, stage T2 or higher) transitional-cell - carcinoma of the bladder
- bladder capacity less than 2 L
- untreated urinary-tract infection
Show all 16Show fewer
- severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis)
- urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and repeated catheterisation
- disease of upper urinary tract (eg, vesicoureteral reflux or urinary-tract stones) that would make multiple transurethral procedures a risk
- previous radiotherapy to the pelvis
- other concurrent chemotherapy
- treatment with radiotherapy-response or biological-response modifiers;
- history of tuberculosis
- other malignant diseases within 5 years of trial registration (except for basal-cell carcinoma)
- pregnancy or nursing
- psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Sequential Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and Electromotive Mitomycin-C Versus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Alone for High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer: a Prospective Randomised Study
Intravesical treatment for superficial bladder cancer has been used for the past 4-5 decades. Intravesical chemotherapy is beneficial in terms of recurrence and time to recurrence in grade 1-2 stage Ta tumours, usually non-invasive. Intravesical chemotherapy has negligible effect on disease progression in high-risk superficial bladder cancer-ie, grade 3, stage T1, and carcinoma in situ. However, BCG as induction and maintenance treatment effectively delays progression. Electromotive mitomycin increases tissue uptake compared with that of passive diffusion. Electromotive mitomycin has emerged as an alternative or complementary treatment to BCG. The rationale for combining anticancer drugs is based on the need to increase efficacy and reduce emergence of resistant malignant cells. This approach is not frequently applied to use of intravesical agents for treatment of superficial bladder cancer, for which immunotherapeutic BCG and chemotherapeutic mitomycin seem to be a potentially effective combination. Studies have addressed concurrent use of mitomycin and BCG, and assigned two roles to mitomycin: antitumor action and tissue-scarifying (ie, surface-modifying) effect that enables BCG to attach more efficiently to the urothelium. The investigators therefore aimed to assess whether induction of inflammation by use of BCG before mitomycin treatment makes the bladder mucosa more permeable and thus enables mitomycin to reach the target more easily. This randomised trial to compare the efficacy of sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin with that of the current standard of BCG alone for patients with high-risk superficial bladder cancer.
After transurethral resection and multiple biopsies patients with stage pT1 bladder cancer are randomly assigned to: 81 mg BCG infused over 120 min once a week for 6 weeks; or to 81 mg BCG infused over 120 min once a week for 2 weeks, followed by 40 mg electromotive mitomycin (intravesical electric current 20 mA for 30 min) once a week as one cycle for three cycles (n=107). Complete responders underwent maintenance treatment: those assigned BCG alone had one infusion of 81 mg BCG once a month for 10 months, and those assigned BCG and mitomycin had 40 mg electromotive mitomycin once a month for 2 months, followed by 81 mg BCG once a month as one cycle for three cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free interval; secondary endpoints were time to progression; overall survival; and disease-specific survival. Analyses were intention to treat.
Read the detailed description
All patients with histologically proven stage pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, whether papillary or solid, are regarded as being at high risk for tumour recurrence and at moderate to high risk for progression because of: multifocal pT1, primary or recurrent, grade 2 transitional-cell carcinoma; primary or recurrent pT1, multifocal or solitary, grade 3 transitional-cell carcinoma; or pT1 with carcinoma in situ. Inclusion criteria are: age 18 years or older; adequate bone-marrow reserve; normal renal function; normal liver function; and Karnofsky performance status between 50 and 100. Exclusion criteria are: previous treatment with BCG or electromotive mitomycin; treatment with any other intravesical cytostatic agent within the past 6 months; concomitant urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract; previous muscle-invasive (ie, stage T2 or higher) transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder; bladder capacity less than 2 L; untreated urinary-tract infection; severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis); urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and repeated catheterisation; disease of upper urinary tract (eg, vesicoureteral reflux or urinary-tract stones) that would make multiple transurethral procedures a risk; previous radiotherapy to the pelvis; other concurrent chemotherapy; treatment with radiotherapy-response or biological-response modifiers; history of tuberculosis; other malignant diseases within 5 years of trial registration (except for basal-cell carcinoma); pregnancy or nursing; and psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.
Study design The institutional review boards of every participating centre approved the study design. Every patient enrolled signed an informed-consent form approved by the institutional review boards. All patients underwent: urinary cytology of the bladder and upper urinary tract; random cold-cup biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra-ie, sampling of seemingly healthy urothelium and of suspicious areas; and complete transurethral resection of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy, ensuring muscle is included in resected samples. Patients with positive or suspect cytology, carcinoma in situ, multifocal tumours, or grade 3 tumours underwent restaging transurethral resection 4-5 weeks later. All clinical assessors are adequately trained in the above procedures, and no methods are used to enhance the quality of measurements. All biopsy samples of tumour and bladder are reviewed by a pathologist for stage and grade. Tumour stage is classified according to the 1997 TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer, and tumour grade is defined in accordance with the 1973 WHO classification. Patients are randomised within 10 days of the first or restaging transurethral resection. Randomisation and data collection are done by use of a central computer. Patients are allocated to BCG alone or to BCG and electromotive mitomycin by use stratified, blocked randomisation cross 14 strata as a result of four factors: primary versus recurrent tumours; multifocal versus unifocal tumours; grade 3 versus grade 2 tumours; and presence versus absence of carcinoma in situ. MV generated and coordinated the randomisation process. This study is not blinded because of differences in treatment schedules and drug appearance.
Treatment schedules All patients are scheduled to receive their allocated intervention about 3 weeks after transurethral resection and multiple, random biopsy sampling. The BCG instillation consisted of 81 mg wet weight BCG Connaught substrain (ImmuCyst®, Alfa Wassermann SpA, Bologna, Italy). Lyophilised (ie, freeze-dried) BCG is suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free solution of 0·9% sodium chloride. After draining of the bladder, the suspension is infused intravesically through a Foley catheter. The solution is retained in the bladder for 120 min, followed by emptying of the bladder and removal of the catheter. Patients randomly allocated to BCG and mitomycin, are placed on fluid restriction and 2 g ingested sodium bicarbonate the night before treatment, the morning of treatment, and 2 h before treatment with mitomycin. A Foley catheter is inserted and postvoid residual volume is reduced to less than 10mL. 40 mg mitomycin (Mitomycin, Kyowa Italiana Farmaceutici, Srl, Milan, Italy) dissolved in 100 mL water is infused intravesically through the Foley catheter by gravity and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 40-60 mA per s to a maximum of 20 mA or 30 min pulsed electric current is given externally.13 Two dispersive cathode electrodes are placed on lower abdominal skin that had been degreased with alcohol and a 2-5-mm layer of conductive gel applied. The bladder is then emptied and the catheter removed. The BCG-alone group is assigned one course of intravesical treatment per week for 6 weeks; patients assigned sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin are assigned one course of treatment per week for 9 weeks, for whom one cycle consisted of two BCG infusions and one mitomycin infusion (three cycles in total). Patients in the BCG-alone group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months. Patients in the BCG-and-mitomycin group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive one infusion a month for 9 months: three cycles of mitomycin, mitomycin, and BCG (ie, six infusions of mitomycin and three infusions of BCG.
Maintenance treatment for both groups is given to the same dose and methods of infusion as initial allocated treatment.
Role of the funding source The sponsor of the study has no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; or in the writing of the report.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Being tested
- bacillus Calmette-Guerin, electromotive mitomycin
- Keywords
- non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer, intravesical therapy, BCG, mitomycin, electromotive drug administration, Bladder Cancer Stage 0, Without Cancer in Situ
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
bacillus Calmette-GuerinBiological
Also called IMMUCYST, Alpha Wassermann, Bologna, Italy
The BCG instillation consisted of 81 mg wet weight (10•2±9•0_108 colony-forming units) BCG Connaught substrain (ImmuCyst®, Alfa Wassermann SpA, Bologna, Italy). Lyophilised (ie, freeze-dried) BCG is suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free solution of 0•9% sodium chloride. After draining of the bladder, the suspension is infused intravesically through a Foley catheter. The solution is retained in the bladder for 120 min, followed by emptying of the bladder and removal of the catheter. The BCG-alone group is assigned one course of intravesical treatment per week for 6 weeks. Patients in the BCG-alone group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months
electromotive mitomycinDrug
Also called IMMUCYST, Alpha Wassermann, Bologna, Italy, MITOMYCIN C 40 mg, Kyowa Italiana Farmaceutici
BCG instillation of 81 mg BCG Connaught-substrain, suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free saline solution, retained for 120 min. Electromotive instillation: 40 mg mitomycin in 100 mL water infused intravesically and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 20 mA for 30 min pulsed electric current is given externally. Patients assigned sequential BCG and EMDA MMC are assigned 1 course of treatment/week for 9 weeks: one cycle consisted of two BCG infusions and one mitomycin infusion (three cycles in total). Patients in the BCG-and-mitomycin group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive one infusion a month for 9 months: three cycles of mitomycin, mitomycin, and BCG (ie, six infusions of MMC and three of BCG).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intravesical BCG alone | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Biological: bacillus Calmette-Guerin |
| Intravesical sequential BCG and EMDA MMC | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: electromotive mitomycin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Disease-free interval
The primary endpoint is disease-free interval for patients without carcinoma in situ and for patients with carcinoma in situ who are disease-free after treatment-ie, time from randomisation to first cystoscopy noting recurrence. Patients with carcinoma in situ who did not have complete response after 3 months of treatment are regarded as having recurrence with no follow-up.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of first documented recurrence, assessed up to 120 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Time to progression
Time to progression is defined as time from randomisation until the onset of muscle-invasive disease as recorded by pathological assessment of transurethral-resection samples or biopsy samples. Patients without recurrence or progression are censored at the last cystoscopy, and those lost to follow-up are censored at the last known day of survival.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of documented progression, assessed up to 120 months.
Overall survival
Overall survival is defined as time from randomisation until death from any cause. Patients without recurrence or progression are censored at the last cystoscopy, and those lost to follow-up are censored at the last known day of survival.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death for any cause, assessed up to 120 months.
Disease-specific survival
Disease-specific survival as time from randomisation until death from bladder cancer. Patients without recurrence or progression are censored at the last cystoscopy, and those lost to follow-up are censored at the last known day of survival.
Measured: From date of randomization until the date of death for bladder cancer, assessed up to 120 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJan 1994
- Primary completionJun 2002
- Study completionJun 2002
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 212 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of L'Aquila
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Savino M. Di Stasi, University of Rome Tor Vergata
- Investigators
- Savino M Di Stasi, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01442519
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UTV-119-1993
- Acronym
- BCG/EMDA-MMC
- Status last verified
- Sep 2011
- First submitted
- 29 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Giurioli A, Valenti M, Zampa G, Storti L, Attisani F, De Carolis A, Capelli G, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin versus BCG alone for high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jan;7(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70472-1.
PubMed 16389183
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Sequential Bacillus Calmette-Guérin and Electromotive Mitomycin-C Versus Bacillus Calmette-Guérin Alone for High Risk Superficial Bladder Cancer: a Prospective Randomised Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01442519
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BCG/EMDA-MMC / UTV-119-1993
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Keywords
- non-muscle invasive urothelial bladder cancer, intravesical therapy, BCG, mitomycin, electromotive drug administration, Bladder Cancer Stage 0, Without Cancer in Situ
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 212 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Rome Tor VergataUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of L'Aquila
- Study start
- Jan 1994
- Primary completion
- Jun 2002 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2002 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Sep 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Intravesical treatment for superficial bladder cancer has been used for the past 4-5 decades. Intravesical chemotherapy is beneficial in terms of recurrence and time to recurrence in grade 1-2 stage Ta tumours, usually non-invasive. Intravesical chemotherapy has negligible effect on disease progression in high-risk superficial bladder cancer-ie, grade 3, stage T1, and carcinoma in situ. However, BCG as induction and maintenance treatment effectively delays progression. Electromotive mitomycin increases tissue uptake compared with that of passive diffusion. Electromotive mitomycin has emerged as an alternative or complementary treatment to BCG. The rationale for combining anticancer drugs is based on the need to increase efficacy and reduce emergence of resistant malignant cells. This approach is not frequently applied to use of intravesical agents for treatment of superficial bladder cancer, for which immunotherapeutic BCG and chemotherapeutic mitomycin seem to be a potentially effective combination. Studies have addressed concurrent use of mitomycin and BCG, and assigned two roles to mitomycin: antitumor action and tissue-scarifying (ie, surface-modifying) effect that enables BCG to attach more efficiently to the urothelium. The investigators therefore aimed to assess whether induction of inflammation by use of BCG before mitomycin treatment makes the bladder mucosa more permeable and thus enables mitomycin to reach the target more easily. This randomised trial to compare the efficacy of sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin with that of the current standard of BCG alone for patients with high-risk superficial bladder cancer.
After transurethral resection and multiple biopsies patients with stage pT1 bladder cancer are randomly assigned to: 81 mg BCG infused over 120 min once a week for 6 weeks; or to 81 mg BCG infused over 120 min once a week for 2 weeks, followed by 40 mg electromotive mitomycin (intravesical electric current 20 mA for 30 min) once a week as one cycle for three cycles (n=107). Complete responders underwent maintenance treatment: those assigned BCG alone had one infusion of 81 mg BCG once a month for 10 months, and those assigned BCG and mitomycin had 40 mg electromotive mitomycin once a month for 2 months, followed by 81 mg BCG once a month as one cycle for three cycles. The primary endpoint was disease-free interval; secondary endpoints were time to progression; overall survival; and disease-specific survival. Analyses were intention to treat.
Detailed description
All patients with histologically proven stage pT1 urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, whether papillary or solid, are regarded as being at high risk for tumour recurrence and at moderate to high risk for progression because of: multifocal pT1, primary or recurrent, grade 2 transitional-cell carcinoma; primary or recurrent pT1, multifocal or solitary, grade 3 transitional-cell carcinoma; or pT1 with carcinoma in situ. Inclusion criteria are: age 18 years or older; adequate bone-marrow reserve; normal renal function; normal liver function; and Karnofsky performance status between 50 and 100. Exclusion criteria are: previous treatment with BCG or electromotive mitomycin; treatment with any other intravesical cytostatic agent within the past 6 months; concomitant urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract; previous muscle-invasive (ie, stage T2 or higher) transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder; bladder capacity less than 2 L; untreated urinary-tract infection; severe systemic infection (ie, sepsis); urethral strictures that would prevent endoscopic procedures and repeated catheterisation; disease of upper urinary tract (eg, vesicoureteral reflux or urinary-tract stones) that would make multiple transurethral procedures a risk; previous radiotherapy to the pelvis; other concurrent chemotherapy; treatment with radiotherapy-response or biological-response modifiers; history of tuberculosis; other malignant diseases within 5 years of trial registration (except for basal-cell carcinoma); pregnancy or nursing; and psychological, familial, sociological, or geographical factors that would preclude study participation.
Study design The institutional review boards of every participating centre approved the study design. Every patient enrolled signed an informed-consent form approved by the institutional review boards. All patients underwent: urinary cytology of the bladder and upper urinary tract; random cold-cup biopsies of the bladder and prostatic urethra-ie, sampling of seemingly healthy urothelium and of suspicious areas; and complete transurethral resection of all bladder tumour visible on endoscopy, ensuring muscle is included in resected samples. Patients with positive or suspect cytology, carcinoma in situ, multifocal tumours, or grade 3 tumours underwent restaging transurethral resection 4-5 weeks later. All clinical assessors are adequately trained in the above procedures, and no methods are used to enhance the quality of measurements. All biopsy samples of tumour and bladder are reviewed by a pathologist for stage and grade. Tumour stage is classified according to the 1997 TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer, and tumour grade is defined in accordance with the 1973 WHO classification. Patients are randomised within 10 days of the first or restaging transurethral resection. Randomisation and data collection are done by use of a central computer. Patients are allocated to BCG alone or to BCG and electromotive mitomycin by use stratified, blocked randomisation cross 14 strata as a result of four factors: primary versus recurrent tumours; multifocal versus unifocal tumours; grade 3 versus grade 2 tumours; and presence versus absence of carcinoma in situ. MV generated and coordinated the randomisation process. This study is not blinded because of differences in treatment schedules and drug appearance.
Treatment schedules All patients are scheduled to receive their allocated intervention about 3 weeks after transurethral resection and multiple, random biopsy sampling. The BCG instillation consisted of 81 mg wet weight BCG Connaught substrain (ImmuCyst®, Alfa Wassermann SpA, Bologna, Italy). Lyophilised (ie, freeze-dried) BCG is suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free solution of 0·9% sodium chloride. After draining of the bladder, the suspension is infused intravesically through a Foley catheter. The solution is retained in the bladder for 120 min, followed by emptying of the bladder and removal of the catheter. Patients randomly allocated to BCG and mitomycin, are placed on fluid restriction and 2 g ingested sodium bicarbonate the night before treatment, the morning of treatment, and 2 h before treatment with mitomycin. A Foley catheter is inserted and postvoid residual volume is reduced to less than 10mL. 40 mg mitomycin (Mitomycin, Kyowa Italiana Farmaceutici, Srl, Milan, Italy) dissolved in 100 mL water is infused intravesically through the Foley catheter by gravity and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 40-60 mA per s to a maximum of 20 mA or 30 min pulsed electric current is given externally.13 Two dispersive cathode electrodes are placed on lower abdominal skin that had been degreased with alcohol and a 2-5-mm layer of conductive gel applied. The bladder is then emptied and the catheter removed. The BCG-alone group is assigned one course of intravesical treatment per week for 6 weeks; patients assigned sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin are assigned one course of treatment per week for 9 weeks, for whom one cycle consisted of two BCG infusions and one mitomycin infusion (three cycles in total). Patients in the BCG-alone group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months. Patients in the BCG-and-mitomycin group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive one infusion a month for 9 months: three cycles of mitomycin, mitomycin, and BCG (ie, six infusions of mitomycin and three infusions of BCG.
Maintenance treatment for both groups is given to the same dose and methods of infusion as initial allocated treatment.
Role of the funding source The sponsor of the study has no role in study design; in the collection, analysis, or interpretation of data; or in the writing of the report.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intravesical BCG alone | Active comparator | Biological: bacillus Calmette-Guerin |
| Intravesical sequential BCG and EMDA MMC | Experimental | Drug: electromotive mitomycin |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 90 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- adequate bone-marrow reserve (ie, white-blood-cell count ≥4000 x106 cells/L and platelet count ≥120 x 109/L)
- normal renal function (ie, serum creatinine ≤123•76 μmol/L)
- normal liver function (ie, serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase ≤42 U/L, serum glutamic-pyruvic transaminase ≤48 U/L, and total bilirubin ≤22•23 μmol/L)
- Karnofsky performance status between 50 and 100.
Key exclusion criteria (16 listed)
- previous treatment with BCG or electromotive mitomycin
- treatment with any other intravesical cytostatic agent within the past 6 months
- concomitant urothelial tumours of the upper urinary tract;
- previous muscle-invasive (ie, stage T2 or higher) transitional-cell - carcinoma of the bladder
- bladder capacity less than 2 L
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| bacillus Calmette-GuerinAlso: IMMUCYST, Alpha Wassermann, Bologna, ItalyThe BCG instillation consisted of 81 mg wet weight (10•2±9•0_108 colony-forming units) BCG Connaught substrain (ImmuCyst®, Alfa Wassermann SpA, Bologna, Italy). Lyophilised (ie, freeze-dried) BCG is suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free solution of 0•9% sodium chloride. After draining of the bladder, the suspension is infused intravesically through a Foley catheter. The solution is retained in the bladder for 120 min, followed by emptying of the bladder and removal of the catheter. The BCG-alone group is assigned one course of intravesical treatment per week for 6 weeks. Patients in the BCG-alone group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive monthly infusions of BCG for 10 months | Biological | Intravesical BCG alone |
| electromotive mitomycinAlso: IMMUCYST, Alpha Wassermann, Bologna, Italy, MITOMYCIN C 40 mg, Kyowa Italiana FarmaceuticiBCG instillation of 81 mg BCG Connaught-substrain, suspended in 50 mL bacteriostatic-free saline solution, retained for 120 min. Electromotive instillation: 40 mg mitomycin in 100 mL water infused intravesically and retained in the bladder for 30 min, while 20 mA for 30 min pulsed electric current is given externally. Patients assigned sequential BCG and EMDA MMC are assigned 1 course of treatment/week for 9 weeks: one cycle consisted of two BCG infusions and one mitomycin infusion (three cycles in total). Patients in the BCG-and-mitomycin group who are disease-free 3 months after treatment are scheduled to receive one infusion a month for 9 months: three cycles of mitomycin, mitomycin, and BCG (ie, six infusions of MMC and three of BCG). | Drug | Intravesical sequential BCG and EMDA MMC |
Primary outcome
Disease-free interval
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented recurrence, assessed up to 120 months
The primary endpoint is disease-free interval for patients without carcinoma in situ and for patients with carcinoma in situ who are disease-free after treatment-ie, time from randomisation to first cystoscopy noting recurrence. Patients with carcinoma in situ who did not have complete response after 3 months of treatment are regarded as having recurrence with no follow-up.
3 secondary outcomes
Time to progression
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of documented progression, assessed up to 120 months.
Overall survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death for any cause, assessed up to 120 months.
Disease-specific survival
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death for bladder cancer, assessed up to 120 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2011.
- Results publication: PubMed 16389183Di Stasi SM, Giannantoni A, Giurioli A, Valenti M, Zampa G, Storti L, Attisani F, De Carolis A, Capelli G, Vespasiani G, Stephen RL. Sequential BCG and electromotive mitomycin versus BCG alone for high-risk superficial bladder cancer: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jan;7(1):43-51. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70472-1.
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Beta-only IL-2 ImmunoTherapY Study
Advanced Solid Tumor, Unresectable Solid Tumor
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Treating Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer With A Non-surgical Method Consisting of Anti-PD-1 Therapy and Chemoradiation
Muscle-Invasive Bladder Carcinoma, Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Inhibitor
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of Two Immunotherapy Drugs (Nivolumab and Ipilimumab) With One Anti-cancer Targeted Drug (Cabozantinib) for Rare Genitourinary Tumors
Bladder Adenocarcinoma, Bladder Clear Cell Adenocarcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Study Investigating Intravesical HDAC Inhibition to Improve Response to Immuno-Oncology Agents
Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
Trial of Nadofaragene Firadenovec vs. Observation in Participants With Intermediate Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Intermediate Risk Non-Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Savino M Di Stasi, MD, PhD principal investigator
Tor Vergata University, Rome, Italy
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing bacillus Calmette-Guerin and electromotive mitomycin in people with Bladder Cancer, run by University of Rome Tor Vergata at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 16 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Disease-free interval (time frame: From date of randomization until the date of first documented recurrence, assessed up to 120 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01442519, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2011.