AzTrials
AzTrials

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1ABACUSNCT01460446

ACCU-CHEK® Aviva Expert Study: Does Use of a Bolus Advisor Improve Glycemic Control in Patients Not Achieving Optimal Control Using Multiple Daily Injections (MDI)?

A study testing Aviva Expert blood glucose meter and Aviva Nano blood glucose meter in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 33 sites in 2 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This clinical, prospective, randomized, multi-center study determined if the use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control as measured by a change in HbA1c in patients failing multiple daily injection/intensified conventional therapy (MDI/ICT). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Aviva Expert blood glucose meter and Aviva Nano blood glucose meter
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
218 participants
Where
33 sitesin 2 countries
Study dates
Oct 2011to Sep 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Must be 18 years of age or older.
  • Diagnosed with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes.
  • Recent HbA1c > 7.5% (measured within the last 6 weeks at local laboratory).
  • On multiple daily injection (MDI) therapy for at least 6 months consisting of 1-2 injections per day of long-acting basal insulin (Lantus® or Detemir®) and at least 2 injections per day of regular or rapid-acting analog insulin for meal coverage.
  • Subject adjusts meal insulin doses based on carbohydrate content of meals.
  • Subject with Type 2 diabetes may be on stable metformin therapy (therapy unchanged during 3 months prior to study).
  • Subject has been in Investigator's practice for at least 3 months but may have been seen by another physician in the practice.
  • Subject has completed carbohydrate (CHO) training within the last 2 years.

Who cannot join

  • Subject is on a therapy regimen that conflicts with the study:
  • Neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) or pre-mixed insulin;
  • oral anti-diabetic agents, with the exception of metformin;
  • injectable anti-diabetic agents other than long-acting insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogs or regular insulin (eg, fixed dose therapy);
  • use of sliding scale insulin therapy that determines insulin dosages based exclusively on specific blood glucose (bG) results.
  • Subject has participated in another interventional trial within 6 weeks prior to study.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • Subject has been diagnosed with any clinically significant infectious disease or major organ system disease, such as gastroparesis or renal disease (at Investigator's discretion).
  • Subject has used systemic oral or inhaled steroids for more than 7 days within the last 3 months.
  • Subject is on chemotherapy or radiation therapy (self-reported).
  • Subject is pregnant or lactating or is currently planning a pregnancy.

Trial locations and contacts

33 sites in 2 countries.

33 sites in 2 countries

Germany17 sites
  • Study site

    Aschaffenburg, 63739

  • Study site

    Augsburg, 86150

  • Study site

    Berlin, 01627

  • Study site

    Berlin, 12351

  • Study site

    Berlin, 13088

  • Study site

    Berlin, 13597

  • Study site

    Duisburg, 47179

  • Study site

    Essen, 45335

  • Study site

    Furth im Wald, 93437

  • Study site

    Köln-Weiden, 50858

  • Study site

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Study site

    München, 81479

  • Study site

    Münster, 48155

  • Study site

    Rostock, 18057

  • Study site

    Simmern, 55469

  • Study site

    Unterhaching, 82008

  • Study site

    Wurzen, 04808

Other trials in Germany

United Kingdom16 sites
  • Study site

    Blackburn, BB23HH

  • Study site

    Bournemouth, BH7 7DW

  • Study site

    Bradford, BD96RJ

  • Study site

    Chester, CH21UL

  • Study site

    Cosham, PO63LY

  • Study site

    Coventry, CV22DX

  • Study site

    Derby, DE223NE

  • Study site

    Exeter, EX25DW

  • Study site

    Leicester, LE15WW

  • Study site

    Lindley, Huddersfield, HD33EA

  • Study site

    Middlesbrough, TS4 3BW

  • Study site

    Northampton, NN15BD

  • Study site

    Nottingham, NG72UH

  • Study site

    Rotherham, S602UD

  • Study site

    Scunthorpe, DN157BH

  • Study site

    Sheffield, S57AU

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Prospective, Multi-centre Study With Diabetic Patients Randomized to 24 Weeks Treatment Supported by Either Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter With an Integrated Bolus Advisor or MDI Standard Therapy With Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano Meter (Without Bolus Advisor)

This clinical, prospective, randomized, multi-center study determined if the use of an insulin bolus advisor improves glycemic control as measured by a change in HbA1c in patients failing multiple daily injection/intensified conventional therapy (MDI/ICT).

Read the detailed description

Eligible participants were randomized to 24 weeks multiple daily injection therapy using either the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor or the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation.

Being tested
Aviva Expert blood glucose meter, Aviva Nano blood glucose meter
Medical subject headings
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Aviva Expert blood glucose meterDevice

  • Aviva Nano blood glucose meterDevice

Study groups in NCT01460446
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Aviva Expert blood glucose meterExperimentalParticipants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter with an integrated bolus advisor to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy.
Receives: Device: Aviva Expert blood glucose meter
Aviva Nano blood glucose meterActive comparatorParticipants used the Accu-Chek® Aviva Nano blood glucose meter and manual bolus calculation to determine the dose of insulin for each injection in their 24 week multiple daily injection therapy.
Receives: Device: Aviva Nano blood glucose meter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24

    HbA1C was measured in blood samples at a central laboratory.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. Percentage of Blood Glucose Measurements Within the Blood Glucose Target Range From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24

    Participants measured their blood glucose at least 3-4 times daily throughout the study. The mean blood glucose level was calculated for each 3-day period from Baseline to Week 24 and the percentage of 3-day blood glucose levels with the target range of 70-180 mg/dL (3.9-10 mmol/L) was calculated for the 2 reporting periods of Screening to Baseline and Week 23 to Week 24.

    Measured: Screening to Week 24

  2. Number of Symptomatic Hypoglycemic Episodes Per Subject Year From Screening to Baseline and From Week 23 to Week 24

    A symptomatic hypoglycemic episode was defined as an event with symptoms consistent with hypoglycemia which was confirmed by a blood glucose reading < 70 mg/dL (3.9 mmol/L). Symptoms might include but were not limited to sweating, dizziness, lightheadedness, tremors, nervousness, hunger, headaches, and weakness or tiredness.

    Measured: Screening to Week 24

  3. Change in the Mean Amplitude of Glucose Excursion (MAGE) From Baseline to Week 24

    Approximately half of the investigational sites monitored glucose levels in participants enrolled in this study using the DexCom Seven® Plus Continuous Glucose Monitoring device. The device provides glucose measurements every 5 minutes for up to 7 days. The system contains a sensor, transmitter, and receiver. The sensor is a flexible round wire that goes under the skin to read glucose levels. The transmitter snaps into the sensor and wirelessly sends glucose readings to the receiver. Data was obtained from approximately one-third of participants and was used to calculate MAGE. Data were collected in the 3 days prior to Baseline and the Week 24 visit. The standard deviation of the blood glucose measurements in each 3-day period was calculated. For each glucose measurement, the difference from the previous reading was calculated. Absolute differences smaller than the standard deviation were discarded. MAGE is the mean of the remaining difference scores.

    Measured: 3 days prior to Baseline to Week 24

  4. Percentage of Bolus Opportunities Where the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advisor Was Used During the Study

    Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  5. Number of Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert Blood Glucose Meter Bolus Advices Modified Per Day by Participants During the Study

    Participants using the Accu-Chek® Aviva Expert blood glucose meter were encouraged to use the Bolus Advisor utility incorporated into the meter. A bolus opportunity occurs, for example, just before eating a meal.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  6. Correct and Incorrect Use of Insulin:Carbohydrate Ratio (I:CHO) and Insulin Sensitivity Factor (ISF) Advice by Participants Using the Aviva Nano Blood Glucose Meter During the Study

    Participants using the Aviva Nano blood glucose meter received individualized advice in how to use their insulin:carbohydrate ratio (I:CHO) and insulin sensitivity factor (ISF) values to determine their insulin dose. The I:CHO ratio advice was considered to have been used correctly if the meal bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's total carbohydrate intake and the I:CHO ratio. The ISF advice was considered to have been correctly used if the correction bolus dose the participant indicated in his/her patient diary was in accordance with the dose which could be calculated based upon the participant's blood glucose target, current blood glucose value, and the ISF.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  7. Change in Carbohydrate Counting Accuracy From Baseline to Week 24

    Participants were asked to assess the carbohydrate content (grams) of 10 standardized meals by using a set of Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) plates, which provide standardized photographs of meals with known carbohydrate values. The mean meal error (MME), an indicator of accuracy, and mean meal absolute error (MMAE), an indicator of variability were calculated from their responses. The MME is defined as the mean of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. A negative MME indicates an underestimation and a positive MME indicates an overestimation of the actual carbohydrate content. The MMAE is defined as the mean of the absolute value of the differences between the estimated carbohydrate content and the actual carbohydrate content over the 10 DAFNE plates. The MMAE is ≥ 0 with a lower value indicating a better ability to estimate the actual carbohydrate content.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  8. Change in the Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale (PHQ-8) Score From Baseline to Week 24

    The Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) contains 8 items which can be rated from 0='not at all' to 3='nearly every day'. The total PHQ-8 score is the sum of the responses to the 8 items and ranges from 0 to 24. A lower score indicates less depression. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  9. Number of Participants With None, Mild, Moderate, Moderately Severe, and Severe Depression at Baseline and Week 24

    The Major Depression Disorder (MDD) scale is derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire depression scale (PHQ-8) and was used to categorize participants in regard to the severity of their depression. There are 5 categories on the MDD scale: None, mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe. The category for each participant is determined from their PHQ-8 score. A total PHQ-8 score of 0 to 4 represents no significant depressive symptoms. A total PHQ-8 score of 5 to 9 represents mild depressive symptoms; 10 to 14, moderate; 15 to 19, moderately severe; and 20 to 24, severe. A higher score indicates more depression.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  10. Change in the Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) Scale Score From Baseline to Week 24

    The Problem Area in Diabetes (PAID) scale contains 20 items which can be rated from 0='not a problem' to 4='serious problem'. The total PAID scale score ranges from 0 to 80 with a higher score indicating more diabetes-related problems. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  11. Change in the Hypoglycemia Fear Survey (HFS-II) Score From Baseline to Week 24

    The Hypoglycemia Fear Survey-II (HFS-II) contains 33 items (15 items regarding behavior and 18 items regarding worry) which can be rated from 0='never' to 4='always'). The total HFS-II score ranges from 0 to 132 with a higher score indicating more fear. A negative change score indicates improvement.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

  12. The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) Score and the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Change From Baseline (DTSQc) Score

    The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire at Baseline (DTSQs) contains 6 items which can be scored from 0='very bad' to 6='very good'. The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from 0 to 36. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at Baseline only.

    The Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for change from Baseline (DTSQc) to study end contains 6 items which can be rated from -3='much worse now' to 3='much better now'). The total score is the sum of the scores of the 6 items and ranges from -18 to 18. A higher score indicates more satisfaction. This questionnaire was administered at the end of the study (Week 24) only.

    Measured: Baseline to Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startOct 2011
  3. Primary completionSep 2012
  4. Study completionSep 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
218 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01460446
Sponsor's protocol ID
RD001333
Acronym
ABACUS
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
22 Sep 2011
Last updated
6 Feb 2014

Publications

  • Cavan DA, Ziegler R, Cranston I, Barnard K, Ryder J, Vogel C, Parkin CG, Koehler W, Vesper I, Petersen B, Wagner RS. Automated bolus advisor control and usability study (ABACUS): does use of an insulin bolus advisor improve glycaemic control in patients failing multiple daily insulin injection (MDI) therapy? [NCT01460446]. BMC Fam Pract. 2012 Oct 13;13:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-13-102.

    PubMed 23062116

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Aviva Expert blood glucose meter and Aviva Nano blood glucose meter in people with Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 33 sites in 2 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 8 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 33 sites in Germany, United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Feb 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Glycosylated Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) From Baseline to Week 24 (time frame: Baseline to Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01460446, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2014; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 6 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in