AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaPhase 3NCT01456897

A Long-term Trial of OPC-34712 in Patients With Schizophrenia

A Phase 3 study testing OPC-34712 in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 1 site in Japan.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term administration of OPC-34712 in patients with schizophrenia. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia
What is being tested?
OPC-34712
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
282 participants
Where
1 siteJapan
Study dates
Oct 2011to May 2015
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients age 18 years or older (at time of informed consent) diagnosed with schizophrenia based on DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria
  • Outpatients who are receiving an oral antipsychotic treatment (other than clozapine), who are considered to require maintenance therapy using antipsychotics, and for whom monotherapy with OPC-34712 is considered feasible

Who cannot join

  • Female patients who are breastfeeding or who have a positive pregnancy test (urine) result prior to receiving investigational medicinal product
  • Patients who are diagnosed with a disease other than schizophrenia (schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, delirium, dementia, amnesia, or other cognitive disorder) based on current DSM-IV-TR Axis Ι criteria, or who are diagnosed with a personality disorder (borderline, paranoid, histrionic, schizotypal, schizoid, or antisocial)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Japan1 site
  • Study site

    Kanto Region

Other trials in Japan

About this study

To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term administration of OPC-34712 in patients with schizophrenia.

Conditions
Schizophrenia
Being tested
OPC-34712
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • OPC-34712Drug

    orally administered once daily

Study groups in NCT01456897
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OPC-34712ExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: OPC-34712

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an AE that started after start of investigational medicinal product (IMP) treatment.

    Measured: From Baseline up to 52 Weeks

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score

    The PANSS consisted of 3 subscales with 30 symptom constructs (positive subscale (7): delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/perseckion, and hostility; negative subscale (7): blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and conversation flow, stereotyped thinking and general psychopathology subscale (16): somatic concern, anxiety, guilt feelings, tension, mannerisms and posturing, depression, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, disorientation, poor attention, lack of judgment and insight, disturbance of volition, poor impulse control, preoccupation, and active social avoidance). Severity was rated on 7-point scale with scores 1 (absence) \& 7 (extremely severe). The PANSS Total score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).

    Measured: From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score

    The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. In PANSS positive subscale, the 7 positive symptom constructs were: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS positive subscale score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome).

    Measured: From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score

    The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. In PANSS negative subscale the severity was rated for the following 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS negative subscale score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome).

    Measured: From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S)

    Severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S, which was the secondary efficacy endpoint. To perform this assessment, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.

    Measured: From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)

  5. Mean Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement(CGI-I)

    The efficacy of trial medication was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The study physician would rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at Baseline prior to the first dose of study medication. Response choices included: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

    Measured: From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2011
  3. Primary completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
282 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01456897
Sponsor's protocol ID
331-10-003
Other IDs
JapicCTI-111632
Status last verified
Oct 2016
First submitted
11 Oct 2011
Last updated
30 Dec 2019
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Ishigooka J, Usami T, Iwashita S, Kojima Y, Matsuo S. Post-hoc analysis investigating the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole in Japanese patients with schizophrenia who were switched from other antipsychotics in a long-term study (Secondary Publication). Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2020 Jun;40(2):122-129. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12107. Epub 2020 Apr 15.

    PubMed 32297486

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing OPC-34712 in people with Schizophrenia, run by Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. at 1 site in Japan.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Dec 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 30 Dec 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (time frame: From Baseline up to 52 Weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01456897, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Dec 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in