CancerNCT01462552
Physician Liver Function Test (LFT) Monitoring for Tykerb Pts
An observational study of Cancer, run by GlaxoSmithKline.
Trial summary
In July 2008, the lapatinib (Tykerb) Prescribing Information (label) was updated to include a boxed warning related to hepatotoxcity and detailed instructions for monitoring liver function before and during lapatanib exposure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Lapatanib
- How many people
- 1 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to Aug 2011
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Female adults age >= 19 years of age with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and who initiated lapatanib from January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2009
Who may be able to join
- Female aged >= 19 years
- A diagnosis of breast cancer with documented metastatic disease (as defined by stage at diagnosis, evidence of disease progression, and/or line of therapy);
- Documented order/prescription for lapatanib from January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2009;
- Received care at a practice utilizing the full electronic medical record capabilities of US Oncology's iKnowMed system
Who cannot join
- Patients participating in clinical trials
- Patients receiving care for another cancer during the study time period
About this study
Official title: Assessment of Physician Compliance to Recommended Liver Function Test Monitoring for Tykerb Patients
In July 2008, the lapatinib (Tykerb) Prescribing Information (label) was updated to include a boxed warning related to hepatotoxcity and detailed instructions for monitoring liver function before and during lapatanib exposure. For patient safety, it is of interest to know the extent to which providers are adherent with these guidelines for hepatic monitoring of lapatanib users.
Thus, the aim of this study is to determine if physicians conduct liver function testing prior to prescribing lapatanib and at regular intervals during exposure, and if they withdraw lapatanib, and do not re-treat, for patients who demonstrate severe liver enzyme elevations while exposed. These aims will be tested in the "Pre-label" (prior to the boxed warning) and "Post-label" (after the boxed warning) periods to determine if physician adherence to the guidelines changed as a result of the warning.
Read more
Specifically, the boxed warning provided the following guidance:
"Hepatotoxicity (alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal and total bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal) has been observed in clinical trials (<1% of patients) and postmarketing experience. The hepatotoxicity may be severe and deaths have been reported. Causality of the deaths is uncertain. The hepatotoxicity may occur days to several months after initiation of treatment. Liver function tests (transaminases, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase) should be monitored before initiation of treatment, every 4 to 6 weeks during treatment, and as clinically indicated. If changes in liver function are severe, therapy with lapatanib should be discontinued and patients should not be re-treated with lapatanib"
The following objectives will be assessed and compared among patients prescribed lapatanib before and after the addition of detailed guidance on liver function testing to the product label on July 9, 2008:
- Objective 1: Determine if physicians perform liver funtion tests (LFTs) prior to prescribing lapatanib (baseline)
- Objective 2: Describe the prevalence of LFT elevations at baseline
- Objective 3: Determine if physicians routinely perform LFTs during the duration of lapatanib exposure
- Objective 4: Describe the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of LFT elevations during lapatanib exposure
- Objective 5: Describe patients that experience severe LFT elevations during lapatanib exposure and calculate the proportion that have lapatanib discontinued and are not re-treated
To achieve these objectives, an observational retrospective cohort study will be conducted using the United States Oncology Electronic Medical Records database. The study population will consist of females with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and a documented order for Lapatanib from January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2009. Patients will be categorized by whether they initiated Lapatanib before or after the July 9, 2008 label change.
'Pre Label': Initiated lapatanib between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2008 to allow these patients to have at least six months of follow-up time prior to the label change.
'Post Label': Initiated lapatanib between July 9, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2010 to allow these patients to have at least six month of follow-up.
The exposure in this study is lapatanib oral medication. The date of initiation of lapatanib will be the index date. Lapatanib exposure period(s) will be defined from the index date through to the end of the study period (June 30, 2008 for pre-label group or June 30, 2010 for post-label group).
The project will use proportions and two estimates of incidence (cumulative incidence and incidence rates using person-time) to describe the outcomes of interest among the users of Lapatanib before and after the label change. The following LFTs will be considered:
- alanine transaminase (ALT)
- aspartate transaminase (AST)
- alkaline phosphatise (ALP)
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Being tested
- Lapatanib
- Keywords
- liver function testing, Breast cancer, lapatanib
- Medical subject headings
- Neoplasms, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
LapatanibDrug
Prescription of lapatinib (Tykerb)
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Metastatic breast cancer pre-label group | Patients with metastatic breast cancer who initiated lapatanib between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2008 to allow these patients to have at least six months of follow-up time prior to the label change. Receives: Drug: Lapatanib | |
| Metastatic breast cancer post-label group | Patients with metastatic breast cancer who initiated lapatanib between July 9, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2010 to allow these patients to have at least six month of follow-up. Receives: Drug: Lapatanib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The change in proportion of patients that receive liver function tests prior to the initiation of lapatanib
Measured: Within 30 days, 60 days, or 90 days prior to (and including) the day that lapatanib was initiated
Secondary outcomes (4)
The change in prevalence of LFT elevations prior to the initiation of lapatanib
Measured: Within 30 days, 60 days or 90 days prior to (and including) the day that lapatanib was initiated
The proportion of patients that have LFT performed routinely (at least every 6 weeks) while exposed to lapatanib
Measured: During entire lapatanib exposure (Based on index date between January 2007 - June 2010).
The incidence of LFT elevations while exposed to lapatanib
Measured: During entire lapatanib exposure (Based on index date between January 2007 - June 2010).
The proportion of patients with a severe LFT elevation that have lapatanib withdrawn, and are not re-treated
Measured: During entire lapatanib exposure (Based on index date between January 2007 - June 2010).
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
- Primary completionAug 2011
- Study completionAug 2011
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by GlaxoSmithKlineThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GSK Clinical Trials, Study director, GlaxoSmithKline
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01462552
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 115270
- Other IDs
- WEUKSTV4275, EPI40640
- Status last verified
- Apr 2015
- First submitted
- 19 May 2011
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of Physician Compliance to Recommended Liver Function Test Monitoring for Tykerb Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01462552
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 115270
- Conditions
- Cancer
- Keywords
- liver function testing, Breast cancer, lapatanib
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- GlaxoSmithKlineIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- Study completion
- Aug 2011 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In July 2008, the lapatinib (Tykerb) Prescribing Information (label) was updated to include a boxed warning related to hepatotoxcity and detailed instructions for monitoring liver function before and during lapatanib exposure. For patient safety, it is of interest to know the extent to which providers are adherent with these guidelines for hepatic monitoring of lapatanib users.
Thus, the aim of this study is to determine if physicians conduct liver function testing prior to prescribing lapatanib and at regular intervals during exposure, and if they withdraw lapatanib, and do not re-treat, for patients who demonstrate severe liver enzyme elevations while exposed. These aims will be tested in the "Pre-label" (prior to the boxed warning) and "Post-label" (after the boxed warning) periods to determine if physician adherence to the guidelines changed as a result of the warning.
Specifically, the boxed warning provided the following guidance:
"Hepatotoxicity (alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase >3 times the upper limit of normal and total bilirubin >1.5 times the upper limit of normal) has been observed in clinical trials (<1% of patients) and postmarketing experience. The hepatotoxicity may be severe and deaths have been reported. Causality of the deaths is uncertain. The hepatotoxicity may occur days to several months after initiation of treatment. Liver function tests (transaminases, bilirubin, and alkaline phosphatase) should be monitored before initiation of treatment, every 4 to 6 weeks during treatment, and as clinically indicated. If changes in liver function are severe, therapy with lapatanib should be discontinued and patients should not be re-treated with lapatanib"
The following objectives will be assessed and compared among patients prescribed lapatanib before and after the addition of detailed guidance on liver function testing to the product label on July 9, 2008:
- Objective 1: Determine if physicians perform liver funtion tests (LFTs) prior to prescribing lapatanib (baseline)
- Objective 2: Describe the prevalence of LFT elevations at baseline
- Objective 3: Determine if physicians routinely perform LFTs during the duration of lapatanib exposure
- Objective 4: Describe the cumulative incidence and incidence rate of LFT elevations during lapatanib exposure
- Objective 5: Describe patients that experience severe LFT elevations during lapatanib exposure and calculate the proportion that have lapatanib discontinued and are not re-treated
To achieve these objectives, an observational retrospective cohort study will be conducted using the United States Oncology Electronic Medical Records database. The study population will consist of females with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and a documented order for Lapatanib from January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2009. Patients will be categorized by whether they initiated Lapatanib before or after the July 9, 2008 label change.
'Pre Label': Initiated lapatanib between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2008 to allow these patients to have at least six months of follow-up time prior to the label change.
'Post Label': Initiated lapatanib between July 9, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2010 to allow these patients to have at least six month of follow-up.
The exposure in this study is lapatanib oral medication. The date of initiation of lapatanib will be the index date. Lapatanib exposure period(s) will be defined from the index date through to the end of the study period (June 30, 2008 for pre-label group or June 30, 2010 for post-label group).
The project will use proportions and two estimates of incidence (cumulative incidence and incidence rates using person-time) to describe the outcomes of interest among the users of Lapatanib before and after the label change. The following LFTs will be considered:
- alanine transaminase (ALT)
- aspartate transaminase (AST)
- alkaline phosphatise (ALP)
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Metastatic breast cancer pre-label group | – | Drug: LapatanibPatients with metastatic breast cancer who initiated lapatanib between January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2008 to allow these patients to have at least six months of follow-up time prior to the label change. |
| Metastatic breast cancer post-label group | – | Drug: LapatanibPatients with metastatic breast cancer who initiated lapatanib between July 9, 2008 and December 31, 2009. Follow-up time for this group will continue until June 30, 2010 to allow these patients to have at least six month of follow-up. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Female adults age >= 19 years of age with a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer and who initiated lapatanib from January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2009
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Female aged >= 19 years
- A diagnosis of breast cancer with documented metastatic disease (as defined by stage at diagnosis, evidence of disease progression, and/or line of therapy);
- Documented order/prescription for lapatanib from January 1, 2007 - December 31, 2009;
- Received care at a practice utilizing the full electronic medical record capabilities of US Oncology's iKnowMed system
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patients participating in clinical trials
- Patients receiving care for another cancer during the study time period
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| LapatanibPrescription of lapatinib (Tykerb) | Drug | Metastatic breast cancer post-label group, Metastatic breast cancer pre-label group |
Primary outcome
The change in proportion of patients that receive liver function tests prior to the initiation of lapatanib
Time frame: Within 30 days, 60 days, or 90 days prior to (and including) the day that lapatanib was initiated
4 secondary outcomes
The change in prevalence of LFT elevations prior to the initiation of lapatanib
Time frame: Within 30 days, 60 days or 90 days prior to (and including) the day that lapatanib was initiated
The proportion of patients that have LFT performed routinely (at least every 6 weeks) while exposed to lapatanib
Time frame: During entire lapatanib exposure (Based on index date between January 2007 - June 2010).
The incidence of LFT elevations while exposed to lapatanib
Time frame: During entire lapatanib exposure (Based on index date between January 2007 - June 2010).
The proportion of patients with a severe LFT elevation that have lapatanib withdrawn, and are not re-treated
Time frame: During entire lapatanib exposure (Based on index date between January 2007 - June 2010).
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2015.
Related trials for Cancer
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
Hepatic Artery Infusion of Carfilzomib in Participants With Liver Metastatic Disease Previously Treated With Hepatic Artery Infusion Pump Therapy
Colorectal Neoplasms, Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2
Tafasitamab With Acalabrutinib and Venetoclax for the Treatment of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia, Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia/Small Lymphocytic Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Selumetinib in Treating Young Patients With Recurrent or Refractory Low Grade Glioma
Low Grade Glioma, Recurrent Childhood Pilocytic Astrocytoma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
A Single-Arm Study of Nimotuzumab Combined With NALIRIFOX as First-Line Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer
Pancreatic Cancer Metastatic
Recruiting
Methylation Profiling in Self-Samples for Identification of (Epi)Genetic Biomarkers for Gynecological Cancers
Gynaecological Cancers, Ovarian Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GSK Clinical Trials study director
GlaxoSmithKline
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Cancer, run by GlaxoSmithKline.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The change in proportion of patients that receive liver function tests prior to the initiation of lapatanib (time frame: Within 30 days, 60 days, or 90 days prior to (and including) the day that lapatanib was initiated). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2015.