AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung Cancer - Non Small CellPhase 2NCT01471197

Safety and Efficacy Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Pemetrexed in Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

A Phase 2 study testing Ipilimumab and Pemetrexed in people with Lung Cancer - Non Small Cell, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 13 sites in 5 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether Ipilimumab will prolong survival when compared to Pemetrexed in subjects with nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer - Non Small Cell
What is being tested?
Ipilimumab and Pemetrexed
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
9 participants
Where
13 sitesin 5 countries
Study dates
Jul 2012to Feb 2013
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Non-Squamous, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Recurrent/Stage IV Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 0 or 1
  • Not progressing after 4 cycles of a platinum-based first line chemotherapy

Who cannot join

  • Brain Metastases (unless stable)
  • Autoimmune Diseases

Trial locations and contacts

13 sites in 5 countries.

13 sites in 5 countries

United States7 sites
  • Blue Ridge Cancer Care

    Christiansburg, Virginia, 24073

  • Medical And Surgical Specialists, Llc

    Galesburg, Illinois, 61401

  • Marin Specialty Care, Inc.

    Greenbrae, California, 94904

  • Meritus Center For Clinical Research

    Hagerstown, Maryland, 21742

  • Carolina Biooncology Institute

    Huntersville, North Carolina, 28078

  • Montgomery Cancer Center

    Mount Sterling, Kentucky, 40353

  • Quincy Medical Group

    Quincy, Illinois, 62301

Other trials in United States

Belgium2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Bruges, 8310

  • Local Institution

    Sint-Niklaas, 9100

Other trials in Belgium

Germany2 sites
  • Local Institution

    Hamburg, 21075

  • Local Institution

    Heidelberg, 69126

Other trials in Germany

France1 site
  • Local Institution

    Paris, 75014

Other trials in France

Spain1 site
  • Local Institution

    Benidorm-Alicante, 03501

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: A Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 2 Safety and Efficacy Trial of Ipilimumab Versus Pemetrexed in Subjects With Recurrent/Stage IV Non-Squamous, Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Not Progressed After Four Cycles of a Platinum-Based First Line Chemotherapy

The purpose of this trial is to determine whether Ipilimumab will prolong survival when compared to Pemetrexed in subjects with nonsquamous, non-small cell lung cancer.

Being tested
Ipilimumab, Pemetrexed
Medical subject headings
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IpilimumabBiological

    Also called Yervoy, BMS-734016

    Intravenous (IV) solution, IV, 10mg/kg, Once every 3 weeks for 4 doses, then once every 12 weeks during Treatment Phase, 90 minute infusion

  • PemetrexedBiological

    Also called Alimta

    IV solution, IV, 500 mg/m2, Once every 3 weeks during Treatment Phase, 10 minute infusion.

Study groups in NCT01471197
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1: IpilimumabExperimentalNot described
Receives: Biological: Ipilimumab
Arm 2: PemetrexedActive comparatorNot described
Receives: Biological: Pemetrexed

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Survival of Participants During the Study - All Treated Participants

    Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death. For those participants who did not die by the time the study was terminated and last patient, last visit occurred, OS was censored (+) on the last date the participant was known to be alive. OS is presented below in increasing monthly categories of survival. OS analysis was to be performed when a total of approximately 132 deaths were observed but due to the early termination of the study, statistical analyses were not performed.

    Measured: Date of Randomization to date of death, up to last patient, last visit, approximately 7 months after study started

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Number of Participants Who Died Within 30 Days and 31 Days After Last Dose - All Treated Participants

    Due to study termination, the categories presented below are deaths occurring within 30 days of last dose and deaths occurring within 32 days of last dose. If the study had not been terminated early, the categories presented would have been 30 days and 90 days after last dose.

    Measured: Day 1 of Treatment to Date of Death, up to last patient, last visit, approximately 7 months after study started.

  2. Number of Participants With Deaths, Adverse Events (AEs), Serious AEs (SAEs) and AEs Leading to Discontinuation - All Treated Participants

    AE=any new unfavorable symptom, sign, or disease or worsening of a preexisting condition that may not have a causal relationship with treatment. SAE=a medical event that at any dose results in death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, or drug dependency/abuse; is life-threatening, an important medical event, or a congenital anomaly/birth defect; or requires or prolongs hospitalization. Treatment-related=having certain, probable, possible, or missing relationship to study drug. Grade (Gr) 1=Mild, Gr 2=Moderate, Gr 3=Severe, Gr 4= Potentially Life-threatening or disabling. Participants were evaluated from Day 1 (first day of treatment with study drug) to the date of the last participant, last visit of the study.

    Measured: Day 1 to Date of last patient, last visit, approximately 7 months after study started.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2011 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2012
  3. Primary completionFeb 2013
  4. Study completionFeb 2013

Why it stopped: Administrative reasons

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
9 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01471197
Sponsor's protocol ID
CA184-124 ST
Other IDs
2011-000732-29
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
10 Nov 2011
Last updated
12 May 2014
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing Ipilimumab and Pemetrexed in people with Lung Cancer - Non Small Cell, run by Bristol-Myers Squibb at 13 sites in 5 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 May 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 13 sites in United States, Belgium, Germany, France, Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 12 May 2014). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Survival of Participants During the Study - All Treated Participants (time frame: Date of Randomization to date of death, up to last patient, last visit, approximately 7 months after study started). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 May 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in