Stress DisordersVRPE ExtensionNCT01459705
Comparing Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy to Prolonged Exposure
A study testing Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE), Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) and Waitlist in people with Stress Disorders and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, run by National Center for Telehealth and Technology at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study is evaluating the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) by comparing it to prolonged exposure therapy (PE) and a waitlist(WL) group for the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in active duty (AD) Soldiers with combat-related trauma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE), Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) and Waitlist
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 162 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Oct 2011to May 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- PTSD diagnosis as assessed by CAPS
- history of deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom/ Operation Enduring Freedom(OIF/OEF)
- non sexually based deployment related trauma
- three or more months since index trauma
- stable on psychotropic medication for 30 days
Who cannot join
- index trauma in the last three months
- history of schizophrenia, other psychotic or bipolar disorder
- history of organic brain disorder
- suicidal risk or intent or self-mutilating behavior requiring hospitalization in the last 6 months
- ongoing threatening situation
- current drug or alcohol dependence
Show all 11Show fewer
- history of seizures
- prior history of PE for PTSD
- other current psychotherapy
- physical condition that interferes with proper use of Virtual Reality head mounted display
- history of loss of consciousness since entering active duty service greater than 15 minutes history of schizophrenia, other psychotic or bipolar disorder
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Womack Clinical Psychology Service
Fort Bragg, North Carolina, 28307
About this study
Official title: Comparing Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy to Prolonged Exposure in the Treatment of Soldiers With Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
This study is evaluating the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) by comparing it to prolonged exposure therapy (PE) and a waitlist(WL) group for the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in active duty (AD) Soldiers with combat-related trauma. The investigators will test the general hypothesis that 10 sessions of VRET or PE will successfully treat PTSD, therapeutically affect levels of physiological arousal, and significantly reduce perceptions of stigma toward seeking behavioral health services.
Read the detailed description
The rationale for this study is based on growing evidence demonstrating that VRET is an efficacious treatment for PTSD and holds the potential to improve access to care for Soldiers who would otherwise avoid treatment. Although PE is considered one of the most effective cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) for treatments for PTSD, there are reasons why it may not be the most viable option for many Soldiers. First, prolonged exposure requires a level of emotional engagement during exposure to the trauma that many patients are unable to obtain. Second, stigma and concerns about how Soldiers will be perceived by peers and leadership has a dramatic impact on whether a Soldier will seek care. VRET may address these concerns and may also improve treatment outcomes and access to care by augmenting the patient's re-living of the trauma with a sensory-rich environment and moderating stigma perceptions by offering non-traditional treatment that is a preferable option for many Soldiers who are reluctant to seek out traditional talk therapies. Despite its promise as a viable treatment option, few studies have examined VRET for combat-related PTSD and there are no published studies that have compared VRET to PE in the treatment of combat-related PTSD. Positive results may provide new treatment options for all Soldiers, but should prove to be an especially attractive option for Soldiers who either do not respond to, or are reluctant to engage in other established therapies such as PE.
- Conditions
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Being tested
- Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE), Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET), Waitlist
- Keywords
- Combat Disorders, Exposure Therapy, Army Personnel
- Medical subject headings
- Stress Disorders, Traumatic, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Combat Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE)Behavioural
Also called PE
Prolonged exposure therapy will consist of 10 treatment sessions lasting 90 - 120 minutes each, with additional between-session homework assignments.
Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET)Behavioural
Also called VRE, VRET
Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy will consist of 10 treatment sessions lasting 90 -120 minutes with additional between-session homework assignments.
WaitlistBehavioural
Also called WL, Waitlist Control Group
This group will refrain from psychotherapy until after the completion of the 5 weeks of study participation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE) | Active comparator | The PE protocol is based on manualized procedures, which are derived from the theory that effective treatment for PTSD requires that the underlying pathological fear structure be activated and paired with new information that is incompatible with the fear structure. PE involves imaginal exposure and in vivo exposure as the two primary strategies to elicit repeated confrontation of feared but objectively safe thoughts, feelings, situations and events. Receives: Behavioral: Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE) |
| Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) | Experimental | The VRET protocol follows the same procedures as the PE protocol with the primary exception being that all instances of imaginal exposure will be augmented by immersion into Virtual Iraq environments, thus creating a situation known as immersive exposure. Receives: Behavioral: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) |
| Waitlist | Placebo comparator | The waitlist (WL) participants will be asked to refrain from psychotherapy during the 5 weeks of study participation. Receives: Behavioral: Waitlist |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Measured: Screening Visit (Day 1)
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Measured: 12 week follow up
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Measured: 26 Week follow up
Secondary outcomes (82)
PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C)
The PCL-C is a self report measure that evaluates att 17 PTSD criteria using a 5 point Likert scale.
Measured: Screening Visit (Day 1)
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
The PC-PTSD is a four-item measure designed to screen for PTSD.
Measured: Screening Visit (Day 1)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
This self report measure of depression contains 21 items that are rated on a 4 point scale.
Measured: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
The IASMHS is a 24 item assessment of help-seeking attitudes. It includes the following three factors based on components of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior: Psychological Openness, Help-seeking Propensity and Indifference to Stigma.
Measured: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Stigma will be measured using a 5 question assessment scale.
Measured: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Suicide Risk Assessment
Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
The BAI is a self report measure consisting of 21 items designed to discriminate anxiety from depression.
Measured: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Behavior and Sympton Identification Scale (BASIS-24)
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Screening Visit (Day 1)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 1 (week 1)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 1(week 1)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 1 (week 1)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 1 (week 1)
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
The PCL-C is a self report measure that evaluates att 17 PTSD criteria using a 5 point Likert scale.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
The PCL-C is a self report measure that evaluates att 17 PTSD criteria using a 5 point Likert scale.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
The PC-PTSD is a four-item measure designed to screen for PTSD.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
The PCL-C is a self report measure that evaluates att 17 PTSD criteria using a 5 point Likert scale.
Measured: 12 week follow up
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
The PCL-C is a self report measure that evaluates att 17 PTSD criteria using a 5 point Likert scale.
Measured: 26 week follow up
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
The PC-PTSD is a four-item measure designed to screen for PTSD.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
The PC-PTSD is a four-item measure designed to screen for PTSD.
Measured: 12 Week follow up
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
The PC-PTSD is a four-item measure designed to screen for PTSD.
Measured: 26 Week follow up
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
This self report measure of depression contains 21 items that are rated on a 4 point scale.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
This self report measure of depression contains 21 items that are rated on a 4 point scale.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
This self report measure of depression contains 21 items that are rated on a 4 point scale.
Measured: 12 Week follow up
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
This self report measure of depression contains 21 items that are rated on a 4 point scale.
Measured: 26 Week follow up
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
The IASMHS is a 24 item assessment of help-seeking attitudes. It includes the following three factors based on components of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior: Psychological Openness, Help-seeking Propensity and Indifference to Stigma.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
The IASMHS is a 24 item assessment of help-seeking attitudes. It includes the following three factors based on components of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior: Psychological Openness, Help-seeking Propensity and Indifference to Stigma.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
The IASMHS is a 24 item assessment of help-seeking attitudes. It includes the following three factors based on components of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior: Psychological Openness, Help-seeking Propensity and Indifference to Stigma.
Measured: 12 Week follow up
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
The IASMHS is a 24 item assessment of help-seeking attitudes. It includes the following three factors based on components of Ajzen's Theory of Planned Behavior: Psychological Openness, Help-seeking Propensity and Indifference to Stigma.
Measured: 26 Week follow up
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Stigma will be measured using a 5 question assessment scale.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Stigma will be measured using a 5 question assessment scale.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Stigma will be measured using a 5 question assessment scale.
Measured: 12 week follow up
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Stigma will be measured using a 5 question assessment scale.
Measured: 26 week follow up
Suicide Risk Assessment
Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Suicide Risk Assessment
Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Suicide Risk Assessment
Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 12 Week follow up
Suicide Risk Assessment
Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 26 Week follow up
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
The BAI is a self report measure consisting of 21 items designed to discriminate anxiety from depression.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
The BAI is a self report measure consisting of 21 items designed to discriminate anxiety from depression.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
The BAI is a self report measure consisting of 21 items designed to discriminate anxiety from depression.
Measured: 12 week follow up
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
The BAI is a self report measure consisting of 21 items designed to discriminate anxiety from depression.
Measured: 26 week follow up
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 2 (week 1)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 3 (week 2)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 4 (week 2)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 5 (week 2.5)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 6 (week 3)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 7 (week 4)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 8 (week 4)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 9 (week 5)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: Treatment session 10 (week 5)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 12 week follow up
BASIS-24
To assess overall psychological pain and gives an indicator of overall wellness. Due to the nature of the questions, this is deemed to be of safety nature.
Measured: 26 week follow up
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 2 (week 1)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 3 (week 2)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 4 (week 2)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 5 (week 2.5)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 6 (week 3)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 7 (week 4)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 8 (week 4)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 9 (week 5)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Ranging from 1 to 100, Subjective Units of Distress are gathered every 5 mintues during imaginal exposure to determine levels of distress and engagement in the situation.
Measured: Treatment session 10 (week 5)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 2 (week 1)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 3 (week 2)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 4 (week 2)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 5 (week 2.5)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 6 (week 3)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 7 (week 4)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 8 (week 4)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 9 (week 5)
Side Effects Questionnaire
The Side Effects Questionnaire is based on a revised version of the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire (SSQ) that will be used to measure general discomfort in both the VRET and PE conditions of the study.
Measured: Treatment session 10 (week 5)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 2 (week 1)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 3 (week 2)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 4 (week 2)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 5 (week 2.5)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 6 (week 3)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 7 (week 4)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 8 (week 4)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 9 (week 5)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: Treatment session 10 (week 5)
Intent to Attend
This is a measure to assess the intent to complete study procedures.
Measured: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2011
- Primary completionMay 2014
- Study completionMay 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (77)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stress DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National Center for Telehealth and Technology
- Sponsor type
- US federal agency
- Collaborators
- The Geneva Foundation
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Gregory A Gahm, PhD, Principal investigator, DCoE- National Center for Telehealth and TechnologyGreg Reger, PhD, Principal investigator, DCoE - National Center for Telehealth and Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01459705
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 112226
- Other IDs
- W81XWH-11-2-0007
- Acronym
- VRPE Extension
- Status last verified
- Nov 2015
- First submitted
- 24 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 14 Dec 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Difede J, Cukor J, Patt I, Giosan C, Hoffman H. The application of virtual reality to the treatment of PTSD following the WTC attack. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Jul;1071:500-1. doi: 10.1196/annals.1364.052.
PubMed 16891607Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF, Ready D, Graap K, Alarcon RD. Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;62(8):617-22. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0808.
PubMed 11561934Koenen KC, Stellman JM, Stellman SD, Sommer JF Jr. Risk factors for course of posttraumatic stress disorder among Vietnam veterans: a 14-year follow-up of American Legionnaires. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):980-6. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.980.
PubMed 14622073Bryant RA, Moulds ML, Guthrie RM, Dang ST, Nixon RD. Imaginal exposure alone and imaginal exposure with cognitive restructuring in treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):706-12. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.706.
PubMed 12924676Foa EB. Psychosocial treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61 Suppl 5:43-8; discussion 49-51.
PubMed 10761678Foa EB, Meadows EA. Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: a critical review. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:449-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.449.
PubMed 9046566Carlson JG, Chemtob CM, Rusnak K, Hedlund NL, Muraoka MY. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EDMR) treatment for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jan;11(1):3-24. doi: 10.1023/A:1024448814268.
PubMed 9479673Sherman JJ. Effects of psychotherapeutic treatments for PTSD: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jul;11(3):413-35. doi: 10.1023/A:1024444410595.
PubMed 9690185Bisson J, Andrew M. Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub2.
PubMed 15846661Resick PA, Nishith P, Weaver TL, Astin MC, Feuer CA. A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Aug;70(4):867-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.4.867.
PubMed 12182270Foa EB, Kozak MJ. Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychol Bull. 1986 Jan;99(1):20-35. No abstract available.
PubMed 2871574Delahanty DL, Raimonde AJ, Spoonster E. Initial posttraumatic urinary cortisol levels predict subsequent PTSD symptoms in motor vehicle accident victims. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Nov 1;48(9):940-7. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00896-9.
PubMed 11074232Shalev AY, Sahar T, Freedman S, Peri T, Glick N, Brandes D, Orr SP, Pitman RK. A prospective study of heart rate response following trauma and the subsequent development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;55(6):553-9. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.55.6.553.
PubMed 9633675Mason J, Southwick S, Yehuda R, Wang S, Riney S, Bremner D, Johnson D, Lubin H, Blake D, Zhou G, et al. Elevation of serum free triiodothyronine, total triiodothyronine, thyroxine-binding globulin, and total thyroxine levels in combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1994 Aug;51(8):629-41. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1994.03950080041006.
PubMed 8042912Yehuda R. Post-traumatic stress disorder. N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 10;346(2):108-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra012941. No abstract available.
PubMed 11784878
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Dec 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparing Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy to Prolonged Exposure in the Treatment of Soldiers With Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01459705
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- VRPE Extension / 112226
- Conditions
- Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
- Keywords
- Combat Disorders, Exposure Therapy, Army Personnel
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 162 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National Center for Telehealth and TechnologyUS federal agency
- Collaborators
- The Geneva Foundation
- Study start
- Oct 2011
- Primary completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 26 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Dec 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is evaluating the efficacy of virtual reality exposure therapy (VRET) by comparing it to prolonged exposure therapy (PE) and a waitlist(WL) group for the treatment of post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in active duty (AD) Soldiers with combat-related trauma. The investigators will test the general hypothesis that 10 sessions of VRET or PE will successfully treat PTSD, therapeutically affect levels of physiological arousal, and significantly reduce perceptions of stigma toward seeking behavioral health services.
Detailed description
The rationale for this study is based on growing evidence demonstrating that VRET is an efficacious treatment for PTSD and holds the potential to improve access to care for Soldiers who would otherwise avoid treatment. Although PE is considered one of the most effective cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBT) for treatments for PTSD, there are reasons why it may not be the most viable option for many Soldiers. First, prolonged exposure requires a level of emotional engagement during exposure to the trauma that many patients are unable to obtain. Second, stigma and concerns about how Soldiers will be perceived by peers and leadership has a dramatic impact on whether a Soldier will seek care. VRET may address these concerns and may also improve treatment outcomes and access to care by augmenting the patient's re-living of the trauma with a sensory-rich environment and moderating stigma perceptions by offering non-traditional treatment that is a preferable option for many Soldiers who are reluctant to seek out traditional talk therapies. Despite its promise as a viable treatment option, few studies have examined VRET for combat-related PTSD and there are no published studies that have compared VRET to PE in the treatment of combat-related PTSD. Positive results may provide new treatment options for all Soldiers, but should prove to be an especially attractive option for Soldiers who either do not respond to, or are reluctant to engage in other established therapies such as PE.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE) | Active comparator | Behavioral: Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE)The PE protocol is based on manualized procedures, which are derived from the theory that effective treatment for PTSD requires that the underlying pathological fear structure be activated and paired with new information that is incompatible with the fear structure. PE involves imaginal exposure and in vivo exposure as the two primary strategies to elicit repeated confrontation of feared but objectively safe thoughts, feelings, situations and events. |
| Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) | Experimental | Behavioral: Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET)The VRET protocol follows the same procedures as the PE protocol with the primary exception being that all instances of imaginal exposure will be augmented by immersion into Virtual Iraq environments, thus creating a situation known as immersive exposure. |
| Waitlist | Placebo comparator | Behavioral: WaitlistThe waitlist (WL) participants will be asked to refrain from psychotherapy during the 5 weeks of study participation. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- PTSD diagnosis as assessed by CAPS
- history of deployment in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom/ Operation Enduring Freedom(OIF/OEF)
- non sexually based deployment related trauma
- three or more months since index trauma
- stable on psychotropic medication for 30 days
Key exclusion criteria (11 listed)
- index trauma in the last three months
- history of schizophrenia, other psychotic or bipolar disorder
- history of organic brain disorder
- suicidal risk or intent or self-mutilating behavior requiring hospitalization in the last 6 months
- ongoing threatening situation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE)Also: PEProlonged exposure therapy will consist of 10 treatment sessions lasting 90 - 120 minutes each, with additional between-session homework assignments. | Behavioural | Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE) |
| Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET)Also: VRE, VRETVirtual Reality Exposure Therapy will consist of 10 treatment sessions lasting 90 -120 minutes with additional between-session homework assignments. | Behavioural | Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) |
| WaitlistAlso: WL, Waitlist Control GroupThis group will refrain from psychotherapy until after the completion of the 5 weeks of study participation | Behavioural | Waitlist |
Primary outcome
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
Time frame: Screening Visit (Day 1)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-IV) PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
Time frame: 12 week follow up
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
Time frame: 26 Week follow up
The CAPS is a structured interview that assesses all DSM-IV PTSD criteria in terms of frequency and intensity. Scores are computed for Intrusion, Avoidance and Hyperarousal symptom clusters, as well as a Total score.We used total scores as the primary outcome. Minimum possible score was 0, maximum possible score was 136. Higher scores indicated higher levels of symptoms.
82 secondary outcomes
PTSD Checklist- Civilian (PCL-C)
Time frame: Screening Visit (Day 1)
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
Time frame: Screening Visit (Day 1)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time frame: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
Time frame: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Time frame: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Suicide Risk Assessment
Time frame: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time frame: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Behavior and Sympton Identification Scale (BASIS-24)
Time frame: Screening Visit(Day 1)
Intent to Attend
Time frame: Screening Visit (Day 1)
Subjective Units of Distress (SUDs)
Time frame: Treatment session 1 (week 1)
Side Effects Questionnaire
Time frame: Treatment session 1(week 1)
BASIS-24
Time frame: Treatment session 1 (week 1)
Intent to Attend
Time frame: Treatment session 1 (week 1)
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
Time frame: 12 week follow up
PTSD Checklist (PCL-C)
Time frame: 26 week follow up
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
Time frame: 12 Week follow up
Primary Care PTSD Screen (PC-PTSD)
Time frame: 26 Week follow up
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time frame: 12 Week follow up
Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time frame: 26 Week follow up
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
Time frame: 12 Week follow up
Inventory of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Services (IASMHS)
Time frame: 26 Week follow up
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Time frame: 12 week follow up
Perceived Stigma Measure (PSS)
Time frame: 26 week follow up
Suicide Risk Assessment
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Suicide Risk Assessment
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Suicide Risk Assessment
Time frame: 12 Week follow up
Suicide Risk Assessment
Time frame: 26 Week follow up
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time frame: 2.5 weeks (or after treatment session 5)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time frame: 5 weeks (or after treatment session 10)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time frame: 12 week follow up
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Dec 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 16891607Difede J, Cukor J, Patt I, Giosan C, Hoffman H. The application of virtual reality to the treatment of PTSD following the WTC attack. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006 Jul;1071:500-1. doi: 10.1196/annals.1364.052.
- Background: PubMed 11561934Rothbaum BO, Hodges LF, Ready D, Graap K, Alarcon RD. Virtual reality exposure therapy for Vietnam veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2001 Aug;62(8):617-22. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v62n0808.
- Background: PubMed 14622073Koenen KC, Stellman JM, Stellman SD, Sommer JF Jr. Risk factors for course of posttraumatic stress disorder among Vietnam veterans: a 14-year follow-up of American Legionnaires. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Dec;71(6):980-6. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.980.
- Background: PubMed 12924676Bryant RA, Moulds ML, Guthrie RM, Dang ST, Nixon RD. Imaginal exposure alone and imaginal exposure with cognitive restructuring in treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003 Aug;71(4):706-12. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.71.4.706.
- Background: PubMed 10761678Foa EB. Psychosocial treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 2000;61 Suppl 5:43-8; discussion 49-51.
- Background: PubMed 9046566Foa EB, Meadows EA. Psychosocial treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder: a critical review. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997;48:449-80. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.449.
- Background: PubMed 9479673Carlson JG, Chemtob CM, Rusnak K, Hedlund NL, Muraoka MY. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EDMR) treatment for combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jan;11(1):3-24. doi: 10.1023/A:1024448814268.
- Background: PubMed 9690185Sherman JJ. Effects of psychotherapeutic treatments for PTSD: a meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. J Trauma Stress. 1998 Jul;11(3):413-35. doi: 10.1023/A:1024444410595.
- Background: PubMed 15846661Bisson J, Andrew M. Psychological treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD003388. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003388.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 12182270Resick PA, Nishith P, Weaver TL, Astin MC, Feuer CA. A comparison of cognitive-processing therapy with prolonged exposure and a waiting condition for the treatment of chronic posttraumatic stress disorder in female rape victims. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2002 Aug;70(4):867-79. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.70.4.867.
- Background: PubMed 2871574Foa EB, Kozak MJ. Emotional processing of fear: exposure to corrective information. Psychol Bull. 1986 Jan;99(1):20-35. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11074232Delahanty DL, Raimonde AJ, Spoonster E. Initial posttraumatic urinary cortisol levels predict subsequent PTSD symptoms in motor vehicle accident victims. Biol Psychiatry. 2000 Nov 1;48(9):940-7. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00896-9.
Related trials for Stress Disorders
RecruitingPhase 1
Rehabilitation Through Virtual Immersion & Integrated Exposure for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (ReVIVE for mTBI)
Traumatic Brain Injuries, TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)
RecruitingPhase 1
Study of Preoperative Radiation Therapy in Participants With Resectable Recurrent Abdominal Adrenocortical Carcinoma
Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC), Recurrent Adrenocortical Carcinoma (ACC)
Recruiting
Randomized Trial of Tele Vs. Clinic TF-CBT in Puerto Rico
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Anterior Bridge-Preserving Versus Conventional Early Apical Release in Bipolar Enucleation of the Prostate
Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia, Benign Prostatic Obstruction
Not yet recruiting
Efficacy of MAGNESIO TOTAL on Sleep Quality and Quality of Life in Adults
Sleep Quality, Magnesium Deficiency
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Gregory A Gahm, PhD principal investigator
DCoE- National Center for Telehealth and Technology
Greg Reger, PhD principal investigator
DCoE - National Center for Telehealth and Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Prolonged Exposure Therapy (PE), Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy (VRET) and Waitlist in people with Stress Disorders and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, run by National Center for Telehealth and Technology at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Dec 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Dec 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS) (time frame: Screening Visit (Day 1)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01459705, which also lists 77 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Dec 2015.