AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2Phase 3NCT01453049

An Efficacy and Safety Study of Fixed-dose Rosiglitazone/Glimepiride to Treat Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Patients

A Phase 3 study testing rosiglitazone/glimepiride fix dose combination and glimepiride in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 12 sites in China.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the rosiglitazone/glimepiride fixed-dose combination tablet will safely and effectively control glycemia as first-line oral therapy in drug naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
What is being tested?
rosiglitazone/glimepiride fix dose combination and glimepiride
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
86 participants
Where
12 sitesChina
Study dates
Apr 2010to Oct 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • type 2 diabetes mellitus
  • HbA1c between 7.5% and 11.0% at screening
  • FPG between 7.0mmol/L and 13.3mmol/L at screening and at randomization visit
  • subject was treated with diet and/or exercise alone
  • QTc<450mesc or QTc<480msec for patients with bundle branch block
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) >19kg/m2
  • Subject has given written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Documented history of significant hypersensitivity to thiazolidinediones, sulfonylureas, or compounds with similar chemical structures
  • Ongoing edema or history of edema requiring pharmacological treatment in the 12 months prior to screening
  • Presence of ischemic heart disease and/or peripheral arterial disease, or NYHA grade I-IV congestive heart failure
  • Taking nitrates
  • Clinically significant renal or hepatic disease
  • Anemia
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Severe hypertriglyceridemia (TG>=5.65mmol/L)
  • Use of oral corticosteroids and Nicotinic acid
  • Systolic blood pressure <170mmHg, or diastolic blood pressure > 100mmHg while on anti-hypertensive treatment
  • Hyperthyroidism requiring treatment
  • Diagnosed macular edema
  • Women who are lactating, pregnant, or planning to become pregnant
  • Presence of an active cancer or recently treated for cancer
  • Drug/alcohol abuse
  • Unwilling or unable to comply with the procedures described in the protocol

Trial locations and contacts

12 sites in 1 country.

12 sites in 1 country

China12 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100029

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Beijing, 100730

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Chongqing, 400016

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dalian, Liaoning, 116027

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shanghai, 200080

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Shenyang, 110003

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215004

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Tianjin, 300052

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wuhan, Hubei, 430030

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Wuhan, 430022

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel-group Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Fixed-dose Rosiglitazone/Glimepiride Combination Therapy With Glimepiride Monotherapy for 24 Weeks in Drug Naive Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the rosiglitazone/glimepiride fixed-dose combination tablet will safely and effectively control glycemia as first-line oral therapy in drug naïve subjects with type 2 diabetes. This 24-week study will compare the effects of treatment with rosiglitazone/glimepiride to treatment with glimepiride alone. The primary objective is to demonstrate superiority of rosiglitazone/glimepiride to glimepiride in lowering Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c).

Read the detailed description

The antihyperglycemic effect of the thiazolidinedione (TZD) class of oral antidiabetic agents is due to their ability to increase insulin sensitivity at the cellular level, which in turn improves the ability of endogenous insulin to regulate glucose utilization by the tissues. Compounds of the sulfonylurea (SU) class act to stimulate insulin production by the pancreas, overcoming insulin resistance by increasing circulating insulin levels. The mechanisms of two kind OADs may be viewed as complementary, offering the opportunity for improved efficacy and durability of effect through coadministration of a TZD and a sulfonylurea.

Successful management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) requires aggressive glycemic control starting at the earliest stages of the disease. Rosiglitazone/glimepiride combination therapy, with complementary mechanisms of action, has the potential to provide significant benefits over monotherapy as first line therapy. Treatment with rosiglitazone/glimepiride at this early stage of diabetes is expected to provide better glycemic control and allow a greater proportion of patients to achieve target glycemic goals than oral monotherapy.

This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, parallel, study to compare the effects of treatment with rosiglitazone/glimepiride combination or glimepiride in drug naïve T2 DM patients.

Being tested
rosiglitazone/glimepiride fix dose combination, glimepiride
Keywords
rosiglitazone/glimepiride, fix dose, type 2 diabetes
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • rosiglitazone/glimepiride fix dose combinationDrug

    Also called Avandaryl

    oral, once daily, dosage is titrated according to FPG and hypoglycemia events

  • glimepirideDrug

    Also called Amaryl

    oral, once daily, dosage is titrated according to FPG and hypoglycemia

Study groups in NCT01453049
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
fix dose of rosiglitazone/glimepirideExperimental4mg/1mg, 4mg/2mg, 4mg/4mg
Receives: Drug: rosiglitazone/glimepiride fix dose combination
glimepirideActive comparator1mg, 2mg, 4mg
Receives: Drug: glimepiride

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24

    Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The American Diabetes Association has recommended an HbA1c value below 53 millimoles per mole (mmol/mol) (7.0%) for most participants. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (32)
  1. Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 24

    Blood samples of participants were collected for FPG assessment. The FPG test, also known as the fasting blood sugar test, measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. Change from Baseline in FBG was calculated as the value at Week 24 minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  2. Number of HbA1c Responders and Non-responders

    Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c responders were defined as participants who had achieved HbA1c <7%, or who achieved a decrease of >= 0.7% from Baseline at Week 24 (LOCF).

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (LOCF)

  3. Number of FPG Responders and Non-responders

    Blood samples of participants were collected for FPG assessment. FPG responders are definded as participants who had a >=1.7 mmol/L decrease from Baseline FPG or who achieved a FPG level < 6.1 mmol/L at Week 24 (LOCF).

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (LOCF)

  4. Number of Participants Who Achieved HbA1c <7%, HbA1c <=6.5%, or Who Achieved a Decrease of >=0.7% From Baseline

    Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24 (LOCF)

  5. Change From Baseline in Fasting Proinsulin and Insulin at Week 24/Early Withdrawal (EW)

    Blood samples of participants who had fasted for 12-14 hours were collected for fasting proinsulin (precursor of insulin) and insulin assessment. Preproinsulin is sequentially processed via proinsulin, through intermediate proteolytic cleavage products, to insulin and C-peptide before release from the beta cell granule by exocytosis. Elevated levels of proinsulin are considered indicative of beta cell dysfunction. Insulin is a hormone that regulates carbohydrate and fat metabolism in the body. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 24/ EW minus the value at Baseline (Week 0).

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  6. Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment Sensitivity (HOMA-S) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants who had fasted for 12-14 hours were collected for fasting glucose (FG) and insulin (FI) assessment. The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance (a condition in which natural hormone insulin becomes less effective in lowering blood sugars) and beta-cell (specialized cells in the pancreas producing insulin) function. HOMA-S is calculated using the following model to predict glucose and insulin concentrations=(FI[milliunits (mU)/milliliter (ml)]*FG [millimoles per liter (mmol/l)])/22.5. numerator, num.; denominator, denom.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  7. Change From Baseline in Homeostasis Model Assessment Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants who had fasted for 12 to 14 hours were collected for fasting glucose (FG) and insulin (FI) assessment. The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance (a condition in which natural hormone insulin becomes less effective in lowering blood sugars) and beta-cell (specialized cells in the pancreas producing insulin) function. HOMA-B is calculated using the following mathematical model to predict glucose and insulin concentrations=(20*FI[mU/ml])/(FG[mmol/l]-3.5).

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  8. Number of Participants at Various Dose Levels at Week 24/EW

    The number of participants at the different dose levels at Week 24/EW was recorded. The different dose levels for Rosi + Glim are: Dose level 1, Rosi 4 mg + Glim 1 mg; Dose level 2, Rosi 4 mg + Glim 2 mg; Dose level 3, Rosi 4 mg + Glim 4 mg. The different dose levels for Glim are: Dose level 1, Glim 1 mg; Dose level 2, Glim 2 mg; Dose level 3, Glim 4 mg.

    Measured: Week 24/EW

  9. Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C), Low Density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C), and Triglyceride (TG) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants who had fasted for 12 to 14 hours were collected for lipid profile (TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, TG) assessment. The lipid profile asesses the risk of heart disease. Change from Baseline in TC, HDL-C, LDL-C, and TG was calculated as the value at Week 24)/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  10. Change From Baseline in Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN), Sodium, Potassium, Chloride, Calcium, and Phosphorus at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for BUN and electrolyte (sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and phosphorus) assessment. The electrolyte balance asseses the condition of the heart and the kidneys, and BUN assesses the condition of the kidneys. Change from Baseline in BUN, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and phosphorus was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  11. Change From Baseline in the Ratio of TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants who had fasted for 12 to 14 hours were collected for lipid profile (TC, HDL-C and LDL-C) assessment. The ratio of TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C was calculated. Change from Baseline in the ratio of TC/HDL-C and LDL-C/HDL-C was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline. For TC/HDL-C, the numerator is TC, and the denominator is HDL-C. For LDL-C/HDL-C, the numerator is LDL-C, and the denominator is HDL-C.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  12. Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for hs-CRP assessment. CRP is a marker of inflammation. High levels of CRP predict the risk of heart disease and diabetes. Change from Baseline in hs-CRP was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  13. Percent Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (Hs-CRP) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for hs-CRP assessment. CRP is a marker of inflammation. High levels of CRP predict the risk of heart disease and diabetes. Percent change from Baseline in hs-CRP was calculated as the value at Visit 8 (Wk 24)/ EW minus the value at Baseline divided by value at Wk 24/ EW multiplied by 100.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  14. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) at Week 24/EW

    EQ-5D is used as a measure of health outcome and includes single-item measures (coded on a 3-point scale [1, no problems; 2, some problems; 3, severe problems]) of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The instrument includes a global rating of current health using a visual analog scale (VAS): 0 (worst imaginable) to 100 (best imaginable). Health states may be converted to a single summary index by applying a formula that attaches values to each of the levels in each dimension. The index scale is -0.111 to 1. A lower index indicates worse health.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  15. Change From Baseline in Adjusted Diabetes Quality of Life (A-DQOL) Scores at Week 24/EW

    In diabetic participants, QOL, anxiety, and depression were measured by the A-DQOL scale . There are 46 core items (10 additional items for adolescents) and 4 major dimensions: treatment satisfaction, treatment impact, worry about long-term complications, and worry about social/vocational issues. Participants respond to all items on a 5-point Likert scale: 1, no impact, no worries, or always satisfied; 5, always affected, always worried, or never satisfied. The total score is a sum of the individual scores of all 46 items (range of 46 to 230); a lower score indicates a better QOL.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  16. Number of Participants With Hypoglycemic Events

    Blood samples of participants were collected for the assessment of blood glucose levels. Hypoglycemia is a condition that occurs when the blood glucose is below 70 mg/dL or 4 mmol/L. All participants; participants with HbA1c <7%, or who achieved a decrease of >= 0.7% from Baseline at Week 24 (HbA1c responders); and participants who had a >=1.7 mmol/L decrease from Baseline FPG or who achieved a FPG <6.1 mmol/L at Week 24 (FPG responders) were evaluated.

    Measured: Week 24/EW

  17. Number of Hypoglycemic Events

    A hypoglycemic event is a condition that occurs when the blood glucose is below 70 mg/dL or 4 mmol/L. All participants, participants with HbA1c <7%, or who achieved a decrease of >= 0.7% from Baseline at Week 24 (HbA1c responders); and participants who had a >=1.7 mmol/L decrease from Baseline FPG or who achieved a FPG <6.1 mmol/L at Week 24 (FPG responders) were evaluated.

    Measured: Week 24/EW

  18. Number of Participants With a Bone Fracture

    Participants with a break in the continuity (fracture) of the bone were evaluated.

    Measured: Week 24/EW

  19. Change From Baseline in White Blood Cell (WBC) Count and Platelet Count at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for WBC count and platelet count assessment. Change from Baseline in WBC count and platelet count was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  20. Change From Baseline in Red Blood Cell (RBC) Count at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for RBC count assessment. Change from Baseline in RBC count was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  21. Change From Baseline in Lymphocytes, Monocytes, Neutrophils, Eosinophils, and Basophils at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for lymphocyte, monocyte, neutrophil, eosinophil, and basophil assessment. Change from Baseline in lymphocytes, monocytes, neutrophils, eosinophils, and basophils was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  22. Change From Baseline in Hematocrit (HCT) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for HCT assessment. Change from Baseline in HCT was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline. HCT is measured as the percentage of the volume of whole blood that is made up of red blood cells.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  23. Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin (HE), Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC), Total Protein (TP), and Albumin at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for HE, MCHC, and TP assessment. Change from Baseline in HE, MCHC, and TP was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  24. Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for MCV assessment. Change from Baseline in MCV was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline. MCV is the average size of the red blood cells expressed in femtoliters. MCV is calculated by dividing the hematocrit (as percent) by the RBC count in millions per microliter of blood, then multiplying by 10. MCV is one of the three main RBC indices that are helpful in determining the cause of anemia.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  25. Change From Baseline in Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for MCH assessment. Change from Baseline in MCH was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline. MCH is the average amount of hemoblobin inside a RBC expressed in picograms. MCH is calculated by dividing the hemoglobin concentration in grams per deciliter by the RBC count in millions per microliter, then multiplying by 10. MCH is one of the three main RBC indices which are helpful to determine the cause of anemia.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  26. Change From Baseline in Alanine Transaminase (ALT), Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), Gamma-glutamyl Transpeptidase (GGT), Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), Alkaline Phosphatase (ALP), and Creatine Kinase (CK) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for ALT, AST, GGT, LDH, ALP, and CK assessment. Change from Baseline in ALT, AST, GGT, LDH, ALP, and CK was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  27. Change From Baseline in Total Bilirubin (TB), Direct Bilirubin (DB), Creatinine, and Uric Acid (UC) at Week 24/EW

    Blood samples of participants were collected for TB, DB, creatinine, and UC assessment. Change from Baseline in TB, DB, creatinine, and UC was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  28. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 24/EW

    The blood pressure of the participants was measured. Change from Baseline in SBP and DBP was calculated as the value at Weeks 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  29. Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Week 24/EW

    The heart rate of the participants was measured. Change from Baseline in heart rate was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  30. Change From Baseline in Weight at Week 24/EW

    The weight of the participants was measured. Change from Baseline in weight was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  31. Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Assessment of Heart Rate at Week 24/EW

    Electrocardiograms of the participants were taken for the evaluation of heart rate. Change from Baseline in heart rate was calculated as the value at Week 24/EW minus the value at Baseline.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

  32. Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data at Week 24/EW

    PR, QT, QTc, RR, QRS, and QRS axis data were measured by ECG. The PR interval (int.) starts at the beginning of the atrial contraction and ends at the beginning of the ventricular contraction. QT (QT int.) and QTc (corrected QT int.) indicate how fast the ventricles are repolarized, becoming ready for a new cycle. The RR int. represents the duration of the ventricular cardiac cycle and is an indicator of ventricular rate. QRS (QRS duration) indicates how fast the ventricles depolarize. The QRS axis is an indicator of the electrical heart axis, which is an average of all heart depolarization.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24/EW

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2010
  3. Primary completionOct 2010
  4. Study completionOct 2010

Why it stopped: US FDA/EMA/SFDA decisions to rosiglitazone-containing medicines, ethic

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
86 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01453049
Sponsor's protocol ID
113263
Status last verified
Dec 2011
First submitted
13 Oct 2011
Last updated
27 Mar 2012
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing rosiglitazone/glimepiride fix dose combination and glimepiride in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 12 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Mar 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 12 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 13 Jan 2012). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 24 (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Mar 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in