Soft Tissue SarcomaPhase 2NCT01458249
An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin Mesylate in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma (Study E7389-J081-217)
A Phase 2 study testing eribulin mesylate in people with Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by Eisai Co., Ltd. at 12 sites in Japan.
Trial summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate in subjects with soft tissue sarcoma who received at least one standard chemotherapy (an anthracycline or an ifosfamide monotherapy or a combination therapy). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- What is being tested?
- eribulin mesylate
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 52 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesJapan
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Feb 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of high or intermediate grade
- Documented evidence of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy
- Within 6 months from the radiographic evidence of disease progression by RECIST criteria in the last chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
- Presence of measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
- Subjects who received at least one standard chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (an anthracycline or an ifosfamide monotherapy, or a combination therapy)
- Subjects aged ≥ 20 years at the time of informed consent
Show all 9Show fewer
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) of 0 or 1
- Adequate organ function
- Voluntary agreement to provide written informed consent
Who cannot join
- A history of malignancies or recurrence within 5 years after the remission
- Significant cardiovascular impairment
- Any serious concomitant illness or infection requiring treatment.
- Hypersensitivity to either halichondrin B or halichondrin B chemical derivatives or both.
- Subjects who have previously participated in a study with eribulin (whether treated with eribulin or not).
- Any medical or other condition which, in the opinion of the principal investigator, will preclude participation in a clinical trial.
Show all 12Show fewer
- Subjects who have received any anti-cancer therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, cytotoxic, hormonal, biological (including humanized antibodies) and targeted agents within 21 days, or any investigational agent within 30 days, prior to the first dose of study drug.
- Subjects who have not recovered from toxicities as a result of prior anti-cancer therapy to ≤ Grade 1, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), except for peripheral neuropathy of Grade 2 and alopecia.
- Subjects with known cerebral metastases with clinical symptoms or requiring treatment.
- Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy > CTCAE Grade 2.
- Female subjects must not be pregnant with a negative by the pregnancy test at Screening, or breastfeeding.
- Subjects participating in other clinical trials
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
Japan12 sites
Study site
Bunkyo, Tokyo
Study site
Chuo-ku, Tokyo
Study site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka
Study site
Hidaka, Hokkaido
Study site
Kashiwa, Chiba
Study site
Nagoya, Aichi-ken
Study site
Okayama, Okayama-ken
Study site
Osaka, Osaka
Study site
Sapporo, Hokkaido
Study site
Shinjuku, Tokyo
Study site
Suita, Osaka
Study site
Tsu, Mie-ken
About this study
Official title: An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin Mesylate in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate in subjects with soft tissue sarcoma who received at least one standard chemotherapy (an anthracycline or an ifosfamide monotherapy or a combination therapy).
- Conditions
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Being tested
- eribulin mesylate
- Keywords
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Medical subject headings
- Sarcoma
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
eribulin mesylateDrug
Also called E7389
Administration of eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m^2 as an IV bolus infusion over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: eribulin mesylate |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression-free Rate at 12 Weeks (PFR12wks)
The PFR at 12 weeks was the percentage of participants with progression-free survival (success) measured as a binary variable based on the tumor response assessed at Week 12 after the start of study treatment. Participants were considered a success if one radiological evaluation performed at least Week 12 after start of therapy indicated stable disease (SD), or complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1); all other cases were considered as failures (including disease progression or death before the Week 12 evaluation, or had unknown disease status at Week 12). If new anticancer treatments were started before the Week 12 evaluation, participants were considered failures. A 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the exact method of binomial distribution.
Measured: Week 12
Secondary outcomes (7)
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the first documented date of event (disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first). PFS was assessed every six weeks (until disease progression was confirmed, or sooner, if clinically indicated) and was based on Investigator and Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessments according to RECIST v1.1. Disease progression was measured using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on targeted tumors and defined as at least a 20% relative increase and 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study), recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. A 95% CI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula. A generalized Brookmeyer and Crowley method was used to construct a log-log-transformed 95% CI.
Measured: Cycle 1 (Day 1) to progressive disease (PD) or death, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014) up to 3 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Overall survival was defined as the time from the date of treatment start to the date of death from any cause. Participants were followed for survival every twelve weeks after PD. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants were censored either at the date that the participant was last known alive or the date of study cutoff, whichever came earlier. Participants censored before database cutoff included those who were lost to follow up and who withdrew consent. A 95% CI was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and Greenwood Formula. A generalized Brookmeyer and Crowley method is used to construct a log-log-transformed 95% CI.
Measured: Cycle 1 (Day 1) to death, or date of study cutoff, (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Objective response rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had a best overall rate (BOR) of CR or PR. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. The BOR of CR and PR in this study required confirmation by a subsequent assessment of response at least four weeks (28 days) later. CR and PR were determined by the Investigator and IRC using RECIST v1.1 for target lesions assessed by MRI/CT scans. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. A 95% CI was calculated using exact method of binomial distribution.
Measured: Date of CR or PR to the date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Disease control rate was defined as the percentage of participants who had BOR of CR + PR + SD. BOR of SD must have manifested at least five weeks (35 days) after the first dose of study treatment. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum of the longest diameter since the treatment started. A 95% CI was calculated using exact method of binomial distribution.
Measured: Date of CR, PR, or SD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR + PR + dSD (duration of SD greater than or equal to 11 weeks [77 days] after the first dose of study treatment). Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. For participants whose BOR was SD, the duration of SD was defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the first documented PD or death, whichever occurred first (i.e., same definition of PFS). If the dSD was censored at a time less than 11 weeks, the participant was considered as not having a clinical benefit. A 95% CI was calculated using exact method of binomial distribution.
Measured: First dose of study treatment to the date of CR, PR, or dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Durable Stable Disease (SD) Rate (dSDR)
Durable stable disease rate was defined as the percentage of participants who manifested durable stable disease (the duration of stable disease for greater than or equal to eleven weeks) and was estimated based on the tumor response assessments performed according to RECIST v1.1. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. A 2-sided 95% CI was calculated using the exact method of binomial distribution.
Measured: Date of dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (24 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Best Overall Response (BOR)
The best overall response categories (CR, PR, SD [including non-CR/non-PD], PD, not evaluable [NE], and unknown [UNK]) were derived based on time point tumor responses during the study as assessed by the IRC as well as the investigator. Tumor assessment was performed at Week 6 and Week 12 after the start of study treatment, and every six weeks thereafter. BOR of SD must have occurred at least 35 days (at least 5 weeks) after the first dose of study drug. If a participant had a BOR of non-CR/non-PD, the participant's BOR was grouped with the SD category.
Measured: Date of CR, PR, SD to PD or death of any cause, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), or up to 3 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionNov 2014
- Study completionFeb 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Soft Tissue SarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Co., Ltd.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Hiroshi Obaishi, Study director, Eisai Co., Ltd.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01458249
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E7389-J081-217
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 21 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 28 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Open-label, Multicenter, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Eribulin Mesylate in Previously Treated Subjects With Advanced or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01458249
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E7389-J081-217
- Conditions
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Keywords
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 52 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Eisai Co., Ltd.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Nov 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Mar 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eribulin mesylate in subjects with soft tissue sarcoma who received at least one standard chemotherapy (an anthracycline or an ifosfamide monotherapy or a combination therapy).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 | Experimental | Drug: eribulin mesylate |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of high or intermediate grade
- Documented evidence of advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma, not amenable to surgery or radiotherapy
- Within 6 months from the radiographic evidence of disease progression by RECIST criteria in the last chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
- Presence of measurable disease by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1
- Subjects who received at least one standard chemotherapy for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (an anthracycline or an ifosfamide monotherapy, or a combination therapy)
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- A history of malignancies or recurrence within 5 years after the remission
- Significant cardiovascular impairment
- Any serious concomitant illness or infection requiring treatment.
- Hypersensitivity to either halichondrin B or halichondrin B chemical derivatives or both.
- Subjects who have previously participated in a study with eribulin (whether treated with eribulin or not).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| eribulin mesylateAlso: E7389Administration of eribulin mesylate at a dose of 1.4 mg/m^2 as an IV bolus infusion over 2-5 minutes on Days 1 and 8 of every cycle, where the duration of each cycle is 21 days. | Drug | eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m^2 |
Primary outcome
Progression-free Rate at 12 Weeks (PFR12wks)
Time frame: Week 12
The PFR at 12 weeks was the percentage of participants with progression-free survival (success) measured as a binary variable based on the tumor response assessed at Week 12 after the start of study treatment. Participants were considered a success if one radiological evaluation performed at least Week 12 after start of therapy indicated stable disease (SD), or complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as defined according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1); all other cases were considered as failures (including disease progression or death before the Week 12 evaluation, or had unknown disease status at Week 12). If new anticancer treatments were started before the Week 12 evaluation, participants were considered failures. A 2-sided 90% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using the exact method of binomial distribution.
7 secondary outcomes
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (Day 1) to progressive disease (PD) or death, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014) up to 3 years
Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (Day 1) to death, or date of study cutoff, (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time frame: Date of CR or PR to the date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time frame: Date of CR, PR, or SD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time frame: First dose of study treatment to the date of CR, PR, or dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Durable Stable Disease (SD) Rate (dSDR)
Time frame: Date of dSD to date of PD or death, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (24 Nov 2014), up to 3 years
Best Overall Response (BOR)
Time frame: Date of CR, PR, SD to PD or death of any cause, whichever is first, or date of study cutoff (14 Nov 2014), or up to 3 years
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Mar 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Substudy 01A: Zilovertamab Vedotin in Pediatric and Young Adult Participants With Hematologic Malignancies or Solid Tumors (MK-9999-01A/LIGHTBEAM-U01)
B-cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Safety and Efficacy Evaluation of 4th Generation Safety-engineered CAR T Cells Targeting Sarcomas
Sarcoma, Osteoid Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 1
Metarrestin (ML-246) in Subjects With Metastatic Solid Tumors
Advanced Solid Tumors, Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Different Doses of RO7836748 Alone or in Combination With Other Cancer Therapies in People With Solid Tumors With a Rat Sarcoma Viral Oncogene Homolog Glycine 12 Valine (RAS G12V) Mutation
Solid Tumors
RecruitingObservational study
Surgery in Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors (GISTs) for Treatment, Tumor Modeling, and Genomic Analysis
Gastric Cancer, Gastric Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Hiroshi Obaishi study director
Eisai Co., Ltd.
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing eribulin mesylate in people with Soft Tissue Sarcoma, run by Eisai Co., Ltd. at 12 sites in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression-free Rate at 12 Weeks (PFR12wks) (time frame: Week 12). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Mar 2016.