AzTrials
AzTrials

Complicated Intra-abdominal InfectionPhase 3NCT01445678

Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Intravenous CXA-201 and Intravenous Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

A Phase 3 study testing CXA-201 and metronidazole and Meropenem in people with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection, run by Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) at 61 sites in 15 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double dummy study of CXA-201 Intravenous (IV) infusions (1500mg q8h) and metronidazole (500mg q8h) versus meropenem (1000mg q8h)for the treatment of adults with Complicated Intraabdominal Infections (cIAI). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection
What is being tested?
CXA-201 and metronidazole and Meropenem
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
494 participants
Where
61 sitesin 15 countries
Study dates
23 Dec 2011to 15 Oct 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Diagnoses of cIAI.
  • Subject requires surgical intervention (e.g., laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery, or percutaneous draining of an abscess) within 24 hours of (before or after) the first dose of study drug.

Who cannot join

  • Simple appendicitis; acute suppurative cholangitis; infected necrotizing pancreatitis; pancreatic abscess; or pelvic infections.
  • Complicated intraabdominal infection managed by staged abdominal repair (STAR), open abdomen technique including temporary closure of the abdomen, or any situation where infection source control is not likely to be achieved.
  • Use of systemic antibiotic therapy for IAI for more than 24 hours prior to the first dose of study drug, unless there is a documented treatment failure with such therapy.
  • Have a concomitant infection at the time of randomization, which requires non-study systemic antibacterial therapy in addition to IV study drug therapy. (Drugs with only gram-positive activity [e.g., daptomycin, vancomycin, linezolid] are allowed).
  • Severe impairment of renal function (estimated CrCl < 30 mL/min), or requirement for peritoneal dialysis, hemodialysis or hemofiltration, or oliguria (< 20 mL/h urine output over 24 hours).
  • The presence of hepatic disease at baseline.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Considered unlikely to survive the 4 to 5 week study period.
  • Any rapidly-progressing disease or immediately life-threatening illness (including respiratory failure and septic shock).
  • Have a documented history of any moderate or severe hypersensitivity or allergic reaction to any β-lactam antibacterial (a history of a mild rash followed by uneventful re-exposure is not a contraindication to enrollment), including cephalosporins, carbapenems, penicillins, or ß-lactamase inhibitors, or metronidazole, or nitroimidazole derivatives.
  • Women who are pregnant or nursing.

Trial locations and contacts

61 sites in 15 countries.

61 sites in 15 countries

Argentina12 sites
  • Study site

    Ciudadelo-Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Córdoba

  • Study site

    Corrientes

  • Study site

    General Rodriguez, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    La Plata, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Loma Hermosa, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Luján, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Merlo, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Paraná, Entre Ríos Province

  • Study site

    Santa Fe

  • Study site

    Tandil, Buenos Aires

  • Study site

    Vicente López, Buenos Aires

Other trials in Argentina

Hungary9 sites
  • Study site

    Budapest

  • Study site

    Győr, Győr-Moson-Sopron

  • Study site

    Gyula, Bekes County

  • Study site

    Kaposvár

  • Study site

    Kecskemét

  • Study site

    Szeged, Csongrád megye

  • Study site

    Szentes, Csongrád megye

  • Study site

    Vác

  • Study site

    Zalaegerszerg, Zala County

Other trials in Hungary

Poland5 sites
  • Study site

    Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship

  • Study site

    Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship

  • Study site

    Lubin, Lublin Voivodeship

  • Study site

    Szczecin, West Pomeranian Voivodeship

  • Study site

    Wołomin, Masovian Voivodeship

Other trials in Poland

United States4 sites
  • Study site

    Boston, Massachusetts

  • Study site

    Columbus, Ohio

  • Study site

    Robbinsdale, Minnesota

  • Study site

    Springfield, Illinois

Other trials in United States

Israel4 sites
  • Study site

    Beer Yahkov

  • Study site

    Haifa

  • Study site

    Kfar Saba, Sharon

  • Study site

    Tel HaShomer, Tel Aviv

Other trials in Israel

Lithuania4 sites
  • Study site

    Kaunas

  • Study site

    Klaipėda

  • Study site

    Šiauliai

  • Study site

    Vilnius

Other trials in Lithuania

Serbia4 sites
  • Study site

    Belgrade

  • Study site

    Krafujevac

  • Study site

    Niš

  • Study site

    Novi Sad

Other trials in Serbia

South Korea4 sites
  • Study site

    Incheon, Gyeonggi-do

  • Study site

    Seoul

  • Study site

    Suwon, Gyeonggi-do

  • Study site

    Wŏnju, Gangwon-do

Other trials in South Korea

Bulgaria3 sites
  • Study site

    Pleven

  • Study site

    Sofia

  • Study site

    Varna

Other trials in Bulgaria

Estonia3 sites
  • Study site

    Kohtla-Järve

  • Study site

    Tallinn

  • Study site

    Tartu

Other trials in Estonia

Chile2 sites
  • Study site

    Santiago

  • Study site

    Temuco, Cautin

Other trials in Chile

Croatia2 sites
  • Study site

    Split, Dalmatia

  • Study site

    Zagreb

Other trials in Croatia

Germany2 sites
  • Study site

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Weurttemberg

  • Study site

    Heidelberg, Baden-Wurttemberg

Other trials in Germany

Latvia2 sites
  • Study site

    Liepāja

  • Study site

    Riga

Other trials in Latvia

Moldova1 site
  • Study site

    Chisinau

Other trials in Moldova

About this study

Official title: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous CXA-201 With That of Meropenem in Complicated Intraabdominal Infections

This is a Phase 3, multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, double dummy study of CXA-201 Intravenous (IV) infusions (1500mg q8h) and metronidazole (500mg q8h) versus meropenem (1000mg q8h)for the treatment of adults with Complicated Intraabdominal Infections (cIAI).

Read the detailed description

Approximately, 500 subjects will be enrolled into this study, randomized 1:1 to receive CXA-201 and metronidazole or comparator (meropenem). Subject participation will require a minimum commitment of 38 days and a maximum of 45 days. An End of Treatment (EOT) visit will occur within 24 hours following the last dose of study drug administration/drug discontinuation. A Test of Cure (TOC)/Safety visit will be conducted 26 to 30 days following the first dose of study drug administration. A Last Follow-up (LFU) visit will be conducted 38 to 45 days after the first dose of study drug.

Being tested
CXA-201 and metronidazole, Meropenem
Keywords
cIAI

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CXA-201 and metronidazoleDrug

    CXA-201 IV infusion (1500mg q8h) and metronidazole IV infusion (500mg q 8h) for 4-14 days

  • MeropenemDrug

    Meropenem IV infusion (1000mg q8h) for 4-14 days

Study groups in NCT01445678
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
CXA-201 and Metronidazole as treatment for cIAIExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CXA-201 and metronidazole
Meropenem as treatment for cIAIActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Drug: Meropenem

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) Population

    Clinical cure is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.

    Measured: TOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administration

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. The Percentage of Subjects With Microbiological Outcome of Success at the TOC Visit in the Microbiologically Evaluable (ME) Population

    Success is eradication (absence of the baseline pathogen in a specimen appropriately obtained from the original site of infection) or presumed eradication (absence of material to culture in a subject who was assessed as a clinical cure) for each baseline pathogen

    Measured: TOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administration

  2. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy (EOT) Visit in the MITT Population

    Clinical response is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.

    Measured: EOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administration

  3. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at End of Therapy in the ME Population

    Clinical response is complete resolution or significant improvement in signs and symptoms of the index infection, such that no additional antibacterial therapy or surgical or drainage procedure was required for the index infection.

    Measured: EOT; Within 24 hours of last study drug administration

  4. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at Long Term Follow-Up (LFU) in the MITT Population

    Clinical response is clinical cure at TOC and no signs and symptoms recur or worsen since the TOC visit.

    Measured: LFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administration

  5. The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Response at LFU Visit in the ME Population

    Clinical response is clinical cure at TOC and no signs and symptoms recur or worsen since the TOC visit

    Measured: LFU; 38 to 45 days after first study drug administration

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted4 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start23 Dec 2011
  3. Primary completion3 Oct 2013
  4. Study completion15 Oct 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
494 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01445678
Sponsor's protocol ID
7625A-004
Other IDs
CXA-cIAI-10-09, CXA-cIAI-10-08
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
26 Sep 2011
Last updated
16 Nov 2018
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: https://www.merck.com/clinical-trials/pdf/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Publications

  • Popejoy MW, Long J, Huntington JA. Analysis of patients with diabetes and complicated intra-abdominal infection or complicated urinary tract infection in phase 3 trials of ceftolozane/tazobactam. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 May 2;17(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2414-9.

    PubMed 28464828
  • Xiao Y, Tong ML, Liu LL, Lin LR, Chen MJ, Zhang HL, Zheng WH, Li SL, Lin HL, Lin ZF, Xing HQ, Niu JJ, Yang TC. Novel predictors of neurosyphilis among HIV-negative syphilis patients with neurological symptoms: an observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Apr 26;17(1):310. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2339-3.

    PubMed 28446129
  • Kullar R, Wagenlehner FM, Popejoy MW, Long J, Yu B, Goldstein EJ. Does moderate renal impairment affect clinical outcomes in complicated intra-abdominal and complicated urinary tract infections? Analysis of two randomized controlled trials with ceftolozane/tazobactam. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Mar 1;72(3):900-905. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw486.

    PubMed 27999024
  • Miller B, Popejoy MW, Hershberger E, Steenbergen JN, Alverdy J. Characteristics and Outcomes of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections Involving Pseudomonas aeruginosa from a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Study. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Jun 20;60(7):4387-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.03074-15. Print 2016 Jul.

    PubMed 27139477
  • Solomkin J, Hershberger E, Miller B, Popejoy M, Friedland I, Steenbergen J, Yoon M, Collins S, Yuan G, Barie PS, Eckmann C. Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Plus Metronidazole for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections in an Era of Multidrug Resistance: Results From a Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase 3 Trial (ASPECT-cIAI). Clin Infect Dis. 2015 May 15;60(10):1462-71. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ097. Epub 2015 Feb 10.

    PubMed 25670823

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing CXA-201 and metronidazole and Meropenem in people with Complicated Intra-abdominal Infection, run by Cubist Pharmaceuticals LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc. (Rahway, New Jersey USA) at 61 sites in 15 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 61 sites in Argentina, Hungary, Poland, United States, Israel and 10 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 15 Jan 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Outcome of Cure at the Test of Cure (TOC) Visit in the Microbiological Intent to Treat (MITT) Population (time frame: TOC; 26-30 days after start of study drug administration). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01445678, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Nov 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in