Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical CareNCT01453309
Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions
A study testing Cell Saver and No Cell Saver in people with Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care, run by Norton Leatherman Spine Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care
- What is being tested?
- Cell Saver and No Cell Saver
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 240 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- At least 18 years of age at time of enrollment
- Signed informed consent
- Requires fusion of 2 to 3 levels from L1-S1 for degenerative lumbar disorders
Who cannot join
- Spinal trauma/fracture/malignancy
- Infection as an indication for surgery
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Prisoners
- Institutionalized in a non-voluntary and/or dependent residence (including hospitals, group homes, etc.), who may not be competent to give informed consent.
- Inability to speak or understand English
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
Louisville, Kentucky, 40202
502-744-0468
Mladen Djurasovic, MD
About this study
The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions.
Read the detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
Cell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient. Although the theoretical benefits of using a cell saver are attractive, the literature seems to be controversial with respect to efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The benefits are clear in patients undergoing fusions for scoliosis that involve more than 5 levels where blood loss is considered substantial. It is less clear in patients who undergo a more limited two to three level lumbar fusion.
The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions.
METHODS Patients seen at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center scheduled to have decompression and fusion over 2 to 3 lumbar spine segments will be screened for the study. After obtaining informed consent, patients will be randomized to have a cell saver used intraoperatively (Cell Saver group) or no cell saver (Non-Cell Saver group). Data to be collected will include age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin) medications used to decrease intraoperative bleeding (Aprotinin, Tranexamic Acid); the use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time, complications, length of stay, discharge information, whether or not patient pre-donated blood, hemoglobin, hematocrit and maximum body temperature prior to surgery and during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively and the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion. The costs associated with the use of the cell-saver and/or blood transfusions, including supplies and personnel time, will be determined.
Randomization Randomization will be through stratified block randomization to allow for stratification of the number of levels fused. Randomization will use sealed envelopes.
Sample Size To detect a medium effect size of 0.3 with an α error of 0.05, a total of 220 subjects need to be included in the analysis. To account for subject withdrawal, a total of 240 subjects will be enrolled
Procedures Patients receiving care at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center will be screened as potential subjects for the study. Only the existing information obtained per standard routine medical procedures will be used. Patients who fail pre-screening will not be recorded on any log or form. Patients considered potential candidates for the study based on screening will sign an Institutional Review Board -approved Informed Consent Document and HIPAA Authorization form prior to participating in any study activity.
Subjects will be randomized to receive or not receive cell saver during surgery. The following data will be collected during the clinic visit: age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin). The following pre-operative data will be collected: hemoglobin, hematocrit, body temperature and whether or not patient pre-donated blood, the predonated blood volume and date of donation.
Surgery will be performed per the standard of care of the treating surgeon. The choice of surgical approach, instrumentation and bone grafts/bone graft substitutes will be at the discretion of the surgeon. The following intraoperative data will be collected: use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time products transfused intraoperatively. In the subjects randomized to the Cell Saver group, the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion will be determined and collected. In-hospital post-operative data to be collected include: complications, length of stay, discharge information, hematocrit, hemoglobin and maximum body temperature during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused postoperatively.
Subjects will be transfused at a set transfusion threshold of hemoglobin of 7.0g/dL or below and corresponding hematocrit of 21 or below. Subjects with Hb 7.0g/dL and are symptomatic as evidenced by tachycardia, hypotension, orthostatic hypotension or have pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease will also be transfused.
The risks that occur in this study are associated with the general risks of spine surgery. Risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusion include allergic reactions, hemolytic reactions, isoimmunization, graft versus host reactions, increased infection rates, and transmission of bloodborne pathogens, including human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. Risks associated with the use of a cell saver include a paradoxical increase in blood loss, electrolyte depletion, metabolic acidosis, and hematuria
Endpoints The primary endpoint is the volume of blood transfusion required. Secondary endpoints include
- Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
- Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
- Volume of blood products used post-operatively
Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics, including frequency counts for discrete variables and measures of central tendency (means, medians) and dispersion (standard deviation, range) for continuous variables will be calculated. Comparisons between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be done with independent t test for continuous variables and χ2 tests for discrete variables. To determine the effects of potentially confounding variables, analysis of covariance to compare the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be used. This will help identify variables that may be statistically different between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups that could potentially influence the total units of blood transfused. Those variables that were significantly related (i.e., correlated) with the number of units of blood transfused will be entered as covariates into the statistical model to determine if they affect the statistical conclusions between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups. All analyses will performed an a priori alpha level of 0.05 using IBM SPSS version 19.0.
Funding This study will be unfunded.
- Being tested
- Cell Saver, No Cell Saver
- Keywords
- lumbar fusion, transfusion, cell-saver, cost-effectiveness
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cell SaverProcedure or surgery
Cell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient.
No Cell SaverProcedure or surgery
Cell Saver will not be available during surgery
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Saver | Active comparator | Patients will have the use of a cell-saver during surgery Receives: Procedure: Cell Saver |
| No Cell saver | Placebo comparator | Patient will not have cell saver available during surgery. Receives: Procedure: No Cell Saver |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Volume of blood transfused
The total volume of blood and blood products transfused during surgery an during hospitalization will be determined
Measured: Hospitalization, range of 3 to 14 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
Measured: Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days
Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
Measured: Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionOct 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical CareStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Norton Leatherman Spine Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mladen Djurasovic, MD, Principal investigator, Norton Leatherman Spine Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01453309
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 11-N0216
- Status last verified
- Oct 2011
- First submitted
- 10 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 17 Oct 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Oct 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cost Effectiveness and Clinical Utility of Cell Saver Use for Two to Three Level Lumbar Fusions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01453309
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 11-N0216
- Keywords
- lumbar fusion, transfusion, cell-saver, cost-effectiveness
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 240 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Norton Leatherman Spine CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- Oct 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 17 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions.
Detailed description
INTRODUCTION:
Cell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient. Although the theoretical benefits of using a cell saver are attractive, the literature seems to be controversial with respect to efficacy and cost-effectiveness. The benefits are clear in patients undergoing fusions for scoliosis that involve more than 5 levels where blood loss is considered substantial. It is less clear in patients who undergo a more limited two to three level lumbar fusion.
The purpose of this study is to determine the cost-effectiveness of using a cell saver for 2 to 3 level lumbar fusions. A secondary objective is to determine if there will be a decrease in the number of allogenic blood transfusions when a cell saver is used intraoperatively. Another secondary objective is to determine incidence of complications associated with cell saver use and transfusions.
METHODS Patients seen at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center scheduled to have decompression and fusion over 2 to 3 lumbar spine segments will be screened for the study. After obtaining informed consent, patients will be randomized to have a cell saver used intraoperatively (Cell Saver group) or no cell saver (Non-Cell Saver group). Data to be collected will include age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin) medications used to decrease intraoperative bleeding (Aprotinin, Tranexamic Acid); the use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time, complications, length of stay, discharge information, whether or not patient pre-donated blood, hemoglobin, hematocrit and maximum body temperature prior to surgery and during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused intraoperatively and postoperatively and the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion. The costs associated with the use of the cell-saver and/or blood transfusions, including supplies and personnel time, will be determined.
Randomization Randomization will be through stratified block randomization to allow for stratification of the number of levels fused. Randomization will use sealed envelopes.
Sample Size To detect a medium effect size of 0.3 with an α error of 0.05, a total of 220 subjects need to be included in the analysis. To account for subject withdrawal, a total of 240 subjects will be enrolled
Procedures Patients receiving care at the Norton Leatherman Spine Center will be screened as potential subjects for the study. Only the existing information obtained per standard routine medical procedures will be used. Patients who fail pre-screening will not be recorded on any log or form. Patients considered potential candidates for the study based on screening will sign an Institutional Review Board -approved Informed Consent Document and HIPAA Authorization form prior to participating in any study activity.
Subjects will be randomized to receive or not receive cell saver during surgery. The following data will be collected during the clinic visit: age, gender, smoking status, height, weight, co-morbidities, the use of medications that may increase bleeding (Plavix, Coumadin, Warfarin), or increase blood production (Ferrous sulfate, erythropoietin). The following pre-operative data will be collected: hemoglobin, hematocrit, body temperature and whether or not patient pre-donated blood, the predonated blood volume and date of donation.
Surgery will be performed per the standard of care of the treating surgeon. The choice of surgical approach, instrumentation and bone grafts/bone graft substitutes will be at the discretion of the surgeon. The following intraoperative data will be collected: use of hypotensive anesthesia, ASA Grade, indications for surgery, date of surgery, estimated blood loss, surgical approach, surgical levels, bone graft used, operative time products transfused intraoperatively. In the subjects randomized to the Cell Saver group, the amount of cell saver salvaged, re-infused, and the cell-saver hematocrit and hemoglobin prior to re-infusion will be determined and collected. In-hospital post-operative data to be collected include: complications, length of stay, discharge information, hematocrit, hemoglobin and maximum body temperature during the patient's hospital stay, surgical drain output, products transfused postoperatively.
Subjects will be transfused at a set transfusion threshold of hemoglobin of 7.0g/dL or below and corresponding hematocrit of 21 or below. Subjects with Hb 7.0g/dL and are symptomatic as evidenced by tachycardia, hypotension, orthostatic hypotension or have pre-existing cardiac or pulmonary disease will also be transfused.
The risks that occur in this study are associated with the general risks of spine surgery. Risks associated with allogeneic blood transfusion include allergic reactions, hemolytic reactions, isoimmunization, graft versus host reactions, increased infection rates, and transmission of bloodborne pathogens, including human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis. Risks associated with the use of a cell saver include a paradoxical increase in blood loss, electrolyte depletion, metabolic acidosis, and hematuria
Endpoints The primary endpoint is the volume of blood transfusion required. Secondary endpoints include
- Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
- Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
- Volume of blood products used post-operatively
Statistical Analysis Descriptive statistics, including frequency counts for discrete variables and measures of central tendency (means, medians) and dispersion (standard deviation, range) for continuous variables will be calculated. Comparisons between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be done with independent t test for continuous variables and χ2 tests for discrete variables. To determine the effects of potentially confounding variables, analysis of covariance to compare the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups will be used. This will help identify variables that may be statistically different between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups that could potentially influence the total units of blood transfused. Those variables that were significantly related (i.e., correlated) with the number of units of blood transfused will be entered as covariates into the statistical model to determine if they affect the statistical conclusions between the Cell Saver and non-Cell Saver groups. All analyses will performed an a priori alpha level of 0.05 using IBM SPSS version 19.0.
Funding This study will be unfunded.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cell Saver | Active comparator | Procedure: Cell SaverPatients will have the use of a cell-saver during surgery |
| No Cell saver | Placebo comparator | Procedure: No Cell SaverPatient will not have cell saver available during surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- At least 18 years of age at time of enrollment
- Signed informed consent
- Requires fusion of 2 to 3 levels from L1-S1 for degenerative lumbar disorders
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Spinal trauma/fracture/malignancy
- Infection as an indication for surgery
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Prisoners
- Institutionalized in a non-voluntary and/or dependent residence (including hospitals, group homes, etc.), who may not be competent to give informed consent.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cell SaverCell Savers are used intraoperatively to decrease the risk of transfusion due to surgical blood loss. Blood collected from the operative field is anticoagulated, filtered, and stored in a reservoir. Once a set volume of blood has been collected in the reservoir, the blood is separated into its red blood cell and plasma components by use of a centrifuge. Red blood cells are washed with a crystalloid solution and then reinfused into the patient. | Procedure or surgery | Cell Saver |
| No Cell SaverCell Saver will not be available during surgery | Procedure or surgery | No Cell saver |
Primary outcome
Volume of blood transfused
Time frame: Hospitalization, range of 3 to 14 days
The total volume of blood and blood products transfused during surgery an during hospitalization will be determined
2 secondary outcomes
Immediate post-op Hematocrit level
Time frame: Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days
Immediate post-op Hemoglobin level
Time frame: Post-operative, range of 1 to 14 days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Oct 2011.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mladen Djurasovic, MD principal investigator
Norton Leatherman Spine Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cell Saver and No Cell Saver in people with Low Back Pain Unresponsive to Non-surgical Care, run by Norton Leatherman Spine Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Oct 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Leah Y Carreon, MD, MSc (502 992 0488 ext. 139, leah.carreon@nortonhealthcare.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Volume of blood transfused (time frame: Hospitalization, range of 3 to 14 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Oct 2011.