Type 1 Diabetes MellitusPhase 3NCT01445951
Clinical Trial Evaluating Technosphere® Insulin Versus Insulin Aspart in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Over a 24-week Treatment Period
A Phase 3 study testing Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler, Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler and Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulin in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Mannkind Corporation at 90 sites in 4 countries.
Trial summary
Open-label, randomized, forced-titration clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of TI Inhalation Power in combination with a basal insulin versus insulin aspart in combination with a basal insulin Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- What is being tested?
- Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler, Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler and Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 518 participants
- Where
- 90 sitesin 4 countries
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women = 18 years of age
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 12 months
- Body mass index (BMI) = 38 kg/m2
- Stable dose of basal/bolus insulin therapy for at least 3 months with an FPG consistently < 220 mg/dL:
- HbA1c = 7.5% and = 10.0%
- Fasting C-peptide = 0.30 pmol/mL
Show all 11Show fewer
- Subject willingness to not use CGM during the entire course of the trial
- Nonsmoking (includes cigarettes, cigars, pipes, and chewing tobacco) for the preceding 6 months
- Negative urine cotinine test, defined as = 100 ng/mL
- Lung function tests: • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 70% Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES III) predicted
- Written informed consent
Who cannot join
- Total daily insulin dose = 2 IU/kg/day. History of insulin pump use within 3 months of Screening or use of continuous glucose monitoring within 6 weeks of Screening
- History of inhaled insulin use in the previous 6 months
- Two or more unexplained severe hypoglycemic episodes within 3 months of Screening or an episode of severe hypoglycemia between Visit 1 and Visit 2. Unexplained refers to episodes of severe hypoglycemia that are not related to a dosing error, lack of or a change in meal size, or related to additional/unanticipated exercise
- Any hospitalization or emergency room visit due to poor diabetic control within 6 months of Screening, or hospitalization or emergency room visit due to poor diabetic control between Visit 1 and Visit 2
- Allergy or known hypersensitivity to insulin or to any of the drugs to be used in the study, or a history of hypersensitivity to TI Inhalation Powder or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
- History of recent blood transfusions (within previous 3 months), hemoglobinopathies, or any other conditions that affect HbA1c measurements.
Show all 17Show fewer
- History of COPD, asthma, or any other clinically important pulmonary disease (eg, pulmonary fibrosis), or use of any medications for these conditions
- Any clinically significant radiological findings on screening chest x-ray
- Active respiratory infection within 30 days before Screening (subject may return after 30 days from resolution for rescreening)
- Major organ system diseases, including: ? Seizure disorder; systemic autoimmune or collagen vascular disease requiring previous or current treatment with systemic corticosteroids, cytotoxic drugs, or penicillamine; cancer (other than excised cutaneous basal cell carcinoma) or any history of lung neoplasms
- Current or previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy that may result in pulmonary toxicity; use of medications for weight loss (eg, sibutramine, orlistat) within 12 weeks of Screening; treatment with amiodarone within 12 weeks of Screening
- Clinically significant abnormalities on screening laboratory evaluation or chest x-ray
- Severe complications of diabetes, in the opinion of the PI, including symptomatic autonomic neuropathy; disabling peripheral neuropathy; active proliferative retinopathy; nephropathy with renal failure, renal transplant, or dialysis; nontraumatic amputations due to gangrene; or vascular claudication
- Women who are pregnant, lactating, or planning to become pregnant during the clinical study period; women of childbearing potential (defined as premenopausal and not surgically sterilized or postmenopausal for fewer than 2 years) not practicing adequate birth control. Adequate birth control is defined as using oral, percutaneous, or transdermal contraceptives; condoms and diaphragms (double barrier) with a spermicide; or intrauterine devices. Postmenopausal for this study includes amenorrhea f
- Current drug or alcohol abuse or a history of drug or alcohol abuse that, in the opinion of the PI, would make the subject an unsuitable candidate for participation in the study
- Exposure to any investigational medications or devices within the previous 30 days before study entry
- Unable to read or write, or unlikely to comprehend and follow the study protocol procedures; lack of compliance with medication or procedures that, in the PI's opinion, may affect the study data or subject safety and that precludes the subject from participation in the study; or any other concurrent medical or major psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the PI, makes the subject unsuitable for the clinical study or could limit the validity of the informed consent or impair the subject'
Trial locations and contacts
90 sites in 4 countries.
90 sites in 4 countries
United States58 sites
Study site
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
Study site
Arlington, Texas, 76014
Study site
Asheville, North Carolina, 28803
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30308
Study site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30318
Study site
Aurora, Colorado, 80045
Study site
Bartlett, Tennessee, 38133
Study site
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70808
Study site
Billings, Montana, 59101
Study site
Burlingame, California, 94010
Study site
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Study site
City of Saint Peters, Missouri, 63376
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75230
Study site
Dallas, Texas, 75246
Study site
Des Moines, Iowa, 50314
Study site
Dunwoody, Georgia, 30338
Study site
Edina, Minnesota, 55435
Study site
Escondido, California, 92026
Study site
Federal Way, Washington, 98003
Study site
Flushing, New York, 11365
Study site
Greenville, North Carolina, 27834
Study site
Greer, South Carolina, 29651
Study site
Hialeah, Florida, 33012
Study site
Hollywood, Florida, 33021
Study site
Houston, Texas, 77095
Study site
Huntington Beach, California, 92648
Study site
Jefferson City, Missouri, 65109
Study site
La Jolla, California, 92037
Study site
La Mesa, California, 91942
Study site
Lawrenceville, Georgia, 30045
Study site
Long Beach, California, 90806
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90017
Study site
Los Angeles, California, 90036
Study site
Los Gatos, California, 95032
Study site
Metairie, Louisiana, 70006
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33156
Study site
Miami, Florida, 33173
Study site
Morehead City, North Carolina, 28557
Study site
Murray, Utah, 84123
Study site
New Hyde Park, New York, 11042
Study site
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112
Study site
New Port Richey, Florida, 34652
Study site
New York, New York, 10016
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68114
Study site
Omaha, Nebraska, 68131
Study site
Palm Harbor, Florida, 34652
Study site
Paramus, New Jersey, 07652
Study site
Portland, Oregon, 97239
Study site
Renton, Washington, 98057
Study site
Roswell, Georgia, 30076
Study site
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Study site
San Mateo, California, 94401
Study site
Santa Barbara, California, 93105
Study site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
Study site
Tustin, California, 92780
Study site
Vincennes, Indiana, 47591
Study site
Wenatchee, Washington, 98801
Study site
West Palm Beach, Florida, 33401
Russia21 sites
Study site
Kemerovo, RUS, 650066
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 105120
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 109240
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 117036
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 117593
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 119048
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 119435
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 125299
Study site
Moscow, RUS, 125315
Study site
Petrozavodsk, RUS, 185019
Study site
Saint Petersburg, Russia, 191186
Study site
Saint Petersburg, Russia, 193312
Study site
Saint Petersburg, RUS, 192148
Study site
Saint Petersburg, RUS, 194044
Study site
Saint Petersburg, RUS, 194291
Study site
Saint Petersburg, RUS, 194354
Study site
Saint Petersburg, RUS, 195257
Study site
Saint Petersburg, RUS, 198013
Study site
Smolensk, RUS, 214018
Study site
Yaroslavl, RUS, 150003
Study site
Yaroslavl, RUS, 150062
Ukraine9 sites
Study site
Dnipropetrovsk, UKR, 49023
Study site
Donetsk, UKR, 83114
Study site
Kharkiv, UKR, 61070
Study site
Kiev, UKR, 04053
Study site
Kiev, UKR, 04114
Study site
Kyiv, UKR, 02175
Study site
Odesa, UKR, 65039
Study site
Odesa, UKR, 65114
Study site
Vinnytsia, UKR, 21010
Brazil2 sites
Study site
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-170
Study site
São Paulo, São Paulo, 01244-030
About this study
Official title: A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Forced-titration Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Technosphere® Insulin Inhalation Powder in Combination With a Basal Insulin Versus Insulin Aspart in Combination With a Basal Insulin in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Over a 24-week Treatment Period
Open-label, randomized, forced-titration clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of TI Inhalation Power in combination with a basal insulin versus insulin aspart in combination with a basal insulin
Read the detailed description
Phase 3 clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy and safety of inhaled prandial TI Inhalation Power in combination with basal insulin versus insulin aspart in combination with basal insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes who are suboptimally controlled with their current insulin regimens. This trial will employ a variety of methods to intensively manage these subjects.
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Being tested
- Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler, Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler, Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulin
- Medical subject headings
- Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C InhalerDrug
Inhalation Powder and injectable insulin
Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 InhalerDrug
Inhalation Powder and injectable insulin
Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulinDrug
Injectable insulin
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler | Experimental | Subjects will receive TI with the MedToneC inhaler and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry Receives: Drug: Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler |
| Aspart Group | Active comparator | Subjects will receive insulin aspart and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry Receives: Drug: Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulin |
| Technosphere ® Insulin-Gen2 Group | Experimental | Subject will receive Technosphere Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry Receives: Drug: Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in HbA1c
Effect of treatment as measured by change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Primary treatment difference is TI-Gen2 vs. Insulin Aspart at Week 24
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Secondary outcomes (6)
FEV1 Change From Baseline to Week 24
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second - change from baseline to week 24
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 24
Comparison of mean change from Baseline to Week 24 visit in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (central laboratory results)
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Mean 7-point Glucose Baseline Values
Mean 7-point glucose at baseline
Measured: Baseline
Mean 7-point Glucose Week 24 Values
Measured: Week 24
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24
Change in body weight from Baseline to Week 24
Measured: Baseline to Week 24
Proportion of Responders Achieving HbA1c <= 7.0%
Efficacy as measured in proportion of subjects achieving HbA1c < or = to 7.0%
Measured: Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionMay 2013
- Study completionJun 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Type 1 Diabetes MellitusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 518 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Mannkind Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01445951
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MKC-TI-171
- Status last verified
- Oct 2014
- First submitted
- 30 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2014
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Seaquist ER, Blonde L, McGill JB, Heller SR, Kendall DM, Bumpass JB, Pompilio FM, Grant ML. Hypoglycaemia is reduced with use of inhaled Technosphere(R) Insulin relative to insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2020 May;37(5):752-759. doi: 10.1111/dme.14202. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
PubMed 31811662Bode BW, McGill JB, Lorber DL, Gross JL, Chang PC, Bregman DB; Affinity 1 Study Group. Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Compared With Injected Prandial Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized 24-Week Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015 Dec;38(12):2266-73. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0075. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
PubMed 26180109
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized, Forced-titration Clinical Trial Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Technosphere® Insulin Inhalation Powder in Combination With a Basal Insulin Versus Insulin Aspart in Combination With a Basal Insulin in Subjects With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Over a 24-week Treatment Period
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01445951
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MKC-TI-171
- Conditions
- Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 518 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Mannkind CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 22 Oct 2014
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Open-label, randomized, forced-titration clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of TI Inhalation Power in combination with a basal insulin versus insulin aspart in combination with a basal insulin
Detailed description
Phase 3 clinical trial designed to examine the efficacy and safety of inhaled prandial TI Inhalation Power in combination with basal insulin versus insulin aspart in combination with basal insulin in subjects with type 1 diabetes who are suboptimally controlled with their current insulin regimens. This trial will employ a variety of methods to intensively manage these subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler | Experimental | Drug: Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C InhalerSubjects will receive TI with the MedToneC inhaler and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry |
| Aspart Group | Active comparator | Drug: Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulinSubjects will receive insulin aspart and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry |
| Technosphere ® Insulin-Gen2 Group | Experimental | Drug: Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 InhalerSubject will receive Technosphere Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler and remain on the basal insulin they were taking prior to study entry |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Men and women = 18 years of age
- Clinical diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus for at least 12 months
- Body mass index (BMI) = 38 kg/m2
- Stable dose of basal/bolus insulin therapy for at least 3 months with an FPG consistently < 220 mg/dL:
- HbA1c = 7.5% and = 10.0%
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Total daily insulin dose = 2 IU/kg/day. History of insulin pump use within 3 months of Screening or use of continuous glucose monitoring within 6 weeks of Screening
- History of inhaled insulin use in the previous 6 months
- Two or more unexplained severe hypoglycemic episodes within 3 months of Screening or an episode of severe hypoglycemia between Visit 1 and Visit 2. Unexplained refers to episodes of severe hypoglycemia that are not related to a dosing error, lack of or a change in meal size, or related to additional/unanticipated exercise
- Any hospitalization or emergency room visit due to poor diabetic control within 6 months of Screening, or hospitalization or emergency room visit due to poor diabetic control between Visit 1 and Visit 2
- Allergy or known hypersensitivity to insulin or to any of the drugs to be used in the study, or a history of hypersensitivity to TI Inhalation Powder or to drugs with a similar chemical structure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C InhalerInhalation Powder and injectable insulin | Drug | Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler |
| Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 InhalerInhalation Powder and injectable insulin | Drug | Technosphere ® Insulin-Gen2 Group |
| Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulinInjectable insulin | Drug | Aspart Group |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in HbA1c
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Effect of treatment as measured by change from baseline in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c). Primary treatment difference is TI-Gen2 vs. Insulin Aspart at Week 24
6 secondary outcomes
FEV1 Change From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
FPG Change From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Mean 7-point Glucose Baseline Values
Time frame: Baseline
Mean 7-point Glucose Week 24 Values
Time frame: Week 24
Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 24
Time frame: Baseline to Week 24
Proportion of Responders Achieving HbA1c <= 7.0%
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2014.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31811662Seaquist ER, Blonde L, McGill JB, Heller SR, Kendall DM, Bumpass JB, Pompilio FM, Grant ML. Hypoglycaemia is reduced with use of inhaled Technosphere(R) Insulin relative to insulin aspart in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2020 May;37(5):752-759. doi: 10.1111/dme.14202. Epub 2019 Dec 19.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 26180109Bode BW, McGill JB, Lorber DL, Gross JL, Chang PC, Bregman DB; Affinity 1 Study Group. Inhaled Technosphere Insulin Compared With Injected Prandial Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized 24-Week Trial. Diabetes Care. 2015 Dec;38(12):2266-73. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0075. Epub 2015 Jul 15.
Related trials for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness and Safety of the Drug AZD6234 for Managing Weight in Adults Who Are Obese or Overweight. These Participants May or May Not Also Have Type 2 Diabetes
Obesity, Overweight
RecruitingPhase 1
Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Immunogenicity Comparison of Bmab1700 and Opdivo® as Adjuvant Monotherapy in Participants With Melanoma
Melanoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study of Botensilimab and Balstilimab for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Not yet recruiting
Inter-Arm Differences in Continuous Glucose Monitor Readings in Adults With Diabetes
Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes
RecruitingObservational study
Estimated Risk of Preeclampsia in the First Trimester and Its Association With Subclinical Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Risk in Women With Type 1 Diabetes
Type 1 Diabetes, Preeclampsia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
90 sites in 4 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Technosphere® Insulin with MedTone C Inhaler, Technosphere ®Insulin with Gen2 Inhaler and Insulin Aspart in combination with a basal insulin in people with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, run by Mannkind Corporation at 90 sites in 4 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 90 sites in United States, Russia, Ukraine, Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 22 Oct 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline to Week 24 in HbA1c (time frame: Baseline to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01445951, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2014.