AzTrials
AzTrials

Muscular DystrophiesPhase 2DMD114876NCT01462292

A Clinical Study to Assess Two Doses of GSK2402968 in Subjects With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD)

A Phase 2 study testing GSK2402968 3mg/kg/week and GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/week in people with Muscular Dystrophies, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 14 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if GSK2402968 is effective in the treatment of ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy resulting from a mutation thought to be corrected by exon 51 skipping. Two doses of GSK2402968 and placebo will be used in this study. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 5 years and older, men only
Conditions the study is for
Muscular Dystrophies
What is being tested?
GSK2402968 3mg/kg/week and GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/week
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
51 participants
Where
14 sitesUnited States
Study dates
26 Oct 2011to 4 Nov 2013
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 5 years and older
  • Men only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Ambulant subjects with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) resulting from a mutation/deletion within the DMD gene, confirmed by a state-of-the-art DNA diagnostic technique covering all DMD gene exons, including but not limited to MLPA (Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification), CGH (Comparative Genomic Hybridisation), SCAIP (Single Condition Amplification/Internal Primer) or H-RMCA (High-Resolution Melting Curve Analysis), and correctable by GSK2402968-induced DMD exon 51 skipping
  • Males, aged at least 5 years,
  • Life expectancy of at least 1 year,
  • Able to rise from floor in < or =15 seconds (without aids/orthoses) at Screening Visit 1 and Screening Visit 2,
  • Able to complete 6 Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) test with minimal distance of at least 75 meters, with reproducible results (within 20% of each other) at Screening Visit 1, Screening Visit 2 and at the baseline visit prior to randomization,
  • Receiving oral glucocorticoids for a minimum of 6 months immediately prior to screening, with no significant change in total daily dosage or dosing regimen for a minimum of 3 months immediately prior to screening and a reasonable expectation that total daily dosage and dosing regimen will not change significantly for the 48 week duration of the study (Dose adjustments that are based on weight changes are permitted),
Show all 9Show fewer
  • QTc <450msec (based on single or average QTc value of triplicate ECGs obtained over a brief recording period), or <480 msec for subjects with Bundle Branch Block. Note: QTc may be either QTcB or QTcF, and machine read or manual overread
  • Willing and able to comply with all protocol requirements and procedures,
  • Able to give informed assent and/or consent in writing signed by the subject and/or parent(s)/legal guardian (according to local regulations).

Who cannot join

  • Any additional missing exon for DMD that cannot be treated with GSK2402968,
  • Current or history of liver disease or impairment including :
  • an INR vaue above 1.5 is in and of itself exclusionary
  • a total bilirubin greater than 2 times the Upper Limit of Normal is in and of itself exclusionary
  • a GGT greater than 2 times the Upper Limit of Normal is in and of itself exclusionary
  • Current or history of renal disease or impairment,
Show all 15Show fewer
  • Baseline platelet count below the Lower Limit of Normal,
  • aPPT above the Upper Limit of Normal,
  • History of significant medical disorder which may confound the interpretation of either efficacy or safety data e.g. inflammatory disease
  • Acute illness within 4 weeks of the first anticipated administration of study medication which may interfere with study assessments,
  • Use of anticoagulants, antithrombotics or antiplatelet agents, previous treatment with investigational drugs, idebenone or other forms of Coenzyme Q10 within 1 month of the first administration of study medication,
  • Current or anticipated participation in any investigational clinical studies,
  • Positive hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis C antibody test (if verified via RIBA or PCA testing), or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test at screening,
  • Symptomatic cardiomyopathy. If subject has a left ventricular ejection fraction <45% at Screening, the investigator should discuss inclusion of subject in the study with the medical monitor,
  • Children in Care. The definition of a Child in Care is a child who has been placed under the control or protection of an agency, organisation, institution or entity by the courts, the government or a government body, acting in accordance with powers conferred on them by law or regulation. The definition of a child in care can include a child cared for by foster parents or living in a care home or institution, provided that the arrangement falls within the definition above. The definition of a child in care does not include a child who is adopted or has an appointed legal guardian

Trial locations and contacts

14 sites in 1 country.

14 sites in 1 country

United States14 sites
  • GSK Investigational Site

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21205

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Columbus, Ohio, 43205

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Dallas, Texas, 75207

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Durham, North Carolina, 27710

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Gulf Breeze, Florida, 32561

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Iowa City, Iowa, 52242

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Kansas City, Kansas, 66160

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

  • GSK Investigational Site

    New York, New York, 10032

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Portland, Oregon, 97239

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Sacramento, California, 95817

  • GSK Investigational Site

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • GSK Investigational Site

    Stanford, California, 94305

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: An Exploratory Study to Assess Two Doses of GSK2402968 in the Treatment of Ambulant Boys With Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy

The purpose of this study is to determine if GSK2402968 is effective in the treatment of ambulant boys with Duchenne muscular dystrophy resulting from a mutation thought to be corrected by exon 51 skipping. Two doses of GSK2402968 and placebo will be used in this study.

Read the detailed description

Boys with Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) suffer from a relentless, progressive and fatal disease due to lack of dystrophin, a critical muscle protein. There is currently no known cure for the disease. GSK2402968 is thought to correct several genetic mutations through skipping of exon 51 and therefore targets only those boys with these mutations.

A reasonable hypothesis is that increasing dystrophin will result in clinical improvement, and that the amount of dystrophin expressed will correlate with clinical improvement above a threshold level (e.g. around 30% of control). The initial limited efficacy data from completed and ongoing unblinded studies with GSK2402968 are encouraging as they have demonstrated de novo production of dystrophin and improved walking ability (primary efficacy endpoint) after 48 weeks of treatment which has been generally well tolerated.

This study is designed to explore the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of two doses of GSK2402968 given over 24 weeks. The two doses to be assessed are 6mg/kg/week and 3mg/kg/week. Based on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling, it is predicted at steady-state that the 6 mg/kg/week dose will induce dystrophin expression greater than 30% of control. The 3 mg/kg/week dose was chosen as modeling predicts 3 mg/kg/week of GSK2402968 will produce dystrophin expression in the range of 18-22%. Potential variability between subjects could theoretically produce higher expression and lead to a dystrophin level correlated with clinical improvement.

Following the treatment period, the study has a 24 week post-treatment phase. The purpose of the post-treatment phase is to model the half-life of dystrophin, assess maintenance of response, and provide information about resolution of adverse event and laboratory abnormalities following cessation of treatment.

Being tested
GSK2402968 3mg/kg/week, GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/week, Placebo to match GSK2402968 3 mg/kg/week, Placebo to match GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/week
Keywords
968, Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, GSK2402968, DMD, Duchenne, GSK
Medical subject headings
Muscular Dystrophies, Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • GSK2402968 3mg/kg/weekDrug

    Comparison of 2 doses of GSK2402968

  • GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/weekDrug

    Comparison of 2 doses of GSK2402968

  • Placebo to match GSK2402968 3 mg/kg/weekDrug

    Matched placebo

  • Placebo to match GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/weekDrug

    Matched Placebo

Study groups in NCT01462292
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
GSK2402968 3 mg/kg/weekExperimental3 mg/kg/week of investigational product
Receives: Drug: GSK2402968 3mg/kg/week
GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/weekExperimental6 mg/kg/week of investigational Product
Receives: Drug: GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/week
Placebo to match GSK2402968 3 mg/kg/weekExperimentalPlacebo
Receives: Drug: Placebo to match GSK2402968 3 mg/kg/week
Placebo to match GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/weekExperimentalPlacebo
Receives: Drug: Placebo to match GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/week

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Muscle Function Using the 6 Minute Walking Distance

    The participants during this assessment were asked to walk, at their own preferred speed, up and down a fixed distance until they were told to stop after 6 minutes. The participants were warned of the time and were told to stop earlier if they feel unable to continue. The total distance walked within the duration of 6 minutes (or until the participant stopped in case of early termination of the test), was recorded in meters. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Change From Baseline in Rise From Floor Time at Week 24

    The rise from floor was assessed, when the participants stood from a standardized supine position as quickly as possible when told to go. Time was recorded with a stopwatch from the initiation of movement until the assumption of upright standing. No aids or orthoses were allowed. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  2. Change From Baseline in 4 Stair Climb Ascent/Descent Time at Week 24

    During this assessment, the participants were asked to ascend and descend four steps. The time for this was recorded with a stopwatch from the initiation of movement until the participant stands on the fourth step, (going up and going down separately). A flight of steps with handrail were used for this test. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  3. Change From Baseline in 10 Meter Walk/Run at Week 24

    The participants during this assessment were asked to traverse marked 10-meter measured walkway as quickly as he safely can. Time was recorded to one tenth of a second with a stop watch from when his first foot crossed the start line until when the second foot crossed the finish line. How often the participant , touched the wall was to be noted. Care was taken to ensure that the participants were safe when completing this test. The assessor was allowed to walk nearby to provide 'emergency' help if needed, but must not support or provide manual assistance for the participant in any way. If the participant was unable to complete the 10-meter walk, the total distance was recorded. The participants were to perform the test in bare feet. No aids or orthoses were allowed. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  4. Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength Total Score at Week 24

    The muscle strength was recorded by handheld myometry using a microFET2 myometer. Upper and lower limb proximal muscles were evaluated including knee flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, shoulder abductors and hip flexors. Total score was calculated by summing up all individual scores. If data for any of the individual muscle strength tests was missing, the total score were set to missing for that visit. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  5. Change From Baseline in Muscle Strength Tests For-Knee Extensor, Knee Flexor, Hip Flexor, Elbow Flexor, Elbow Extensor, Shoulder Abductor at Week 24

    The muscle strength was recorded by handheld myometry using a microFET2 myometer. Upper and lower limb proximal muscles were evaluated including knee flexors, knee extensors, elbow flexors, elbow extensors, shoulder abductors and hip flexors. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  6. Change From Baseline in the North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) Total Score

    The NSAA was a functional scale devised from Hammersmith Scale of Motor Ability specifically for use in ambulant children with DMD. It consists of 17 activities graded 0 (unable to perform), 1 (performs with modifications), 2 (normal movement). The scale assessed activities that required for ambulatory activity and included items that were rarely achieved in untreated DMD (jump, hop, raise head) as well as items that are known to progressively deteriorate over time (stand from a chair, walk). A standardized manual is available within the SPM with specific instructions for grading. Video snaps used in training program to ensure evaluator reliability. The total score ranged from 0-34 where the highest score of 34 implies absence of symptoms and lower score implies more severe symptoms. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baselie (Week 0) and Week 24

  7. Number of Participants With Accidental Falls During 6 Minute Walk Distance Test

    The participants during the 6 minute walk distance were asked to walk, at their own preferred speed, up and down a fixed distance until they were told to stop after 6 minutes. The participants were warned of the time and were told to stop earlier if they feel unable to continue. The total distance walked within the duration of 6 minutes (or until the participant stopped in case of early termination of the test), was recorded in metersThe number of accident falls during the 6 minute walk distance were reported. Data is reported for the number of participants with accidental falls of 0, 1 and 2.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0), Week 24, Week 36 and Week 48

  8. Change From Baseline in Creatinine Kinase Serum Concentrations

    Creatine kinase (CK) is a muscle-specific enzyme; its level in plasma is considered to reflect the extent of muscle damage. In the blood samples drawn to this purpose, the plasma level of CK was measured. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48

  9. Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second of Exhalation (FEV1) at Week 24

    FEV1 is the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs in the first second of a forced exhalation. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 24

    FVC is defined as the amount of air which can be forcibly exhaled from the lungs after taking the deepest breath possible. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  11. Change From Baseline in Peak Cough Flow at Week 24

    The peak cough flow was conducted using a spirometer. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the Baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  12. Change From Baseline in Peak Expiratory Flow at Week 24

    The peak expiratory flow is a measure of the amount of air that can be pushed through the airways in a single rapid exhalation. The peak expiratory flow was measured using spirometry. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Sniff Pressure Test at Week 24

    This was one of the pulmonary function test which was a non-invasive procedure. It measured the inspiratory muscle strength by transdiaphragmatic (Pdi) and esophageal pressures (Pes) generated during volitional and nonvolitional maneuvers. Change from Baseline, was defined as the post-randomization value minus the baseline value. Baseline was defined as Week 0.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  14. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Dystrophin Expression at Week 24 by Immunofluorescence Assay (IFA)

    A muscle biopsy from the tibialis anterior muscle was taken to assess the expression of dystrophin. The muscle biopsy samples were collected by open biopsy or with the conchotome method according to standard hospital procedures for obtaining muscle biopsies from children. The minimum amount of muscle tissue required is a small piece of muscle of at least 0.5 x 0.5 x 0.5 centimeters. The muscle tissue was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen-cooled 2-methylbutane and stored at -80°Celsius (C) or -70°C till shipment. In case of DMD participants , there is defect in the dystrophin producing gene or absence. Data for number of participants with change from baseline in dystrophin expression, was diagnosed using IFA and was categorized as strong increase, increase, and no change, decrease.

    Measured: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24

  15. Number of Clinician Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) Responders

    Single item question designed to provide a brief, stand-alone assessment of the clinician's view of the participant's global functioning after initiating a study medication, compared to their global functioning just prior to initiating treatment. Evaluated by an expert physician or evaluator familiar with DMD and who could make an expert clinical global judgement about severity of illness across various time points within context of clinical experience. The CGI-I reflects the clinician's judgment about the total picture of the participant : the illness severity, the level of distress and other aspects of impairment, and impact of illness on functioning. The CGI-I is rated without regard to clinician's belief that any clinical changes are or are not due to medication and without consideration of etiology of symptoms. It is measured on 7-point Likert scale (1 = 'very much improved', 2 = 'much improved', 4 = 'no change', 5 = 'minimally worse', 6 = 'much worse', 7 = 'very much worse').

    Measured: Week 24 and Week 48

  16. Assessment of Functional Outcome by : Functional Outcomes Survey During Treatment Period

    This was conducted by the family or caregiver. This helped to document the observed changes in the participant's functional outcome like the day to day activities; general health, mobility, and other general daily activities. The data for Week 24 has been reported as improved, not improved and not applicable.

    Measured: Up to Week 24

  17. Assessment of Functional Outcome by : Physician Assessment of Daily Living

    This was conducted by the physician, which helped to assess and document observed changes in the participant by the physician reported by the participant or his family or caregiver. This was reported as any worsening and any improvement up to week 24.

    Measured: Week 24 and Week 48

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Oct 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study start26 Oct 2011
  3. Primary completion21 May 2013
  4. Study completion4 Nov 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
51 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01462292
Sponsor's protocol ID
114876
Acronym
DMD114876
Status last verified
Aug 2017
First submitted
3 Oct 2011
Last updated
16 Oct 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing GSK2402968 3mg/kg/week and GSK2402968 6 mg/kg/week in people with Muscular Dystrophies, run by GlaxoSmithKline at 14 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 15 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 14 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean Change From Baseline in Muscle Function Using the 6 Minute Walking Distance (time frame: Baseline (Week 0) and Week 24). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in