Rheumatoid ArthritisPhase 2NCT01468077
A Study in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Comparing Different Infusion Durations of RoActemra/Actemra (Tocilizumab) Treatment
A Phase 2 study testing Tocilizumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 8 sites in 2 countries.
Trial summary
This multi-center, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, open-label study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a shortened RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) infusion time compared to the normal infusion time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- What is being tested?
- Tocilizumab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 47 participants
- Where
- 8 sitesin 2 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Sep 2013
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients, at least 18 years of age, inclusive
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis of at least 6 months duration
- Moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (DAS28 >/=3.2)
- Patients received at least 1 disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and/or 1 or more TNFalfa-inhibitors over a period of at least 8 weeks
Who cannot join
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned surgery within 6 months following randomization
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Functional class IV (ACR criteria)
- History of severe allergic reaction to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
- Known active current or history of recurrent infection (including tuberculosis)
Show all 10Show fewer
- Primary or secondary immunodeficiency (history of or currently active)
- Body weight >150 kg
- Previous treatment with any cell-depleting therapies
- Previous treatment with tocilizumab
Trial locations and contacts
8 sites in 2 countries.
8 sites in 2 countries
Denmark7 sites
Study site
Aalborg, 9000
Study site
Frederiksberg, 2000
Study site
Hellerup, 2900
Study site
Holbæk, 4300
Study site
Odense, 5000
Study site
Silkeborg, 8600
Study site
Svendborg, 5700
About this study
Official title: Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Incidence of Tocilizumab Related Infusion Reactions in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active RA, When Infusion is Given Over 31 Minutes Compared to 1 Hour
This multi-center, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, open-label study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a shortened RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) infusion time compared to the normal infusion time. Patients will be randomized to 8 mg/kg RoActemra/Actemra infusion of 31 minutes every 4 weeks or to RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg infusion of 60 minutes every 4 weeks. The anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks.
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Being tested
- Tocilizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Arthritis, Rheumatoid
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TocilizumabDrug
Also called RoActemra, Actemra
8 mg/kg infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab, Normal Administration | Experimental | Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg infusion of 60 minutes duration every 4 weeks for 6 infusions (up to 24 weeks) Receives: Drug: Tocilizumab |
| Tocilizumab, Fast Administration | Experimental | Tocilizumab 8 mg/kg infusion of 31 minutes duration every 4 weeks for 6 infusions (up to 24 weeks). The first infusion was 1 hour. If an infusion reaction occurred during any treatment, 1 hour infusions were used for all subsequent infusions Receives: Drug: Tocilizumab |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Participants With Any Infusion Reaction
An infusion reaction was defined as any adverse event (AE) that occurred during the infusion or during the 24 hours following the infusion and deemed possibly or probably related to tocilizumab.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1), and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
Secondary outcomes (15)
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Tocilizumab in Response to an AE or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
All occurrences of participants who received at least 1 infusion of tocilizumab and then stopped tocilizumab infusions due to an AE or SAE were analyzed.
Measured: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Tocilizumab for Other Reasons
Participants that stopped the administration of tocilizumab and discontinued the study prematurely due to reasons other than an AE or SAE were analyzed.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Increased Liver Enzyme Values of Greater Than (>)1.5 Times, or >3 Times, or >5 Times Over the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Increased liver enzyme values defined as Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and/or Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) values of >1.5 times, or >3 times, or >5 times over the ULN. Almost none of the participants had increased measurements of AST, thus only values of ALT were presented. None of the participants presented with increased values of ALT above 3 or 5 ULN at any of the visits.
ITT Completers is defined as a subset of the participants in the ITT population who completed all study visits.
Measured: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Increased Lipid Values by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Increased levels of high density lipoproteins (HDL) equal to or greater than (≥)1.5 millimoles per liter (mmol/L), and low density lipoproteins (LDL) ≥4.1 mmol/L, and total cholesterol ≥5.1 mmol/L, are defined according to the Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP-III) guidelines.
Measured: Screening and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 1.2 Points in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Improvement in Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) disease activity was measured by the DAS28 score, which is an index combining measurements of swollen and tender joints, acute phase response High sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP), and global assessment of disease activity by the participant. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units in the DAS28 score during the study period. A low disease activity was defined as a DAS28 score less than (<)3.2, and remission was defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a DAS28 Score Below 3.2 (Low Disease Activity) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Improvement in RA disease activity was measured by the DAS28 score, which is an index combining measurements of swollen and tender joints, acute phase response hsCRP, and global assessment of disease activity by the participant. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units in the DAS28 score during the study period. A low disease activity was defined as a DAS28 score <3.2, and remission was defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a DAS28 Score Below 2.6 (Remission) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Improvement in RA disease activity was measured by the DAS28 score, which is an index combining measurements of swollen and tender joints, acute phase response hsCRP, and global assessment of disease activity by the participant. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units in the DAS28 score during the study period. A low disease activity was defined as a DAS28 score <3.2, and remission was defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
DAS28 Score by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Improvement in RA disease activity was measured by the DAS28 score, which is an index combining measurements of swollen and tender joints, acute phase response hsCRP, and global assessment of disease activity by the participant. A clinically meaningful improvement was defined as a reduction of at least 1.2 units in the DAS28 score during the study period. A low disease activity was defined as a DAS28 score <3.2, and remission was defined as a DAS28 score <2.6.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) Improvement (ACR20 Response) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
ACR20 response is defined as an improvement of ≥20% in swollen joint count (SJC; 66 joints) and tender joint count (TJC; 68 joints) as well as ≥20% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 remaining ACR assessments: Patient Global Assessment of Pain; Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI); and acute phase reactive factors (Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate [ESR] or C-Reactive Protein [CRP]).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50 Response) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
ACR50 response is defined as an improvement of ≥50% in SJC (66 joints) and TJC (68 joints) as well as ≥50% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 remaining ACR assessments: Patient Global Assessment of Pain; Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity; HAQ-DI; and acute phase reactive factors (ESR or CRP).
Measured: Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70 Response) by Visit, Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
ACR70 response is defined as an improvement of ≥70% in SJC (66 joints) and TJC (68 joints) as well as ≥70% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 remaining ACR assessments: Patient Global Assessment of Pain; Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity; HAQ-DI; and acute phase reactive factors (ESR or CRP).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 90% Improvement (ACR90 Response) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
ACR90 response is defined as an improvement of ≥90% in SJC (66 joints) and TJC (68 joints) as well as ≥90% improvement in at least 3 of the following 5 remaining ACR assessments: Patient Global Assessment of Pain; Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; Physician Global Assessment of Disease Activity; HAQ-DI; and acute phase reactive factors (ESR or CRP).
Measured: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
hsCRP is a marker for inflammation and is measured in milligrams per liter (mg/L). High levels of this protein indicate inflammation in diseases such as RA.
Measured: Screening, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) Score by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
M-HAQ is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. Assessment based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. Scores range 0 to 3; without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 0.22 Units in M-HAQ Compared to Baseline Per Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
M-HAQ is a self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in RA. Assessment based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. Scores range 0 to 3; without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3.
Measured: Weeks 4, 8. 12, 20, and 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionSep 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Rheumatoid ArthritisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hoffmann-La RocheThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 47 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La Roche
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Trials, Study director, Hoffmann-La Roche
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01468077
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ML27901
- Status last verified
- Jul 2015
- First submitted
- 7 Nov 2011
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2015
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Multicenter, Randomized, Parallel Group Study to Compare the Incidence of Tocilizumab Related Infusion Reactions in Patients With Moderate to Severe Active RA, When Infusion is Given Over 31 Minutes Compared to 1 Hour
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01468077
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ML27901
- Conditions
- Rheumatoid Arthritis
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 47 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hoffmann-La RocheIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Nov 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Aug 2015
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This multi-center, randomized, parallel-group, active-controlled, open-label study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of a shortened RoActemra/Actemra (tocilizumab) infusion time compared to the normal infusion time. Patients will be randomized to 8 mg/kg RoActemra/Actemra infusion of 31 minutes every 4 weeks or to RoActemra/Actemra 8 mg/kg infusion of 60 minutes every 4 weeks. The anticipated time on study treatment is 24 weeks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tocilizumab, Normal Administration | Experimental | Drug: TocilizumabTocilizumab 8 mg/kg infusion of 60 minutes duration every 4 weeks for 6 infusions (up to 24 weeks) |
| Tocilizumab, Fast Administration | Experimental | Drug: TocilizumabTocilizumab 8 mg/kg infusion of 31 minutes duration every 4 weeks for 6 infusions (up to 24 weeks). The first infusion was 1 hour. If an infusion reaction occurred during any treatment, 1 hour infusions were used for all subsequent infusions |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patients, at least 18 years of age, inclusive
- Diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis of at least 6 months duration
- Moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis (DAS28 >/=3.2)
- Patients received at least 1 disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) and/or 1 or more TNFalfa-inhibitors over a period of at least 8 weeks
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Major surgery (including joint surgery) within 8 weeks prior to screening or planned surgery within 6 months following randomization
- Rheumatic autoimmune disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Prior history of or current inflammatory joint disease other than rheumatoid arthritis
- Functional class IV (ACR criteria)
- History of severe allergic reaction to human, humanized or murine monoclonal antibodies
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TocilizumabAlso: RoActemra, Actemra8 mg/kg infusion | Drug | Tocilizumab, Fast Administration, Tocilizumab, Normal Administration |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Participants With Any Infusion Reaction
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1), and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20
An infusion reaction was defined as any adverse event (AE) that occurred during the infusion or during the 24 hours following the infusion and deemed possibly or probably related to tocilizumab.
15 secondary outcomes
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Tocilizumab in Response to an AE or a Serious Adverse Event (SAE)
Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Tocilizumab for Other Reasons
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Increased Liver Enzyme Values of Greater Than (>)1.5 Times, or >3 Times, or >5 Times Over the Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Increased Lipid Values by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Screening and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of at Least 1.2 Points in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a DAS28 Score Below 3.2 (Low Disease Activity) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a DAS28 Score Below 2.6 (Remission) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
DAS28 Score by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving American College of Rheumatology 20 Percent (%) Improvement (ACR20 Response) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 50% Improvement (ACR50 Response) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 70% Improvement (ACR70 Response) by Visit, Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving ACR 90% Improvement (ACR90 Response) by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24
High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Levels by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
Modified Health Assessment Questionnaire (M-HAQ) Score by Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 20, and 24
Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 0.22 Units in M-HAQ Compared to Baseline Per Visit Among Participants Who Completed All Visits
Time frame: Weeks 4, 8. 12, 20, and 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2015.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Safety and Pharmacokinetics of LPX-TI641 in Rheumatoid Arthritis and Psoriatic Arthritis
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA)
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Phase 1 Study of QLS2416 Injection in Participants With Autoimmune Diseases
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotyping of Rheumatic Diseases - An Observational Study
Rheumatic Diseases, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
RecruitingPhase 1/2
A Phase 1/2 Study of NKX019 in Subjects With Immune-Mediated Diseases (Ntrust-2)
Systemic Sclerosis, Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies
RecruitingObservational study
The Pathogenesis and Natural History of Sjogren's Disease
Sjogren's Syndrome, Salivary Gland
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Trials study director
Hoffmann-La Roche
8 sites in 2 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Tocilizumab in people with Rheumatoid Arthritis, run by Hoffmann-La Roche at 8 sites in 2 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 8 sites in Denmark, Iceland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Aug 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Participants With Any Infusion Reaction (time frame: Baseline (Day 1), and Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2015.