Study Of Dacomitinib (PF-00299804) In Advanced NSCLC Patients (Post Chemo Or Select First Line) To Evaluate Prophylactic Intervention On Derm And GI AEs And PRO

Study at a glance

From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Jan 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.

Official title

ARCHER 1042: A PHASE 2 STUDY OF DACOMITINIB IN ADVANCED NON-SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER (POST-CHEMOTHERAPY OR SELECT FIRST LINE PATIENTS) TO EVALUATE PROPHYLACTIC INTERVENTION ON DERMATOLOGIC AND GASTROINTESTINAL ADVERSE EVENTS AND PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

NCT01465802

Acronym / sponsor ID

ARCHER 1042 / A7471042

Conditions

Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Keywords

non-small cell lung cancer, advanced, previously treated

Phase

Phase 2

Study type

Interventional

Recruitment status

Completed

Enrolment

236 participants (actual)

Lead sponsor

PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)

Study start

26 Dec 2011 (actual)

Primary completion

18 May 2015 (actual)

Study completion

18 May 2015 (actual)

First posted

7 Nov 2011 (estimated)

Results

Posted 17 Aug 2016

Clinical summary

The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.

Study design

Primary purpose

Treatment

Allocation

Non-randomised

Masking

None (open label)

Number of arms

3

Who may qualify

Ages

18 years and older

Sex

All

Healthy volunteers

Not accepted

Age groups

Adult, Older adult

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Interventions

Primary outcome

1. Percentage of Participants With Select Dermatologic Adverse Events of Interest (SDAEI) (All Causality, All Grade) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment by Treatment Arm for Cohort I

   Time frame: First 8 Weeks of Treatment

   SDAEI of all causality and all grades were evaluated in participants in Cohort I. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. 95% confidence interval (CI) calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution. After protocol amendment 1, Arm C was removed from Cohort I and enrollment to Arm C was terminated. Only 7 participants were enrolled in Cohort I Arm C as a result. Given the smaller sample size, analyse of Outcome Measure 1 was not conducted in Cohort I Arm C.

2. Percentage of Participants With SDAEI (All Causality, Grade Greater Than or Equal to [≥] 2) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment by Treatment Arm for Cohort I

   Time frame: First 8 Weeks of Treatment

   SDAEI of all causality and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort I. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. Adverse events (AEs) were graded for severity using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0). 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution. After protocol amendment 1, Arm C was removed from Cohort I and enrollment to Arm C was terminated. Only 7 participants were enrolled in Cohort I Arm C as a result. Given the smaller sample size, analyse of Outcome Measure 2 was not conducted in Cohort I Arm C.

3. Mean Change From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) Skindex-16 Scale Scores (Total Score, Symptoms Score, Emotion Score, and Functioning Score) by Treatment Arm for Cohort I

   Time frame: First 8 Weeks of Treatment

   Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) \& disease/treatment-related symptoms were assessed using Dermatologic Survey (Skindex-16) that assesses "bother". It includes 3 multi-item scales: symptoms, emotions \& functioning. Individual scaled scores \& total scores were determined. Skindex questions were transformed to a linear scale of 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered). Subscale scores are an average of non-missing questions in a given scale if greater than (>) 75% of total subscale questions are non-missing. The Total Score is an average of all non-missing questions in the Skindex if >75% of total questions are non-missing. A negative change score represents a better quality of life. A change score of 10 points is considered clinically significant. Skindex completion criteria were defined as completion of 3 out of 4 items for questions 1 to 4, 6 out of 7 items for questions 5 to 11, 4 out of 5 items for questions 12 to 16 for the visit.

4. Percentage of Participants With Diarrhea AEs (All Causality, All Grade and Grade ≥2) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment for Cohort II

   Time frame: First 8 Weeks of Treatment

   Diarrhea AEs of all causality, all grade and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. AEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.

5. Mean Change From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) Modified Oral Mucositis Daily Questionnaire (OMDQ) Scores (Mouth and Throat Soreness Categories and Scale, and Diarrhea Categories and Scale) for Cohort II

   Time frame: Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, EoT and Follow-up

   Diarrhea severity was assessed using the modified-OMDQ. This questionnaire is comprised of 6 questions in total; however, only two items relate to diarrhea symptoms (item 5 and item 6). Symptoms scores were developed for both the full questionnaire and for the diarrhea-only questions for each completed survey. Mucositis questions were transformed to a score range of 0 to 10. Increasing OMDQ values are associated with greater symptom burden. Modified OMDQ completion criteria were defined as completion of all 4 questions (questions 2, 4, 5 and 6). M/T = mouth and throat.

6. Percentage of Participants With SDAEI (All Causality, All Grade) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment for Cohort II

   Time frame: First 8 Weeks of Treatment

   SDAEI of all causality and all grades were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.

7. Percentage of Participants With SDAEI (All Causality, Grade ≥2) in the First 8 Weeks of Treatment for Cohort II

   Time frame: First 8 Weeks of Treatment

   SDAEI of all causality and Grade ≥2 were evaluated in participants in Cohort II. These SDAEIs included dermatitis acneiform, dry skin, exfoliative rash, nail discoloration, nail disorder, paronychia, pruritus, rash, skin exfoliation, skin fissures, skin infection, skin laceration and skin ulcer. AEs were graded for severity using the NCI-CTCAE, Version 4.0. 95% CI calculated using exact method based on binomial distribution.

8. Mean Change From Baseline (Cycle 1 Day 1) Skindex-16 Scale Scores (Total Score, Symptoms Score, Emotion Score, and Functioning Score) for Cohort II

   Time frame: Cycles 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6, EoT and Follow-up

   PROs of HRQoL and disease/treatment-related symptoms were assessed using Dermatologic Survey (Skindex-16) that assesses "bother". It includes 3 multi-item scales: symptoms, emotions \& functioning. Individual scaled scores \& total scores were determined. Skindex questions were transformed to a linear scale of 0 (never bothered) to 100 (always bothered). Subscale scores are an average of non-missing questions in a given scale if > 75% of total subscale questions are non-missing. The Total Score is an average of all non-missing questions in the Skindex if >75% of total questions are non-missing. A negative change score represents a better quality of life. A change score of 10 points is considered clinically significant. Skindex completion criteria were defined as completion of 3 out of 4 items for questions 1 to 4, 6 out of 7 items for questions 5 to 11, 4 out of 5 items for questions 12 to 16 for the visit.

9. Mean Area Under the Plasma Concentration Time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) and From 0 to 120 Hours (AUC0-120) for Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 on Cycle 1 Days 10 to 15 for Cohort III

   Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 10: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose (the 120 hour sample was obtained on Day 15 pre-dose).

   AUC0-24 is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC0-120 is the AUC from time 0 to 120 hours post-dose. AUC was calculated by the linear trapezoidal method using a non-compartmental pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. ng*hr/mL = nanogram hours per milliliter

10. Mean Maximum Observed Plasma Concentrations (Cmax) for Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 on Cycle 1 Days 10 to 15 for Cohort III

    Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 10: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose (the 120 hour sample was obtained on Day 15 pre-dose).

    Cmax was obtained from direct inspection of the data. ng/mL = nanograms per milliliter

11. Median Time of Occurrence of Cmax (Tmax) for Dacomitinib and Its Metabolite PF-05199265 on Cycle 1 Days 10 to 15 for Cohort III

    Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 10: Pre-dose and 2, 4, 6, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 hours post-dose (the 120 hour sample was obtained on Day 15 pre-dose).

    Tmax was obtained from direct inspection of the data as the time of first occurence of Cmax.

Results and safety

Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…

Research links

• Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Jan 2019.
• Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
• To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
• Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

Related trials for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

• RecruitingPhase 1/2

  Study of INBRX-106 and INBRX-106 in Combination With Pembrolizumab (Keytruda®) in Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors (Hexavalent OX40 Agonist)

  Solid Tumor, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

• RecruitingObservational study

  A Prospective ,Multicenter ,Non-interventional ,Real-world Study Observing Changes in Molecular Markers Osimertinib Targeted Therapy in EGFRm NSCLC

  Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

• RecruitingPhase 3

  A Study Evaluating Sotorasib Platinum Doublet Combination Versus Pembrolizumab Platinum Doublet Combination as a Front-Line Therapy in Participants With Stage IV or Advanced Stage IIIB/C Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (CodeBreaK 202)

  Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

• Active, not recruitingPhase 2

  Datopotamab Deruxtecan (Dato-DXd, DS-1062a) in Advanced and/or Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

  Metastatic Lung Cancer, Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

• Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2

  STAR0602 With Nivolumab in Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and in Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer, and STAR0602 Alone in Thymic Carcinoma

  NSCLC, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Referral and contact

AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.

81 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.