AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical CareNCT01453309

Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions

A study testing Cell Saver and No Cell Saver in people with Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care, run by Norton Leatherman Spine Center at 1 site in United States.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
What is being tested?
Cell Saver and No Cell Saver
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
240 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Oct 2011to Oct 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 18 years of age at time of enrollment
  • Signed informed consent
  • Requires fusion of 2 to 3 levels from L1-S1 for degenerative lumbar disorders

Who cannot join

  • Spinal trauma/fracture/malignancy
  • Infection as an indication for surgery
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Prisoners
  • Institutionalized in a non-voluntary and/or dependent residence (including hospitals, group homes, etc.), who may not be competent to give informed consent.
  • Inability to speak or understand English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Norton Leatherman Spine Center

    Louisville, Kentucky, 40202

    502-744-0468

    Mladen Djurasovic, MD

Other trials in United States

About this study

The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION:

Cell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient. Although the theoretical benefits of using a cell saver are attractive, the literature seems to be controversial with respect to efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The benefits are clear in patients undergoing fusions for scoliosis that involve more than 5 levels where blood loss is considered substantial. It is less clear in patients who undergo a more limited two to three level lumbar fusion.

The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions.

METHODS Patients seen at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center scheduled to have decompression and fusion over 2 to 3 lumbar spine segments will be screened for the study. After obtaining informed consent, patients will be randomized to have a cell saver used intraoperatively (Cell Saver group) or no cell saver (Non-Cell Saver group). Data to be collected will include age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin) medications used to decrease intraoperative bleeding (Aprotinin, Tranexamic Acid); the use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time, complications, length of stay, discharge information, whether or not patient pre-donated blood, hemoglobin, hematocrit and maximum body temperature prior to surgery and during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively and the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion. The costs associated with the use of the cell-saver and/or blood transfusions, including supplies and personnel time, will be determined.

Randomization Randomization will be through stratified block randomization to allow for stratification of the number of levels fused. Randomization will use sealed envelopes.

Sample Size To detect a medium effect size of 0.3 with an α error of 0.05, a total of 220 subjects need to be included in the analysis. To account for subject withdrawal, a total of 240 subjects will be enrolled

Procedures Patients receiving care at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center will be screened as potential subjects for the study. Only the existing information obtained per standard routine medical procedures will be used. Patients who fail pre-screening will not be recorded on any log or form. Patients considered potential candidates for the study based on screening will sign an Institutional Review Board -approved Informed Consent Document and HIPAA Authorization form prior to participating in any study activity.

Subjects will be randomized to receive or not receive cell saver during surgery. The following data will be collected during the clinic visit: age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin). The following pre-operative data will be collected: hemoglobin, hematocrit, body temperature and whether or not patient pre-donated blood, the predonated blood volume and date of donation.

Surgery will be performed per the standard of care of the treating surgeon. The choice of surgical approach, instrumentation and bone grafts/bone graft substitutes will be at the discretion of the surgeon. The following intraoperative data will be collected: use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time products transfused intraoperatively. In the subjects randomized to the Cell Saver group, the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion will be determined and collected. In-hospital post-operative data to be collected include: complications, length of stay, discharge information, hematocrit, hemoglobin and maximum body temperature during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused postoperatively.

Subjects will be transfused at a set transfusion threshold of hemoglobin of 7.0g/dL or below and corresponding hematocrit of 21 or below. Subjects with Hb 7.0g/dL and are symptomatic as evidenced by tachycardia, hypotension, orthostatic hypotension or have pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease will also be transfused.

The risks that occur in this study are associated with the general risks of spine surgery. Risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusion include allergic reactions, hemolytic reactions, isoimmunization, graft versus host reactions, increased infection rates, and transmission of bloodborne pathogens, including human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. Risks associated with the use of a cell saver include a paradoxical increase in blood loss, electrolyte depletion, metabolic acidosis, and hematuria

Endpoints The primary endpoint is the volume of blood transfusion required. Secondary endpoints include

  • Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
  • Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
  • Volume of blood products used post-operatively

Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics, including frequency counts for discrete variables and measures of central tendency (means, medians) and dispersion (standard deviation, range) for continuous variables will be calculated. Comparisons between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be done with independent t test for continuous variables and χ2 tests for discrete variables. To determine the effects of potentially confounding variables, analysis of covariance to compare the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be used. This will help identify variables that may be statistically different between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups that could potentially influence the total units of blood transfused. Those variables that were significantly related (i.e., correlated) with the number of units of blood transfused will be entered as covariates into the statistical model to determine if they affect the statistical conclusions between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups. All analyses will performed an a priori alpha level of 0.05 using IBM SPSS version 19.0.

Funding This study will be unfunded.

Being tested
Cell Saver, No Cell Saver
Keywords
lumbar fusion, transfusion, cell-saver, cost-effectiveness

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cell SaverProcedure or surgery

    Cell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient.

  • No Cell SaverProcedure or surgery

    Cell Saver will not be available during surgery

Study groups in NCT01453309
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cell SaverActive comparatorPatients will have the use of a cell-saver during surgery
Receives: Procedure: Cell Saver
No Cell saverPlacebo comparatorPatient will not have cell saver available during surgery.
Receives: Procedure: No Cell Saver

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Volume of blood transfused

    The total volume of blood and blood products transfused during surgery an during hospitalization will be determined

    Measured: Hospitalization, range of 3 to 14 days

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Immediate post-op Hematocrit level

    Immediate post-op Hematocrit level

    Measured: Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days

  2. Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level

    Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level

    Measured: Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2011
  3. Primary completionOct 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
240 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01453309
Sponsor's protocol ID
11-N0216
Status last verified
Oct 2011
First submitted
10 Oct 2011
Last updated
17 Oct 2011
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cell Saver and No Cell Saver in people with Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care, run by Norton Leatherman Spine Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Leah Y Carreon, MD, MSc (502 992 0488 ext. 139, leah.carreon@nortonhealthcare.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Volume of blood transfused (time frame: Hospitalization, range of 3 to 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2011.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in