HealthyPhase 2/3dlpNCT01451866
Comparison Between Classic Leg-press Training and Complex Leg-press Training on a Dynamic Leg-press
A Phase 2/3 study testing resistance training and complex resistance training in people with Healthy, run by University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
A complex training on a dynamic leg-press with visual feed-back will improve coordinative capacity, power, sensorimotor and cognitive aspects more than a classic training on the same leg-press but without visual feed-back. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Healthy
- What is being tested?
- resistance training and complex resistance training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 34 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to Nov 2011
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy adult (>18yrs) participants
- Able to do resistance training
Who cannot join
- Recent injuries preventing resistance training
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Swiss Olympic Medical Center Leukerbad
Leukerbad, Valais, 3954
About this study
Official title: Comparison of a Classic Leg-press Training Compared to a Complex Training on a Dynamic Leg-press With Visual Feed-back. Pilot-study
A complex training on a dynamic leg-press with visual feed-back will improve coordinative capacity, power, sensorimotor and cognitive aspects more than a classic training on the same leg-press but without visual feed-back.
Read the detailed description
The project evaluates two different resistance training programs on a leg press. One group will perform a standard resistance training with the aim of muscle hypertrophia, the other group will perform a complex resistance training combining rate of force development training, power training, speed endurance as well as sensorimotor aspects (i.e. following visual feedback to reproduce given forces or joint angles).
Hypotheses: Participants in the complex training group will change the relation between counter movement jump and squat jump, i.e. they will more improve in the counter movement jump because of improved sensorimotor capacity.
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Being tested
- resistance training, complex resistance training
- Keywords
- resistance training, Healthy People Programs
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
resistance trainingOther
hypertrophic resistance training
complex resistance trainingOther
complex resistance training with speed, excentric and power-endurance elements
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| classic leg-press training | Active comparator | Classic resistance training on the dynamic leg press. 6 x 8 repetitions at 60% 1 RM Receives: Other: resistance training |
| Complex leg-press training | Experimental | Complex leg-press training with visual feed-back on a dynamic leg-press. Receives: Other: complex resistance training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
coordination
coordination, i.e. sensorimotor capacity measured with (a) the difference between counter-movement jump and squat jump and (b) with a test for dynamic joint-position sense on the dynamic leg press
Measured: 5 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Power
power measured on the dynamic leg press and with the squat jumps
Measured: 5 weeks
Balance
Balance measured with the Star Excursion Balance Test
Measured: 5 weeks
Power - Endurance
Repeated power production during a repeated chair rise test where participants rise from a chair during one minute with two second rest between rises.
Measured: 5 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completionNov 2011
- Study completionNov 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for HealthyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Roger Hilfiker, University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland
- Investigators
- Roger Hilfiker, MPTSc., Study chair, HES-SO Valais
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01451866
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BA09_DLP
- Acronym
- dlp
- Status last verified
- Nov 2014
- First submitted
- 26 Sep 2011
- Last updated
- 25 Nov 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Nov 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of a Classic Leg-press Training Compared to a Complex Training on a Dynamic Leg-press With Visual Feed-back. Pilot-study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01451866
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- dlp / BA09_DLP
- Conditions
- Healthy
- Keywords
- resistance training, Healthy People Programs
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 34 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Applied Sciences of Western SwitzerlandUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Nov 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A complex training on a dynamic leg-press with visual feed-back will improve coordinative capacity, power, sensorimotor and cognitive aspects more than a classic training on the same leg-press but without visual feed-back.
Detailed description
The project evaluates two different resistance training programs on a leg press. One group will perform a standard resistance training with the aim of muscle hypertrophia, the other group will perform a complex resistance training combining rate of force development training, power training, speed endurance as well as sensorimotor aspects (i.e. following visual feedback to reproduce given forces or joint angles).
Hypotheses: Participants in the complex training group will change the relation between counter movement jump and squat jump, i.e. they will more improve in the counter movement jump because of improved sensorimotor capacity.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| classic leg-press training | Active comparator | Other: resistance trainingClassic resistance training on the dynamic leg press. 6 x 8 repetitions at 60% 1 RM |
| Complex leg-press training | Experimental | Other: complex resistance trainingComplex leg-press training with visual feed-back on a dynamic leg-press. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Healthy adult (>18yrs) participants
- Able to do resistance training
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Recent injuries preventing resistance training
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| resistance traininghypertrophic resistance training | Other | classic leg-press training |
| complex resistance trainingcomplex resistance training with speed, excentric and power-endurance elements | Other | Complex leg-press training |
Primary outcome
coordination
Time frame: 5 weeks
coordination, i.e. sensorimotor capacity measured with (a) the difference between counter-movement jump and squat jump and (b) with a test for dynamic joint-position sense on the dynamic leg press
3 secondary outcomes
Power
Time frame: 5 weeks
Balance
Time frame: 5 weeks
Power - Endurance
Time frame: 5 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Nov 2014.
Related trials for Healthy
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Human Subarachnoid Space Using Intrathecal Gadolinium Contrast
Healthy Volunteers
RecruitingObservational study
Survey to Determine Incarcerated Persons' Views on Surrogate Decision Making
Healthy Volunteers
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn How Different Amounts of the Study Medicine Called PF-07985631 Are Tolerated and Act in the Body of Healthy Adults
Healthy
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Collection and Distribution of Blood Components From Healthy Donors for In Vitro Research Use
Blood Donors, Apheresis
Recruiting
Metabolic Impact of VLCPUFA-Rich Fish Oil: A Clinical Study on Omega-3 Index Enhancement in Healthy Individuals
Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Fish Oils
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Roger Hilfiker, MPTSc. study chair
HES-SO Valais
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing resistance training and complex resistance training in people with Healthy, run by University of Applied Sciences of Western Switzerland at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Nov 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
coordination (time frame: 5 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Nov 2014.