AzTrials
AzTrials

Crohn's DiseasePhase 2NCT01470599

A Open-Label Study Of CP-690,550 As Long-Term Therapy (48 Weeks) In Subjects With Crohn's Disease

A Phase 2 study testing CP-690,550 in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Pfizer at 75 sites in 17 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study hypothesis is to establish the safety and tolerability of long-term open-label (OL) CP-690,550 therapy in subjects with Crohn's disease. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 76 years
Conditions the study is for
Crohn's Disease
What is being tested?
CP-690,550
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
75 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
Apr 2012to Jul 2016
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 76 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects who complete 26-week maintenance treatment of the A3921084 study or subjects who withdraw early due to A3921084 study treatment failure (see Appendix 5).
  • Women of childbearing potential must test negative for pregnancy prior to study enrolment.
  • Sexually active females of childbearing potential are required to use adequate contraceptive methods during the study period and until completion of the follow-up procedures. No specific contraceptive measures are required in male subjects during study participation.

Who cannot join

  • Subjects who have been discontinued due to protocol violation(s) (as determined by the Sponsor) in the A3921084 study.
  • Subjects who were discontinued from the A3921084 study due to an adverse event.
  • Subjects likely to require any non-elective surgery or surgery requiring overnight stay (with the exception of minor same day outpatient procedures that will not interfere with study drug dosing).

Trial locations and contacts

75 sites in 17 countries.

75 sites in 17 countries

United States32 sites
  • East Ann Arbor Health and Geriatrics Center

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-2701

  • University of Michigan Health Systems

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-5000

  • Gastroenterology Consultants of Clearwater

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • West Coast Endoscopy Center

    Clearwater, Florida, 33756

  • Clinical Research of West Florida, Inc.

    Clearwater, Florida, 33765

  • Cleveland Clinic

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • Shands Endoscopy Center

    Gainesville, Florida, 32608

  • Shands Hospital at the University of Florida

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610-0214

  • Investigational Drug Service

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • Shands Medical Plaza and Cancer Center

    Gainesville, Florida, 32610

  • NYU Langone Long Island Clinical Research Associates

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • NYU Langone Nassau Gastroenterology Associates

    Great Neck, New York, 11021

  • Clinical Research Of The Rockies

    Lafayette, Colorado, 80026

  • Gastroenterology Associates of Central Georgia, LLC

    Macon, Georgia, 31201

  • Great Lakes Gastroenterology

    Mentor, Ohio, 44060

  • The Endoscopy Center of Lake County

    Mentor, Ohio, 44060

  • Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research - GI Associates, LLC

    Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215

  • Gastroenterology Group of Naples

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Gulfshore Endoscopy Center (Endoscopies Only)

    Naples, Florida, 34102

  • Digestive and Liver Disease Specialists

    Norfolk, Virginia, 23502

  • Alliance Clinical Research

    Oceanside, California, 92056

  • North Florida Gastroenterology Research, LLC

    Orange Park, Florida, 32073

  • Internal Medicine Specialists

    Orlando, Florida, 32806

  • University of Utah HSC

    Salt Lake City, Utah, 84132

  • Center for Digestive Health

    Troy, Michigan, 48098

  • Surgical Centers of Michigan

    Troy, Michigan, 48098

  • Christus Trinity Mother Frances Endoscopy Center

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • Digestive Health Specialists of Tyler

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • Endoscopy Center of Tyler

    Tyler, Texas, 75701

  • Allegiance Research Specialists

    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226

  • GI Associates

    Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, 53226

  • Great Lakes Gastroenterology

    Willoughby, Ohio, 44094

Other trials in United States

Canada5 sites
  • London Health Sciences Centre - University Hospital

    London, Ontario, N6A 5A5

  • Montreal General Hospital-Mcgill University Health Centre

    Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4

  • Office of Dr. David C Pearson

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8R 6R3

  • Office of Drs. Ranjith Andrew Singh, Jamie D. Papp

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 3P9

  • PerCuro Clinical Research Limited

    Victoria, British Columbia, V8V 3P9

Other trials in Canada

Hungary5 sites
  • Peterfy Sandor Utcai Korhaz, Rendelointezet es Baleseti Kozpont, I. sz. Belgyogyaszat

    Budapest, 1076

  • Pannonia Magánorvosi Centrum Kft

    Budapest, 1136

  • Szent Janos Korhaz es Eszak-budai Egyesitett Korhazak

    Budapest, H-1125

  • Bugat Pal Korhaz Egeszsegugyi Szolgaltato Kozhasznu Nonprofit Kft.,

    Gyöngyös, 3200

  • Clinfan Kft.

    Szekszárd, 7100

Other trials in Hungary

Japan5 sites
  • Toho University Sakura Medical Center

    Chiba, 285-8741

  • The Hospital of Hyogo College of Medicine

    Nishinomiya, Hyōgo, 663-8501

  • Osaka City University Hospital

    Osaka, 545-8586

  • Hokkaido P.W.F.A.C Sapporo-Kosei general Hospital

    Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0033

  • National Hospital Organization Sendai Medical Center

    Sendai, Miyagi, 983-8520

Other trials in Japan

Australia3 sites
  • Monash Medical Centre

    Clayton, Victoria, 3168

  • Nepean Public Hospital

    Kingswood, New South Wales, 2747

  • Royal Melbourne Hospital

    Parkville, Victoria, 3050

Other trials in Australia

Czechia3 sites
  • Medial Pharma spol.s.r.o.

    Hradec Králové, 500 12

  • RDG centrum s.r.o.

    Hradec Králové, 500 12

  • Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK, s.r.o.

    Hradec Králové, 50012

Other trials in Czechia

Germany3 sites
  • Charite Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin

    Berlin, 12203

  • Universitaetsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein

    Kiel, 24105

  • Universitaetsklinikum Ulm

    Ulm, 89081

Other trials in Germany

Israel3 sites
  • Department of medicine Shaare Zedek Medical Center

    Jerusalem, 91031

  • Dept. of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Meir Medical Center

    Kfar Saba, 44281

  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    Tel Aviv, 64239

Other trials in Israel

Spain3 sites
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona

    Barcelona, 08036

  • Hospital Universitario de La Princesa

    Madrid, 28006

  • Hospital Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda Servicio Digestivo - Planta 2

    Madrid, 28222

Other trials in Spain

Bulgaria2 sites
  • 4-MBAL, Parvo vatreshno otdelenie

    Sofia, 1000

  • MBAL Sofiamed OOD, Otdelenie po gastroenterologia

    Sofia, 1797

Other trials in Bulgaria

France2 sites
  • Hopital Huriez - CHRU de Lille

    Lille, 59037

  • Hôpital Haut-Lévêque

    Pessac, 33604

Other trials in France

Netherlands2 sites
  • VU University Medical Center

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

  • Academisch Medisch Centrum

    Amsterdam, 1105 AZ

Other trials in Netherlands

South Korea2 sites
  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 135-710

  • Asan Medical Center

    Soeul, 138-736

Other trials in South Korea

Ukraine2 sites
  • Municipal Institution "Odesa Regional Clinical Hospital". Odesa Regional Centre of Gastroenterology.

    Odesa, 65117

  • Medical Clinical Research Center of Medical Center "Health Clinic" LLC

    Vinnitsa, 21029

Other trials in Ukraine

Austria1 site
  • AKH Wien Universitaetsklinik fuer Innere Medizin III

    Vienna, 1090

Other trials in Austria

Greece1 site
  • General Hospital of Athens "Evangelismos",1st Gastroenterology Department

    Kolonaki Athens, 106 76

Other trials in Greece

South Africa1 site
  • Parklands Medical Centre

    Durban, 4091

Other trials in South Africa

About this study

Official title: A Open-Label Extension Study Of CP-690,550 As Maintenance Therapy In Patients With Crohn's Disease

The study hypothesis is to establish the safety and tolerability of long-term open-label (OL) CP-690,550 therapy in subjects with Crohn's disease.

Conditions
Crohn's Disease
Being tested
CP-690,550
Medical subject headings
Crohn Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • CP-690,550Drug

    ORAL TABLET, TWICE DAILY

  • CP-690,550Drug

    ORAL TABLETS, TWICE DAILY

Study groups in NCT01470599
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
5mg BIDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CP-690,550
10mg BIDExperimentalNot described
Receives: Drug: CP-690,550

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adjudicated Potential Cardiovascular Events

    Pre-specified cardiovascular events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. Potential events of interest (pEoI) were identified by the investigator, sponsor, review of alerts from central electrocardiogram assessments, and by search of adverse events (AE)/serious adverse event (SAE) listings for events coded to death (coronary and non-coronary), myocardial infarction (non-fatal), all coronary revascularization, unstable angina, stroke (fatal and non-fatal), transient ischemic attack, congestive heart failure, peripheral arterial vascular disease, dyspnoea, and chest pain. The independent reviewers (IRs) determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the definitions summarized from the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium 'Standardized Definitions for End Point Events in Cardiovascular Trials' published October 2010.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52

  2. Adjudicated Malignancy Events

    Pre-specified malignancy events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by the investigator, sponsor, potential primary event notifications (i.e. malignancies excluding non-melanoma skin cancers) for a specific protocol, events submitted for histopathology review for potential malignancies which met the criteria for potential malignancies, and by search of AE/SAE listings for events coded to Malignant tumors Standard Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) Queries (SMQ) (20000194). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, a ten-digit multi-axial classification of the site (4 characters), morphology (4 digits), behavior (1 digit), and grading (1 digit) of neoplasms.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52

  3. Adjudicated Hepatic Injury Events

    Pre-specified liver injury events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor \& search of clinical, safety \& laboratory databases (potential Hy's law event, ALT/AST ≥5 x ULN, events meeting hepatic discontinuation criteria, SAEs coded to MedDRA hepatobiliary system organ class (SOC), AEs/SAEs coded to MedDRA liver infections or infectious biliary disorders SMQ, AEs coded to MedDRA drug-induced liver injury (DILI) preferred term or any death with ALT or AST ≥3xULN, bilirubin ≥2xULN or jaundice). IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessing DILI (definite, highly likely, probable, possible, unlikely, unrelated or undetermined), pattern (hepatocellular, mixed, cholestatic or undetermined), likely, competing or alternative cause(s), severity (mild, moderate, severe, fatal/transplantation or undetermined), Hy's law case, recovery \& liver failure (all yes, no or undetermined).

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52

  4. Adjudicated Opportunistic Infection Events

    Pre-specified opportunistic infection events were adjudicated by blinded committees of external experts. pEoI were identified by investigator, sponsor \& search of SAE listings for serious infections coded to MedDRA infections \& infestations SOC \&/or events meeting pre-specified criteria for IR pre-screening to determine if adjudication is required. IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification according to definitions for opportunistic infections (invasive fungal infections per the European Organization for Research \& Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group \& the National Institute of Allergy \& Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group [EORTC/MSG] Consensus Group definitions, endemic fungal infections per the EORTC/MSG Consensus Group definitions, other fungal infections, viral, bacterial \& parasitic infections \& vaccine dissemination) \& special interest infections (actinomycosis, Legionella \& mononucleosis-like toxoplasmosis).

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52

  5. Adjudicated Gastrointestinal (GI) Perforation Events

    Pre-specified GI perforation events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. The pEoI were identified via search of AE/SAE listings using the MedDRA GI Perforation SMQ. The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification based on whether a GI perforation occurred and if yes, the location within the GI tract, possible contributing medical conditions and/or concomitant medications.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52

  6. Adjudicated Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) Events

    Pre-specified ILD events were adjudicated by committees of external experts who were blinded to treatment assignment. pEoI were identified by searches of the clinical, safety \& laboratory databases (AEs coded to the MedDRA ILD SMQ and events nominated by the study clinician or clinical lead). The IRs determined if the pEoI met the criteria for EoI classification by assessment of the ILD event (probably ILD, possible ILD, alternative diagnosis likely, other or insufficient information to classify).

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52

Secondary outcomes (23)
  1. Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission at Week 48

    CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of less than (<) 150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score <150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95 percent (%) Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Week 48

  2. Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study

    CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of <150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score <150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

  3. Percentage of Participants in Clinical Remission and Sustained Clinical Remission Among Participants in Clinical Response (CDAI-100 Response) or Clinical Remission at Baseline of This Study

    CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Clinical remission was defined as a CDAI score of <150. Sustained clinical remission was defined as being in clinical remission (CDAI score <150) at both Week 24 and Week 48. Clinical response was defined as a CDAI score reduction of at least 100 points from the A3921083 study baseline value. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

  4. Time to Relapse Among Participants in Clinical Remission at Baseline

    Relapse was defined as an increase in CDAI of more than (>) 100 points from the baseline and an absolute CDAI score of >220 points. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. Data presented are rates estimated from Kaplan-Meier curves.

    n = number of participants remaining at risk.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52

  5. Observed CDAI Score by Week

    CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants remaining at risk.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

  6. Change From Baseline Observed CDAI Score by Week

    CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

  7. Percentage of Participants Achieving a Steroid-Free Clinical Remission at Week 48 - Among Subjects on Steroids at A3921086 Baseline

    Steroid-free clinical remission at Week 48 was a CDAI <150 points in participants who were steroid-free at Week 48. CDAI is a composite index consisting of weighted scoring of 8 disease variables: number of liquid or very soft stools, intensity of abdominal pain, general well-being, occurrence of extraintestinal symptoms, need for antidiarrheal drugs, presence of abdominal masses, hematocrit, and body weight. CDAI scores range from 0 to approximately 600 points, higher score indicates higher disease activity.

    Measured: Week 48

  8. Corticosteroid Use Over Time

    Use of corticosteroids (yes or no) was recorded at baseline and throughout the study. Percentage of participants taking corticosteriod at each visit was reported.

    Measured: Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48

  9. Percentage of Participants Switching From 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID After Initial Assignment by Visit

    There was a single study treatment dose adjustment allowed, at the discretion of the Investigator, from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or from 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID, after the initial 8 weeks of fixed open label treatment and for the remaining treatment period of 40 weeks. Percentage of participants whose study treatment were switched from 5 mg BID to 10 mg BID or 10 mg BID to 5 mg BID after initial assignment was reported.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 48

  10. Observed Change From Baseline in Fecal Calprotectin by Week

    Fecal calprotectin is an inflammatory marker for the gastrointestinal tract and considered as a measurement of neutrophil migration to the gastrointestinal tract. Higher values indicate more serious inflammation. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

  11. Observed Change From Baseline in High Sensitivity C-reactive Protein (CRP) by Week

    The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 52/follow-up

  12. Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit

    The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated patient reported outcome (PRO) instrument for measuring disease-specific quality of life (QoL) in participants with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/early termination (ET)

  13. Change From Baseline IBDQ Total Score and Domain Scores (Bowel Function, Emotional Status, Systemic Symptoms, and Social Function) at Week 48/ET Visit

    The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). The 32 items are grouped into 4 domains: bowel function, emotional status, systemic symptoms and social function. The 4 domains are scored as follows: bowel symptoms 10 to 70; systemic symptoms 5 to 35; emotional function 12 to 84; social function 5 to 35. For each domain, a higher score indicates better QoL. Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. Positive change in total score indicated improvement in QoL.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/ET

  14. Percentage of Participants With an IBDQ Total Score of Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 170 at Week 48/ET Visit

    The IBDQ is a psychometrically validated PRO instrument for measuring disease-specific QoL in participants with IBD. IBDQ consists of 32 items, each item score ranged from 1 (worst possible response) to 7 (best possible response). Total score is the sum of each item score, and ranged from 32 to 224 with a higher score indicating a better QoL. A score ≥170 corresponds to clinical remission. 95% Clopper-Pearson exact confidence interval reported for the proportions.

    Measured: Week 48/ET

  15. Percentage of Participants With a Response to the Patient-Reported Treatment Impact (PRTI) Assessment at Week 48/ET Visit by Category

    The IBD PRTI modified questionnaire comprises 3 individual questions administered to the participant: participant satisfaction with study treatment; participant preference for study drug over prior treatment (this question on participant preference for study drug is prefaced by a simple question of previous treatment/s for IBD received in order to place the preference question into context) and participant willingness to reuse the study treatment again. Each of these questions (except the question on previous treatment, which is informational only) is scored on a 5 point Likert scale. PSA = Patient Satisfaction Assessment; PPTA = Patient Previous Treatment Assessment; PPA = Patient Preference Assessment; PWA = Patient Willingness Assessment.

    Measured: Week 48/ET visit

  16. Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) Component and Domain Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit

    The component and domain scores were scored using the United States (US) 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

  17. Change From Baseline SF-36 Component and Domain Scores at Week 48/ET Visit

    The component and domain scores were scored using the US 1998 general population norms. The resulting norm-based T scores for both the SF36 version 2 and SF36 health domain scales and component summary measures have means of 50 and standard deviations of 10. Higher scores indicate better health-related QoL. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

  18. EuroQoL 5 Dimensions Questionnaire (EQ-5D) Utility Scores at Baseline and Week 48/ET Visit

    EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

  19. Change From Baseline EQ-5D Utility Scores at Week 48/ET Visit

    EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, selfcare, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range from 0.594 to 1.000; a higher score indicates a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

  20. EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Baseline and Week 8/ET Visit

    EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeters (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. n = number of participants with non-missing data.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

  21. Change From Baseline EQ-5D VAS Scores at Week 8/ET Visit

    EQ5D is a participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related QoL in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 mm (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 48/ET visit

  22. Percentage of Participants Hospitalized Due to Crohn's Disease

    The number of participants hospitalized due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52/follow-up

  23. Length of Hospitalizations Due to Crohn's Disease

    The length of hospitalizations due to Crohn's disease were recorded at every study visit.

    Measured: From baseline to Week 52/follow-up

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Nov 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2012
  3. Primary completionJul 2016
  4. Study completionJul 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01470599
Sponsor's protocol ID
A3921086
Other IDs
2011-003622-27
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
27 Oct 2011
Last updated
16 Oct 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Panes J, D'Haens GR, Higgins PDR, Mele L, Moscariello M, Chan G, Wang W, Niezychowski W, Su C, Maller E. Long-term safety and tolerability of oral tofacitinib in patients with Crohn's disease: results from a phase 2, open-label, 48-week extension study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Feb;49(3):265-276. doi: 10.1111/apt.15072.

    PubMed 30663107

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing CP-690,550 in people with Crohn's Disease, run by Pfizer at 75 sites in 17 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Oct 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 75 sites in United States, Canada, Hungary, Japan, Australia and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Oct 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adjudicated Potential Cardiovascular Events (time frame: From baseline to Week 52). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01470599, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Oct 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in